The aim of this study was to measure the level of agreement of four portable football velocity and spin rate measurement systems (Jugs speed radar gun, 2-D high-speed video, TrackMan and adidas miCoach football) against a Vicon motion analysis system. One skilled male university football player performed 70 shots covering a wide range of ball velocities (12–30 m s−1) and spin rates (94–743 r/min). A Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess the level of agreement. For ball velocity, the 2-D high-speed video had the smallest systematic error, followed by the radar gun, TrackMan and miCoach football at 0.2, 0.4, 0.5 and 4.8 m s−1, respectively. A similar ranking was also observed for the random errors (95% confidence intervals: ±0.4, ±1.5, ±1.9 and ±6.0 m s−1). The first three systems all tracked ball velocity in >90% of shots, while the miCoach football tracked slightly fewer shots (79%). For spin rate, the miCoach football had a much smaller systematic error (4 vs 38 r/min) and random error (95% confidence intervals: ±24 vs ±355 r/min) compared to TrackMan. The miCoach also successfully tracked spin rate in more shots than the TrackMan (79% vs 44%). These results indicate that 2-D high-speed video would be the preferred option for the field assessment of ball velocity; however, radar gun and TrackMan may also be appropriate. A minimum of 10 frames of 2-D high-speed video, captured close to the ball starting position, was demonstrated to be sufficient in providing a reliable measure of ball velocity. The miCoach ball is the preferred option for field assessment of ball spin rate.
Read full abstract