BAP1 Loss Research Articles

Abstract 5199: A novel role for BAP1 in development and tumor suppression

Abstract Uveal melanoma (UM) is the second most common form of melanoma and one of the most deadly types of cancer. Recent discoveries in our laboratory and others have led to a deeper understanding of the driver mutations UM. The initiating mutation that is present in virtually all UM occurs in one of four genes in the Gaq signaling pathway (the “Gaq” mutations) and result in sustained activation of proliferative signals. A second mutation occurs later in one of three genes – BAP1, SF3B1 or EIF1AX (the “BSE” mutations), which determines metastatic risk – BAP1 (high risk), SF3B1 (intermediate risk) or EIF1AX (low risk). Surprisingly, we recently discovered that the Gaq mutation and the subsequent BSE mutation occur very close in molecular time. This work suggests that Gaq mutations may cause epigenetic changes that predispose to BSE mutations. We have shown that BAP1-mutant UMs exhibit a de-differentiation and stem-cell like phenotype, suggesting that BAP1 may normally regulate differentiation programs during embryonic development. Consistent with this possibility, BAP1 loss in mouse is embryonic lethal. To study the role of BAP1 in early vertebrate development, therefore, we chose Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog), a widely used model for studying gene function during development. We found that targeted depletion of the Xenopus BAP1 protein (xBap1) causes a striking developmental phenotype affecting multiple germ layers, and that this phenotype is associated with disruption of super enhancers around differentiation genes that are normally maintained by BAP1. Taken together, these studies suggest that loss of BAP1 promotes tumor progression and metastasis, at least in part, by disrupting tightly controlled differentiation programs that govern cell identity. These findings may nominate new therapeutic targets in BAP1-mutant cancers. Citation Format: Dawn A. Owens, Jeffim N. Kuznetsov, Stefan Kurtenbach, Tristan Agüero, Mary Lou King, J. William Harbour. A novel role for BAP1 in development and tumor suppression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5199.

Targeted Therapy of Uveal Melanoma: Recent Failures and New Perspectives.

Among Uveal Melanoma (UM) driver mutations, those involving GNAQ or GNA11 genes are the most frequent, while a minor fraction of tumors bears mutations in the PLCB4 or CYSLTR2 genes. Direct inhibition of constitutively active oncoproteins deriving from these mutations is still in its infancy in UM, whereas BRAFV600E-targeted therapy has obtained relevant results in cutaneous melanoma. However, UM driver mutations converge on common downstream signaling pathways such as PKC/MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and YAP/TAZ, which are presently considered as actionable targets. In addition, BAP1 loss, which characterizes UM metastatic progression, affects chromatin structure via histone H2A deubiquitylation that may be counteracted by histone deacetylase inhibitors. Encouraging results of preclinical studies targeting signaling molecules such as MAPK and PKC were unfortunately not confirmed in early clinical studies. Indeed, a general survey of all clinical trials applying new targeted and immune therapy to UM displayed disappointing results. This paper summarizes the most recent studies of UM-targeted therapies, analyzing the possible origins of failures. We also focus on hyperexpressed molecules involved in UM aggressiveness as potential new targets for therapy.

BAP1 In Solid Tumors

One of the most attractive cancer-related genes under investigation is BAP1. Reasons of this growing interest are related to the wide spectrum of pathways directly or indirectly modulated by this gene and shared by several solid tumors. Programmed cell-death, cell metabolisms, immune cells development, ferroptosis and defects in DNA damage response are only some of the multitude of processes depending on BAP1. Loss of this gene seems to occur in different times of tumor history. Moreover, times of BAP1 loss strongly diverge among primary tumors suggesting the presence of several and different triggering factors. Regardless of when it happens, BAP1 loss usually results in prognosis worsening and in the acquisition of more aggressive clinical features by cancer cells.

Probing the Tumor Suppressor Function of BAP1 in CRISPR-Engineered Human Liver Organoids.

The deubiquitinating enzyme BAP1 is a tumor suppressor, among others involved in cholangiocarcinoma. BAP1 has many proposed molecular targets, while its Drosophila homolog is known to deubiquitinate histone H2AK119. We introduce BAP1 loss-of-function by CRISPR/Cas9 in normal human cholangiocyte organoids. We find that BAP1 controlsthe expression of junctional and cytoskeleton components by regulating chromatin accessibility. Consequently, we observe loss of multiple epithelial characteristics while motility increases. Importantly, restoring the catalytic activity of BAP1 in the nucleus rescues these cellular and molecular changes. We engineer human liver organoids to combine four common cholangiocarcinoma mutations (TP53, PTEN, SMAD4, and NF1). In this genetic background, BAP1 loss results in acquisition of malignant features upon xenotransplantation. Thus, control of epithelial identity through the regulation of chromatin accessibility appears to be a key aspect of BAP1's tumor suppressor function. Organoid technology combined with CRISPR/Cas9 provides an experimental platform for mechanistic studies of cancer gene function in a human context.

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: an Update for Pulmonologists

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable disease, and its global incidence is predicted to rise. The epidemiology is changing especially in developed countries where the increases in incidence centers around the older age group. Pulmonologists are the frontline specialists faced with the challenges of diagnosing MPM and management of the associated respiratory issues, especially malignant pleural effusions. Although much of recent literature surrounds treatment of MPM, this review highlights latest developments in aspects of MPM care relevant to pulmonologists’ practice. Advances in imaging have allowed more MPM cases to be diagnosed with percutaneous-guided biopsy without resorting to thoracoscopy. Cytological examination, coupled with molecular testing (e.g., BAP-1 loss and fluorescent in situ hybridization for CDKN2A gene loss), now allows many cases of MPM to be diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology. Many biomarkers have been proposed for mesothelioma; however, work is needed to first validate initial studies and then tease-out the interactions between known prognostic indicators and any proposed biomarker. A series of multicenter randomized trials have established the role of indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) as the choice of management for malignant pleural effusions. Combining IPC with talc pleurodesis is a new approach. Prognostic factors, including a new algorithm, are reviewed to assist pulmonologists. Many guidelines have been published by various agencies, again with different recommendations (especially regarding therapies). Pulmonologists must therefore stay abreast of the literature in order to provide the best care for patients.

Intrinsic apoptosis shapes the tumor spectrum linked to inactivation of the deubiquitinase BAP1.

Malignancies arising from mutation of tumor suppressors have unexplained tissue proclivity. For example, BAP1 encodes a widely expressed deubiquitinase for histone H2A, but germline mutations are predominantly associated with uveal melanomas and mesotheliomas. We show that BAP1 inactivation causes apoptosis in mouse embryonic stem cells, fibroblasts, liver, and pancreatic tissue but not in melanocytes and mesothelial cells. Ubiquitin ligase RNF2, which silences genes by monoubiquitinating H2A, promoted apoptosis in BAP1-deficient cells by suppressing expression of the prosurvival genes Bcl2 and Mcl1. In contrast, BAP1 loss in melanocytes had little impact on expression of prosurvival genes, instead inducing Mitf Thus, BAP1 appears to modulate gene expression by countering H2A ubiquitination, but its loss only promotes tumorigenesis in cells that do not engage an RNF2-dependent apoptotic program.

Loss of BAP1 as a candidate predictive biomarker for immunotherapy of mesothelioma

As trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies demonstrate responses in only a minority of pleural mesotheliomas (PlMs) and largely exclude patients with the related peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM), clinicians need predictive biomarkers of response and inclusion of PeM patients in future trials. A new study finds that loss of the deubiquitinase BAP1 in PeM correlates with an inflammatory tumor microenvironment, suggesting that BAP1 status might identify PeM, and possibly PlM, patients who would benefit from ICI therapy.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) accurately distinguishes malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign mesothelial proliferations

Accurate distinction of benign mesothelial proliferations from malignant mesothelioma remains a diagnostic challenge. Sequential use of BAP1 immunohistochemistry and CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization is specific for diagnosis of mesothelioma, but fluorescence in situ hybridization is both costly and time-consuming. Early data indicate that mesothelioma shows extensive loss of nuclear 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC). We studied 49 cases of mesothelioma (17 epithelioid mesothelioma, 22 biphasic mesothelioma, and 10 sarcomatoid mesothelioma) and 23 benign mesothelial proliferations using a 5-hmC single immunohistochemical stain, CAM5.2/5-hmC double immunohistochemical stain, and BAP1 immunohistochemistry. Estimations of extent of 5-hmC loss were made using the 5-hmC single stain and CAM5.2/5-hmC double stain, and extent of nuclear 5-hmC loss was definitively quantitated in at least 1000 cells per case. Mean nuclear 5-hmC loss in mesothelioma (84%) was significantly greater than in benign mesothelial proliferations (4%) (p < 0.0001). Using 5-hmC loss in > 50% of tumor nuclei to define the diagnosis of mesothelioma, 5-hmC immunohistochemistry showed sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 100%. An immunopanel including 5-hmC and BAP1 immunohistochemistry achieved sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 100%. Extensive nuclear 5-hmC loss is sensitive and specific for mesothelioma in the differential diagnosis with benign mesothelial proliferations. In challenging mesothelial lesions, immunohistochemical studies showing either extensive 5-hmC loss or BAP1 loss indicate a diagnosis of mesothelioma, precluding the need for CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization in a considerable number of cases.

Expression and Mutation Patterns of PBRM1, BAP1 and SETD2 Mirror Specific Evolutionary Subtypes in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Bi-allelic inactivation of the VHL gene on chromosome 3p is the characteristic feature in most clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). Frequent gene alterations were also identified in SETD2, BAP1 and PBRM1, all of which are situated on chromosome 3p and encode histone/chromatin regulators. The relationship between gene mutation, loss of protein expression and the correlations with clinicopathological parameters is important for the understanding of renal cancer progression. We analyzed PBRM1 and BAP1 protein expression as well as the tri-methylation state of H3K36 as a surrogate marker for SETD2 activity in more than 700 RCC samples. In ccRCC loss of nuclear PBRM1 (68%), BAP1 (40%) and H3K36me3 (47%) expression was significantly correlated with each other, advanced tumor stage, poor tumor differentiation (P < .0001 each), and necrosis (P < .005) Targeted next generation sequencing of 83 ccRCC samples demonstrated a significant association of genetic mutations in PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2 with absence of PBRM1, BAP1, and HEK36me3 protein expression (P < .05, each). By assigning the protein expression patterns to evolutionary subtypes, we revealed similar clinical phenotypes as suggested by TRACERx Renal. Given their important contribution to tumor suppression, we conclude that combined functional inactivation of PBRM1, BAP1, SETD2 and pVHL is critical for ccRCC progression.

Genetic Profiling of Primary Orbital Melanoma: An Analysis of 6 Cases with Clinicopathologic Correlation

To analyze the genetic profile of 6 cases of primary orbital melanoma with clinicopathologic correlation. Retrospective noninterventional study to analyze the genetic profile of 6 cases of primary orbital melanoma and to correlate the genetic findings with prognosis and clinicopathologic features. Inclusion criteria were patients with primary orbital melanoma with no evidence of primary eyelid skin, conjunctival, uveal, or remote melanoma at extraocular sites. The study involved 6 primary orbital melanomas from 6 patients. Four patients were exenterated and 2 had incisional biopsies performed. Clinical notes and radiologic records were assessed to ascertain clinical tumor behavior. Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and exposed to immunohistochemistry for S100, MelA, HMB45, Sox10, and BAP1. Melanoma DNA was exposed to array comparative genomic hybridization to assess gross chromosomal copy number changes. Point mutation assessment and Sanger sequencing were performed for GNAQ, GNA11, BRAF, NRAS, pTERT, SF3B1, and EIF1AX. These were the presence of gross chromosomal copy number changes and the presence of mutations in GNAQ, GNA11, BRAF, NRAS, pTERT, SF3B1, and EIF1AX; the presence of metastases and time period between diagnosis and death from melanoma; and correlation between the tumor genetic profile and the clinical behavior of the tumor. One of the 6 cases was clinically associated with oculodermal melanocytosis. Of the 6 patients, 3 died of melanoma metastases and 1 of unrelated causes; 2 remain alive at last review. Three of the 6 cases were histologically associated with a benign precursor lesion. All melanomas expressed S100, MelA, HMB45, and Sox10. One patient showed loss of BAP1 nuclear staining. The most frequent chromosomal gains across the 6 cases, in order of frequency, were 6p, 8q, 17q, 6q, and 20p. The most frequently lost regions were 1p, 9p, 16q, and 17p. One patient showed monsomy 3 and gain of 8q (and showed the BAP1 loss). Mutations were found in GNAQ (1 case), GNA11 (1 case), SF3B1 (2 cases), NRAS (2 cases), and pTERT (2 cases). The data point to 2 genetic groups for primary orbital conjunctiva melanoma-like and a uveal melanoma-like group. A larger study would help confirm this suggestion.

Immunohistochemical Assessment of BAP1 Protein in Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas.

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas are common malignant salivary gland tumors. Despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, there has not been much improvement in outcome of these patients, necessitating identification of novel targeted therapeutic agents. Genomic profiling of mucoepidermoid carcinomas has recently revealed aberrations in BAP1 gene. Therefore, we conducted this study to identify BAP1 loss by immunohistochemistry in these tumors. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma cases were retrieved; hematoxylin-and-eosin stained sections were reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for BAP1 was performed. Forty cases were assessed, including 25 salivary gland and 15 pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinomas. There were 19 cases in the parotid (76%), two in submandibular gland (8%), and remaining 16% from minor salivary gland locations. Ten (40%) were low grade, nine (36%) were intermediate grade, and six (24%) were high grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Thirteen (86.7%) pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinomas were tracheobronchial, while two (13.3%) were intraparenchymal; all were low grade mucoepidermoid carcinomas. On immunohistochemistry, BAP1 nuclear staining was retained in all cases (100%), irrespective of tumor location or grade. Therapeutic connotations necessitate the identification of readily applicable techniques to detect BAP1 loss in mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Using immunohistochemistry, loss of BAP1 staining was not seen in any of our cases, suggesting insensitivity of BAP1 IHC to detect aberrations at genomic level in these tumors. Analysis of BAP1 alterations by targeted sequencing may therefore be performed prior to excluding the possibility of response to BAP1-targeted therapeutics based on immunohistochemistry alone.

Multiple tumor suppressors regulate a HIF-dependent negative feedback loop via ISGF3 in human clear cell renal cancer.

Whereas VHL inactivation is a primary event in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the precise mechanism(s) of how this interacts with the secondary mutations in tumor suppressor genes, including PBRM1, KDM5C/JARID1C, SETD2, and/or BAP1, remains unclear. Gene expression analyses reveal that VHL, PBRM1, or KDM5C share a common regulation of interferon response expression signature. Loss of HIF2α, PBRM1, or KDM5C in VHL-/-cells reduces the expression of interferon stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3), a transcription factor that regulates the interferon signature. Moreover, loss of SETD2 or BAP1 also reduces the ISGF3 level. Finally, ISGF3 is strongly tumor-suppressive in a xenograft model as its loss significantly enhances tumor growth. Conversely, reactivation of ISGF3 retards tumor growth by PBRM1-deficient ccRCC cells. Thus after VHL inactivation, HIF induces ISGF3, which is reversed by the loss of secondary tumor suppressors, suggesting that this is a key negative feedback loop in ccRCC.

Nuclear grading, BAP1, mesothelin and PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prognostic implications

For malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), histopathological subtype is one of the most important prognostic factors. Several immunohistochemical stains whose expressions have possible therapeutic implications have been identified in MPM such as BAP1, mesothelin and PD-L1. The aim of our work was to evaluate the clinical significance and prognostic implications of BAP1, mesothelin and PD-L1 expression in 117 patients with a diagnosis of MPM who were diagnosed in our institution between 2002 and 2017. We also correlated this immunohistochemical profile to a recently described nuclear grading and to histopathological subtype. Mesothelin expression, BAP1 loss and PD-L1 expression were associated with histopathological subtype (p<0.0001), BAP1 loss was more frequent in epithelioid subtype whereas PD-L1 expression was more frequent in non-epithelioid subtype. For epithelioid MPM, BAP1 expression was associated with overall survival (p=0.034), with a longer survival when BAP1 expression is lost. Necrosis and nuclear grading are associated with overall survival (p=0.0048 and <0.0001, respectively), with longer survival when necrosis was absent and for grade I. For non-epithelioid MPM, overall survival was not related to clinical, histopathological or immunohistochemical expression of BAP1, mesothelin or PD-L1. In multivariate analysis, grade I for nuclear grading was an independent prognostic factor associated with overall survival (p<0.0001). In epithelioid and non-epithelioid MPM, we analysed overall survival in subgroups with combined mesothelin, BAP1 and PD-L1 expression. In epithelioid MPM, BAP1 retained/mesothelin negativity/PD-L1>1%, and BAP1 retained/mesothelin positivity/PD-L1>1% profiles, are associated with shorter overall survival. In non-epithelioid MPM, BAP1 loss/mesothelin negativity/PD-L1>1% is associated with shorter overall survival. Our work confirms that nuclear grading in epithelioid MPM is a strong and independent prognosis factor. Moreover, this study on several promising immunohistochemical stains whose expressions have possible therapeutic implications identifies subgroups with a poor prognosis.

PO-223 Modelling malignant mesothelioma in mice: a critical role for BAP1 loss

Introduction Malignant mesothelioma(MM) is a highly aggressive tumour of serosal surfaces. The vast majority of cases of mesothelioma are linked to asbestos exposure. Loss of BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2ABtumour suppressor gene function is frequently observed in malignant mesothelioma. There is limited treatment option available with cisplatin/pemetrexed as the main frontline therapy with modest survival advantage. There is an urgent need of preclinical models that are fast, reproducible and that recapitulates human disease to test new treatment modalities. Here, we describe a mouse model of MM based upon the co-deletion of Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2ab. Material and methods Mesotheliomas were induced by deleting Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2ab in the thoracic cavity of mice. The tumour and its microenvironment were characterised histologically. Furthermore, we performed gene expression, chromatin profiling and drug response in tumor-derived primary cells. In addition, we employed this autochthonous model for testing current standard of care as a proof of concept treatment. Results and discussions The combined inactivation of Bap1, Nf2, and Cdkn2ab in thoracic cavity led to a highly aggressive primarily epithelioid mesothelioma with histopathological features and gene expression profile similar to human MM. This includes the distinct inflammatory phenotype. Bap1 deletion accelerated mesothelioma dramatically when combined with Nf2, Cdkn2a, Cdkn2b and p19Arf disruption (hereafter refer as BNC loss). The accelerated tumour development is invariably connected with EZH2 mediated redistribution of H2K27me3 towards promoter sites, and activation of the PI3K, MAPK pathway. The primary cells derived from mouse mesothelioma showed drug response profile similar to those observed in human MM. Treatment of BNC tumours with cisplatin and pemetrexed, the current frontline treatment modestly prolonged survival of the mice. Conclusion We have developed a mouse model that is fast and recapitulates human mesothelioma. The mouse model is an ideal model system to study the biology and pathogenesis of mesothelioma. Furthermore, the immune-competence of this model, and the fast and synchronous tumour onset makes it very suitable to design and validate new treatment regimens for this deadly disease.

An update on molecular alterations in melanocytic tumors with emphasis on Spitzoid lesions.

Significant progress in the molecular pathology of melanocytic tumors have revealed that benign neoplasms, so-called nevi, are initiated by gain-of-function mutations in one of several primary oncogenes, such as BRAF in acquired melanocytic nevi, NRAS in congenital nevi or GNAQ/GNA11 in blue nevi, with consequent MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation. Secondary genetic alterations overcome tumor suppressive mechanisms and allow the progression to intermediate lesions characterized by TERT-p mutation or to invasive melanomas displaying disruption of tumor suppressor genes. Currently, melanoma is molecularly regarded as four different diseases, namely BRAF, NRAS, NF1 and the "triple wild type" subtypes, which are associated with particular clinicopathological features. Melanocytic Spitzoid lesions include benign Spitz nevus, atypical Spitz tumor (AST) and Spitzoid melanoma. This is a challenging diagnostic group, particularly with regard to the distinction between AST and Spitzoid melanoma on clinical and histological grounds. Molecular analysis has identified the presence of HRAS mutation, BAP1 loss (often accompanying by BRAF mutations) or several kinase fusions in distinct categories of Spitz tumors. These aberrations account for the rapid growth characteristic of Spitz nevi. Subsequent growth is halted by various tumor suppressive mechanisms abrogation of which allow the development of AST, now better classified as low-grade melanocytic tumor. Although at present ancillary genetic techniques have not been very helpful in the prediction of biological behavior of AST, they have defined distinct tumor subsets differing with regard to biology and histology. Finally, we discuss how novel molecular markers may assist the differential diagnosis of melanoma, particularly from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). It is anticipated that the significant progress in the field of molecular pathology regarding the various types of melanocytic tumors, will eventually contribute to a more accurate histologic categorization, prediction of biologic behavior and personalized treatment.

The diagnostic role of BAP1 in serous effusions

The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic role of BAP1 in effusion cytology. Effusions (n = 258), consisting of 53 malignant mesotheliomas and 205 other cancers, the majority carcinomas (62 breast, 60 ovarian, 31 lung, 51 carcinomas of other origin, 1 melanoma), were analyzed for BAP1 expression using immunohistochemistry. BAP1 was lost in 46 (87%) mesotheliomas compared with 4 (2%) of 205 other cancers (P < .001), resulting in sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 98%, respectively. There was no significant difference between peritoneal (n = 14) and pleural (n = 39) mesotheliomas. The 4 carcinomas with loss of BAP1 included 1 ovarian, 1 breast, 1 uterine cervical, and 1 gastric carcinoma. The present study supports the role of BAP1 as a highly sensitive and specific marker for malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions and argues for inclusion of this test in all specimens in which this diagnosis is considered.

Abstract IA06: Driver mutations and cell-of-origin as critical factors determining the phenotypic characteristics of thoracic tumor subtypes

Abstract IA06: Driver mutations and cell-of-origin as critical factors determining the phenotypic characteristics of thoracic tumor subtypes

New Insights on Diagnostic Reproducibility of Biphasic Mesotheliomas: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation by the International Mesothelioma Panel From the MESOPATH Reference Center.

The 2015 WHO classification of tumors categorized malignant mesothelioma into epithelioid, biphasic (BMM), and sarcomatoid (SMM) for prognostic relevance and treatment decisions. The survival of BMM is suspected to correlate with the amount of the sarcomatoid component. The criteria for a sarcomatoid component and the interobserver variability between pathologists for identifying this component are not well described. In ambiguous cases, a "transitional" (TMM) subtype has been proposed but was not accepted as a specific subtype in the 2015 WHO classification. The aims of this study were to evaluate the interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of BMM, to determine the nature and the significance of TMM subtype, and to relate the percentage of sarcomatoid component with survival. The value of staining for BRCA-1-associated protein (BAP1) and CDKN2A(p16) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were also assessed with respect to each of the tumoral components. The study was conducted by the International Mesothelioma Panel supported by the French National Cancer Institute, the network of rare cancer (EURACAN) and in collaboration with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). The patient cases include a random group of 42 surgical biopsy samples diagnosed as BMM with evaluation of SMM component by the French Panel of MESOPATH experts was selected from the total series of 971 BMM cases collected from 1998 to 2016. Fourteen international pathologists with expertise in mesothelioma reviewed digitally scanned slides (hematoxylin and eosin - stained and pan-cytokeratin) without knowledge of prior diagnosis or outcome. Cases with at least 7 of 14 pathologists recognizing TMM features were selected as a TMM group. Demographic, clinical, histopathologic, treatment, and follow-up data were retrieved from the MESOBANK database. BAP1 (clone C-4) loss and CDKN2A(p16) homozygous deletion (HD) were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH, respectively. Kappa statistics were applied for interobserver agreement and multivariate analysis with Cox regression adjusted for age and gender was performed for survival analysis. The 14 panelists recorded a total of 544 diagnoses. The interobserver correlation was moderate (weighted Kappa= 0.45). Of the cases originally classified as BMM by MESOPATH, the reviewers agreed in 71% of cases (385 of 544 opinions), with cases classified as pure epithelioid in 17% (93 of 544), and pure sarcomatoid in 12% (66 of 544 opinions). Diagnosis of BMM was made on morphology or IHC alone in 23% of the cases and with additional assessment of IHC in 77% (402 of 544). The median overall survival (OS) of the 42 BMM cases was 8 months. The OS for BMM was significantly different from SMM and epithelioid malignant mesothelioma (p < 0.0001). In BMM, a sarcomatoid component of less than 80% correlated with a better survival (p= 0.02). There was a significant difference in survival between BMM with TMM showing a median survival at 6 months compared to 12 months for those without TMM (p < 0.0001). BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 42) of the total cases and in both components in 26%. We also compared the TMM group to that of more aggressive patterns of epithelioid subtypes of mesothelioma (solid and pleomorphic of our large MESOPATH cohort). The curve of transitional type was persistently close to the OS curve of the sarcomatoid component. The group of sarcomatoid, transitional, and pleomorphic mesothelioma were very close to each other. We then considered the contribution of BAP1 immunostaining and loss of CDKN2A(p16) by FISH. BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 41) of the total cases and in both component in 27% of the cases (11 of 41). There was no significant difference in BAP1 loss between the TMM and non-TMM groups. HD CDKN2A(p16) was detected in 74% of the total cases with no significant difference between the TMM and non-TMM groups. In multivariate analysis, TMM morphology was an indicator of poor prognosis with a hazard ratio= 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.6 - 8.0; and p= 0.003 even when compared to the presence of HD CDKN2A(p16) on sarcomatoid component (hazard ratio= 4.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 16.3, p= 0.02). The interobserver concordance among the international mesothelioma and French mesothelioma panel suggests clinical utility for an updated definition of biphasic mesothelioma that allows better stratification of patients into risk groups for treatment decisions, systemic anticancer therapy, or selection for surgery or palliation. We also have shown the usefulness of FISH detection of CDKN2A(p16) HD compared to BAP1 loss on the spindle cell component for the separation in ambiguous cases between benign florid stromal reaction from true sarcomatoid component of biphasic mesothelioma. Taken together our results further validate the concept of transitional pattern as a poor prognostic indicator.

Nuclear BAP1 loss is common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and a subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma but rare in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Deletion in the 3p21 region, the chromosomal location of BAP1, has been reported in a subset of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), biliary and pancreatic cancers. This suggests that BAP1 could play a role in the pathogenesis of these tumors. We assessed the frequency of BAP1 loss by immunohistochemistry in 103 hepatic, biliary and pancreatic cancers. We also assessed chromosomal alterations in the BAP1 region in the same tumors by genotyping. We identified high frequency 4/8 (50%) of BAP1 loss in intrahepatic cholangicarcinoma (ICC). However the frequency was lower in HCC 9/51 (17.6%), pancreatic 1/42(2.4%) and extrahepatic biliary cancers (0/2). Loss of heterozygosity of at least one marker from the 3p21 region was observed in 75% of ICC, 52.9% of HCC and 45.2% of pancreatic cancers. Expression of hepatocytic (HepPar1) and bile duct (cytokeratin 7) markers were common (7/9, 77.8%) in the HCC tumors with loss or decrease of BAP1 compared with those with preserved BAP1 (18/42, 42.9%), (Fisher exact p = 0.0751). Our results confirm the high frequency of BAP1 alterations in ICC and low frequency in pancreatic cancers. It also suggests that BAP1 is commonly altered in a subtype of HCC with both hepatocytic and biliary differentiation. Further studies of the therapeutic implications of our findings are warranted.

Ocular treatment of choroidal melanoma in relation to the prevention of metastatic death - A personal view.

About 50% of patients with choroidal melanoma develop metastatic disease, despite successful eradication of the primary tumor. Patient care is complicated by the fact that we do not know whether ocular treatment ever influences survival and if so in whom. Some authorities believe that metastatic spread is never preventable, because it has always occurred by the time the ocular tumor is detected. Others hold the view that metastatic spread can occur late, at least in some patients, in whom timely and successful treatment is life-saving. Some melanomas never seem to metastasize, even if they reach an advanced stage. It is likely that many patients are undergoing futile enucleation or experiencing severe ocular morbidity and visual loss from excessive radiation safety margins in the hope of living longer. Some of these patients would do better with tumor resection, often rejected because of concerns about iatrogenic tumor dissemination. At the same time, many patients with a small melanoma are being left untreated for years until growth is documented, possibly missing opportunities for prolonging life. Metastatic disease is highly likely when genetic tumor analysis detects monosomy 3, chromosome 8q gain, a class 2 gene expression profile, and/or BAP1 loss. Do these lethal genetic aberrations ever develop while the patient is under observation? If so, can these be predicted by genetic analysis? Do lethal mutations and metastasis ever occur because ocular treatment has failed to eradicate the tumor completely? Answers to these questions would profoundly change the management of patients with uveal melanoma.