Balloon Occlusion Of Aorta Research Articles

Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon for placenta accreta spectrum disorders with placenta previa: a novel approach to uterus preserving.

To evaluate the efficacy of intrauterine inflated Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon (ICRB) in postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) management and fertility preserving for placenta accreta spectrum disorders with placenta previa (previa PAS). At a tertiary referral center, 74 patients suffering with previa PAS were entered into this retrospective cohort study from January, 2016 to December, 2020, and were confirmed intraoperatively that abnormal invasive placenta reaches the cervical internal ostium and the upper part of the cervical canal. In control group (n = 39), the combination of infrarenal abdominal aorta balloon occlusion (IAABO) and longitudinal parallel compression suture to lower uterine segment were performed. In study group (n = 35), in addition to the aforementioned surgical techniques, ICRB was implemented at the cervical internal ostium and the outside of the cervix simultaneously. Use of ICRB significantly reduced the rate of peripartum hysterectomy (2.9% vs 30.4%, p = 0.001), and associated with a reduction in surgical time and duration of IAABO (mean 172.7min vs 206.6min, p = 0.017; median 30min vs 40min, p < 0.001). Use of ICRB significantly reduced the estimated amount of blood loss (median 2500ml vs 4000ml, p < 0.001), amounts of packed red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion (median 6 U vs 13.5 U, p < 0.001; median 450ml vs 1200ml, p < 0.001), postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of oligomenorrhea postoperatively (median 5days vs 6days, p = 0.009; 13.8% vs 61.1% p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed between both the groups regarding the use of cryo and PLT, injury of urinary system, relaparotomy, admission to the ICU, postpartum hematocele in uterine cavity, and postoperative complications (including incidence rate of DVT, incidence rate of femoral thrombosis, puerperal morbidity, intrauterine infection, surgical site infection, and deep tissue infection). ICRB was a simple, effective procedure for PPH management and fertility preserving in some previa PAS cases in which abnormal invasive placenta reaches the cervical internal ostium and the upper part of the cervical canal, in tandem with IAABO and compression suture.

Aortic Balloon Occlusion Technique Does Not Improve Peri-Operative Outcomes for Acute Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Patients With Lower Body Malperfusion.

BackgroundThe management of malperfusion is vital to improve the outcomes of surgery for acute type A acute aortic dissection (ATAAD). Open arch repair under hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (HCA/sACP) is safe and efficient but associated with inevitable hypothermia and ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique is shown to be organ protective by allowing higher temperature and shorter circulatory arrest time. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this new technique for ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion.MethodsBetween January 2013 and November 2020, 355 ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion who underwent arch repair in our institute were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ABO group (n = 85) and HCA/sACP group (n = 271). Propensity score matching was performed to correct baseline differences.ResultsUsing the propensity score matching, 85 pairs were generated. Circulatory arrest time was significantly lower in the ABO group compared with the HCA/sACP group (median, 8 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). The incidence of in-hospital mortality (10.6 vs. 12.9%; p = 0.812), stroke (7.1 vs. 7.1%; p = 1.000), dialysis (25.9 vs. 32.9%; p = 0.183), hepatic dysfunction (52.9 vs. 57.6%; p = 0.537), tracheostomy (4.7 vs. 2.4%; p = 0.682), paraplegia (1.2 vs. 4.7%; p = 0.368) were comparable between ABO and HCA/sACP groups. Other outcomes and major adverse events were comparable. The multivariable logistic analysis did not recognize ABO technique protective against any major adverse outcomes.ConclusionsFor ATAAD patients with lower body malperfusion, the ABO technique allows the performance of arch repair with frozen elephant trunk (FET) under higher temperature and shorter circulatory arrest time. However, ABO technique did not improve perioperative outcomes. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this technique.

Application of the aortic balloon occlusion technique in Sun's procedure: A single-center study.

To study the impact of a balloon occlusion (BO) technique in stented elephant trunk implantation in Sun's procedure for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAAD) on important postoperative organ complications and patient rehabilitation. Eighty-five patients with AAAD who underwent Sun's procedure from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected. Cases were divided into two groups based on whether the aortic BO technique was used in stented elephant trunk implantation: the BO group and the nonballoon occlusion (NBO) group. The collected data included the patients' clinical characteristics, operative data, postoperative complications and recovery. We applied statistical software to study the impact of a BO technique in stented elephant trunk implantation in Sun's procedure. A total of 85 patients with AAAD underwent Sun's procedure. A total of 29 used BO technique, 56 did not use. The circulatory arrest time in the BO group was controlled within 8.07 ± 2.33 min, and the nasopharyngeal temperature dropped to 28°C. Overall postoperative complications were less frequent in BO group than NBO group (52% vs. 75%; p = .030). Using BO technique, we reduced the 24-h drainage volume, and lowered the occurrence of hypoxemia (48%), liver dysfunction (10%), and median tracheal intubation time was 37 h (range: 12.5-106 h), median intensive care unit (ICU) time was 65 h (range: 17-207 h). During total aortic arch replacement and stented elephant trunk surgery for AAAD, we used the aortic BO technique, which avoids deeper hypothermia and effectively shortens circulatory arrest times. This approach is helpful for reducing the incidence of postoperative complications and shortening the intensive care unit time. This method also reduces the patient's medical burden and facilitates faster recovery.

Should open repair be the choice in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm instead of endovascular aortic repair—Experience in a tertiary referral vascular centre

AbstractAimRuptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) is one of the most difficult surgical emergencies with poor outcomes. Aortic occlusion balloon (AOB) can reduce intraoperative mortality and a protocol was made to ensure smooth logistics, which we regard as Protocol II. We herein review the clinical outcomes between endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open repair of RAAA.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 113 patients with RAAA in 10 years. We measured the primary outcome between two cohorts, EVAR and open repair. Furthermore, we looked into the mortality based on subgroup analysis according to treatment modality and the Queen Elizabeth Hospital physiological classification.ResultsThe overall mortality in Protocol II was significantly lower than that in Protocol I. In the open repair group, the 30‐day mortality was lower in Protocol II, especially in Classes IIb, IIC and III. Protocol II also demonstrated better perioperative outcomes. There was lower 30‐day mortality in EVAR than that in open repair in Protocol I but there was no difference between open repair and EVAR in Protocol II.ConclusionProtocol‐driven management with AOB involving a multidisciplinary team approach can improve survival and perioperative outcomes in RAAA. In those cases with unfavourable anatomy, open repair should be performed. For those class IIA RAAAs, the method of repair should depend on the anatomy, and whether to use AOB should be an individualised decision. In cases of class IIB RAAAs, routine use of AOB can improve survival. For classes IIC and III, we would offer open repair with mandatory use of AOB employing a damage control approach.

Maternal outcomes of abnormally invasive placenta in China and their association with use of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion

Objective To compare maternal outcomes of abnormally invasive placenta in China in 2012, 2015, and 2018, and further examine the association between use of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO) and the risk of maternal outcomes. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis included 830 women diagnosed as abnormally invasive placenta from 5 tertiary care centers in China in 2012, 2015 and 2018. Participants were divided into AABO group and non-AABO group according to whether they were treated with AABO or not. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of use of AABO with postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy and repeated surgery. Results Among 830 participants, 66.0% (548/830) and 34.0% (282/830) of women were diagnosed with placenta increta and percreta, respectively; 33.3% (276/830) of women with abnormally invasive placenta were treated with AABO. In 2012, 2015, and 2018, the rate of blood transfusion was 83.1, 59.8, and 56.2%; the rate of hysterectomy was 50.8, 11.2, and 2.4%; and the rate of repeated surgery was 10.2, 9.4, and 0.9%. Use of AABO was associated with lower risk of postpartum hemorrhage (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35–0.99), blood transfusion (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.52–0.99), hysterectomy (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01–0.14) and repeated surgery (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.05–0.41) after adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusion The rates of blood transfusion, hysterectomy and repeated surgery progressively decreased from 2012 to 2018 in Chinese women with abnormally invasive placenta. Use of AABO was associated with lower risk of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy and repeated surgery.

Intra-abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the management of placenta percreta.

Background:Massive bleeding is the main concern for the management of placenta percreta (PP). Intra-abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) is one method for pelvic devascularization, but the efficacy of IABO is uncertain. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of IABO in PP patients.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of PP cases from six tertiary centers in China between January 2011 and December 2015. PP cases with/without the use of IABO were analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the effect of selection bias. Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and the rate of hysterectomy, as well as neonatal outcomes, were analyzed.Results:One hundred and thirty-two matched pairs of patients were included in the final analysis. Compared with the control group, maternal outcomes, including PPH (68.9% vs. 87.9%, χ2 = 13.984, P < 0.001), hysterectomy (8.3% vs. 65.2%, χ2 = 91.672, P < 0.001), and repeated surgery (1.5% vs. 12.1%, χ2 = 11.686, P = 0.001) were significantly reduced in the IABO group. For neonatal outcomes, Apgar scores at 1 minute (8.67 ± 1.79 vs. 8.53 ± 1.68, t = −0.638, P = 0.947) and 5 minutes (9.43 ± 1.55 vs. 9.53 ± 1.26, t = 0.566, P = 0.293) were not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusions:IABO can significantly reduce blood loss, hysterectomies, and repeated surgeries. This procedure has not shown harmful effects on neonatal outcomes.

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms assisted by double balloon occlusion technique combined with intra-aneurysm fibrin binder injection technique

Objective: To investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of alternating double balloon occlusion combined with intra-aneurysm injection of human fibrin binder in the endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Methods: The clinical data of 28 patients with rAAA admitted to Department of Vascular Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 5 females, aged (62±5) years (range: 46 to 88 years).The maximum diameter of the tumors was (65.2±10.5) mm (range: 47.3 to 100.5 mm), all of which were subrenal rAAA. The intraoperative EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm was successfully performed under the emergency green channel procedure, and this surgery was assisted used the double balloon occlusion technique in aorta of inferior renal and superior renalcombined with intraoperative human fibrin binder injection technique. Observation indexes included: patients with preoperative preparation, operation time, hospitalization days, surgical treatment success rate and the incidence of postoperative complications, and aortic stent form during the follow-up period, the incidence of leakage, branch stents patency rate and infection rates. Results: The preoperative preparation time of 28 patients was (45.5±8.5) minutes (range:20 to 100 minutes). The operation time was (100.0±15.5) minutes (range:85 to 210 minutes), the ICU stay time was (7±2) days(range:1 to 17 days). The length of hospitalization was (13.5±2.5) days(range:5 to 43 days). The success rate of surgical treatment was 92.9% (26/28). Two patients died, 1 case died of postoperative multifocal lacunar cerebral infarction and massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and another elderly patient (84 years old) died of massive abdominal fluid due to preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture, postoperative complicated with significant abdominal compartment syndrome, and secondary multiple organ failure. Balloon occlusion of the upper renal aorta took (13±2)minutes (range:12 to 30 minutes). The intraoperative injection of fibrin adhesive was (14±2) ml(range:6 to 28 ml) in 22 cases. The incidence of major postoperative complications was 57.1% (16/28). Among the 26 patients who survived the surgery, 69.2% (18/26) completed the 3-year follow-up, and the follow-up time was (30±3) months(range:13 to 36 months). During the follow-up, the aortic stent was in good shape without obvious displacement. The incidence of leakage within 6 months after the operation was 10.7% (3/28), and there was no internal leakage in the patients who were followed up for 36 months after the operation. The patency rate of renal artery and iliac artery branch stents was 16/18. The incidence of stent infection was 7.7% (2/26), 1 case occurred at 1 month and another case at 6 months, respectively. All patients recovered after prolonged intensive anti-infection therapy. Conclusions: Under the standard emergency treatment process, the double balloon alternating occlusion technique combined with the intra-aneurysm injection of human fibrin adhesive technique can assist the successful completion of the endovascular repair of rAAA, effectively improve the success rate of treatment for patients, and reduce the incidence of postoperative leakage and serious complications. The mid-term and long-term results of EVAR for rAAA are good, safe and reliable.

Isolated Ruptured Paravisceral Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

The goal of this study is to investigate the clinical presentation, treatment options, and outcomes of the patients with isolated ruptured paravisceral penetrating aortic ulcers (PV-PAU). All patients presenting with acute aortic syndrome from 2015 to 2020 were screened, of which patients with isolated ruptured PV-PAU were included in this retrospective study. Study endpoints were the assessment of treatment options, technical success, and clinical outcome. Outcome measures included major perioperative complications and mortality. Sixteen patients (11 men; median age 68; IQR 60 - 75 years) presented with isolated ruptured PV-PAU were included in this study. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 1 - 51). Ruptured PV-PAUs represented 12.3% of the ruptured aortic aneurysms in all locations. PV-PAUs were found in segment A (n=8, 50%), segment B (n=5, 31%), and segment C (n=3, 19%). PV-PAUs showed a mean protrusion distance of 27±10 mm, a mean neck diameter of 21 ± 7 mm, and maximal aortic diameter of 50 ± 11 mm. Five patients (31%) showed hemodynamic instability on admission and needed intense fluid resuscitation. Of those, 2 patients needed urgent laparotomy with a fast transabdominal supraceliac aortic clamping, one needed an aortic balloon occlusion to obtain rapid aortic control. The open aortic repair was the most frequently performed surgery (11/16, 69%), followed by hybrid procedures (3/16) and parallel graft chimney technique (2/16). Two patients died during the follow-up, calculating for in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates of 6 - 12%, respectively. The postoperative morbidity rate was 31%. Postoperative complications included acute renal failure (31%), pneumonia (25%), and 1case of ischemic colitis (6%). No spinal cord ischemia was reported. Ruptured PV-PAU is a rare and challenging diagnostic and therapeutic entity. Open aortic repair seems to be a reliable option in treating patients with isolated ruptured PV-PAUs. Hybrid procedures and parallel stent-graft techniques can only be used in selected patients.

Fetal and neonatal outcomes following maternal aortic balloon occlusion for hemorrhage in pregnancy: A review of the literature.

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal death worldwide, with increased risk in women with abnormal placentation. Aortic balloon occlusion (ABO), including resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion, has been used for obstetrical hemorrhage for 20 years, and is associated with decreased operative blood loss, fewer transfusions, and lower rates of hysterectomy. However, the effect of aortic occlusion on fetal/neonatal outcomes is not well known. A literature review on ABO for obstetrical or traumatic hemorrhage was performed. Cases were included if fetal/neonatal outcomes were reported. Data were collected on timing of balloon inflation (predelivery or postdelivery), fetal/neonatal mortality, and Apgar scores. Secondary maternal outcomes included blood loss, need for hysterectomy, ABO-related complications, and mortality. Twenty-one reports of ABO in 825 cases of obstetrical hemorrhage were reviewed (nine case reports/series and twelve comparative studies). 13.5% (111/825) had aortic occlusion prior to delivery of the fetus. Comparative cohorts included 448 patients who underwent iliac artery balloon occlusion (n = 219) or no vascular balloon occlusion (n = 229). The most common neonatal outcome reported was Apgar scores, with no difference in fetal/neonatal outcomes between ABO and non-ABO patients in any study. One neonatal mortality occurred in the sole reported case of ABO use in a pregnant trauma patient at 24 weeks gestation. One maternal mortality occurred because of aortic dissection. Five comparative studies reported significantly decreased blood loss in ABO patients compared to non-ABO patients, and four studies reported significantly lower rates of hysterectomy in ABO patients. ABO-related complications were reported in 1.6% of patients (13/825). Obstetrical hemorrhage is a devastating complication, and ABO may potentially decrease blood loss and reduce the hysterectomy rate without compromising fetal and neonatal outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the safety of predelivery aortic occlusion as this occurred in 14% of the cases.

Risk factor analysis of clinical outcomes of total aortic arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk with aortic balloon occlusion

BackgroundTotal aortic arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) requires hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) for 20 min, which increases the surgical risk. We invented an aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique that requires 5 min of HCA on average to perform TAR with FET and investigated the possible merit of this new method in this study.MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent TAR and FET (consisting of 130 cases of ABO group and 230 cases of conventional group) in Fuwai Hospital between August 2017 and February 2019. In addition to the postoperative complications, the alterations of blood routine tests, alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) during in-hospital stay were also recorded.ResultsThe 30-day mortality rates were similar between ABO group (4.6%) and conventional group (7.8%, P = 0.241). Multivariate analysis showed ABO reduced postoperative acute kidney injury (23.1% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.013) and hepatic injury (12.3% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.001), and maintained similar cost to patients (25.5 vs. 24.9 kUSD, P = 0.298). We also found that AST was high during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and recovered to normal before discharge, while ALT was not as high as AST in ICU but showed a rising tendency before discharge. The platelet count showed a rising tendency on postoperative day 3 and may exceed the preoperative value before discharge.ConclusionsThe ABO achieved the surgical goal of TAR with FET with an improved recovery process during the in-hospital stay.

The prevention and management of approach-specific complications of abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in pelvic and sacral surgery

Objective: To investigate the causes,prevention and treatment of femoral artery puncture related complications caused by the application of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the resection of pelvic and sacral tumors. Methods: Clinical data of 23 patients with femoral artery puncture related complications who received REBOA in the resection of pelvic and sacral tumors from August 2010 to August 2018 at the Musculoskeletal Tumor Center,Peking University People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.There were 8 males and 15 females,with the an age of (37.0±16.2) years (range:15 to 65 years).Arterial access via the Seldinger technique for REBOA was obtained in the right common femoral artery of 18 cases,and in the left of 6 cases.An arterial sheath with a diameter of 11 to 12 F(1 F≈0.33 mm) was used for the patient.The occurrence and treatment of postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Acute femoral arterial thrombosis occurred in 18 patients,which was managed by open repair 48 hours postoperatively.Among the 349 patients admitted before 2015 who received hemostasis by compression after femoral artery sheath removal,12 patients (3.4%) developed acute femoral artery thrombosis.While the 476 patients admitted after 2015 who used a vascular stapler to close the femoral artery wound,6 patients (1.3%) developed acute femoral artery thrombosis.One case of retroperitoneal hematoma and 1 case of femoral pseudoaneurysm were found and surgically fixed.Postoperative follow-up was (40±18) months (range:13 to 108 months).Three cases with chronic lower extremity ischemia were confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography during 1 to 5 years follow-up.Two of them had minimal symptoms and denied further treatment,while the other one received femoral-femoral artery bypass surgery to restore distal flow for pain and numbness relief. Conclusions: Acute femoral arterial thrombosis was the most common femoral artery puncture.Technique refinement of REBOA,the use of percutaneous suture device and close follow-up can reduce the approach-specific complications,and help to detect and treat the complications timely,which may popularize the clinical application of REBOA.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of aorta (REBOA): expanding the window of survival in massive bleeding

Exsanguinating hemorrhage is responsible for 30 to 40% of early deaths from trauma and most of these deaths occur within the first few hours of injury 1. A study by A. Alarhyem et al. in 2016 revealed a precipitous rise in trauma deaths in victims with high grade injuries with pre-hospital time

Clinical Effect of Abdominal Aortic Balloon Occlusion Combined with Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Dangerous Placenta Previa

Clinical Effect of Abdominal Aortic Balloon Occlusion Combined with Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Dangerous Placenta Previa

Aortic balloon for the intra-operative management of placenta accreta spectrum: need for standardised methodology and safety data.

In 2003, Bell-Thomas et al (BJOG 2003;110:1120-1122) reported on the emergency use of a transfemoralaorticocclusion catheter to control massive haemorrhage in a case of caesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta. This was only the second case published in the international literature on the use of an intra-abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) in the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (Paull et al. Anesth Intensive Care 1995;23:731-734).

Improvement of Clinical Outcomes of Total Aortic Arch Replacement and Frozen Elephant Trunk Surgery With Aortic Balloon Occlusion.

Background: Total aortic arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) surgery provides improved long-term results, but the surgery itself is associated with higher risks compared with isolated proximal reconstructions. We applied an aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) technique to reduce the circulatory arrest (CA) time and improve other clinical outcomes.Methods: All patients who underwent TAR with FET surgery (130 with ABO technique, 230 with the conventional approach) in Fuwai Hospital from August 2017 to February 2019 were reviewed in this retrospective observational cohort study. Intra- and early-postoperative results and clinical characteristics were analyzed.Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching (130 cases in each group), the 30-day mortality of the ABO group and the conventional group were 4.6% and 10.8% (p = 0.063), respectively. Although the reduction in complications was not statistically significant, the complication rate in the ABO group was relatively low, having fewer cases of postoperative renal (23.1 vs. 38.5%, p = 0.007) and hepatic (12.3 vs. 30.0%, p < 0.001) injury, lower postoperative wake-up time (15.2 ± 23.6 h vs. 20.1 ± 26.5 h, respectively, p < 0.001), reduced chest tube output (176.03 ± 143.73 ml vs. 213.29 ± 130.12 ml, respectively, p = 0.003), lower red blood cell transfusion volume (4.98 ± 6.53 u vs. 7.28 ± 10.41 u, respectively, p = 0.008), and no fatal events.Conclusions: The ABO technique is a simple method that can reduce the CA time and improve the recovery stage following TAR with FET surgery. The technique represents a practical strategy to treat patients with high operative risks due to its lower complication rate compared with the conventional approach.

Risk Factors for Abdominal Compartment Syndrome After Endovascular Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Control Study

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) increasingly often. Despite rEVAR being a minimally invasive method, abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) remains a significant post-operative threat. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for ACS after rEVAR, including aortic morphological features. The Swedish vascular registry (Swedvasc) was assessed for ACS after rEVAR in the period 2008 - 2015. All patients identified were compared with controls (i.e., patients who did not develop ACS after rEVAR), matched by centre and repair date. Case records were reviewed, and radiology images analysed in a core laboratory. Comparisons were performed with respect to physiological and radiological risk factors. The study population consisted of 40 patients with ACS and 68 controls. Pre-operatively, patients with ACS had a lower blood pressure (BP) than controls (median 70 mmHg vs. 97 mmHg; p < .001). Intra-operatively, they had aortic balloon occlusion more often (55.0% vs. 10.3%; p < .001) and received more transfusions than controls (median nine units of packed red blood cells [pRBC] vs. two units; p < .001). Ninety-seven per cent of those who developed ACS had a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, aortic balloon occlusion, or received more than five pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the instructions for use did not differ between patients and controls (57.5% vs. 54.4%; p= .84), and neither did the pre-operative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (57.1% vs. 63.9%; p= .52) nor the number of visible lumbar arteries on pre-operative imaging (2 vs. 4; p= .014). In multivariable logistic regression, the number of intra-operative transfusions were predictive of ACS (p < .001), while pre-operative hypotension (p= .32) and aortic balloon occlusion (p= .018) were not. ACS after rEVAR is mainly associated with physiological factors and is unlikely to develop without the presence of a pre-operative BP < 70 mmHg, the need for an aortic occlusion balloon, or more than five intra-operative pRBC unit transfusions. Treatment outside the IFU or any other morphological factor were not associated with a risk of ACS.

The Efficacy and Postoperative Follow-Up of Different Interventional Methods in Cesarean Section for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and postoperative recovery between uterine artery embolization (UAE) and infrarenal aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) in planned cesarean sections for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Material/MethodsA retrospective analysis using the clinical data of 62 patients with placenta previa combined with placenta accreta for planned cesarean between January 2014 and December 2019 was performed at the First People’s Hospital in Lianyungang. Thirty-five cases undergoing UAE during cesarean section were defined as group A, while the other 27 cases undergoing IABO were defined as group B. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters including intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, radiation duration, radiation dose, hysterectomy rate, operation duration, Intensive Care Unit hospitalization, complications, and neonatal outcomes as well as the maternal recovery during follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsIntraoperative blood loss, transfusion volume, radiation time, radiation dose, hysterectomy rate, duration of surgery, Intensive Care Unit admission, and complications were higher in group A than group B, with differences being statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in birth weight, 1-min Apgar score, neonatal asphyxia rate, admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, breastfeeding time, duration of postpartum lochia, and data related to menstruation between the 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsIABO, which was more effective than UAE in cesarean section of patients with placenta accreta spectrum, could be further applied in treatment.

Early-to-midterm outcomes of aortic balloon occlusion technique versus hybrid procedure for aortic arch diseases.

The goal of this study was to compare the early-to-midterm outcomes of patients treated with the frozen elephant trunk procedure with aortic balloon occlusion (FET-ABO) versus hybrid repair for aortic arch diseases. Patients who underwent the FET-ABO (n = 134) and the hybrid procedure (n = 220) from 2017 to 2020 at our institution were analysed retrospectively. Early-to-midterm outcomes were compared using inverse probability weighting. Low-risk and high-risk subgroup analyses were performed according to the cut-off of the additive European System for Cardiac Operative Evaluation value of 6. The present study demonstrated similar 30-day mortality (3.7% vs 8.6%; P = 0.118) and adverse events between the FET-ABO and the hybrid groups. Fewer intraoperative red blood cell transfusions (0.54 ± 1.45 vs 1.26 ± 2.47 U; P = 0.001), decreased total hospital costs (P < 0.001) and considerable early-to-midterm survival [crude: hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.91; P = 0.030; adjusted: HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.91; P = 0.032) were obtained with the FET-ABO compared to the hybrid procedure. The inverse probability weighting method substantiated the foregoing results. Adjusted subgroup analyses suggested that the FET-ABO procedure had a trend towards improved survival in low-risk patients (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.93; P = 0.041) and achieved outcomes comparable to those of the hybrid procedure in high-risk patients (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.15-1.42; P = 0.176). The FET-ABO technique could be better promoted in hospitals lacking experience and equipment and could be more viable and cost-effective for selected patients compared with the hybrid procedure.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Blood Control in Lumbar Spine Tumor Resection Surgery: A Technical Note.

ObjectivesTo describe the technique of the aorta balloon occlusion, and evaluate the blood loss in lumbar spine tumor surgery assisted by aortic balloon occlusion, and to observe the balloon‐related complications.MethodsSix patients with lumbar spine tumor underwent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta prior to tumor resections in our institution between May 2018 to January 2021. Medical records including demographic, diagnosis, tumor location, surgical approach, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and perioperative balloon‐related complication were evaluated retrospectively.ResultsThis series included four males and two females, with a median age of 50 years (range 22 to 69). Of these, three primary tumors were plasmacytoma, giant cell tumor of bone, and osteosarcoma, while recurrence of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone (GCT), and metastatic thyroid cancer were diagnosed in cases 1, 6, and 2, respectively. L2 was involved in cases 1 and 5. L3 was involved in case 6. L4 was involved in case 2, 3, and 6. L5 was involved in case 4. One‐stage total en bloc resection surgery (TES) was accomplished in all patients; of this series, signal anterior approach was conducted in case 1, signal posterior approach was utilized in cases 2, 3, and 6, while combined anterior and posterior approach was performed in cases 4 and 5. The median intraoperative blood loss was 1683 mL and ranged from 400 to 3200 mL with a median surgical duration of 442 min and a range from 210 to 810 min. During the perioperative period, no serious balloon‐related complications occurred.ConclusionsEndovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta successfully controls intraoperative exsanguination, contributing to a more radical tumor resection and a low rate of tumor cell contamination in lumbar tumor surgery.

914 A Comparison of Mortality, Indicators of Treatment Success and Complications of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Introduction This study aims to provide an updated review on in-hospital mortality rates in patients who underwent Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta (REBOA) versus Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) or standard care without REBOA, to identify potential indicators of REBOA use and complications. Method Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines were used to perform the study. A literature search was done from 01 January 2005 to 30 June 2020 using EMBASE, MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model and the DerSimonian and Laird estimation method. Results 25 studies were included in this study. The odds of in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent REBOA compared to RT was 0.18 (p &amp;lt; 0.01). The odds of in-hospital survival of patients who underwent REBOA compared to non-REBOA was 1.28 (p = 0.62). There was a significant difference found between survivors and non-survivors in terms of their pre-REBOA systolic blood pressure (SBP) (19.26 mmHg, p &amp;lt; 0.01), post-REBOA SBP (20.73 mmHg, p &amp;lt; 0.01), duration of aortic occlusion (-40.57 mins, p &amp;lt; 0.01) and ISS (-8.50, p &amp;lt; 0.01). Common complications of REBOA included acute kidney injury, multi-organ dysfunction and thrombosis. Conclusions Our study demonstrated lower in-hospital mortality of REBOA versus RT. Prospective multi-centre studies are needed for further evaluation of the indications, feasibility, and complications of REBOA.