The objective of this study was to compare the performance between Viabahn (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) balloon-expandable stent (VBX) and self-expanding covered stents (SESs; Viabahn and Fluency [Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz]) used as bridging stents for directional branches during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair of complex aortic aneurysms. Patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (type I-IV) or pararenal aortic aneurysms unsuitable for either open repair or endovascular repair with commercially available devices were prospectively enrolled into a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial. Descriptive statistics of the cohort included demographics, risk factors, and anatomic and device characteristics. Individual branches were grouped as either VBX or SES and were analyzed for primary patency, branch-related type I or type III endoleaks, branch instability, branch-related secondary intervention, and branch-related aortic rupture or death. Categorical variables were expressed as total and percentage and continuous variables as median (interquartile range). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term result. Groups were compared with the log-rank test. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. During the period from July 2012 through April 2019, there were 263 patients treated for complex aortic aneurysm with fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair. The devices used were either a custom-manufactured device or off-the-shelf p-Branch or t-Branch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). The median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 66-79 years), 70% male, and 81% white. The most common cardiac risk factors were smoking (92%), hypertension (91%), hyperlipidemia (78%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52%). The total number of vessels incorporated to repair was 977, with branches representing 18.4% (179 branches). Among the 179 branches were 54 (30%) celiac artery, 56 (31%) superior mesenteric artery, 38 (21%) right renal artery, and 31 (18%) left renal artery. VBX and SES groups represented, respectively, 53% (n = 95) and 47% (n = 84) of the total (Fig).The overall cohort survival rate at 24 months was 78.5% ± 3%. There was no branch-related rupture or death. Primary patency at 24 months (VBX, 98.1%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .98), freedom from endoleak (VBX, 97.3%; SES, 98.6%; log-rank, P = .63), freedom from secondary intervention (VBX, 91.5%; SES, 95%; log-rank, P = .69), and freedom from branch instability (VBX, 95.5%; SES, 97.3%; log-rank, P = .72) were similar between groups (Fig 2). The initial experience with VBX stents demonstrated excellent primary patency and similarly low rates of branch-related complications and endoleaks, with no branch-related aortic rupture or death. Our results demonstrate that in high volume and experienced aortic center, the VBX stent is a safe and effective bridging stent option during branched endovascular aortic repair. Multicenter studies with longer follow-up are necessary to validate our initial results.Fig 2Freedom from branch instability (BI). CI, Confidence interval; SES, self-expanding covered stent; VBX, Viabahn balloon-expandable stent.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)
Read full abstract