Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair Research Articles

Repair of the Major Lesion Resulting from C5′-Oxidation of DNA

Oxidation of the C5'-position of DNA results in direct strand scission. The 3'-fragments produced contain DNA lesions at their 5'-termini. The major DNA lesion contains an aldehyde at its C5'-position, but its nucleobase is unmodified. Excision of the lesion formed from oxidation of thymidine (T-al) is achieved by strand displacement synthesis by DNA polymerase β (Pol β) in the presence or absence of flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). Pol β displaces T-al and thymidine with comparable efficiency, but less so than a chemically stabilized abasic site analogue (F). FEN1 cleaves the flaps produced during strand displacement synthesis that are two nucleotides or longer. A ternary complex containing T-al is also a substrate for the bacterial UvrABC nucleotide excision repair system. The sites of strand scission are identical in ternary complexes containing T-al, thymidine, or F. UvrABC incision efficiency of these ternary complexes is comparable as well but significantly slower than a duplex substrate containing a bulky substituted thymidine. However, cleavage occurs only on the 5'-fragment and does not remove the lesion. These data suggest that unlike many lesions the redundant nature of base excision and nucleotide excision repair systems does not provide a means for removing the major damage product produced by agents that oxidize the C5'-position. This may contribute to the high cytotoxicity of drugs that oxidize the C5'-position in DNA.

The biological and structural characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrA provides novel insights into its mechanism of action

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an extremely well adapted intracellular human pathogen that is exposed to multiple DNA damaging chemical assaults originating from the host defence mechanisms. As a consequence, this bacterium is thought to possess highly efficient DNA repair machineries, the nucleotide excision repair (NER) system amongst these. Although NER is of central importance to DNA repair in M. tuberculosis, our understanding of the processes in this species is limited. The conserved UvrABC endonuclease represents the multi-enzymatic core in bacterial NER, where the UvrA ATPase provides the DNA lesion-sensing function. The herein reported genetic analysis demonstrates that M. tuberculosis UvrA is important for the repair of nitrosative and oxidative DNA damage. Moreover, our biochemical and structural characterization of recombinant M. tuberculosis UvrA contributes new insights into its mechanism of action. In particular, the structural investigation reveals an unprecedented conformation of the UvrB-binding domain that we propose to be of functional relevance. Taken together, our data suggest UvrA as a potential target for the development of novel anti-tubercular agents and provide a biochemical framework for the identification of small-molecule inhibitors interfering with the NER activity in M. tuberculosis.

Role of the insertion domain and the zinc-finger motif of Escherichia coli UvrA in damage recognition and ATP hydrolysis

UvrA is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each protomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase domains, that belong to the family of ATP-binding cassette domains. Three structural domains are inserted in these ATPase domains: the insertion domain (ID) and UvrB binding domain (in ATP domain I) and the zinc-finger motif (in ATP domain II). In this paper we analyze the function of the ID and the zinc finger motif in damage specific binding of Escherichia coli UvrA. We show that the ID is not essential for damage discrimination, but it does stabilize UvrA on the DNA, most likely by forming a clamp around the DNA helix. We present evidence that two conserved arginine residues in the ID contact the phosphate backbone of the DNA, leading to strand separation after the ATPase-driven movement of the ID's. Remarkably, deletion of the ID generated a phenotype in which UV-survival strongly depends on the presence of photolyase, indicating that UvrA and photolyase form a ternary complex on a CPD-lesion. The zinc-finger motif is shown to be important for the transfer of the damage recognition signal to the ATPase of UvrA. In the absence of this domain the coupling between DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis is completely lost. Mutation of the phenylalanine residue in the tip of the zinc-finger domain resulted in a protein in which the ATPase was already triggered when binding to an undamaged site. As the zinc-finger motif is connected to the DNA binding regions on the surface of UvrA, this strongly suggests that damage-specific binding to these regions results in a rearrangement of the zinc-finger motif, which in its turn activates the ATPase. We present a model how damage recognition is transmitted to activate ATP hydrolysis in ATP binding domain I of the protein.

Modeling the Interactions of the Nucleotide Excision Repair UvrA2 Dimer with DNA

The UvrA protein initiates the DNA damage recognition process by the bacterial nucleotide excision repair (NER) system. Recently, crystallographic structures of holo-UvrA(2) dimers from two different microorganisms have been released (Protein Data Bank entries 2r6f , 2vf7 , and 2vf8 ). However, the details of the DNA binding by UvrA(2) and other peculiarities involved in the damage recognition process remain unknown. We have undertaken a molecular modeling approach to appraise the possible modes of DNA-UvrA(2) interaction using molecular docking and short-scale guided molecular dynamics [continuum field, constrained, and/or unrestricted simulated annealing (SA)], taking into account the three-dimensional location of a series of mutation-identified UvrA residues implicated in DNA binding. The molecular docking was based on the assumptions that the UvrA(2) dimer is preformed prior to DNA binding and that no major protein conformational rearrangements, except moderate domain reorientations, are required for binding of undamaged DNA. As a first approximation, DNA was treated as a rigid ligand. From the electrostatic relief of the ventral surface of UvrA(2), we initially identified three, noncollinear DNA binding paths. Each of the three resulting nucleoprotein complexes (C1, C2, and C3) was analyzed separately, including calculation of binding energies, the number and type of interaction residues (including mutated ones), and the predominant mode of translational and rotational motion of specific protein domains after SA to ensure improved DNA binding. The UvrA(2) dimer can accommodate DNA in all three orientations, albeit with different binding strengths. One of the UvrA(2)-DNA complexes (C1) fulfilled most of the requirements (high interaction energy, proximity of DNA to mutated residues, etc.) expected for a natural, high-affinity DNA binding site. This nucleoprotein presents a structural organization that is designed to clamp and bend double-stranded DNA. We examined the binding site in more detail by docking DNAs of significantly different (AT- vs CG-enriched) sequences and by submitting the complexes to DNA-unrestricted SA. It was found that in a manner independent of the DNA sequence and applied MD protocols, UvrA(2) favors binding of a bent and unwound undamaged DNA, with a kink positioned in the proximity of the Zn3 hairpins, anticollinearly aligned at the bottom of the ventral protein surface. It is further hypothesized that the Zn3 modules play an essential role in the damage recognition process and that the apparent existence of a family of DNA binding sites might be biologically relevant. Our data should prove to be useful in rational (structure-based) mutation studies.

Regulation and Rate Enhancement during Transcription-Coupled DNA Repair

SummaryTranscription-coupled DNA repair (TCR) is a subpathway of nucleotide excision repair (NER) that is triggered when RNA polymerase is stalled by DNA damage. Lesions targeted by TCR are repaired more quickly than lesions repaired by the transcription-independent “global” NER pathway, but the mechanism underlying this rate enhancement is not understood. Damage recognition during bacterial NER depends upon UvrA, which binds to the damage and loads UvrB onto the DNA. Bacterial TCR additionally requires the Mfd protein, a DNA translocase that removes the stalled transcription complexes. We have determined the properties of Mfd, UvrA, and UvrB that are required for the elevated rate of repair observed during TCR. We show that TCR and global NER differ in their requirements for damage recognition by UvrA, indicating that Mfd acts at the very earliest stage of the repair process and extending the functional similarities between TCR in bacteria and eukaryotes.

Role of the two ATPase domains of Escherichia coli UvrA in binding non-bulky DNA lesions and interaction with UvrB

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA. UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.

Excision of a Lyase-Resistant Oxidized Abasic Lesion from DNA

The C2'-oxidized abasic lesion (C2-AP) is produced in DNA that is subjected to oxidative stress. The lesion disrupts replication and gives rise to mutations that are dependent upon the identity of the upstream nucleotide. Ape1 incises C2-AP, but the 5'-phosphorylated fragment is not a substrate for the lyase activity of DNA polymerase beta. Excision of the lesion is achieved by strand displacement synthesis in the presence of flap endonuclease during which C2-AP and the 3'-adjacent nucleotide are replaced. The oxidized abasic lesion is also a substrate for the bacterial UvrABC nucleotide excision repair system. These data suggest that the redundant nature of DNA repair systems provides a means for removing a lesion that resists excision by short patch base excision repair.

Nucleotide Excision Repair of a DNA Interstrand Cross-Link Produces Single- and Double-Strand Breaks

The DNA radical resulting from formal abstraction of a hydrogen atom from the thymidine methyl group, 5-(2'-deoxyuridinyl)methyl radical, forms interstrand cross-links with the opposing 2'-deoxyadenosine. This is the first chemically characterized, radical-mediated cross-link between two opposing nucleotides. In addition, cross-linking between opposing bases in the duplex is less common than between those separated by one or two nucleotides. The first step in cross-link repair was investigated using the UvrABC bacterial nucleotide excision repair system. UvrABC incised both strands of the cross-linked DNA, although the strand containing the cross-linked purine was preferred by the enzyme in two different duplexes. The incision sites in one strand were spaced 11-14 nucleotides apart, as is typical for UvrABC incision. The majority of incisions occur at the third phosphate from the 3'-side of the cross-link and eighth or ninth phosphate on the 5'-side. In addition, cleavage was found to occur on both strands, producing double-strand breaks in approximately 25-29% of the incision events. This is the first example of double-strand cleavage during nucleotide excision repair of cross-linked DNA that does not already contain a strand break in the vicinity of the cross-link.

Comparison of the activities of bacterial and mammalian nucleotide excision repair systems for DNA-protein crosslinks

Endogenous and environmental genotoxic agents produce DNA damage and induce cell death and mutations. The repair mechanisms of base lesions and single and double strand breaks have been well characterized in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. However, the molecular pathways that repair or tolerate DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) remains to be largely elucidated. In this study, we constructed DNA substrates containing defined DPCs and assessed the incision activities of prokaryotic and eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair systems for DPCs in vitro.

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA.UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.

Single-molecule analysis reveals two separate DNA-binding domains in the Escherichia coli UvrA dimer

The UvrA protein is the initial damage-recognizing factor in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each monomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase sites. Using single-molecule analysis we show that dimerization of UvrA in the presence of ATP is significantly higher than with ADP or nonhydrolyzable ATPγS, suggesting that the active UvrA dimer contains a mixture of ADP and ATP. We also show that the UvrA dimer has a high preference of binding the end of a linear DNA fragment, independent on the presence or type of cofactor. Apparently ATP binding or hydrolysis is not needed to discriminate between DNA ends and internal sites. A significant number of complexes could be detected where one UvrA dimer bridges two DNA ends implying the presence of two separate DNA-binding domains, most likely present in each monomer. On DNA containing a site-specific lesion the damage-specific binding is much higher than DNA-end binding, but only in the absence of cofactor or with ATP. With ATPγS no discrimination between a DNA end and a DNA damage could be observed. We present a model where damage recognition of UvrA depends on the ability of both UvrA monomers to interact with the DNA flanking the lesion.

Functions of base flipping in E. coli nucleotide excision repair

UvrB is the main damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and is capable of recognizing various structurally unrelated types of damage. Previously we have shown that upon binding of Escherichia coli UvrB to damaged DNA two nucleotides become extrahelical: the nucleotide directly 3′ to the lesion and its base-pairing partner in the non-damaged strand. Here we demonstrate using a novel fluorescent 2-aminopurine-menthol modification that the position of the damaged nucleotide itself does not change upon UvrB binding. A co-crystal structure of B. caldotenax UvrB and DNA has revealed that one nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix into a pocket of the UvrB protein where it stacks on Phe249 [J.J. Truglio, E. Karakas, B. Hau, H. Wang, M.J. DellaVecchia, B. van Houten, C. Kisker, Structural basis for DNA recognition and processing by UvrB, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 360–364]. By mutating the equivalent of Phe249 (Tyr249) in the E. coli UvrB protein we show that on damaged DNA neither of the extrahelical nucleotides is inserted into this protein pocket. The mutant UvrB protein, however, resulted in an increased binding and incision of undamaged DNA showing that insertion of a base into the nucleotide-binding pocket is important for dissociation of UvrB from undamaged sites. Replacing the nucleotides in the non-damaged strand with a C3-linker revealed that the extruded base in the non-damaged strand is not directly involved in UvrB-binding or UvrC-mediated incision, but that its displacement is needed to allow access for residues of UvrB or UvrC to the neighboring base, which is directly opposite the DNA damage. This interaction is shown to be essential for optimal 3′-incision by UvrC. After 3′-incision base flipping in the non-damaged DNA strand is lost, indicative for a conformational change needed to prepare the UvrB–DNA complex for 5′-incision.

DNA Tandem Lesion Repair by Strand Displacement Synthesis and Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA tandem lesions are comprised of two contiguously damaged nucleotides. This subset of clustered lesions is produced by a variety of oxidizing agents, including ionizing radiation. Clustered lesions can inhibit base excision repair (BER). We report the effects of tandem lesions composed of a thymine glycol and a 5'-adjacent 2-deoxyribonolactone (LTg) or tetrahydrofuran abasic site (FTg). Some BER enzymes that act on the respective isolated lesions do not accept the tandem lesion as a substrate. For instance, endonuclease III (Nth) does not excise thymine glycol (Tg) when it is part of either tandem lesion. Similarly, endonuclease IV (Nfo) does not incise L or F when they are in tandem with Tg. Long-patch BER overcomes inhibition by the tandem lesion. DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) carries out strand displacement synthesis, following APE1 incision of the abasic site. Pol beta activity is enhanced by flap endonuclease (FEN1), which cleaves the resulting flap. The tandem lesion is also incised by the bacterial nucleotide excision repair system UvrABC with almost the same efficiency as an isolated Tg. These data reveal two solutions that DNA repair systems can use to counteract the formation of tandem lesions.

NMR analysis of [ methyl- 13C]methionine UvrB from Bacillus caldotenax reveals UvrB–domain 4 heterodimer formation in solution

UvrB is a central DNA damage recognition protein involved in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Structural information has been limited by the apparent disorder of the C-terminal domain 4 in crystal structures of intact UvrB; in solution, the isolated domain 4 is found to form a helix–loop–helix dimer. In order to gain insight into the behavior of UvrB in solution, we have performed NMR studies on [ methyl- 13C]methionine-labeled UvrB from Bacillus caldotenax (molecular mass = 75 kDa). The 13 methyl resonances were assigned on the basis of site-directed mutagenesis and domain deletion. Solvent accessibility was assessed based on the relaxation and chemical shift responses of the probe methyl resonances to the stable nitroxide, 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPOL). M632, located at the potential dimer interface of domain 4, provides an ideal probe for UvrB dimerization behavior. The M632 resonance of UvrB is very broad, consistent with some degree of monomer–dimer exchange and/or conformational instability of the exposed dimer interface. Upon addition of unlabeled domain 4 peptide, the M632 resonance of UvrB sharpens and shifts to a position consistent with a UvrB–domain 4 heterodimer. A dissociation constant ( K D) value of 3.3 μM for the binding constant of UvrB with the domain 4 peptide was derived from surface plasmon resonance studies. Due to the flexibility of the domain 3–4 linker, inferred from limited proteolysis data and from the relaxation behavior of linker residue M607, the position of domain 4 is constrained not by the stiffness of the linking segment but by direct interactions with domains 1–3 in UvrB. In summary, UvrB homodimerization is disfavored, while domain 4 homodimerization and UvrB–domain 4 heterodimerization are allowed.

Dynamics of the UvrABC Nucleotide Excision Repair Proteins Analyzed by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.

UvrB Domain 4, an Autoinhibitory Gate for Regulation of DNA Binding and ATPase Activity

UvrB, a central DNA damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair, has weak affinity for DNA, and its ATPase activity is activated by UvrA and damaged DNA. Regulation of DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis by UvrB is poorly understood. Using atomic force microscopy and biochemical assays, we found that truncation of domain 4 of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB (UvrBDelta4) leads to multiple changes in protein function. Protein dimerization decreases with an approximately 8-fold increase of the equilibrium dissociation constant and an increase in DNA binding. Loss of domain 4 causes the DNA binding mode of UvrB to change from dimer to monomer, and affinity increases with the apparent dissociation constants on nondamaged and damaged single-stranded DNA decreasing 22- and 14-fold, respectively. ATPase activity by UvrBDelta4 increases 14- and 9-fold with and without single-stranded DNA, respectively, and UvrBDelta4 supports UvrA-independent damage-specific incision by Cho on a bubble DNA substrate. We propose that other than its previously discovered role in regulating protein-protein interactions, domain 4 is an autoinhibitory domain regulating the DNA binding and ATPase activities of UvrB.

Base Flipping in Nucleotide Excision Repair

UvrB, the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair is capable of binding a vast array of structurally unrelated lesions. A beta-hairpin structure in the protein plays an important role in damage-specific binding. In this paper we have monitored DNA conformational alterations in the UvrB-DNA complex, using the fluorescent adenine analogue 2-aminopurine. We show that binding of UvrB to a DNA fragment with cholesterol damage moves the base adjacent to the lesion at the 3' side into an extrahelical position. This extrahelical base is not accessible for acrylamide quenching, suggesting that it inserts into a pocket of the UvrB protein. Also the base opposite this flipped base is extruded from the DNA helix. The degree of solvent exposure of both residues varies with the type of cofactor (ADP/ATP) bound by UvrB. Fluorescence of the base adjacent to the damage is higher when UvrB is in the ADP-bound configuration, but concomitantly this UvrB-DNA complex is less stable. In the ATP-bound form the UvrB-DNA complex is very stable and in this configuration the base in the non-damaged strand is more exposed. Hairpin residue Tyr-95 is specifically involved in base flipping in the non-damaged strand. We present evidence that this conformational change in the non-damaged strand is important for 3' incision by UvrC.

The uvrA, uvrB and uvrC genes are required for repair of ultraviolet light induced DNA photoproducts in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1

BackgroundSequenced archaeal genomes contain a variety of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA repair gene homologs, but relatively little is known about how these microorganisms actually perform DNA repair. At least some archaea, including the extreme halophile Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, are able to repair ultraviolet light (UV) induced DNA damage in the absence of light-dependent photoreactivation but this 'dark' repair capacity remains largely uncharacterized. Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 possesses homologs of the bacterial uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC nucleotide excision repair genes as well as several eukaryotic repair genes and it has been thought that multiple DNA repair pathways may account for the high UV resistance and dark repair capacity of this model halophilic archaeon. We have carried out a functional analysis, measuring repair capability in uvrA, uvrB and uvrC deletion mutants.ResultsDeletion mutants lacking functional uvrA, uvrB or uvrC genes, including a uvrA uvrC double mutant, are hypersensitive to UV and are unable to remove cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers or 6–4 photoproducts from their DNA after irradiation with 150 J/m2 of 254 nm UV-C. The UV sensitivity of the uvr mutants is greatly attenuated following incubation under visible light, emphasizing that photoreactivation is highly efficient in this organism. Phylogenetic analysis of the Halobacterium uvr genes indicates a complex ancestry.ConclusionOur results demonstrate that homologs of the bacterial nucleotide excision repair genes uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC are required for the removal of UV damage in the absence of photoreactivating light in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Deletion of these genes renders cells hypersensitive to UV and abolishes their ability to remove cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts in the absence of photoreactivating light. In spite of this inability to repair UV damaged DNA, uvrA, uvrB and uvrC deletion mutants are substantially less UV sensitive than excision repair mutants of E. coli or yeast. This may be due to efficient damage tolerance mechanisms such as recombinational lesion bypass, bypass DNA polymerase(s) and the existence of multiple genomes in Halobacterium. Phylogenetic analysis provides no clear evidence for lateral transfer of these genes from bacteria to archaea.

Binding of the UvrB dimer to non-damaged and damaged DNA: Residues Y92 and Y93 influence the stability of both subunits

UvrB is the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Previous AFM experiments have indicated that UvrB binds to a damage as a dimer. In this paper we visualize for the first time a UvrB dimer in a gel retardation assay, with the second subunit (B2) more loosely bound than the subunit (B1) that interacts with the damage. A β-hairpin motif in UvrB plays an important role in damage specific binding. Alanine substitutions of Y92 or Y93 in the β-hairpin result in proteins that kill E. coli cells as a consequence of incision in non-damaged DNA. Apparently, both residues are needed to prevent binding of UvrB to non-damaged DNA. The lethality of Y93A results from UvrC-mediated incisions, whereas that of Y92A is due to incisions by Cho. This difference could be ascribed to a difference in stability of the B2 subunit in the mutant UvrB–DNA complexes. We show that for 3′ incision UvrC needs to displace this second UvrB subunit from the complex, whereas Cho seems capable to incise the dimer-complex. Footprint analysis of the contacts of UvrB with damaged DNA revealed that the B2 subunit interacts with the flanking DNA at the 3′ side of the lesion. The B2 subunit of mutant Y92A appeared to be more firmly associated with the DNA, indicating that even when B1 is bound to a lesion, the B2 subunit probes the adjacent DNA for presence of damage. We propose this to be a reflection of the process that the UvrB dimer uses to find lesions in the DNA. In addition to preventing binding to non-damaged DNA, the Y92 and Y93 residues appear also important for making specific contacts (of B1) with the damaged site. We show that the concerted action of the two tyrosines lead to a conformational change in the DNA surrounding the lesion, which is required for the 3′ incision reaction.

Identification of Residues within UvrB That Are Important for Efficient DNA Binding and Damage Processing

The UvrB protein is the central recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. We have shown previously that the highly conserved beta-hairpin motif in Bacillus caldotenax UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage recognition, and UvrC-mediated incision, as deletion of the upper part of the beta-hairpin (residues 97-112) results in the inability of UvrB to be loaded onto damaged DNA, defective incision, and the lack of strand-destabilizing activity. In this work, we have further examined the role of the beta-hairpin motif of UvrB by a mutational analysis of 13 amino acids within or in the vicinity of the beta-hairpin. These amino acids are predicted to be important for the interaction of UvrB with both damaged and non-damaged DNA strands as well as the formation of salt bridges between the beta-hairpin and domain 1b of UvrB. The resulting mutants were characterized by standard functional assays such as oligonucleotide incision, electrophoretic mobility shift, strand-destabilizing, and ATPase assays. Our data indicated a direct role of Tyr96, Glu99, and Arg123 in damage-specific DNA binding. In addition, Tyr93 plays an important but less essential role in DNA binding by UvrB. Finally, the formation of salt bridges between the beta-hairpin and domain 1b, involving amino acids Lys111 bound to Glu307 and Glu99 bound to Arg367 or Arg289, are important but not essential for the function of UvrB.