Balloon-expandable Bioprosthesis Research Articles

Complete Crush of a Balloon-expandable Bioprosthesis After Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

We report on a case of an 88-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis. Concomitant morbidities consisted of severe atherosclerosis, a large thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, atrial fibrillation, malignancy of the rectum with termino-terminal descendorectostomy, chronic renal insufficiency, and adipositas (body mass index, 31.1). Due to the high surgical risk (EuroSCORE II, 12.3%), the patient was considered to be a good candidate for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In an interdisciplinary approach the patient underwent transapical TAVI (Edwards Sapien XT, 26 mm) due to anatomic reasons (horizontal aorta) in addition to a large thoracoabdominal aneurysm that was mostly covered by thrombus formation (Figure A, B). Due to the relevant comorbidities, we decided to embed the TAVI as part of a staged procedure treatment strategy. The procedure went exceptionally well with a wire position that was kept at all times out of the thoracic aneurysm and was followed by a benign postinterventional course. As a sign of …

Direct Transatrial Transcatheter SAPIEN Valve Implantation Through Right Minithoracotomy in a Degenerated Mitral Bioprosthetic Valve

Transcatheter valve implantation into failing surgical mitral bioprosthetic valves have been reported. This strategy avoids performing high-risk repeat cardiac surgery in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. All these patients have been treated by a transapical approach. We report a case of failing bioprosthetic mitral valve in an 82-year-old woman successfully treated with a 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN balloon expandable bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) with direct left atrial approach through a right anterior thoracotomy. Our experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of this approach. Therefore, mitral valve-in-surgical valve implantation may be a viable treatment alternative in carefully selected patients.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve-in-Valve Implantation for a Failed Xenograft

A 78-year-old gentleman with a diagnosis of symptomatic severe xenograft aortic stenosis with multiple comorbidities was referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, that is, a "valve-in-valve" procedure. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed by transapical approach using a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis. During valve deployment, the prosthesis moved toward the left ventricle and a second balloon-expandable valve was implanted within the first one-a "valve-in-valve-in-valve" to avoid further ventricular embolization of the first bioprosthesis. Echocardiography at hospital discharge showed a residual mean transvalvular gradient of 17 mm Hg and trivial paravalvular aortic regurgitation. At 1 year follow-up, the patient was in New York Heart Association functional class II.

TCT-137: Comparison of Balloon-expandable and Self-expandable Bioprosthesis for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

TCT-137: Comparison of Balloon-expandable and Self-expandable Bioprosthesis for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transatrial Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Implantation of Balloon Expandable Bioprosthesis

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation into failing mitral and aortic bioprosthetic valves have been reported. This strategy avoids performing high-risk repeat cardiac surgery in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation has not been described. We report a case of failing bioprosthetic tricuspid valve in a 48-year-old woman with carcinoid syndrome. We attempted a transatrial transcatheter approach and we successfully deployed a 26-mm Edwards Sapien balloon expandable bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) into a severely stenotic tricuspid bioprosthesis. This case demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of this approach. Therefore, tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation may be a viable treatment alternative in carefully selected patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high risk patients With severe aortic stenosis using the Edwards Sapien balloon‐expandable bioprosthesis: A single centre study with immediate and medium‐term outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TCAVI) is an emerging alternative therapy to open-heart surgery in high-risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Between January 2007 and May 2009, 46 patients underwent TCAVI with the 23 mm or 26 mm Edwards Sapien bioprosthesis via either the transapical (TA-AVI) or transfemoral (TF-AVI) approach. All patients had an estimated operative mortality risk of >15%. A total of 46 patients (30 TA-AVI, 16 TF-AVI) with a mean aortic valve area (AVA) of 0.63 +/- 0.2 cm(2) and mean gradient of 54 +/- 16 mm Hg were treated. Predicted operative mortality was 25.3% by logistic Euroscore and 8.7% by Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Procedural success was 93% in the TA-AVI group and 88% in the TF-AVI group. There was one intraprocedural death in the TA-AVI group. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.5% (2-TA-AVI, 1-TF-AVI). Four patients (9.5%) died from noncardiac causes after 30 days. Successful TCAVI was associated with a significant increase in AVA from 0.6 +/- 0.1 cm(2) to 1.6 +/- 0.6 cm(2) in the TA-AVI group and 0.6 +/- 0.1 cm(2) to 1.4 +/- 0.2 cm(2) in the TF-AVI group at a mean follow up of 7.4 +/- 4.4 and 8.3 +/- 5.0 months, respectively. At discharge, there was significant improvement in AVA (P < 0.0001), transaortic mean gradient (P < 0.0001), and mitral regurgitation (P = 0.01). At medium term follow up, the valve area was maintained and there was significant improvement in NYHA class in both groups (P < 0.0001). At medium term follow-up, both transcatheter approaches demonstrated good valve durability with no cardiac-related mortality post hospital discharge.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

There has been significant improvement in device designs, operative techniques, and early clinical outcomes in <5 years. Presently, there are two catheter-based bioprostheses (balloon expandable or self-expandable), which have been widely used in humans and are undergoing clinical investigations. Three approaches, including transvenous, transarterial, and transapical have been used for delivery of the catheter-based bioprostheses, and transarterial and transapical approaches have been adopted by cardiologists and cardiac surgeons worldwide. The most recent clinical results have been very encouraging and promising. With experience, 30-day operative mortality with either balloon-expandable or self-expandable bioprosthesis was reduced significantly to approximately 10% in high-risk patients. In vivo long-term durability of catheter-based bioprostheses remains unknown, and presently transcatheter procedure is limited to the cohort of high-risk patients. Expanding this new technology to low-risk patients should be done with extreme caution because conventional aortic valve replacement still provides the best long-term outcome with minimal operative mortality and morbidity in low-risk patients. Ongoing clinical trials will address many unanswered questions, such as patient selection, long-term in vivo durability, preoperative assessment, and the role of the procedures in management of valvular diseases.

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement in patients with challenging aortoiliofemoral access

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) offers considerable promise in treating high risk patients with aortic valve disease. Two devices are currently clinically available for transfemoral delivery: the Edwards-Sapien balloon-expandable bioprosthesis and the Corevalve self-expanding bioprosthesis, both of which require careful sizing of the peripheral vasculature. Through a case based discussion, we illustrate that these limits of PAVR technology can be stretched in cases of extraordinary clinical need. We demonstrate that, following a learning curve of "optimal cases," successful PAVR is also possible in diffusely diseased peripheries of borderline small size or with focal aortoiliofemoral disease amenable to a separate intervention beforehand.