Barbed Suture Closure Research Articles

Knotless suture in revision total joint arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

The use of barbed sutures for wound closure in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to be effective and safe. However, their effectiveness and safety in revision TJA procedures has not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using barbed suture closure in revision TJA setting. A total of 80 patients undergoing revision TJA between September 2020 and November 2022 were included in this randomized controlled trial study. Following informed consent, patients were computer-randomized to the treatment arm (barbed suture wound closure) or to the control arm (conventional wound closure). Closure duration, closure rate, number of sutures used and wound related outcomes including complication rates and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score were compared between groups. The use of barbed sutures decreased closure time by 6min (30.1 vs. 36.1min, P = 0.008) with a higher wound closure rate (6.5 vs. 5.5mm/minute, P = 0.013). Additionally, the number of sutures used for wound closure in the barbed group was significantly lower than in the control group (6.2 vs. 10.1, respectively, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative wound complications (P = 0.556) or patient and observer POSAS scores (P = 0.211, P = 297, respectively) between the two groups at 3-month follow-up. Closure of revision TJA surgical wound utilizing barbed sutures reduced closure time and the number of needles handled by operative staff, with no significant increase in intra- or post-operative complications rate when compared to traditional closure technique. I.

Rectal tear repair using barbed suture in the horse.

To describe the repair utilizing integral-anchor barbed suture in equine rectal tears. 3 horses aged 3 to 10 years old with grade 3 to 4 rectal tears. Grade 3 and 4 rectal tears were referred for surgical repair immediately after iatrogenic tearing or tearing during parturition. Integral-anchor barbed suture (Stratafix Symmetric PDS Plus, size 1, 18" CT-1) was placed using long-handled instruments or hand closure depending on the accessibility and visibility of the tear. Closure of grade 3 tears was performed using a continuous appositional pattern. A horizontal mattress pattern was performed in the grade 4 tear. No other surgical procedures were performed. Two grade 3 tears were successfully repaired with no complications and discharged from the hospital. One grade 4 tear was successfully repaired; however, 4 days post-surgery partial dehiscence of the suture site occurred, and the horse was euthanized. Grade 3 rectal tears were repaired successfully by using an integral-anchor barbed suture. No post-operative complications were reported. Blind hand suturing could be performed in cranial locations when the laceration could not be made visible. For grade 4 rectal tears, additional surgical procedures beyond barbed suture closure are needed.

Barbed Suture versus Interrupted Suture in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Are They Equivalent?

Posterior cervical spine approaches have been associated with increased rates of wound complications compared to anterior approaches. While barbed suture wound closure for lumbar spine surgery has been shown to be safe and efficacious, there is no literature regarding its use in posterior cervical spine surgery. In a cohort of patients undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery, we sought to compare postoperative complication rates between barbed and traditional interrupted suture closure. A retrospective review of demographics, past medical history, and operative and postoperative variables collected from a prospective registry between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020 was undertaken. All patients 18 years old and above undergoing elective posterior cervical fusion were included. The primary outcome of interest was wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, or hematoma. In addition, numerical rating scale (NRS) neck pain (NP), NRS arm pain (AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and operative time were collected. A variety of statistical tests were used to compare the two suture groups. Of 117 patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion, 89 (76%) were closed with interrupted suture and 28 (24%) with barbed suture. The interrupted cohort were more likely to have >1 comorbidity (p<0.001), diabetes mellitus (p=0.013), and coronary artery disease (p=0.002). No difference in postoperative wound complications between interrupted/barbed sutures was observed after univariate (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.27-4.25, p=0.927) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.15-4.00, p=0.756). Univariate logistic regression revealed no differences in achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) NRS-NP (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.28-1.88, p=0.508) or NRS-AP (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.25-1.90, p=0.464) at 3 months between suture groups. The interrupted suture group was less likely to achieve MCID NDI at 3 months (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, p=0.016). Barbed suture closure in posterior cervical spine surgery does not lead to higher rates of postoperative wound complications/SSI compared to traditional interrupted fascial closure.

The J Technique for Barbed Suture Closure

The J Technique for Barbed Suture Closure

647. A CASE OF ACUTE GASTRIC TUBE ULCER BLEEDING SAVED BY EMERGENCY SURGERY

Abstract Gastric tube ulcer is recognized as one of the complications after esophageal cancer surgery. When a ulcer bleeds, or penetrates to the pericardial space, or perforates, it often follows a fatal course due to its anatomical position and the complexity of surgical treatment. We report a case of persistent bleeding from a gastric tube ulcer after esophageal cancer operation, which was unable to treat endoscopically. The case was a 67-year-old man. Thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy and posterior mediastinal route subtotal gastric reconstruction were performed for middle thoracic esophageal cancer. His fifth-year regular endoscopy revealed a gastric tube ulcer. As a cause of myalgia, the patient was prescribed NSAIDs every day by a nearby doctor. Initially, no bleeding was observed, and discontinuance of NSAIDs and conservative treatment with PPI was continued. However, five months later, sudden hematemesis was observed at night, and he was transferred to a nearby doctor. Emergency endoscopy revealed gastric tube ulcer bleeding. And he was transferred to our hospital in an emergency. However, two days later, hematemesis and persistent ulcer hemorrhage were observed. Due to the difficulty of cauterizing to heartbeat, emergency surgery was performed. The first attempt was made to approach by a posterior mediastinal route, but it was difficult to confirm the ulcer and it was difficult to control bleeding without compression. Adding the thoracotomy, the ulcer was confirmed under direct vision. An ulcer defect was about 5 cm, bleeding was from the ulcer margin. Barbed suture closure and the omental patch were performed. The postoperative course was uneventful and discharged from the hospital 21 days after the operation. We experienced a rare case of acute hemorrhagic gastric tube ulcer that was difficult to treat conservatively and was saved by emergency surgery. After reconstruction of esophageal cancer, there are complicated situations such as the route of the elevated gastric tube, the position of the ulcer, and the risk of perforation to the pericardial space. Prompt and accurate medical care is required.

Impact of Whole-Layer Barbed Suture Closure on the Postoperative Effect and Aesthetic Satisfaction with Incision After Knee Arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of whole-layer barbed suture for incision closure on the clinical outcome and aesthetic satisfaction of patients with the incision following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients (37 men and 57 women, 50–84 years old) who underwent a first TKA between May 2018 and April 2021. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to the suture mode, with 45 cases (group A) receiving closure of the deep tissue with a barbed suture and intradermal suture of the incision with another barbed suture and 49 cases (group B) receiving closure of the deep tissue with absorbable suture and interrupted suture of the incision with nonabsorbable suture. Further comparisons were performed regarding incision length, suture time, postoperative incision complications, Hollander Wound Evaluation Score (HWES), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, American Knee Society (AKS) score, and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The clinical effects of the two suture modes in TKA and the patients’ aesthetic satisfaction with the incision were also evaluated at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the operation.ResultsCompared with group B, group A had higher HWES at 2 weeks after the operation (P < 0.05), shorter suture times (P < 0.05) and lower POSAS scores at 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in incision length, complication rate, HSS or AKS scores (P > 0.05).ConclusionCompared with the interrupted suture, the use of whole-layer barbed suture for incision closure after TKA has the advantages of a safe and effective outcome, short operation time, high cosmesis degree of the wound scar and high patient satisfaction.

The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery.MethodsOne hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in the prospective randomized controlled trial study to receive either barbed suture wound closure (n = 91) or conventional suture closure (n = 90). Outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), wound closure time, length of incision, length of hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, wound complications of dehiscence and infection, and costs.ResultsBarbed suture group was related with significantly lower ORT (P = 0.036), wound closure time (P < 0.001) and average wound closure time (P < 0.001), and significantly lower wound complication rates (dehiscence and infection) (P = 0.031). No significant differences were found when compared with conventional suture group in terms of length of incision (P = 0.086), length of hospital stay (P = 0.174), readmission rates up to 90 days after the surgical procedure (P = 0.232) and costs (P = 0.205).ConclusionThe study suggested the knotless barbed suture technique outperformed the conventional suture in shortening operating room time, wound closure time and average wound closure time, and reducing wound complication rates.

Non-absorbable Barbed Sutures for Primary Fascial Closure in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.

PurposeThe aim of this study is to describe the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal fascial closure using a barbed suture prior to mesh placement.Materials and methodsPatients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were included in this retrospective review. Patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, primary fascial closure was performed with a 2-polypropylene non-absorbable unidirectional barbed suture followed by fixation of the intraperitoneal mesh. In the second group, the mesh was fixed intraperitoneally using tacks without closing the fascial defect.ResultsA total of 148 patients who underwent laparoscopic primary ventral hernia repair were included. A total of 72 (48.6%) patients were included in the barbed suture with mesh group and 76 (51.4%) patients in the mesh-only group. The mean fascial defect size was 25 cm2 in the first group and 64 cm2 in the second group. The median suturing time for fascial closure was 15 minutes. The average surgery time was 98 minutes in the first group and 96 minutes in the second group. The mean follow-up period was 80 days for Group 1 and 135 days for Group 2. No hernia recurrence or mortality occurred in this study.ConclusionThe barbed suture closure technique is a fast, safe, and effective technique for fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in combination with mesh placement. Further evidence to support these findings and longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Subcuticular Barbed Suture and Skin Glue Wound Closure Decreases Reoperation and Length of Stay in Geriatric Hip Fractures When Compared With Staples.

Introduction:Patients with geriatric hip fracture are notoriously frail and at risk for complications. Persistent postoperative wound drainage can lead to prolonged hospital stay, increased risk for infection, and need for revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of wound closure technique, barbed monofilament subcuticular suture and skin glue versus staples on rates of intervention for wound drainage and length of hospital stay after geriatric hip fracture fixation.Methods:A retrospective review of isolated hip fractures in patients older than 60 years at a single institution over a 3-year period was done. Hip fractures included femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with internal fixation or arthroplasty. Skin closure technique, at the discretion of the operating surgeon, included either barbed subcuticular monofilament suture and skin glue or staples. Charts and radiographs were reviewed to determine patient characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, type of wound closure, length of stay, and interventions for persistent wound drainage.Results:There were 175 patients in the barbed suture and skin glue group and 211 patients in the staples group. The barbed suture group had an average postsurgical length of stay of 5.0 days which was significantly lower than the staples group (7.0 days, P < 0.00001). In the staples group, 17 patients (8%) required incisional negative pressure wound therapy due to wound drainage with five patients (2.4%) returning to the operating room secondary to persistent wound drainage. No patients were observed in the barbed suture group that required intervention for wound drainage.Discussion:Barbed suture and skin glue closure is associated with markedly shorter hospital stay and fewer interventions for wound drainage when compared with staples after surgical treatment of geriatric hip fractures.

A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of the Quality of Wound Closure With Barbed Versus Standard Suture After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Complications such as joint infection or delayed wound healing can lead to morbidity and elevated health care costs after total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of running knotless barbed suture vs standard monofilament suture wound closure with respect to wound drainage and healing complications after total joint arthroplasty. For this study, 1000 joint arthroplasty patients were prospectively randomized to have fascial, soft tissue, and skin closure with knotless barbed suture vs standard suture during the period 2016 to 2018. An absorptive dressing was used for 1 week postoperatively. Each dressing was weighed and the saturated surface area of the dressing measured. A total of 939 dressings were available for evaluation. Incisions were evaluated for wound healing at each postoperative visit. Of the 1000 joint arthroplasties performed, suture breakage or needle disengagement occurred similarly with the standard monofilament suture and the running barbed suture (13 times vs 6 times; P=.17). Dressings were weighed, and when standard monofilament sutures were used, an average of 1.2 g more postoperative bandage weight was recorded (P<.002). Postoperative wound complications including stitch abscess or wound irritation occurred more often with standard monofilament sutures than with running barbed sutures (16 times vs 5 times; P<.025). Optimal wound closure after joint replacement is critical to enhance soft tissue healing and minimize infection risk, which can be caused by excessive wound drainage. The positive results shown for the running barbed suture of this prospective study indicate the difference in quality of closure between the standard monofilament suture and the running barbed suture in hip and knee arthroplasty surgical sites. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):216-222.].

Cadaveric Evaluation of Load to Failure in Canine Gingiva Apposed With Varied Suture Patterns Using Poliglecaprone 25.

The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of suture pattern and repair length on the load to failure in an ex vivo canine gingival model. Healthy mandibular gingiva and mucosa were harvested from fresh cadavers euthanized for purposes unrelated to the study. Samples were randomly assigned by length and pattern. Lingual and buccal free gingival margins were apposed using a simple interrupted (SI), cruciate (XT), simple continuous (SC), or unidirectional knotless continuous barbed suture (SF) closure technique with USP 4-0 poliglecaprone 25i, ii applied over 2 lengths (3 cm and 6 cm). A custom template was used to ensure uniform suture bite application. Surgical time was recorded. Using a soft tissue mechanical testing frame, samples were tensioned to failure. Testing was video recorded and reviewed in conjunction with the tension trace data for tension at initial failure (Tfail) and maximum tension sustained (Tmax). Two factor ANOVA by length and pattern was performed followed by individual one way T-tests. Statistically significant findings were XT-SC-SF patterns were quicker to perform than SI. SF was more likely to fail by suture breakage than tissue tearing, and SF withstood less tension at the 3 cm length than SI-XT-SC. No significant difference was detected in Tmax or Tfail between SI and SC or XT. The study demonstrates that SC and XT are comparable to SI in tension resistance and faster to perform suggesting that SC and XT could replace SI for extraction site closure although further in vivo testing is required.

Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.

Newer methods of wound closure such as barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and equivalent wound complications in various surgeries. However, few studies have compared barbed suture and conventional wound closure techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this review was to appraise the efficacy and safety of the barbed suture in closure of TKA. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify relevant randomized-controlled trials involving barbed sutures and conventional sutures in TKA in electronic databases, including Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang database, up to August 2019. Finally, we identified 1,472 TKAs (1,270 patients) assessed in 13 randomized-controlled trials. Compared with conventional wound closure techniques, barbed sutures resulted in shorter total wound closure time (p < 0.001), fewer needle puncture injuries to members of the surgical team (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in terms of blister formation (p = 1.0), superficial infection (p = 0.82), range of motion (p = 0.94), incisional exudate (p = 0.75), suture abscess (p = 0.26), or suture breakage (p = 0.11), wound-related complications (p = 0.10), ecchymosis (p = 0.08) between barbed and conventional wound closure. Based on the available level I evidence, we thus conclude that a knotless barbed suture is a safe and effective approach for wound closure in TKA. Given the relevant possible biases in our meta-analysis, more adequately powered and better-designed randomized-controlled trials studies with long-term follow-up are required to recommend barbed sutures for routine administration in TKA.

Hair-sparing technique using absorbable intradermal barbed suture versus traditional closure methods in supratentorial craniotomies for tumor.

Hair-sparing techniques in cranial neurosurgery have gained traction in recent years and previous studies have shown no difference in infection rates, yet limited data exists evaluating the specific closure techniques utilized during hair-sparing craniotomies. Therefore, it was the intention of this study to evaluate the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) and perioperative complications associated with using an absorbable intradermal barbed suture for skin closure in hair-sparing supratentorial craniotomies for tumor in order to prove non-inferiority to traditional methods. A retrospective review of supratentorial craniotomies for tumor by a single surgeon from 2011 to 2017 was performed. All perioperative adverse events and wound complications, defined as a postoperative infection, wound dehiscence, or CSF leak, were compared between three different groups: (1) hair shaving craniotomies + transdermal polypropylene suture/staples for scalp closure, (2) hair-sparing craniotomies + transdermal polypropylene suture/staples for scalp closure, and (3) hair-sparing craniotomies + absorbable intradermal barbed suture for scalp closure. Two hundred sixty-three patients underwent hair shaving + transdermal polypropylene suture/staples, 83 underwent hair sparing + transdermal polypropylene suture/staples, and 100 underwent hair sparing + absorbable intradermal barbed suture. Overall, 2.9% of patients experienced a perioperative complication and 4.3% developed a wound complication. In multivariable analysis, the use of a barbed suture for scalp closure and hair-sparing techniques was not predictive of any complication or 30-day readmission. Furthermore, the absorbable intradermal barbed suture cohort had the lowest overall rate of wound complications (4%). Hair-sparing techniques using absorbable intradermal barbed suture for scalp closure are safe and do not result in higher rates of infection, readmission, or reoperation when compared with traditional methods.

Intraoperative adjunctive techniques to reduce seroma formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a systematic review.

Seroma formation is the most common postoperative complication after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Recurrence and seroma formation may be difficult to distinguish. Many adjunctive techniques with which to reduce the incidence of seroma formation after laparoscopic inguinal repair have been described in the literature; however, the evidence for using intraoperative adjunctive techniques is limited. Therefore, the present systematic review was performed to evaluate the effects and limitations of adjunctive techniques used during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Major databases (PubMed, Embase, Springer, and Cochrane Library) were searched using the terms "seroma," "laparoscopic inguinal hernia", "TAPP", "TEP", "inguinal hernia", "tack", "barbed suture", "drainage", "Endoloop technique", and "fibrin sealant". All studies involving adults undergoing laparoscopic/endoscopic inguinal hernioplasty with at least one intervention designed to reduce seroma formation were included. Of the 965 studies identified, 8 met the inclusion criteria. Six adjunctive techniques were described in the literature. Transversalis fascia (TF) inversion with tacking: one prospective non-randomized controlled study revealed a lower incidence of postoperative seroma after TF inversion with tacking for direct inguinal hernias (4.17% vs. 14.29%, P < 0.05). Endoloop technique: one prospective study of 76 cases involving this technique revealed a low incidence of seroma formation (3.9% at 2weeks) in direct hernias. Barbed suture closure of TF: one prospective study of 36 direct hernias reported only one clinical palpable seroma that resolved 1month later. Surgical drains: three trials reported the results of drains, and the pooling results demonstrated significantly less seroma formation in patients with surgical drains (2.1 vs. 23.8%; odds ratio 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.19; P < 0.0001). Fibrin sealant: one prospective clinical study of 40 patients with indirect inguinal hernias reported a lower volume (P < 0.001) and lower incidence (5% vs. 15%) of seroma formation in the fibrin group. Distal sac fixation technique: in one prospective study of six patients with large inguinoscrotal hernias, one patient developed a seroma on postoperative day 8. Seroma formation is a natural process that cannot be completely prevented following laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty, especially in patients with direct and large indirect inguinal hernias. Some intraoperative adjunctive techniques are effective in reducing clinically palpable seroma formation in select patients. More randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation.

A Novel Knotless Barbed Suture Technique for Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fracture in Posterior Surgery.

Surgical wound closure directly influences spinal surgical efficiency and several postoperative complications. The traditional suture technique is time-consuming and associated with greater rates of complications. Bidirectional absorbable barbed sutures seem to compensate for some of the limitations of traditional suture; however, they rarely are reported in spinal surgery. We designed a novel suture technique for use in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. The data of 189 patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures were analyzed between bidirectional barbed suture closure and traditional interrupted suture closure. Data of operative time, wound closure time, length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, complications of wound dehiscence and postoperative hematoma, cost, and neurologic status were collected. No significant differences were observed in the baseline demographics of included patients. Compared with the traditional suturing group, the barbed sutures decreased the mean operative time (P= 0.037), suture time (P < 0.01), and mean suturing time (P < 0.01) significantly, although no statistically significant differences were found in blood loss (P= 0.724) and neurologic functional scores (preoperative: P= 0.901; 3 months after surgery: P= 0.208; final follow-up assessments: P= 0.163), and no statistically significant differences were found in rates of postoperative infection, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Our findings suggest that the novel knotless barbed suture has comparable strength to traditional sutures, with the advantage of less suturing time. It is an efficient, safe technique, and alternative choice for patients with thoracolumbar fracture after posterior surgery.

32: Knotless barbed suture closure of the uterine incision at cesarean - a randomized controlled trial

Knotless barbed sutures are becoming increasingly available for surgical procedures in obstetrics and gynecology. Our purpose was to determine if the use of the knotless barbed suture reduces closure time of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was closure time of the uterine incision. In order to show a decrease of 25% from 6 min to 4.5 min using the knotless barbed suture with a power of 0.9 and type 1 error of 5%, at least 34 women would be needed in each group. Women were randomized by sealed envelope to uterine closure with either a bidirectional knotless barbed suture or polyglactin 910 braided (conventional) suture. Secondary outcomes included blood loss during incision closure and the number of additional hemostatic sutures needed. Patients were enrolled from August 2016 until March 2017. 102 women were randomized. Fifty-one had uterine closure with knotless barbed suture and 51 with conventional suture. The groups were similar for demographics as well as number of previous cesareans. Uterine closure time using the knotless barbed suture was significantly shorter than the conventional suture by a mean of 1 min 43 sec (P<0.000, 95% CI 67.69 - 138.47 sec). Blood loss estimated during incision closure was significantly lower (mean 221 ml versus 268 ml, P<0.005) and the use of hemostatic sutures was significantly less (median 0 versus 1, P<0.0001). The use of a knotless barbed suture significantly reduced closure time of the uterine incision. There was also less need for additional hemostatic sutures and slightly reduced estimated blood loss.

Single layer cystotomy closure of excised porcine bladders with barbed versus smooth suture material.

To determine which of 2 suture materials would be superior in terms of closure time and leakage pressure in open single-layer cystotomy closure. Experimental study. Twenty-four freshly harvested porcine urinary bladders. A cystotomy was performed and the incision closed with a single layer simple continuous suture pattern with barbed (n = 12) or smooth (n = 12) suture. Time required for closure was measured. Each bladder was connected to a system for monitoring intraluminal pressure while inflated with saline until leakage occurred. Intraluminal pressure at time of initial leakage and leakage site were recorded. Two-sample t tests were used to compare maximum leakage pressure and closure time between the 2 groups. P < .05 was considered significant. All bladders were sutured successfully with no difference in mean closure time (barbed suture 296 ± 46 seconds; smooth suture 293 ± 26 seconds) (P = .821). There was no difference in mean leakage pressure of porcine urinary bladder incisions closed in a single layer with barbed suture (28.8 ± 10.4 mm Hg) compared with smooth suture (30.6 ± 8.8 mm Hg) (P = .642). Barbed suture provides comparable cystotomy repair to smooth suture, and no benefit to its use was identified in an open procedure. Barbed suture closure should be evaluated for adequate tensile strength in the presence of urine, satisfactory in vivo healing of cystotomies, and lack of long-term urolith formation in dogs and cats.

Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis.

Newer methods of wound closure such as bidirectional barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and thus overall operating room costs during total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unclear whether these sutures have similar clinical outcomes or whether they place the patient at risk of developing wound complications that may outweigh the time-saving benefits of these sutures. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all level I trials that reported the use of barbed suture during TJA. We analyzed the efficacy, safety, major and minor complications, and overall cost related to barbed sutures. Four studies met our criteria, and included 588 patients who were randomized either to barbed suture closure (n = 290 TJAs, 268 TKAs, and 22 THAs) or to a matched conventional suture cohort (n = 298 TJAs, 279 TKAs, and 19 THA). In terms of time savings with wound closure, the barbed suture was 6.3minutes faster than the conventional cohort (p < 0.05). The odds for developing a minor complication were nearly identical (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p = 0.95) and for major complication was not significantly different (OR 2.94, p = 0.27). The overall mean savings including both THA and TKA was USD 298 per case. In randomized controlled trials, barbed sutures are consistently associated with shorter wound closure time, which also corresponds to cost savings, even when the higher cost of these sutures is taken into account. There was no significant difference in the odds of experiencing either minor or major complications between patients in whom barbed sutures versus standard sutures were used for wound closure. Current evidence supports continued use of these sutures. Level I.

The AINU Technique for Laparoscopic Vesico-Vaginal Fistula Repair: A Preliminary Report

Introduction: With safe obstetric practices now globally available, most vesico-vaginal fistulas (VVF) presenting in recent times are secondary to various gynecologic surgeries. Most of them are supra-trigonal in location. Laparoscopic repair of VVF is gaining ground as an alternative to open repair of VVF. In this study, we describe our initial experience with a novel technique of laparoscopic VVF repair involving a limited transverse cystotomy for access and a single-layered barbed suture closure of bladder. Materials and Methods: Twenty cases of supra-trigonal VVFs following gynecologic surgeries were taken up for repair by our novel technique. The mean age of the patients was 32 years and the mean VVF size was 1.5 cm. Results: The mean operative time was 54 min. Estimated mean blood loss was 30 ml and the mean postoperative stay was 2.5 days. None of the patients had any recurrence with a mean follow-up of 14 months. Conclusion: The limited transverse cystotomy approach has advantages in decreasing the operative time, improving ease of laparoscopic suturing, allowing an automatic separation of suture lines and allowing for an easier anterior dissection of the bladder to reduce tension on the suture line if necessary. Further this approach provides excellent results in select patients of supra-trigonal VVF in terms of continence and postoperative bladder overactivity.

Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionThis retrospective study documented the rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in a large series of gynecologic patients who were treated with an endoscopic (robotic-assisted or laparoscopic) hysterectomy that incorporated either delayed absorbable monofilament barbed or vicryl running sutures. MethodWe sought to discern any prognostic associations between operative variables (e.g., closure type (barbed or vicryl sutures), endoscopic approach (robotic-assisted or laparoscopic), and energy source (Harmonic Ace Shears or monopolar/bipolar electro-surgery)) and the risk for VCD via patient chart review. Statistical evaluation was comprised of univariate analyses and multiple regression. ResultsWe identified 1876 subjects; there were 14 cases (0% with barbed suture and 0.99% with vicryl suture) of VCD (an overall incidence of 0.75%), nearly all of which were associated with a robotic-assisted hysterectomy involving vicryl sutures (p = 0.034). However, the type of endoscopic surgery (P = 0.11) and energy source (P = 0.28) were not significant prognostic factors. The VCD patients' exhibited a median duration of 47 days (range, 14–116) until the development of their condition. ConclusionVaginal cuff separation subsequent to laparoscopic closure is a rare occurrence. While our incidence of VCD was low and comparable to other reported rates in the literature, we did not observe any cases of VCD following laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with barbed suture closure.