Balloon Expulsion Test Research Articles

Defining normal pouch function in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a pilot study.

Most patients experience good functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. We aimed to determine if asymptomatic patients with an IPAA had findings consistent with normal defecation on standard objective anorectal tests. Patients 18-65years old with IPAA and self-reported healthy pouch function were recruited. Patients with chronic pouchitis, Crohn's disease, anastomotic stricture, or indication for IPAA other than ulcerative or indeterminate colitis were excluded. Patients underwent an interview with an abbreviated Rome Questionnaire followed by high-resolution ano-pouch manometry, balloon expulsion test, pouch barostat, and magnetic resonance (MR) defecography. Twenty patients completed all testing. Six patients were excluded from the final analysis due to symptoms suggestive of pouch evacuation disorder on the abbreviated Rome Questionnaire (n=2), structural abnormality on MR imaging (n=3), or both (n=1). Of the remaining 14 patients, mean anal resting pressure during high-resolution manometry was 72±16mmHg, mean anal squeeze pressure was 247±69mmHg, and mean pouch-anal gradient during the simulated evacuation was -27±37mmHg. The meantime to balloon expulsion was 54seconds. During dynamic MR defecography, the mean descent of ano-pouch junction was 2.6cm, and mean pouch evacuation was 44.5% and 74.2% pre- and posttoilet phase, respectively. A substantial proportion of patients with IPAA and self-reported healthy pouch function have anatomic and/or functional abnormalities of the pouch. In asymptomatic IPAA patients with an anatomically normal pouch, we have proposed normal parameters for high-resolution ano-pouch manometry, time to balloon expulsion, pouch barostat, and MR defecography.

Retrospective evaluation of operator bias in the performance of high-resolution anorectal manometry.

Measurements obtained during high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRM) are subject to operator-patient interactions. For example, standardized enhanced instruction delivered by a single operator in a test-retest fashion did not consistently increase pressures generated during dynamic maneuvers. It is probable that factors other than verbal instruction effect communication during the procedure. To investigate this hypothesis, we retrospectively examined inter-operator variance in HRM results. The electronic health records at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, were used to identify patients who had undergone HRM in 2019 and 2020. The analysis focused on constipated patients. The instructions given to the patients they had examined, and the pressure measurements obtained during HRM, by 6 different nurse operators were compared. When performing HRM on their individual patients (range 126-673), the 6 nurses used similar instructions for each of the maneuvers and sensory testing thresholds. The proportion of patients with prolonged balloon expulsion tests and the rectal sensory thresholds were similar among operators. Significant variance was seen in the mean rectoanal pressures at rest, during squeeze, and during dynamic maneuvers. The proportion of patients with manometry results suggestive of a defecatory disorder differed between operators by 18% and 28% in women <50 and >50years old, respectively. Operators obtain significantly different results during HRM despite using similar instructions to patients. Substantial differences in the proportion of patients with manometry findings suggestive of a defecatory disorder among operators may have a significant impact on the diagnoses and therapies offered to constipated patients.

Diagnostic Strategy and Tools for Identifying Defecatory Disorders.

This article reviews the indications, techniques, interpretation, strengths, and weaknesses of tests (anal manometry, anal surface electromyography, rectal balloon expulsion test, barium and MRI defecography, assessment of rectal compliance and sensation, and colonic transit) that are used diagnose defecatory disorders in constipated patients. The selection of tests and the sequence in which they are performed should be individualized to and interpreted in the context of the clinical features. Because anorectal functions are affected by age, results should be interpreted with reference to age- and sex-matched normal values for the same technique.

Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test.

Anorectal manometry (ARM) comprehensively assesses anorectal sensorimotor functions. This review examines the indications, techniques, interpretation, strengths, and weaknesses of high-resolution ARM (HR-ARM), 3-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-HR-ARM), and portable ARM, and other assessments (i.e., rectal sensation and rectal balloon expulsion test) that are performed alongside manometry. It is based on a literature search of articles related to ARM in adults. HR-ARM and 3D-HR-ARM are useful for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD), to identify anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction and guide management in patients with fecal incontinence (FI), constipation, megacolon, and megarectum; and to screen for anorectal structural (e.g., rectal intussusception) abnormalities. The rectal balloon expulsion test is a useful, low-cost, radiation-free, outpatient assessment tool for impaired evacuation that is performed and interpreted in conjunction with ARM. The anorectal function tests should be interpreted with reference to age- and sex-matched normal values, clinical features, and results of other tests. A larger database of technique-specific normal values and newer paradigms of analyzing anorectal pressure profiles will increase the precision and diagnostic utility of HR-ARM for identifying abnormal mechanisms of defecation and continence.

Clinical value of positive BET and pelvic floor dyssynergia in Chinese patients with functional defecation disorder

Background Functional defecation disorder (FDD) is a common subtype of functional constipation (FC). Balloon expulsion test (BET) and high resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) are significant tools but their results are not always consistent. Aims To investigate the characteristics of patients with positive BET and pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) and explore the value of both positive results in FDD diagnosis. Methods We retrospectively diagnosed FC subtypes and enrolled FDD patients based on Rome-IV criteria. They underwent HR-ARM, BET and CTT tests. Then they were classified to two groups and further stratified by FDD subtypes. Validated questionnaires were applied to investigate patients’ constipation, anxiety/depression and quality of life. Results 335 FDD patients were finally enrolled. They were classified into two groups according to whether BET and PFD were both positive (consistent or not). 84.48% showed consistent results. These patients had significantly higher anal residual pressure, lower anal relaxation rate, manometric defecation index (MDI) and a more negative rectoanal pressure gradient (RAPG) (Ps < .05). The specific distribution of FDD phenotypes in two groups showed significant difference (p = .021). Males suffered a more negative RAPG (p < .001) and age was correlated with anal relaxation rate (p < .001). A subset (177 individuals) was investigated with validated questionnaires. Scores for Defecation Symptoms, Physical Discomfort and GAD-7 score were significantly high in Consistent Group (Ps < .05). GAD-7 score was associated with Defecation Symptoms (p < .001) while anal residual pressure, GAD-7 and Defecation Symptoms score were linked to Physical Discomfort (Ps < .05). The diagnostic specificity and PPV for FDD rose significantly with positive BET and PFD. Conclusion FDD patients with positive BET and PFD suffered from severe defecation symptoms, anxiety and impaired QOL. Positive BET and PFD could be an ideal tool for screening FDD.

Innovative Balloon Expulsion Testing for Defecation Disorders: Look Before Leaping the Old Path.

Bellini, Massimo MD1; Lambiase, Christian MD1; Chiarioni, Giuseppe MD2,3 Author Information

Can a Defecation Posture Modifying Device Correct an Abnormal Balloon Expulsion Test in Chronically Constipated Patients?

Evacuation disorders are common among chronically constipated (CC) patients who fail to respond to laxatives and are typically diagnosed by anorectal manometry (ARM) and/or balloon expulsion testing (BET).1,2 Recently, there has been emerging interest in the use of defecation posture-modifying devices (DPMDs) to improve constipation symptoms, presumably by replicating the physiologic benefits of squatting on stool evacuation, such as straightening of the anorectal angle and relaxing the pelvic floor. However, the ability of DPMDs to normalize anorectal function in adult patients with CC has not been studied.

Anorectal Manometry Profile among Patients with Chronic Constipation and Faecal Incontinence in Western India: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: About 50% of patients referred to tertiary care centre for constipation in the western countries have faecal evacuation disorder. A diagnosis of faecal evacuation disorder requires specialised investigations such as anorectal manometry. Anorectal manometry is a method to measure pressure exerted by the muscles in anus and rectum. Aim: To evaluate the characteristics of anorectal pressure in a cohort of western Indian patients with chronic constipation and faecal incontinence. Also, to evaluate the types of faecal evacuation disorders in patients with chronic constipation. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2022 at Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical College and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Total of 115 patients presented with chronic constipation and faecal incontinence, were included in the study. Sigmoidoscopy or full-length colonoscopy, Balloon Expulsion Test (BET) and anorectal manometry test were done in all the patients. Mean resting and squeeze pressure were measured by anorectal manometry. Continuous variables were summarised using means and standard deviations for normally distributed data. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Results: Among 115, 62 were (53.9%) males and 53 (46.1%) females with mean age 51.9±16.2 years. In High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (HRAM), the mean resting anal pressure was 67.2±34.24 mmHg (range 14-183 mmHg) and mean squeeze pressure was 113.4±60.9 mmHg (range 30-290 mmHg). In present study type I dyssynergic defecations was most common with 20 (17.4%) patients. Conclusion: The present study showed that almost half of the patients had defecation disorders and type I dyssynergic defecations was most common, followed by type IV

Magnetic resonance defecography findings of dyssynergic defecation.

Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is defined as paradoxical contraction or inadequate relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles during defecation, which causes functional constipation. Along with the anal manometry and balloon expulsion tests, magnetic resonance (MR) defecography is widely used to diagnose or rule out pelvic dyssynergia. Besides the functional abnormality, structural pathologies like rectocele, rectal intussusception, or rectal prolapse accompanying DD can also be well demonstrated by MR defecography. This examination can be an uncomfortable experience for the patient, so the imaging method and the importance of patient cooperation must be explained in detail. The defecatory phase of the examination is indispensable for evaluation, and inadequate effort should be ruled out before diagnosing DD. MR defecography provides important data for the diagnosis of DD, but optimal imaging criteria should be applied. Further tests can be suggested if patient co-operation is not sufficient or MR defecography findings are irrelevant.

Rectal Evacuation Disorders in Patients Presenting With Chronic Functional Diarrhea.

Defecatory disorders include a spectrum of conditions that manifest as spastic rectal evacuation disorders or flaccid disorders causing obstructed defecation.1 Functional defecation disorders are usually evidenced by 2 of the following 3 tests documenting impaired evacuation: abnormal balloon expulsion test, abnormal anorectal evacuation pattern with manometry, or impaired rectal evacuation by imaging. Descending perineal syndrome is defined by at least 4-cm caudal movement of the anorectum upon defecation with a failure of rectoanal angle opening, outlet obstruction, and incomplete defecation.

Evaluation of Anorectal Function in Perianal Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study.

Background: Perianal Crohn’s disease is a disabling condition, with little known about anorectal function in healed/inactive perianal Crohn’s disease; Aim: To evaluate anorectal function in a cohort of patients with treated/healed perianal Crohn’s disease; Methods: Prospective cohort study, including high-resolution anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and 3D-endoanal ultrasound in all patients; Results: Of the 16 patients studied (mean age ± SD, 42 ± 13 years), 12 (75%) were men. A laceration of the internal anal sphincter and/or anal scarring was seen in nine (56%) patients; there was no laceration of the external anal sphincter. Five (56%) of these nine patients had never experienced faecal incontinence. All had normal anal resting and squeeze pressures. Manometry suggested dyssynergia in 11 (69%) patients, with only one (6%) fulfilling the criteria for obstructed defecation. Hyposensitivity for at least one sensory parameter was seen in 11 (69%) patients and hypersensitivity in five (31%) patients; Conclusions: This study detected sphincter abnormalities in more than half of patients, many of whom were asymptomatic. Alterations in rectal sensation were frequently seen, more commonly with rectal hyposensitivity. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03819257).

Development of a Simple, Point-of-Care Device to Test Anorectal Function in Patients with Constipation: Randomized Clinical Trial

Functional constipation (FC) is one of the most frequently encountered gastrointestinal conditions in practice.1 Practice guidelines universally recommend that patients with typical constipation symptoms and no alarm features be treated empirically with dietary/lifestyle interventions and laxative therapy.2,3 Unfortunately, by the time a patient reaches a gastroenterologist, these treatments frequently have already been tried. Anorectal function testing (anorectal manometry [ARM] and balloon expulsion test [BET]) is the next best step in management guidelines in this all-too-common scenario, because treatment can then be targeted toward pelvic floor dysfunction or colon transit abnormalities. Unfortunately, more than 95% of patients continue to take only over-the-counter laxatives and receive empirical dietary advice, whereas fewer than 2% undergo physiologic evaluation to ascertain the cause of their symptoms.4 Indeed, more than 90% of patients desire more effective treatment options. These observations call into question the wisdom of a management strategy that fails to recognize the intrinsic diversity of the constipation universe and reinforces the misguided "one size fits all" empirical treatment strategy.

P024 Anorectal Manometry in Patients with Fecal Incontinence After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study.

Fecal incontinence (FI) affects up to 1 in 4 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and is associated with inflammation, surgeries, and altered rectal sensitivity. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a surgical intervention for select IBD patients to avoid a permanent stoma. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) studies in IBD patients with FI demonstrate lower resting pressures and rectal sensory dysfunction. However, HRAM data in IBD patients with FI post-IPAA remains limited. We hypothesized patients with FI would have lower resting and squeeze pressures and rectal hypersensitivity compared to healthy controls and that these changes would be similar after IPAA. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on patients undergoing HRAM from 2017-2021 at a single urban academic medical center. Patient characteristics (age, gender, BMI, stool frequency, diabetes, pregnancy history) and surgical history (prior perianal surgery, index vs. re-do IPAA) were obtained. HRAM variables included rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), sphincter length, resting, squeeze, cough, and push pressures, sensation thresholds (first sensation, constant sensation, desire to defecate, urgency to defecate, max tolerable volume), and balloon expulsion test (BET). HRAM outcomes in IPAA patients with FI (IPAA-FI) were compared to non-IBD patients with FI (non-IBD-FI). HRAM data for both patient cohorts were also compared to existing normative data of healthy controls. Non-IBD patients with constipation and FI were excluded from analysis. An independent samples t-test was performed (p < 0.05) for continuous variables, and chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Fifty-six patients (66% female) were in the non-IBD-FI group. Eighteen patients (67% female) were in the IPAA-FI group. Average age in the IPAA-FI cohort was 44.8 ± 13.6 vs. 66.3 ± 14.4 in the non-IBD-FI group (p< 0.01). Sphincter length in the IPAA-FI group was 2.7 ± 1.1cm vs. 3.2 ± 0.6cm in the non-IBD-FI group (p=0.03). There was no significant difference in sensation thresholds or resting, squeeze, cough, and push pressures between the two groups. Urinary incontinence was observed in 5.6% of IPAA-FI patients vs. 44.6% of non-IBD-FI patients (p < 0.01). RAIR was present in 38.5% of IPAA-FI patients vs. 100% of non-IBD-FI patients (p < 0.01). Both patient cohorts had significantly shorter sphincter length, lower squeeze and push pressures, and lower sensation thresholds compared to normative data. Resting pressures for the IPAA-FI group was not significantly different compared to healthy controls. Overall, anorectal pressures and sensation are similar between IPAA-FI and non-IBD-FI patients. However, the underlying FI mechanism seems to differ. Higher rates of urinary incontinence in the non-IBD-FI cohort suggests global pelvic floor dysfunction compared to IPAA-FI patients who are younger and have post-operative neuromuscular dysfunction, as evidenced by shorter sphincter length and absent RAIR. Though rectal hypersensitivity and lower squeeze/push pressures are observed in both patient groups compared to healthy controls, normal resting pressure in IPAA-FI suggests that potentially different normative ranges are needed for this cohort to accurately assess post-surgical changes and guide pre-operative counseling.

A novel wireless, smartphone-based biofeedback training device for functional defecatory disorders: a pilot study.

Functional defecatory disorders (FDDs) are highly prevalent around the world. Biofeedback is an effective treatment for FDDs. Traditionally, this treatment is performed by clinicians in a limited number of hospitals because of procedure-related expenses and a need for a dedicated procedure room. To make the biofeedback therapy more widely available, we have designed a novel wireless, smartphone-based biofeedback device, with the ultimate goal of performing the therapy at home. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether the developed device can be employed to treat patients with FDDs in a clinical setting, prior to employing it in a home setting. From March 2018 to July 2018, we performed the biofeedback therapy using the newly developed wireless, smartphone-based device in patients with FDDs 30min daily during weekdays for 2weeks. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for bowel satisfaction, Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM), Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL), and a balloon expulsion test were assessed at baseline and after the therapy. Thirteen patients were recruited and ten of them (mean age 70.3 ± 8.9years, female:male ratio: 3:7) completed the study. Spontaneous bowel movements, complete spontaneous bowel movements, and VAS were all significantly increased after the therapy compared with baseline, respectively (6.5 ± 4.3 vs. 1.5 ± 2.2, p = 0.006; 3.1 ± 2.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.002; 49.5 ± 31.0 vs. 12.0 ± 9.2, p = 0.003). There was a significant decrease in the PAC-SYM and PAC-QoL after the biofeedback therapy (0.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, p = 0.001; 0.7 ± 0. 6 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4, p = 0.001). The therapy reduced the balloon expulsion time significantly (83.9 ± 68.8s vs. 160.0 ± 36.7s, p = 0.002). No obvious adverse events related to the procedure itself occurred. Biofeedback training using the newly developed wireless, smartphone-based device is feasible in the clinic setting, and it seems to be a promising method for improving constipation and related symptoms in patients with FDDs. These findings could be used to develop a much-needed, home-based, suitably powered, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Justification of the diagnostic algorithm and treatment strategies in patients with severe chronic slow-transit constipation

Surgical treatment of patients with chronic slow-transit constipation leads to unsatisfactory results in almost a third of cases. It appears relevant to the search for the causes of unsatisfactory results of surgical interventions in such patients and the need to develop a rational diagnostic algorithm; its implementation will allow us to determine the indications for surgical treatment and justify the volume of colon resection. For this purpose, the results of the examination and treatment of 53 patients with constipation were analyzed. The median disease duration was 15 years, and the median duration of constipation was 6.2 1.6 days. Patients were divided into a group with a positive effect of conservative treatment and a group without the expected effect. The symptoms, results of laboratory tests of blood and feces, and instrumental studies of the colon were analyzed. A balloon expulsion test was used to exclude proctogenic constipation. The evacuation function of the colon was studied by X-ray examination, while the transit time of barium sulfate or X-ray contrast markers through the gastrointestinal tract was estimated. Twenty-four patients underwent surgery for chronic slow-transit constipation, while the sigmoid colon was removed in one patient, including 7-left-sided hemicolectomy and 16-subtotal resection of the colon. Long-term results were examined in the period from 3 to 6 months after surgery. In the total examination of the semiotics of chronic slow-transit constipation, the results did not show significant differences between the groups of patients and did not allow us to justify the stratification into severe and non-severe disease course by its specific symptoms. The use of X-ray contrast markers for the assessment of the state of the evacuation function of the colon makes it possible to quantify the severity of various motor disorders and justify the choice of the volume of its resection. The analysis of the long-term results of the treatment of patients with chronic slow-transit constipation allows us to conclude that segmental resections of the colon (left-sided hemicolectomy, resection of the sigmoid colon) have a good therapeutic effect if the preoperative examination revealed a segmental type of failure of the evacuation function of the colon, and subtotal resection of the colon is appropriate for the common type. The absence of negative results of surgical treatment of patients with chronic slow-transit constipation, in which the formation of a colonic anastomosis was performed with a short stump of the sigmoid colon, indicates the possibility of using this option to complete the surgical intervention.

An exploring study of defecography, digital rectal examination, and balloon expulsion test for screening and predicting of symptoms with defecation disorders

An exploring study of defecography, digital rectal examination, and balloon expulsion test for screening and predicting of symptoms with defecation disorders

Diagnosis of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Choice of Treatment Regimen in Constipation Patients

Aim. A practical review of functional gastrointestinal disorder diagnosis in constipation patients and the rationale for opting treatment.Key points. Functional constipation commonly afflicts different ages and negatively impacts the quality of life. The current diagnostic algorithm in chronic constipation includes the disease identification according to Rome Criteria IV, red-flag symptom detection and instrumental laboratory examination. Functional constipation is notably often associated with anorectal abnormalities that bear a diagnostic value to elaborate an apt treatment strategy. Anorectal manometry, rectal sensation and balloon expulsion tests are the well-studied and significant probing techniques for objective anorectal zone sensorimotor function assessment in patients with functional constipation. The article reviews modern diagnostic methods in functional defecation disorders.Conclusion. The examination and treatment algorithms presented will help improve diagnosis and apply the most suitable management in a constipation-associated functional digestive pathology.

Investigations of Anorectal Function

Investigations of Anorectal Function Abstract. Investigations of anorectal function allows measurement of anal sphincter pressure, evaluation of rectal sensitivity and verification of rectoanal reflexes, which are essential elements in the assessment of bowel emptying. It is combined with a balloon expulsion test to ensure that the manometric findings are consistent with anorectal function. These tests are used in the diagnostic work-up of chronic defecation disorders, constipation and faecal incontinence, but can also provide clarification in the pre- and post-operative setting, for functional anorectal pain and other disorders of pelvic floor function. Most patients referred for investigation of these symptoms require a comprehensive assessment of anorectal structure and function. Because of the high variability of normal values and complexity of anorectal function, no single examination provides all the information needed to make a symptom-explaining, conclusive diagnosis and influence treatment decisions. Anorectal manometry is useful to assess the extent of impairment of anorectal function and to differentiate between organic and functional disorders (including pelvic floor dyssynergia). A preceding detailed anamnesis as well as endoscopic (procto / rectoscopy) and imaging procedures (anorectal endosonography, dynamic MR defecography) complete the diagnostic investigation instead.

Diagnostics of functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with constipation

The purpose of the review is to acquaint general practitioners, therapists, gastroenterologists with the possibilities of diagnosing functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract associated with constipation, as well as to draw attention to the need for additional examination methods for a comprehensive assessment of functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract in patients with constipation on pathogenesis.Functional constipation is an urgent problem today due to its prevalence among different age groups, a negative impact on the quality of life, as well as the variability of the clinical forms of diseases associated with this symptom. The modern diagnostic algorithm for chronic constipation consists of several stages, including the identification of signs of the disease, according to the Rome criteria of the IV revision (2016), the identification of symptoms of “red flags” and laboratory and instrumental research. It should be borne in mind that functional constipation is often based on the pathology of the anorectal zone, which is an important factor in the diagnosis and development of further therapeutic strategies. The article provides an overview of modern and promising methods for diagnosing functional disorders of defecation, taking into account functional disorders of the anorectal zone associated with constipation.Functional methods such as anorectal manometry, rectal sensory test and balloon expulsion test are the most studied and obligatory tests for an objective assessment of the sensorimotor function of the anorectal zone. In Russia, these methods are used very little, which requires extensive familiarization of practitioners with the advantages of these techniques. Knowledge and application of the presented examination algorithms will help the clinician to increase the overall diagnostic efficiency and apply the most justified tactics of managing patients with functional pathology of the digestive system associated with constipation.

Pelvic floor biofeedback is an effective treatment for severe bloating in disorders of gut-brain interaction with outlet dysfunction.

The pathophysiology of bloating is partially understood. We investigated in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) the relationship between severity of bloating, abdominal girth changes and defecation pattern, and the efficacy of pelvic floor biofeedback treatment on bloating. Disorders of gut-brain interaction patients with severe bloating as the main complaint were prescribed 2 weeks dietary advice and underwent abdominal girth measurements. At the first visit, all patients underwent a questionnaire on the subjective improvement of bloating, a (0-100) VAS abdominal bloating, and abdominal girth measurement. Patients reporting inadequate bloating relief underwent a standardized balloon expulsion test. Furthermore, they were invited to undergo pelvic floor electromyography and biofeedback treatment previously used for constipation due to dyssynergic defecation. The primary outcome was bloating improvement on a 5-point Likert scale. The secondary outcomes were the effect of diet intervention and pelvic floor biofeedback treatment on bloating severity and quality of life changes as well as the effect of pelvic floor biofeedback treatment on BET and EMG on straining. One hundred and fifty six patients (129F, 39.3±11.7mean age) completed the 2-week run-in period. 105 patients were diet non-responder and underwent balloon expulsion test, with the vast majority (64%) failing the test. Patients who scored higher bloating on VAS had a significant association with failed balloon expulsion test (adjusted B 0.4 [95% CI 10.8-25.7], p<0.0001). 63% agreed to perform pelvic floor biofeedback treatment at Verona center, 54% became responders reporting fair or major improvement/cure (ITT analysis, McNemar test, p<0.0001), and all of them showed a 50% decrease in bloating severity. Disordered defecation is a prevalent etiology in DGBI patients with bloating unresponsive to conservative measures; pelvic floor biofeedback treatment to improve the defecation effort significantly relieved bloating (http://www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN17004079).