Bad Split Research Articles

Evaluation of Mandibular Anatomy Associated With Bad Splits in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of Mandible.

This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with bad splits during sagittal split ramus osteotomy by using three-dimensional computed tomography. This study included 8 bad splits and 47 normal patients without bad splits. Mandibular anatomic parameters related to osteotomy line were measured. These included anteroposterior width of the ramus at level of lingula, distance between external oblique ridge and lingula, distance between sigmoid notch and inferior border of mandible, mandibular angle, distance between inferior outer surface of mandibular canal and inferior border of mandible under distal root of second molar (MCEM), buccolingual thickness of the ramus at level of lingula, and buccolingual thickness of the area just distal to first molar (BTM1) and second molar (BTM2). The incidence of bad splits in 625 sagittal split osteotomies was 1.28%. Compared with normal group, bad split group exhibited significantly thinner BTM2 and shorter sigmoid notch and inferior border of mandible (P <0.05). However, for BTM1 and buccolingual thickness of the ramus at level of lingula, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. Mandibular angle, anteroposterior width of the ramus at level of lingula, external oblique ridge and lingula, and MCEM were not significantly different between the groups. This study suggests that patients with shorter ramus and low thickness of the buccolingual alveolar region distal to the second molar had a higher risk of bad splits. These anatomic data may help surgeons to choose the safest surgical techniques and best osteotomy sites.

Risk factors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A literature review and meta-analysis.

The most common complications that are associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy are: bad splits, postoperative infection, removal of osteosynthesis material, and neurosensory disturbances of the lower lip. Particularly in elective orthognathic surgery, it is important that surgeons inform their patients about the risk of these complications and attempt to minimize these risks. The purpose of this literature review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of these common complications and their risk factors. After a systematic electronic database search, 59 studies were identified and included in this review. For each complication, a pooled mean incidence was computed. Both the pooled study group and the pooled 'complication group' were analysed. The mean incidences for bad split (2.3% per SSO), postoperative infection (9.6% per patient), removal of the osteosynthesis material (11.2% per patient), and neurosensory disturbances of the lower lip (33.9% per patient) are reported. Regularly reported risk factors for complications were the patient's age, smoking habits, presence of third molars, the surgical technique and type of osteosynthesis material. This information may help the surgeon to minimize the risk of these complications and inform the patient about the risks of complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

Enquête nationale : avulsion des dents de sagesse incluses en chirurgie orthognathique mandibulaire

There is no recommendation concerning wisdom teeth (WT) extraction in mandibular orthognathic surgery. We carried out an investigation among the members of the French Society of Stomatology and Oro-maxillofacial Surgery (SFSCMFCO), in order to evaluate the practices and habits of maxillofacial surgeons in this field. We emailed the 424members of the SFSCMFCO with a questionnaire. We obtained 143feedbacks that could be exploited. In total, 72.5% of practitioners prefer WT to be extracted before performing a bilateral sagittal spilt osteotomy (BSSO). In this case, a period of 6months between the two surgeries was considered as desirable by more than 70% of the surgeons. In total, 74.6% of the surgeons thought that the presence of WT could make a BSSO more complicated. However, 73.9% of the surgeons would not postpone the BBSO in a patient ready for surgery but with remaining impacted WT. A majority of surgeons think that the presence of impacted WT may complicate a BSSO and increases the risk of bad split. Most of the authors recommend extracting the impacted WT 6months before BSSO at least. However, these potential complications are easy to overcome and don't compromise the final result. Therefore, we think that impacted WT should not delay a BSSO if the orthodontic preparation makes the patient ready for surgery.

Simultaneous removal of third molars and completion of a sagittal split osteotomy: effects of age and presence of third molars

The risk of removal of third molars (M3) during a sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with removal of mandibular M3 during versus before SSO. A chart and radiographic review was completed in all patients who underwent an SSO from April 2010 until September 2014. The presence or absence of M3, degree of impaction, age, sex, and occurrence of bad splits were noted. The variables were analyzed using the Pearson χ(2), ANOVA, and Fisher's exact tests set to a significance of 5%. For the 215 patients, the mean age was 23.28 years with an increase in the incidence of bad splits in older patients (P= .013). Sixty-six (30.70%) of them had at least 1 M3 present at the time of surgery. There were 6 (2.79%) bad splits. Paradoxically, looking at the occurrence of bad splits and presence of third molar, when the data were analyzed by the number of patients undergoing the procedure, there was slight evidence of a difference (P = .073), but when the data were analyzed by the surgical site, there was a statistically significant association (P = .05). The discrepancy between the 2 ways of analyzing the data may be related to there being double the number of observations when analyzed by surgical site and thus the analysis being more powerful.

Residents' journal review

Residents' journal review

Medial cortex fracture patterns after sagittal split osteotomy using short versus long medial cuts: can we obviate bad splits?

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the lingual fracture patterns after sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) using short and long medial osteotomy cuts, via three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Forty-six subjects participated in this prospective study. Two types of medial osteotomy line were made: for type I, the medial osteotomy line was finished just before the lingula; for type II, the medial osteotomy line was extended 3–4mm beyond the lingula. Three fracture patterns were observed after SSOs. There were no significant differences in the medial fracture patterns between the two medial osteotomy types (P=0.16). The buccolingual thickness of the ramus was lower in fractures with pattern 3 (bad split) than in the two other fracture patterns. The length of the medial osteotomy line – short or long – did not alter the prevalence of a bad split. The bone thickness of the ramus may affect the type of fracture pattern on the medial side of the ramus.

Angled Osteotomy Design Aimed to Influence the Lingual Fracture Line in Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Human Cadaveric Study

The traditional osteotomy design in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy includes a horizontal lingual bone cut, a connecting sagittal bone cut, and a vertical buccal bone cut perpendicular to the inferior mandibular cortex. The buccal bone cut extends as an inferior border cut into the lingual cortex. This study investigated a modified osteotomy design including an angled oblique buccal bone cut that extended as a posteriorly aimed inferior border cut near the masseteric tuberosity. The authors implemented a randomized controlled study. The study sample was comprised of 28 cadaveric dentulous mandibles. The primary outcome variable was the pattern of lingual fracture induced using the conventional (n = 14) and modified (n = 14) osteotomy designs. The secondary outcome variables included the incidence of bad splits and the status of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. The angled osteotomy design resulted in a significantly larger number of the lingual fractures originating from the inferior border cut (odds ratio [OR] = 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.86; P < .01), with a significantly more posterior relation of the fracture line to the mandibular canal (OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63; P < .01) and foramen (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.28-3.08; P < .01). No bad splits occurred with the angled design, whereas 3 bad splits occurred with the conventional design, although this difference was not statistically significant (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25; P = .07). IAN status was comparable between designs, although the nerve more frequently required manipulation from the proximal mandibular segment when the conventional design was used (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47; P = .06). The results suggest that the angled osteotomy design promotes a more posterior lingual fracture originating from the inferior border cut and a trend was apparent that this also might decrease the incidence of bad splits and IAN entrapment. These results must be carefully extrapolated to the clinical setting, with future studies clarifying these findings.

Simultaneous Removal of Third Molars During a Sagittal Split Does Not Increase the Incidence of Bad Splits in Patients Aged 30 Years or Older

An increasing number of patients who are 30 years old or older have been presenting for orthognathic surgery, some of whom have impacted third molars. The purpose of our report was to review the incidence of bad splits in this age group, both with and without third molars (3Ms). A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who had undergone sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) who were 30 years old or older was performed. The inclusion criteria were age 30 years or older and performance of an SSO. Those with incomplete data or who were younger than 30 years old were excluded. A history and radiographic review was performed to find cases with a bad split that had occurred during the surgical procedures. The fractures were correlated with the presence or absence of the lower 3Ms, the degree of impaction of the 3Ms, and patient age and gender. For this aged sample, the variables of 3M presence and gender were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. For patient age, analysis of variance was applied, and for the degree of impaction, the Pearson test was used. All the tests used the level significance of 0.05%. Of the 220 patients who underwent SSO during the study period, 52 were older than 30 years (24%). Of these, 8 patients (15%) had had at least 1 3M present at surgery. Most of the patients had undergone sagittal splits without complications. A total of 3 patients had had bad splits in this sample, 1 of whom had a 3M present at surgery and 2 of whom did not. No association was found between the occurrence of a bad split and the variables studied, including the presence of a 3M (P = .089), degree of impaction (P = .074), age (P = .963), and gender (P = .266). From the results in this small subset of patients, 3Ms can be removed in patients older than 30 years concomitant with bilateral SSO.

A guiding oblique osteotomy cut to prevent bad split in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a technical note

Aim: To present a simple technical modification of a medial osteotomy cut which prevents its misdirection and overcomes various anatomical variations as well as technical problems. Methods: The medial osteotomy cut is modified in the posterior half at an angle of 15°-20° following novel landmarks. Results: The proposed cut exclusively directs the splitting forces downwards to create a favorable lingual fracture, preventing the possibility of an upwards split which would cause a coronoid or condylar fracture. Conclusion: This modification has proven to be successful to date without encountering the complications of a bad split or nerve damage.

Attachment Rate of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve to Buccal Plate During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Influences Self-Reported Sensory Impairment

This study was aimed to investigate a modified buccal osteotomy technique and whether the integrity of the lingual part of the lower border influences the attachment of the neurovascular bundle to the proximal segment of the mandible during a sagittal split osteotomy without increasing the number of bad splits. The presence of self-reported sensibility disturbance in the lower lip at the last follow-up visit was assessed. This study included 220 and 133 patients with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy undergoing the classical and the new modified buccal osteotomy techniques, respectively. In the new technique, the lower border is divided into a lingual fragment that remains incorporated in the tooth-bearing fragment and a buccal fragment that comes with the proximal fragment (buccal plate). In the classical technique, the inferior alveolar nerve was attached to the proximal segment of the mandible in more than one third of operation sites (36.36% on the right and 40.91% on the left) compared with less than one fourth of the operation sites using the new technique (9.73% on the right and 23.01% on the left). The overall figure of self-reported changed sensibility was 09.40% (12/128) in the new technique compared to 15.12% in the classical technique. We present a suitable improvement to the classical buccal osteotomy technique that allows less manipulation and injury of the inferior alveolar nerve with consequent reduction in self-reported postoperative changes in lower lip sensation

The Effect of Splitting on Random Forests.

The effect of a splitting rule on random forests (RF) is systematically studied for regression and classification problems. A class of weighted splitting rules, which includes as special cases CART weighted variance splitting and Gini index splitting, are studied in detail and shown to possess a unique adaptive property to signal and noise. We show for noisy variables that weighted splitting favors end-cut splits. While end-cut splits have traditionally been viewed as undesirable for single trees, we argue for deeply grown trees (a trademark of RF) end-cut splitting is useful because: (a) it maximizes the sample size making it possible for a tree to recover from a bad split, and (b) if a branch repeatedly splits on noise, the tree minimal node size will be reached which promotes termination of the bad branch. For strong variables, weighted variance splitting is shown to possess the desirable property of splitting at points of curvature of the underlying target function. This adaptivity to both noise and signal does not hold for unweighted and heavy weighted splitting rules. These latter rules are either too greedy, making them poor at recognizing noisy scenarios, or they are overly ECP aggressive, making them poor at recognizing signal. These results also shed light on pure random splitting and show that such rules are the least effective. On the other hand, because randomized rules are desirable because of their computational efficiency, we introduce a hybrid method employing random split-point selection which retains the adaptive property of weighted splitting rules while remaining computational efficient.

Removal of bicortical screws and other osteosynthesis material that caused symptoms after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a retrospective study of 251 patients, and review of published papers

Rigid fixation with either bicortical screws or miniplates is the current standard way to stabilise the mandibular segments after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Both techniques are widely used and the superiority of one or other method is still debatable. One complication of rigid fixation is the need to remove the osteosynthesis material because of associated complaints. The main aim of this retrospective study was to analyse how often we needed to remove bicortical screws because they caused symptoms after BSSO in our clinic. Review of other published papers also enabled us to investigate the reported rates of removal of screws and miniplates at other centres. The mean (SD) duration of follow-up of 251 patients (502 sites) was 432 (172) days, and the number of bicortical screws removed in our clinic was 14/486 sites (3%). Other methods of fixation were used at 16 sites. We found no significant association between removal of bicortical screws and age, sex, presence of third molars, or bad splits. Published rates of removal of bicortical screws and miniplates are 3.1%–7.2% and 6.6%–22.2% per site, respectively. These findings show that fixation with bicortical screws after BSSO is associated with a low rate of removal of osteosynthesis material. Reported incidences imply a lower rate of removal for screws than for miniplates.

Relationship Between Mandibular Anatomy and the Occurrence of a Bad Split Upon Sagittal Split Osteotomy

A bad split is a troublesome complication of the sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the occurrence of a bad split and mandibular anatomy in SSO using cone-beam computed tomography. The authors designed a cohort retrospective study. Forty-eight patients (96 SSO sites) were studied. The buccolingual thickness of the retromandibular area (BLR), the buccolingual thickness of the ramus at the level of the lingula (BLTR), the height of the mandible from the alveolar crest to the inferior border of the mandible, (ACIB), the distance between the sigmoid notch and the inferior border of the mandible (SIBM), and the anteroposterior width of the ramus (APWR) were measured. The independent t test was applied to compare anatomic measurements between the group with and the group without bad splits. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) test was used to find a cutoff point in anatomic size for various parts of the mandible related to the occurrence of bad splits. The mean SIBM was 47.05±6.33 mm in group 1 (with bad splits) versus 40.66±2.44 mm in group 2 (without bad splits; P=.01). The mean BLTR was 5.74±1.11 mm in group 1 versus 3.19±0.55 mm in group 2 (P=.04). The mean BLR was 14.98±2.78 mm in group 1 versus 11.21±1.29 mm in group 2 (P=.001). No statistically significant difference was found for APWR and ACIB between the 2 groups. The ROC test showed cutoff points of 10.17 mm for BLR, 36.69 mm for SIBM, and 4.06 mm for BLTR. This study showed that certain mandibular anatomic differences can increase the risk of a bad split during SSO surgery.

Presence of mandibular third molars during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy increases the possibility of bad split but not the risk of other post-operative complications

Timing of third molar removal in relation to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is controversial, especially with regard to post-operative complications. We investigated the influence of mandibular third molar presence on complications after BSSO with sagittal splitters and separators, by a retrospective record review of 251 patients (502 surgical sites). Mandibular third molars were present during surgery at 169 sites and removed at least 6 months preoperatively in 333 sites. Bad splits occurred at 3.0 % (5/169) and 1.5% (5/333) of the respective sites. Presence of mandibular third molars significantly increased the risk of bad splits (OR 1.08, CI 1.02–1.13, p < 0.01). The mean incidences of permanent neurosensory disturbances, post-operative infection, and symptomatic removal of the osteosynthesis material were 5.4% (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79–1.00; p = 0.06), 8.2% (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.99–1.20; p = 0.63), and 3.4% (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, .92–1.03; p = 0.35) per site, respectively, without a significant influence of mandibular third molar status. In conclusion, the presence of mandibular third molars during surgery increases the possibility of bad split but does not affect the risk of other complications. Therefore, third molars can be removed concomitantly with BSSO using sagittal splitters and separators.

Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: A pilot study

Two major drawbacks of classical bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) are occasional inferior alveolar nerve damage and bad splits. In order to avoid these two well-known disadvantages and benefit from ultrasonic bone cutting, a low-to-high oblique piezoosteotomy (LHO) was developed from Schlössmann's 1922 high oblique osteotomy, clinically evaluated with a standard and a novel osteosynthesis system.Eighty-five patients were retrospectively evaluated, 23 with an LHO osteotomy with standard osteosynthesis, 33 LHO with a dedicated plate osteosynthesis and compared to 29 patients with BSSO and standard osteosyntheses.The mean mandibular advancement in the LHO standard osteosynthesis/LHO dedicated plate osteosynthesis/BSSO collectives was 4.7 ± 2.5/7.8 ± 7.1/4.1 ± 2.8 mm, the mean one year relapse 2.6 ± 0.8 (p = 0.58)/1.4 ± 1.4 (p = 0.28)/2.1 ± 1.4 mm; the mean mandibular setback was 6.9 ± 3.6/7.7 ± 4.1/8.1 ± 4.9 mm and the one year relapse 2.9 ± 2.9 (p = 0.16)/1.4 ± 1.0 (p = 0.38)/1.5 ± 1.9 mm; clockwise rotation of the mandible was 5.2 ± 3.2/6.3 ± 5.1/10.2 ± 6.9°, the one year relapse 2.7 ± 1.2 (p = 0.18)/2.1 ± 1.7 (p = 0.09)/11.4 ± 9.3°; counterclockwise rotation averaged 6.4 ± 3.2/6.5 ± 7.9/6.5 ± 6.1° with a mean one year relapse of 3.3 ± 0.6 (p = 0.37)/3.7 ± 1.9 (p = 0.21)/4.5 ± 6.2°.LHO had 3%, BSSO 5% three months postoperative inferior alveolar nerve deficit (p = 0.17). The operation time was significantly shorter when LHO and dedicated plates were used compared to BSSO. Two broken conventional plates occurred in LHO, which stimulated the development of the dedicated plates used, one in BSSO; four bad splits in BSSO and two in LHO. Reosteosyntheses were performed using the newly developed dedicated “orthognathics” plate.LHO was successfully performed, easier and faster than BSSO. Gonial angle modifications were possible due to the oblique cut. Postoperative stability appears sufficient for moderate repositioning with a lower incidence of bad split and inferior alveolar nerve irritation, moreover blood loss was reduced. Since 2 standard miniplate fractures occurred in LHO, the “orthognathics” osteosynthesis was developed, applied and no further osteosynthesis fractures were seen.

Three-dimensional evaluation of lingual split line after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in asymmetric prognathism.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of lingual split line when performing a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) for asymmetric prognathism. This was accomplished with the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional (3D) software program.Materials and MethodsThe study group was comprised of 40 patients (20 males and 20 females) with asymmetric prognathism, who underwent BSSO (80 splits; n=80) from January 2012 through June 2013. We observed the pattern of lingual split line using CBCT data and image analysis program. The deviated side was compared to the contralateral side in each patient. To analyze the contributing factors to the split pattern, we observed the position of the lateral cortical bone cut end and measured the thickness of the ramus that surrounds the mandibular lingula.ResultsThe lingual split patterns were classified into. The true "Hunsuck" line was 60.00% (n=48), and the bad split was 7.50% (n=6). Ramal thickness surrounding the lingual was 5.55±1.07 mm (deviated) and 5.66±1.34 mm (contralateral) (P=0.409). The position of the lateral cortical bone cut end was classified into three types: A, lingual; B, inferior; C, buccal. Type A comprised 66.25% (n=53), Type B comprised 22.50% (n=18), and Type C comprised 11.25% (n=9).ConclusionIn asymmetric prognathism patients, there were no differences in the ramal thickness between the deviated side and the contralateral side. Furthermore, no differences were found in the lingual split pattern. The lingual split pattern correlated with the position of the lateral cortical bone cut end. In addition, the 3D-CT reformation was a useful tool for evaluating the surgical results of BSSO of the mandible.

Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients

An unfavourable fracture, known as a bad split, is a common operative complication in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The reported incidence ranges from 0.5 to 5.5%/site. Since 1994 we have used sagittal splitters and separators instead of chisels for BSSO in our clinic in an attempt to prevent postoperative hypoaesthesia. Theoretically an increased percentage of bad splits could be expected with this technique. In this retrospective study we aimed to find out the incidence of bad splits associated with BSSO done with splitters and separators. We also assessed the risk factors for bad splits. The study group comprised 427 consecutive patients among whom the incidence of bad splits was 2.0%/site, which is well within the reported range. The only predictive factor for a bad split was the removal of third molars at the same time as BSSO. There was no significant association between bad splits and age, sex, class of occlusion, or the experience of the surgeon. We think that doing a BSSO with splitters and separators instead of chisels does not increase the risk of a bad split, and is therefore safe with predictable results.

Ultrasonic orthognathic surgery: enhancements to established osteotomies

The use of a novel ultrasonic osteotome enabled the authors to modify well-established orthognathic osteotomies to more favourably address the anatomy. For this purpose, they utilized a powerful ultrasonic device with tissue-selective cutting characteristics that was originally developed for spinal osteotomies and nerve decompression (BoneScalpel™ by Misonix Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA). Its straight ultrasonic blade was adapted for dual action, and a soft protective element was added. The product modifications and the related changes regarding maxillary and mandibular osteotomies are explained in detail. A series of 83 patients underwent orthognathic surgery with the BoneScalpel ultrasonic osteotome. All osteotomies within this study group were performed purely ultrasonically and without the auxiliary use of reciprocating saws or rotary burrs. The complications, alveolar nerve impairment and bad splits were assessed. To assess the quality of the lingual osteotomies and pterygomaxillary separation, three-dimensional scanning was performed on 30 patients. In conclusion, the BoneScalpel™ ultrasonic osteotome enabled improved control over orthognathic osteotomies and resulted in significant reductions in the occurrence of nerve impairment and bad splits.

Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibula performed with separators: A multi-centre prospective study

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is an effective and commonly used treatment to correct mandibular hypo- and hyperplasia. Hypoesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is a common complication of this surgical procedure. This prospective multi-centre study aimed to determine the incidence of neurosensory disturbances of the IAN after BSSO procedures performed without the use of chisels. Our study group comprised 158 patients, with a follow-up period of 1 year, who underwent BSSO (with or without Le Fort I) that incorporated the use of sagittal split separators and splitters but no chisels. The percentage of BSSO split procedures that resulted in IAN damage was 5.1%. The percentage of patients (without genioplasty) who experienced IAN damage was 8.9%. The concomitant genioplasty in combination with BSSO was significantly associated with hypoesthesia. Peri-operative removal of the wisdom tooth or a Le Fort I procedure did not influence post-operative hypoesthesia. We believe that the use of splitting forceps and elevators without chisels leads to a lower incidence of persistent post-operative hypoesthesia 1 year after BSSO of the mandible, without increasing the risk of a bad split.

Complicaciones quirúrgicas de la cirugía ortognática: presentación de tres casos y revisión de la literatura

The correction of dental-facial deformities by means of osteotomies of the facial bones is commonly known as orthognathic surgery. The most common surgical techniques employed are the LeFort 1 maxillary osteotomy, and sagittal mandibular osteotomy. These techniques are highly standardised and ensure predictable and stable results over time. The surgical complications rate is low, between 1% and 25%, and varies depending on how a complication is defined. ObjectivesTo present a literature review of the complications reported in corrective osteotomies of dental-facial deformities, and a description of the diagnosis and treatment of three cases. Material and methodThree cases with a complication are presented: two inadequate osteotomies (“bad split”) in the sagittal mandibular osteotomy and one maxillary aseptic necrosis after a LeFort 1 maxillary osteotomy. ResultsTwo alternatives for correcting the mandibular bad split are presented, using bicortical screws and using a reinforced plate with screws threaded to the plate. In the maxillary aseptic necrosis, the clinical signs, the diagnostic tests used, the initial treatment, and finally the sequelae of this case are presented. ConclusionsThe surgical correction of dental-facial deformities using orthognathic surgery is a safe treatment with predictable results. Despite the development of new materials and techniques, no surgical procedure is complication free. It is the responsibility of the surgeon to assess the risks of each case, to inform the patient and diagnose and treat the complications with the greatest diligence and efficacy.