Summary 1. Four treatment groups were used: two control groups, Baiomys pups reared by Baiomys dams and Mus pups reared by Mus dams: two experimental groups, Mus and cross-fostered Baiomys pups reared by Mus dams, and Baiomys and cross-fostered Mus pups reared by Baiomys dams. The adult behaviours of control animals were compared to those of experimental conspecifics. 2. The open field total activity scores of cross-fostered Baiomys were greater than those of control Baiomys. The open field total activity scores of cross-fostered Mus were lower than those of control Mus. It is suggested that differential handling by the dams might account for this difference. 3. In a social preference test control Mus and Baiomys spent more time in a chamber adjacent to a conspecific. Both cross-fostered male and female Mus spent more time in a chamber adjacent to a Baiomys. However, the cross-fostered female Mus showed a stronger preference for the foster species than did the cross-fostered Mus males and cross-fostered male Baiomys spent more time adjacent to a conspecific. Thus the results from the social preference tests indicated that females were more affected by cross-fostering than males. 4. The behaviours of animals from control groups differed from those of the cross-fostered groups when pair encounters were staged between conspecifics and between Baiomys and Mus. Some of the differences involved measures of fighting and grooming behaviour, number of attempted mounts and approach and with-drawal behaviour. 5. Pair encounters revealed that the cross-fostered animals were reacting more positively to the foster species than to conspecifics. 6. Cross-fostered animals were profoundly influenced in their open field performances, social preferences (with the exception of the male cross-fostered Baiomys) and social behaviours as a result of being cross-fostered to a different species at birth. The cross-fostered animals established, presumably through learning, new social relationships with the foster species. 7. Cross-fostered male and female Mus did not lose their ability to mate with a conspecific. This implies that sexual behaviour in this species is less susceptible to change due to early experience than other social behaviours such as fighting, allogrooming, and approach and avoidance behaviours.
Read full abstract