implemented as a means of quantifying posture in physiotherapy departments in the near future. Objectives: The first objective of this study was to devise a protocol for use with patients with different spinal dysfunctions. The second objective was to produce a database of normative back shape values in young adults. These baseline values would then enable the comparison of subjects with healthy backs to the backs of patients with spinal problems. Subjects: 100 healthy subjects aged 20–40 years old were recruited. Subjects were excluded if they had any lower limb or back injury that prevented the subject standing for the duration of data collection. Instrumentation: This study used a relatively low-cost (<£3000), portable system, known as the MIDAS (Middlesbrough Integrated Digital Assessment System), with software specifically designed for the assessment of back posture. Procedure: The patient was positioned in front of the MIDAS, allowing measurement of landmarks of their back for posture assessment. Data collection involved one tester touching the MIDAS stylus tip to each of the marked points in a standardized order dictated by the software and pressing the foot pedal of the MIDAS to store the position on the computer. Results: The results indicate that overall young adults are very symmetrical. The mean distances between the left and right sides of the back and the average values were then calculated. Only the distance between the scapula and the acromion process was significantly smaller on the left side than the right side. It is possible that this is related to the fact that most subjects were right handed. A map of 3D back patient values for normative distances and angles was produced and will be shown at the presentation. Conclusions: Our results will provide a normative database for clinicians (physiotherapist, chiropractors, spinal surgeon) who routinely assess back posture. The method we have devised will also provide an evidenced based objective alternative to just ‘‘eyeballing’’ back posture during clinical evaluation.