I I94 Reviews an entire alternative lifestyle to the urban bourgeoisie. Builders' pattern books offered and realized arcadian dreams, and the spaces within the dacha's walls created sites for relations and recreations distinct from city life; leisure, consumption, and feminized space became the hallmarks-cliches even-of dacha life. Revolution marked a break in dacha history, but continuities were evident too. The old dachniki became victims of class war during the Revolution and Civil War. In the early years of Soviet power many settlements degenerated into shanty towns; given the desperate housing shortage dachniki were, more often than not, little more than suburban squatters who had lost out in the struggle to get a town apartment. Soon, however, themore comfortable buildings in the prime locations around Moscow and Leningrad were made available to favoured members of the regime: power and privi lege reasserted itself in terms of access to scarce resources, a process which gathered pace as the Stalin regime stabilized in the 'Great Retreat' of the mid-I 930s and the new vydvizhentsyi aspired to 'chintz and lace-curtain respectability'. Thereafter, as Lovell shows, dachas became an established part of life for the nomenklatura and, in the post-war years, the locus of a distinct intelligentsia subculture. The book con cludes with a short section on the post-Soviet context and the swamping of previous 'dacha cultures' by new social cohorts and new architectural styles. A small point: in the conclusion the author worries about how to characterize the classic dacha's social constituency. He identifies this constituency as 'urban nonproletarians'-an aspect of Russia's failed middle class-but finds ithard to locate any common identity within the group save their 'exurban habit' (p. 236). But the problem, it seems tome, can easily be solved. The people he is discussing are those who, in eighteenth-century Britain, would have been called the 'middling orders' and in the nineteenth century, perhaps more accurately, the professional middle classes. Harold Perkin delineated them in his seminal works The Origins ofModern Eng lish Society (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, I969) and The Rise of Professional Society (London: Macmillan, I989). As Lovell hints in the Introduction (pp. 2 4), dachniki comprised exactly that salaried group of professionals and hirelings doctors, lawyers, artists and designers, teachers, writers, engineers, and specialists of all kinds-characteristic of modernizing societies everywhere, but especially in coun tries, like Russia, where the state has played such a crucial role in determining the pace, scale, and direction of economic and social change. Summerfolk is a fascinating study, intelligently conceived and full of surprises and interesting byways. It is a joy to read, and will be of interest to specialists and non specialists alike. ROBINSONCOLLEGE,CAMBRIDGE CHRISTOPHER WARD Bakhtin: Ethics and Mechanics. Ed. by VALERIEZ. NOLLAN. Evanston, IL: North western University Press. 2004. xxxiii+95 pp. $79.95 (pbk $27.95). ISBN o 8IOI-I67I-5 (pbko-8IOI-I515-8). This slim volume consists of four essays and an extended introduction. Each es say, taken by itself, is of interest. Most contribute something to our understanding or evaluation of Bakhtin's own work aswell as to the texts towhich this is applied. David Krasner's 'Dialogics and Dialectics: Bakhtin, Young Hegelians, and Dramatic The ory' usefully draws a distinction between dialectics in the conception of Hegel himself (with its emphasis on synthesis) and that of the Young Hegelians (emphasizing the conflict of irreconcilable opposites), before exploring what Bakhtin holds in common with the latter (their rejection of transcendental aesthetics), and where his dialogics differs from their dialectics (polyphony rather than necessary conflict). Two plays by MLR, IOI .4, 2oo6 I I95 contemporary black writers are then read as paradigm texts forYoung Hegelian and Bakhtinian aesthetics. Jacqueline Zubeck's 'Bakhtin's Ethics and an Iconographic Standard in Crime and Punishment' interprets Dostoevsky's hero Raskolnikov as the embodiment of the unethical subject of Bakhtin's Towards- a Philosophy of theAct, one whose theoreticized world-view prevents him from accepting answerability for his actions on the basis of his 'non-alibi inBeing'. In a perhaps insufficiently motivated manceuvre, Zubeck goes on to apply the theology and semiotics of the icon toDosto evsky's text...
Read full abstract