PurposeWe explore the apparent value of ERM within the CB landscape in the absence of endogeneity concerns.Design/methodology/approachWe explore the observed market value of enterprise risk management (ERM) in a specific industry, community banks (CBs). To do this we employ standard event study methodology. We use the surprise failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank (SBNY) as a natural experiment to investigate this phenomenon.FindingsWe observe several consistent results. CBs with high institutional ownership and high insider ownership exhibited a negative relationship with abnormal returns. Univariate results indicate that there is a negative relationship between ERM and CB. However, multivariate results controlling for other known factors which impact returns indicate no relationship between ERM implementation and value for CBs. Finally, we find evidence the market considers CBs to have less risk of failure or exposure to regional banking contagion, as CARs are positive when using a regional bank index as the market model benchmark.Research limitations/implicationsThese results call into question the value of ERM for CBs.Originality/valueThese results call into question the value of ERM for CBs. This is the first paper to explore ERM value within CBs using a natural experiment approach.
Read full abstract