This book is a welcome addition to T&T Clark’s series Critical Readings in Biblical Studies. Reynolds should be commended for his work in selecting, editing, and bringing together previously published essays in order to illuminate the “Son of Man Problem” and the ensuing “Son of Man Debate” (p. xiii). The volume contains an opening introductory essay followed by four sections addressing the different issues involved in the problem. Each section has the same structure: a short introductory essay about the issue of the section, a number of articles addressing the issue, and an annotated bibliography. In the short introductory essay, Reynolds summarizes each article and indicates its significance to the topic. The annotated bibliography lists a few other significant articles and monographs (between 7 and 11) that could be pursued for further study of the topic that did not make it into the essays contained in the section.Reynolds starts the work with a longer opening essay that introduces the volume as a whole. It discusses the significance of the issue at hand, describes the debate about the term Son of Man, sketches out a brief history of scholarship, and then outlines three “methodological challenges” in the debate (diachronic or synchronic approaches, titular or non-titular use of “the Son of Man,” and the issues around the authenticity of Jesus’s saying). All of this is done for the reader in order to place the ensuing articles in the broader scholarly context. It is an excellent essay in its own right that clearly and critically summarizes the situation.The first section then considers issues of debate and method. The eight essays address the possibility of an answer to the debate and the various means by which any such answer can be ascertained. They are written by luminaries such as A. J. B. Higgins, C. D. F. Moule, M. D. Hooker, Carsten Colpe, Maurice Casey, F. H. Borsch, I. Howard Marshall, and Larry H. Hurtado.The second section covers the solutions to the problem that are reached on idiomatic grounds. There are seven essays in this section: two by Geza Vermes and one each by J. A. Fitzmyer, Richard Bauckham, Maurice Casey, Paul Owen and David Shepherd, and P. J. Williams.The third section presents eight essays grouped under the heading “Danielic Origins of ‘the Son of Man.’” As the title indicates, these essays by T. W. Manson, Norman Perrin, Ragnar Leivestad, Barnabas Lindars, W. Horbury, Adela Yarbro Collins, John J. Collins, and Lester L. Grabbe all examine the links between the “Son of Man” and Daniel.The final section contains four essays on the important topic “one like a son of man” in the Greek versions of Dan 7. The essays are by Johan Lust, Loren T. Stuckenbruck, Otfried Hofius and Reynolds himself.The volume concludes with a select bibliography (that goes well beyond the essays contained in the volume and the annotated bibliographies), and indexes of references, authors, and subjects.There are multiple strengths to this volume that make it an attractive starting point for any research on the “Son of Man.” Not only does it bring together the key articles in the debate in one place for ease of reference, but they are grouped in a way that enables students to get a handle on the issues and the methods used to answer the question quickly. The annotated bibliography at the end of each section removes the possible objection of selection bias because it lists articles and monographs that are significant but that were not included in the volume. The annotation enables a reader to consider which of these works they need to consult further. As such, it stimulates research even with materials not reproduced in full in the volume. Consequently, this book will not just enable readers to understand the debate but also position them well to undertake new research.While not all will agree with Reynolds’s selection of important essays or possible shaping of the debate by the headings used to group the articles, my greatest fear for the volume is its possible self-defeating nature. If it achieves its goals of helping readers enter the debate so that new solutions are proposed, then the volume will be dated because it does not contain the results of its own labor. Should this be the case, and I hope it will, then it will call for a second edition.Overall, this is an excellent volume that provides many of the key essays on a much debated and important topic in an easily accessible way. Students and scholars undertaking research on the “Son of Man” will thank Reynolds for his work on their behalf.
Read full abstract