Barricor Tube Research Articles

Sample suitability and stability in different blood collection tubes for methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, acetone and glycols analysis

AimTo systematically examine the sample suitability and stability for volatile alcohols (methanol, ethanol and isopropanol with its metabolite acetone) and glycols (ethylene/propylene glycols, EG/PG) in different collection tubes.MethodTwo pools of...

Comparison of Barricor tube and serum separator tube in outpatients

Abstract Objectives In clinical laboratories, it is common to obtain serum and plasma by using a barrier tube due to its various advantages. In this study, we aimed to compare 18 biochemistry analytes in outpatient clinic and outpatient oncology patients by measuring in a Barricor tube and a serum separator tube (SST). Methods Venous blood was drawn into the Barricor tube and SST from volunteers consisting of outpatients and outpatient oncology patients. The biochemical parameters were measured using the AU2700 autoanalyser (Beckman Coulter Inc., CA, USA) and Beckman Coulter Access immunoanalyser (Beckman Coulter Inc., CA, USA). The biochemical analytes evaluated in the two participant groups were compared between the Barricor tube and SST. Results In the study, when the results in both the outpatient group and the outpatient oncology patient group, bias (%), allowable bias (%), CV (%), allowable CV (%), total error (%), total allowable error (TEa) (%) were evaluated; potassium (K) total error (%) between Barricor tube and SST exceeded TEa, however, all other parameters were within TEa. Conclusions Considering its various advantages and compared biochemical analytes, we think that can be switched to the Barricor tube in clinical laboratories and the reference range change can be made for K.

Evaluation of the Barricor Tube in 28 Routine Chemical Tests and Its Impact on Turnaround Time in an Outpatient Clinic.

BackgroundWe recently introduced the Barricor (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) plasma separation tube, which uses a mechanical separator instead of a gel. We evaluated the effects of using the Barricor tube in a stat (statin) laboratory on the results and turnaround time (TAT) of routine chemical tests. We verified the impact of Barricor tube on reducing TAT and providing results similar to those obtained using serum separator tubes (SSTs).MethodsWe collected venous blood samples from 166 outpatients in Barricor tubes and SSTs and measured 28 routine analytes using an AU5800 instrument (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). TAT indexes were compared before and after using Barricor tube.ResultsMean percent differences were <5%, except for alanine aminotransferase , total CO2, high-density lipoprotein, phosphate, total protein, and direct bilirubin. The median TAT decreased from 45 to 38 minutes, and the rate of a TAT >60 minutes decreased from 7.84% to 2.66%, which was approximately one-third of that for SST. The reduction in TAT was attributable to a decrease in centrifugation time. Incomplete clotting and repeated centrifugation, which occurred frequently when using SST, also decreased after using the Barricor tubes.ConclusionsThe Barricor tube is an alternative to SST for routine chemical tests in institutions aiming to reduce TAT, with clinically allowable differences in test results.

Improved Sample Quality and Decreased Turnaround Time When Using Plasma Blood Collection Tubes with a Mechanical Separator in a Large University Hospital.

Serum is commonly used for clinical chemistry testing but many conditions can affect the clotting process, leading to poor sample quality and impaired workflow. With serum gel tubes, we found a high proportion of sample probe aspiration errors on our Beckman AU5800 analyzers. We decided to implement the BD Barricor™ plasma tubes, and we validated an off-specification centrifugation scheme and verified that results obtained for 65 chemistry and immunochemistry tests were comparable to those obtained in serum gel tubes. Finally, we evaluated the impact of this new tube on sample error rate and laboratory turnaround time. To validate centrifugation settings, 50 paired samples were collected in Barricor tubes and centrifuged at 1912 × g for 10 min or 5 min (off-specification). To compare serum gel tubes with Barricor plasma tubes, 119 paired samples were collected from volunteers and results were analyzed using weighed Deming regression. Finally, the proportion of aspiration errors and laboratory TAT for potassium were measured before and after implementing Barricor tubes. Barricor tubes showed clinically acceptable equivalence to serum gel tubes for the studied analytes, and the off-specification centrifugation scheme did not affect the results. Implementing Barricor tubes improved the laboratory workflow by decreasing the aspiration error rates (2.01% to 0.77%, P < 0.001) and lowering hemolysis (P < 0.001). The laboratory TAT for potassium were also significantly lowered (P < 0.001). Use of Barricor tubes instead of serum gel tubes leads to better sample quality, shorter more reproducible laboratory TAT, and decreases costs associated with error management.

A Multicenter Evaluation of a Nongel Mechanical Separator Plasma Blood Collection Tube for Testing of Selected Therapeutic Drugs.

Some therapeutic drugs are unstable during sample storage in gel tubes. BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Plasma Blood Collection Tube with nongel separator was compared with plasma gel tubes, BD Vacutainer PST™, PST II, and BD Vacutainer Serum Tube for acetaminophen, salicylate, digoxin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproic acid, and vancomycin during sample storage for up to 7 days. Seven hospital sites enrolled 705 participants who were taking at least one selected drug. The study tubes were collected and tested at initial time (0 h), after 48 h of storage at room temperature and on day 7 (after additional 5 days of refrigerated storage). The performance of BD Barricor tube was evaluated for each drug by comparing BD Barricor samples with samples from the other tubes at 0 h from the same participant; stability was evaluated by comparing test results from the same tube at 0 h, 48 h, and 7 days. At 0 h, BD Barricor showed clinically equivalent results for selected therapeutic drugs compared with the other tubes, except phenytoin in BD PST. Phenytoin samples ≥20 µg/mL in BD PST had 10-12% lower values than samples in BD Barricor. During sample storage, all selected drugs remained stable for 7 days in BD Barricor and in serum aliquots. In BD PST, all drugs remained stable except phenytoin and carbamazepine and in BD PST II except for phenytoin. The BD Barricor Tube is effective for the collection and storage of plasma blood samples for therapeutic drug monitoring without sample aliquoting.

Barricor blood collection tubes are equivalent to PST for a variety of chemistry and immunoassay analytes except for lactate dehydrogenase

IntroductionThe BD Barricor tube uses a novel mechanical separator designed to eliminate gel artifacts, decrease cellular contamination, and improve stability. Here, we evaluated the Barricor tube as a possible replacement for PST using Beckman Coulter analyzers under both optimal, alternative, and suboptimal centrifugation conditions based on BD recommendations. MethodsPaired PST and Barricor samples were collected from 4 local hospitals and processed based on site-specific preanalytical systems involving automated or manual centrifugation. Centrifugation conditions ranged from 1912 ×g for 10 min (suboptimal), 2060 g for 10 min (alternative), and 4000 ×g for 3 or 10 min (optimal). Tube volume (4.5 vs. 5.5 ml) was also assessed. Forty-three chemistry and immunochemistry analytes were measured on Beckman Coulter DxC and DxI analyzers. ResultsUsing an automated preanlaytical system with suboptimal spin conditions, no bias between PST and Barricor was observed for all analytes tested except lactate dehydrogenase (LD). Further investigation revealed significant increase in LD when Barricor was spun for 10 min at 1912, 2060 and 4000 ×g, ranging from +7.4–19.4% vs. PST across the entire measurement interval (87–493 U/l). Smaller tube volume was also associated with higher LD. Differences in LD occurred despite no change in other hemolysis markers such as potassium, phosphate, and AST. ConclusionsLD is most sensitive to varying centrifugation conditions (time and speed) in Barricor tubes. We recommend that BD centrifugation protocols should be closely evaluated to determine if Barricor is equivalent to PST under local preanalytical configurations.

Improved quality of samples and laboratory turnaround time using 3.5 mL low vacuum BD Vacutainer® Barricor tubes in the emergency department

BackgroundCentrifugation is a consuming time step which participates to increase the turnaround time (TAT) in laboratories, likewise hemolysis sample that needs a re-sampling could delay management of patients. Recently, it has been postulated that BD Barricor™ tube could allow to decrease the centrifugation time and prevent hemolysis, two key feature to ensure high-quality results.Aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of replacing 4 mL BD vacutainer heparin lithium tube by low vacuum 3.5 mL BD vacutainer Barricor™ tube in an emergency department (ED) on hemolysis rate and TAT. MethodsData of hemolysis index (HI) and TAT were compared between the first period of 15 days using 4 mL BD vacutainer heparin lithium tubes with 15 min at 2000xg as centrifugation setting and a second period of 15 days using BD vacutainer Barricor™ tube centrifuged 3 min at 4000xg. ResultsA significantly reduced time duration between reception of sample and available results in informatics lab system was observed with the reduction time of centrifugation allowed by use of Barricor™ tube compared to regular heparin lithium tubes (p < 0.001). A significative decrease in hemolysis rate also occurred in the second period as samples with HI < 10 reached from 52.5% in the first period to 68.5% (p < 0.001) in the second. ConclusionLow vacuum BarricorTM tubes allowing a higher speed of centrifugation improve lab TAT without impairment of sample quality as a significant reduction of hemolysis was observed, a double advantage which is of particular interest for ED.

Stabilization of Plasma Glucose: The Use of Newer Technology and Pragmatic Laboratory Practice.

The target values for plasma glucose concentrations for the investigation and diagnosis of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose, and the realization that small incremental changes in glucose concentration increase the risk of adverse events, has led to greater focus on laboratory glucose results. Although analytical methods show acceptable precision, the control of preanalytical error due to the stability of glucose remains problematic. The aim of this study was to compare glucose concentrations in 3 different and commercially available blood tubes, with analysis and storage under current practices and conditions. Blood samples for glucose were obtained from consenting patients attending the Diabetic Clinic at the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast. Blood was collected into BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Lithium Heparin tubes, BD Vacutainer Fluoride EDTA tubes, and Greiner Vacuette® FC-Mix (sodium fluoride/citrate/Na2EDTA) tubes in that order. The Barricor tubes were immediately centrifuged at 4000g for 3 min. All samples were then sent to the Biochemistry Laboratory for analysis on the same day, and again the following day after storage at 4 °C. There was no significant difference in mean glucose concentrations between immediately centrifuged Barricor and FC-Mix tubes when analyzed on day 0. Both tube types demonstrated higher mean glucose concentrations than traditional fluoride EDTA (F/EDTA) samples. Both immediately separated Barricor and citrated FC-Mix plasma preserve glucose concentrations to the same extent, and better than F/EDTA preservative. These newer technologies involved offer pragmatic solutions to improved glucose analysis, allowing laboratories to choose the best option given the source of their samples.

Quality of plasma samples and BD Vacutainer Barricor tubes: Effects of centrifugation

BackgroundsThe BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ Plasma collection tube (BD Barricor) uses an innovative non-gel separation method. This study compared the plasma residual cell count (PRCC) obtained from BD Barricor and from BD PST II plasma tubes. MethodsFour BD Barricors and one BD PST II were collected from 40 donors. BD PST II was centrifuged at 1300g/10 min, while the BD Barricors were centrifuged at 1800g/10 min, 4000g/3 min, 4000g/7 min and 4000g/15 min. PRCC was evaluated measuring white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC) and Platelets (PLT) counts by Siemens ADVIA 2120. Cell-free hemoglobin was quantified by haemolysis index (HI) by Roche Cobas c501. ResultsBD PST II Median WBC, RBC and PLT counts were 0.38 (109/L), 0.0291 (1012/L) and 113.5 (109/L), respectively. Considering the BD PST II as reference, PRCC differences were expressed as median bias percentage. WBC showed a significant reduction at all the conditions (p < 0.01), being the reductions: 63.9% (1800g/10 min), 69.9% (4000g/3 min), 75.0% (4000g/7 min) and 82.7% (4000g/15 min). RBC reductions 29.7% (1800g/10 min), 33.8% (4000g/3 min), 39.6% (4000g/7 min) and 66.4 (4000g/15 min) were all significant (p < 0.01). PLT reductions were 1.6% at 1800g/10 min (p = ns), 1.2% at 4000g/3 min (p = ns), 27.1% at 4000g/7 min (p = 0.046) and 46.6% at 4000g/15 min (p = 0.005). BD Barricor centrifuged for 7 and 15 min at 4000g showed an increased haemolysis. ConclusionsBD Barricors plasma quality improved with increasing the centrifugation times but already at 4000g/3 min, the suggested centrifugation condition, a significant improvement was achieved.

The Becton Dickinson Barricor Tube Does Not Introduce Isobaric Interferences in Mass Spectrometry-based Measurements of Testosterone.

Testosterone analysis by mass spectrometry is essential for accurate low-level results. Unfortunately, the commonly used gel-based separator tubes introduce an intense, isobaric interference that can coelute with testosterone and impede analysis. The new Becton Dickinson (BD) BarricorTM tube (BT) uses an elastomer separator that might not introduce such interferences. Testosterone concentrations and chromatograms were obtained for plasma samples from plasma separator tubes (PSTs) and the new BTs using a laboratory-developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Intense signals close to the testosterone retention time were observed in the testosterone quantifier transition (289.2→97.0) from the PSTs; resolving these signals required longer chromatographic run times. No isobaric interferences were introduced by the BTs, allowing for shorter chromatographic run times and faster inject-to-inject times. BTs do not introduce the interferences observed in PSTs in LC-MS/MS testosterone analysis. These tubes can be used as a single tube that both separates cells and is amenable to LC-MS/MS testosterone analysis without additional chromatographic run times.