B3 Lesions Research Articles

An audit of mammographic screen detected lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed on initial image guided needle biopsy: how has our practice changed over 10 years?

To review all cases of B3 lesion diagnosed at initial image-guided needle biopsy over two 5-year cohorts to identify upgrade rates to malignancy and the effect of changing guidance on the management of such lesions. Data was collected retrospectively. Mammographic features, biopsy type and management were recorded for each lesion. Upgrade rates for each B3 histological category were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. There were 224 cases in 2005-2010 and 240 cases in 2010-2015. Mammographically 211 lesions were microcalcifications, 182 masses, 65 distortions and six asymmetric densities with no difference in the mammographic features in the two cohorts. Two hundred and eight 14 G core biopsies and 256 initial vacuum-assisted biopsies were performed. There was a statistically significant reduction in benign surgical biopsies and an increase in second-line vacuum biopsy/excision in the latter cohort, with no significant change in the upgrade rate. There was an overall 6% upgrade to invasive malignancy and 13% upgrade to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The upgrade rates for the following histological categories were atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (AIDEP) 33.2% (21/63); classical (not pleomorphic) in situ lobular neoplasia (ISLN) 18.2% (6/33); flat epithelial hyperplasia (FEA) 21.7% (20/92); papilloma with atypia 53.8% (7/13), without atypia 12.1% (8/66); and radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion with atypia 16.7% (2/12), and without atypia 7.9% (6/76). Upgrade rates remain high for some histological categories even with first-line use of vacuum biopsy. Management of borderline lesions should be considered carefully in a multidisciplinary meeting. In many cases, the need for diagnostic surgical excision has been replaced by image-guided vacuum sampling.

Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

Purpose: To assess whether radiologist needs to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasonography (US) assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting.Patients and methods: Image data on 1,070 patients with 1,070 category 3–5 breast lesions with a pathological diagnosis scanned between January and June 2016 were included. Both real-time and static image assessments were acquired for each lesion. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of each category in the two groups were calculated according to the ACR BI-RADS manual and compared. Kappas were determined for agreement on two assessment approaches.Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value for real-time US were 98.9%, 58.2%, 44.8% and 99.4%, and for static images were 98.9%, 57.1%, 44.1% and 99.3%, respectively. The performance of the two groups was not significantly different (areas under ROCs: 0.786 vs 0.780, P=0.566) if the final assessment was only dichotomized as negative (category 3) and positive (categories 4 and 5). All PPVs of each category for each assessment were within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013 except subcategory 4B (reference range: >10% and ≤50%) of static image evaluation, which was also significantly higher than that of real-time assessment (54.8% vs 40.7%, P=0.037). The overall agreement of the two approaches was moderate (κ=0.43–0.56 according to different detailed assessment).Conclusion: Both static image and real-time assessment had similar diagnostic performance if only the treatment recommendations were considered, that is, follow-up or biopsy. However, as for subcategory 4B lesions without obviously benign or malignant US features, real-time scanning by the interpreter is recommended to obtain a more accurate BI-RADS assessment after assessing static images.

Abstract P6-02-07: Is real-time rescanning by radiologists necessary for all ACR BI-RADS US category 3 to 5 lesions in the diagnostic setting?

Abstract Purpose: To assess the value of radiologists' rescanning before final interpretation for American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasonography (US) category 3–5 lesions. Materials and Methods: Image data on 1070 patients with 1070 category 3–5 breast lesions with a pathological diagnosis scanned between January 2016–June 2017 were included. Both real-time and static images were acquired for each lesion. The diagnostic performance of assessing static images and rescanning by the radiologist were each calculated. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of each category in the two groups were calculated and compared. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value for real-time US were 98.9%, 58.2%, 44.8% and 99.4%, and for static images were 98.9%, 57.1%, 44.1% and 99.3%, respectively. Areas under the curves were not significantly different if final assessment was only dichotomized as negative or positive (≥ category 3: P = .566). Significant differences were observed if more detailed classification was performed (category 3–5 without subcategory: 0.969 vs. 0.955, P = .0113; category 3–5 with subcategory 4A–4C: 0.915 vs. 0.855, P < .0001). All PPVs of each category for each assessment were within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013 except subcategory 4B of static image evaluation, which was also significantly higher than that of real-time assessment (54.8% vs. 40.7%, P = .037),BI-RADS US of real-time and static images evaluation correlate with pathology are listed in Table 1. The overall agreement of the two approaches was moderate (κ = 0.43 if lesions were assigned to category/subcategory 3, 4A–4C, 5). Table1BI-RADS US category/subcategoryPPV provided by ACRReal-time US n (%)Static image US n (%)P3>0 &≤2%4674581.000Benign 464(99.4%)455(99.3%) Malignant 3(0.6%)3(0.7%) 4A>2% &≤10%2883010.257Benign 271(94.1%)276(91.7%) Malignant 17(5.9%)25(8.3%) 4B>10% &≤50%911350.037Benign 54(59.3%)61(45.2%) Malignant 37(40.7%)74(54.8%) 4C>50% &<95%50790.473Benign 5(10.0%)4(5.1%) Malignant 45(90.0%)75(94.9%) 5≥95%174971.000Benign 3(1.7%)1(1.0%) Malignant 171(98.3%)96(99.0%) BI-RADS US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System for Ultrasonography, PPV positive predictive value, ACR American College of Radiology Conclusion: Both static image evaluation and real-time assessment had similar diagnostic performance for most lesions; however, the diagnostic performance of static image evaluation for subcategory 4B lesions was lower. Real-time rescanning by the interpreter is strongly recommended for lesions of subcategory 4B after assessing static images. YH and JM contributed equally to this study. Citation Format: Hu Y, Mei J, Jiang X, Liu Q, Gong C. Is real-time rescanning by radiologists necessary for all ACR BI-RADS US category 3 to 5 lesions in the diagnostic setting? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-02-07.

Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography – Virtual touch™ imaging quantification in the evaluation of breast masses: Impact on ultrasonography’s specificity and its ultimate clinical benefit

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and the clinical benefit of Shear-Wave Elastography - Virtual Touch™ Imaging Quantification (SWE-VTIQ) as a complement to ultrasonography (US). MethodsFrom October 2016 through Jun 2017, B-mode US and SWE-VTIQ were prospectively performed in 396 breast masses in 357 women who consented to undergo this study. Quantitative elastography values were recorded: Vmax (maximum elasticity), Vmean (median elasticity), Vratio(max) (ratio of Vmax and surrounding parenchyma) and Vratio(mean) (ratio of Vmean and surrounding parenchyma). The histopathology of the lesions was considered the reference standard for benign or malignant definition. The performance of the four elastographic parameters was evaluated trough sensitivity, specificity and AUC. The parameter with the best performance was tested in six different diagnostic approaches defined based on clinical practice. ResultsOf the 396 masses, 122 (30.8%) were benign and 274 (69.2%) were malignant. All SWE parameters were significantly higher in malignant masses (all p < 0.01). Vmax and Vratio(max) performed significantly better then Vratio(mean) (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). SWE-VTIQ improved US specificity in all diagnostic approaches, except when applied to BI-RADS 3 lesions. SWE-VTIQ reduced the false positive rate in 25% if applied only to BI-RADS 4A masses, maintaining a high sensitivity (98.9%, 95% confidence interval 97.1–100%) and a negative predictive value of 95.5%. When applied to BI-RADS 4A and 4B masses, SWE-VTIQ reduced the false positive rate in 54.4%. However, 13 malignant cases would be missed in this approach (4.7% of all malignant cases). ConclusionsSWE-VTIQ increases US specificity when applied to BI-RADS 4 A lesions, significantly reducing unnecessary interventions and preserving the diagnosis of malignant lesions. When applied also to BI-RADS® 4B lesions, SWE-VTIQ increases the number of false negative cases, which should be evaluated with caution.

LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN MOSCOW FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING (LDCT-MLCS): BASELINE RESULTS

Study aim. To justify selective lung cancer screening via low-dose computed tomography and evaluate its effectiveness. Materials and methods. In 2017 we have concluded the baseline stage of “Lowdose computed tomography in Moscow for lung cancer screening (LDCT-MLCS)” trial. The trial included 10 outpatient clinics with 64-detector CT units (Toshiba Aquilion 64 and Toshiba CLX). Special low-dose protocols have been developed for each unit with maximum effective dose of 1 mSv (in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 2.2.1, Sanitary Regulations 2.6.1.1192-03). The study involved 5,310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18-92 years (mean age 62 years). Diagnosis verification was carried out in the specialized medical organizations via consultations, additional instrumental, laboratory as well as pathohistological studies. The results were then entered into the “National Cancer Registry”. Results. 5310 patients (53% men, 47% women) aged 18 to 92 years (an average of 62 years) participated in the LDCT-MLCS. The final cohort was comprised of 4762 (89.6%) patients. We have detected 291 (6.1%) Lung-RADS 3 lesions, 228 (4.8%) Lung- RADS 4A lesions and 196 (4.1%) Lung-RADS 4B/4X lesions. All 4B and 4X lesions were routed in accordance with the project's methodology and legislative documents. Malignant neoplasms were verified in 84 cases (1.76% of the cohort). Stage I-II lung cancer was actively detected in 40.3% of these individuals. For the first time in the Russian Federation we have calculated the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one lung cancer (NNS=57) and to detect one Stage I lung cancer (NNS=207). Conclusions. Based on the global experience and our own practices, we argue that selective LDCT is the most systematic solution to the problem of early-stage lung cancer screening.

Adjuvant antibiotic loaded bio composite in the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis — A multicentre study

BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers are associated with a high morbidity and are common cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputations. The effect of debridement and the use of an adjuvant local antibiotic carrier in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with osteomyelitis was evaluated. MethodsA retrospective review of patients with diabetic foot ulceration and osteomyelitis treated by debridement with adjuvant local antibiotic was performed. Seventy patients with Texas Grade 3B & 3D lesions were included, with a mean age of 68 years. Cerament G, an antibiotic-loaded absorbable calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite bio-composite was used along with intraoperative multiple bone sampling and culture-specific systemic antibiotics. ResultsPatients were followed up until infection eradication or ulcer healing. Mean follow up was 10 months (4–28months). Nine patients had Charcot foot deformity, 14 had peripheral vascular disease. 62% of patients had forefoot, 5% midfoot and 33% hind foot involvement. Fifty-three patients (87%) had polymicrobial infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism isolated. Infection was eradicated in 63 patients (90%) with mean time to ulcer healing of 12 weeks. Seven patients were not cured and required further treatment. Five patients had below knee amputation. ConclusionsAdjuvant, local antibiotic therapy with an absorbable bio-composite can help achieve up to 90% cure rates in diabetic foot ulceration with osteomyelitis. Cerament G can act as effective void filler allowing dead space management after excision and preventing reinfection and the need for multiple surgical procedures. Level of evidenceLevel IV- case series.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia and the risk of underestimation: tissue sampling method, multifocality, and associated calcification significantly influence the diagnostic upgrade rate based on subsequent surgical specimens

BackgroundRisk assessment and therapeutic options are challenges when counselling patients with an atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) to undergo either open surgery or follow-up only.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a series of ADH lesions and assessed whether the morphological parameters of the biopsy materials indicated whether the patient should undergo surgery. A total of 207 breast biopsies [56 core needle biopsies (CNBs) and 151 vacuum-assisted biopsies (VABs)] histologically diagnosed as ADH were analyzed retrospectively, together with subsequently obtained surgical specimens. All histological slides were re-analyzed with regard to the presence/absence of ADH-associated calcification, other B3 lesions (lesion of uncertain malignant potential), extent of the lesion, and the presence of multifocality.ResultsThe overall underestimation rate for the whole cohort was 39% (57% for CNB, 33% for VAB). In the univariate analysis, the method of biopsy (CNB vs VAB, p = 0.002) and presence of multifocality in VAB specimens (p = 0.0176) were significant risk factors for the underestimation of the disease (ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive cancer detected on subsequent open biopsy). In the multivariate logistic regression model, the absence of calcification (p = 0.0252) and the presence of multifocality (unifocal vs multifocal ADH, p = 0.0147) in VAB specimens were significant risk factors for underestimation.ConclusionsMultifocal ADH without associated calcification diagnosed by CNB tends to have a higher upgrade rate. Because the upgrade rate was 16.5% even in the group with the lowest risk (VAB-diagnosed unifocal ADH with calcification), we could not identify a subgroup that would not require an open biopsy.

Role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the post biopsy management of B3 lesions: Preliminary results.

To evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in the post biopsy management of breast lesions classified as lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) by core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). The local ethics committee approved this retrospective study and for this type of study formal consent is not required. A total of 42 B3 lesions in 40 women aged 41-77 years were included in our study. All patients underwent CESM 2-3 weeks after the biopsy procedure and surgical excision was subsequently performed within 60 days of the CESM procedure. Three radiologists reviewed the images independently. The results were then compared with histologic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for confirmed demonstration of malignancy at CESM were 33.3%, 87.2%, 16.7%, and 94.4% for reader 1; 66.7%, 76.9%, 18.2%, and 96.7% for reader 2; 66.7%, 74.4%, 16.7%, and 96.7% for reader 3. Overall agreement on detection of malignant lesions using CESM among readers ranged from moderate to substantial (κ = .451-.696), for categorization of BPE from moderate to substantial (κ = .562-.711), and for evaluation of lesion intensity enhancement from fair to moderate (κ = .346-.459). In cases of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 1, BI-RADS 2, or BI-RADS 3 results at CESM, follow-up or VAB rather than surgical biopsy might be performed.

Management of BIRADS 3, 4A, and 4B Lesions Diagnosed as Pure Papilloma by Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy: Is Surgical Excision Necessary?

There is lack of consensus on managing papillomas due to varied upgrade rates in the literature related to variability in the studied populations. We specifically studied upgrade rates of pure papilloma diagnosed with ultrasound core biopsy (UCB) using spring-loaded (SLB) and vacuum-assisted (VAB) biopsy devices in patients with low-to-intermediate pre-test probability for malignancy on imaging. From 01/01/2008 to 06/30/2016, 227 patients with 248 pure papillomas classified as BI-RADS 3, 4a, and 4b were diagnosed by UCB and underwent surgical excision or clinical and/or imaging follow-up. Imaging features, biopsy device, and final pathology were documented. 177 lesions were biopsied with SLB (14-gauge) and 71 lesions with VAB (9-13 gauges). At surgery, upgrade rates to high-risk lesions and malignancy for SLB were 14.3% (22/154) and 1.9% (3/154), and for VAB were 3.5% (2/57) and 0% (0/57), respectively (p < 0.05). The combined surgical upgrade rate to high-risk lesions and malignancy was 11.4% (24/211) and 1.4% (3/211), respectively. The overall upgrade rate (including surgical and clinical and/or imaging follow-up) to high-risk lesions and malignancy was 9.7% (24/248) and 1.2% (3/248), respectively. No ultrasound features were predictive of upgrade. Rates of complete excision were 7.1% (11/154) for SLB and 19.3% (11/57) for VAB (p < 0.05). BI-RADS 3, 4a, or 4b masses biopsied with UCB revealed pure papilloma upgrade to malignancy in less than 2% of cases. SLB was associated with greater upgrades compared with VAB. Therefore, follow-up imaging is a reasonable alternative to excision, particular in those sampled by VAB. Excision could be considered if the diagnosis of a high-risk lesion would change clinical management.

Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula. Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal. Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely.

A new risk stratification score for the management of ultrasound-detected B3 breast lesions.

To develop a predictive scoring system for ultrasound-detected B3 lesions at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (US-CNB). A total of 2724 consecutive US-CNBs performed in our Institution (January 2011 to December 2014) were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) histopathological examination of the entire lesion or (b) availability of radiologic follow-up (FUP) ≥24months. Patient- and lesion-related variables-patients' age, lesion consistency, lesion size, vascularization, BI-RADS category, and US-CNB result-were analyzed. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for malignancy were calculated correlating US-CNB results with excision histology or FUP. A scoring system for underlying malignancy was developed using risk factors weighting. A total of 102 B3 lesions were included: 27 atypical ductal hyperplasia (26.5%), 5 lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (4.9%), 32 radial scar (31.4%), 37 papillary lesions (36.3%), and 1 fibroepithelial lesion (0.9%). Surgery was performed on 71/102 (69.6%) lesions, and 22/71 were malignant; the remaining 31/102 lesions (30.4%) were unchanged at FUP. The overall PPV for malignancy was 21.6%. Patients' age (odds ratio [OR]=3.63, P=0.008), lesion consistency (OR=5.96, P=0.001), BI-RADS category (OR=17.52, P<0.001), and CNB result (OR=3.6, P=0.008) were associated with a higher risk of malignancy underestimation and selected as risk factors in the score definition. Two risk groups were identified: low (0-2 points) and high risk (3-5 points), with significantly different risk of malignancy underestimation (8.0% vs 59.3%, P<0.001). The proposed score helps to predict the risk of malignancy underestimation and choose the management of B3 lesions at US-CNB.

Malignancy rates of B3-lesions in breast magnetic resonance imaging \u2013 do all lesions have to be excised?

BackgroundApproximately 10% of all MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (MR-VAB) are histologically classified as B3 lesions. In most of these cases surgical excision is recommended. The aim of our study was to evaluate the malignancy rates of different B3 lesions which are visible on MRI to allow a lesion-adapted recommendation of further procedure.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 572 consecutive MR-VAB was performed. Inclusion criteria were a representative (=successful) MR-VAB, histologic diagnosis of a B3 lesion and either the existence of a definite histology after surgical excision or proof of stability or regression of the lesion on follow-up MRI. Malignancy rates were evaluated for different histologies of B3 lesions. Lesion size and lesion morphology (mass/non-mass enhancement) on MRI were correlated with malignancy.ResultsOf all MR-VAB 43 lesions fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The malignancy rate of those B3 lesions was 23.3% (10/43). The highest malignancy rate was found in atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) lesions (50.0%; 4/8), 33.3% (2/6) in flat epithelial atypia (FEA), 28.6% (2/7) in lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN) and 12.5% (2/16) in papillary lesions (PL). All 6 complex sclerosing lesions were benign. Mass findings were significantly more frequently malignant (31.3%, 10/32; p < 0.05) than non-mass findings (0/11). Small lesions measuring 5–10 mm were most often malignant (35.0%; 7/20). All large lesions (> 20 mm) were not malignant (0/10). Intermediate sized lesions (11–20 mm) turned out to be malignant in 23.1% (3/13).ConclusionsThe malignancy rate of B3 lesions which were diagnosed after MR-VAB was 23.3%. ADH, FEA and LIN showed considerable malignancy rates (50%, 33% and 29%) and should therefore undergo surgical excision. None of the cases, which were diagnosed as radial scars, non-mass enhancement or larger lesions (> 20 mm) were malignant. Here, a follow-up MRI seems to be advisable to avoid unnecessary operations.Trial registrationRetrospective study design, waived by the IRB.

Lesions of \u201cuncertain malignant potential\u201d in the breast (B3) identified with mammography screening

BackgroundCore needle biopsy (CNB) is a standard diagnostic procedure in the setting of breast cancer screening. However, CNB may result in the borderline diagnoses of lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3). The aim of this study was to access the outcome of lesions diagnosed as B3 category in a large series of screen-detected cases to evaluate the rates of malignancy for the different histological subtypes.MethodsWe identified all CNBs over a six-year period (2009-2015) in a breast cancer screening unit in Germany. A total of 8.388 CNB’s were performed for screen detected breast lesions. B3 diagnosis comprised 4.5% (376/8.388). Of the 376 patients who were diagnosed as B3, 299 underwent subsequent excision biopsy with final excision histology.ResultsOut of 376 patients diagnosed with B3 lesions, the prevalence of different histopathology showed 161 (42.8%) patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 98 (26.1%) with flat epithelial atypia (FEA), 50 women (13.3%) showed lobular neoplasia (LN), in 40 (10.6%) patients papillary findings and in 27 patients (7.2%) a radial scar complex. Final excision histology was benign in 74% (221/299) and malignant in 26% (78/299) of the patients. Lesion specific positive predictive values (PPV) for a subsequent diagnosis of in situ or invasive carcinoma were as follows: ADH 40%, FEA 20.5%, papillary lesion 13.5%, radial scar 16.6%, LN 0%.ConclusionOur results show that approximately one-third of core needle biopsies of screen detected breast lesions classified as B3 are premalignant or malignant on excision.Lesions of uncertain malignant potential of the breast (B3) are heterogeneous in respect to risk of malignancy.

NHS Breast Screening multidisciplinary working group guidelines for the diagnosis and management of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential on core biopsy (B3 lesions)

Needle core biopsy is considered the histological diagnostic method of choice for screen-detected breast lesions. Although the majority are definitively diagnosed as normal, benign, or malignant, approximately 7% are categorised as B3, of uncertain malignant potential. These include a wide range of lesions with different risks of associated malignancy from <2% to approaching 40% from literature review in UK practice. Historically, these have typically been surgically excised as a diagnostic procedure but the majority are then proven to be benign. An alternative approach, for many of these lesions, is thorough sampling/excision by vacuum-assisted biopsy techniques to exclude the presence of co-existing carcinoma. This would potentially reduce the benign open biopsy rate whilst maintaining accuracy of cancer diagnosis. A group from the Radiology, Surgery, and Pathology NHS Breast Screening Programme Co-ordinating Committees and an additional co-opted expert were charged with review and development of guidelines for the clinical management of B3 lesions. The guidelines reflect suggested practice as stated by the NHS Breast Screening Programme and approved by the Royal College of Radiologists.

Relevance of B3 lesions in breast diagnosis – frequency and therapeutic consequences

AbstractWith improvements in breast imaging and minimally invasive interventions, detection of early breast cancer has increased. However, with the improved diagnostic capabilities, the risk of false-positive benign lesions as well as lesions classified as B3 by histopathology has also increased. Varying rates of malignancies are associated with B3 lesions, raising the question of whether such lesions should always be surgically removed. The results of our retrospective analysis should assist in this decision-making process.307 core needle or vacuum-assisted needle biopsies in which B3 lesions were found were examined. The most common lesions were intraductal papillomas (44 %), atypical ductal hyperplasia (22.8 %), flat epithelial atypia (9.4 %), phyllodes tumours (6.5 %), radial scars (5.9 %), LIN 1 (4.9 %), complex fibroadenomas (3.3 %) and LIN 2 (1.6 %). The frequencies depended considerably on whether the tissue was obtained by core biopsy or vacuum biopsy. Stereotactic vacuum biopsy was generally performed in the case of microcalcification not apparent on sonography. Lesions visible on ultrasound had core needle biopsy.Surgery was performed in 254 cases and a malignancy was found in 27.2 % on the final histopathology. Malignancy was found in 24.6 % of 114 cases initially diagnosed as intraductal papilloma. Similarly, cancer was discovered in 48.4 % of the 62 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia, in 2.4 % of the 41 cases of flat epithelial atypia, complex fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour, in 20.7 % of the 29 cases of LIN 1 and radial scar as well as in 50 % of the 8 cases of LIN 2, adenomyoepithelioma and atypical apocrine metaplasia.These data indicate the necessity for complete surgical removal of a B3 lesion when it is discovered using the core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy technique. The decision not to perform surgery can be made when the risk of associated malignancy is deemed low in the clinical pathology conference, but careful follow-up is essential.

B3 lesions of the breast; is watchful waiting an option?

Introduction: Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) represent a heterogeneous group of pathologies with a 10 - 30% overall risk of malignancy diagnosis after surgical excision. Malignancy risk varies depending on B3 subtypes. With such heterogeneity, ideal management of patients with B3 lesions is unclear.

Management of B3 lesions: Is yearly mammography for five years necessary?

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend excision and yearly mammographic follow-up of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3). This is due to the risk of upgrade to malignancy and the 3-5 fold increased risk of breast cancer in the long term. We present a 10-year experience in a single centre to determine the upgrade rate and yield from yearly surveillance.

Radiomics Based on Adapted Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Helps to Clarify Most Mammographic Findings Suspicious for Cancer.

Purpose To evaluate a radiomics model of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 breast lesions extracted from breast-tissue-optimized kurtosis magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for lesion characterization by using a sensitivity threshold similar to that of biopsy. Materials and Methods This institutional study included 222 women at two independent study sites (site 1: training set of 95 patients; mean age ± standard deviation, 58.6 years ± 6.6; 61 malignant and 34 benign lesions; site 2: independent test set of 127 patients; mean age, 58.2 years ± 6.8; 61 malignant and 66 benign lesions). All women presented with a finding suspicious for cancer at x-ray mammography (BI-RADS 4 or 5) and an indication for biopsy. Before biopsy, diffusion-weighted MR imaging (b values, 0-1500 sec/mm2) was performed by using 1.5-T imagers from different MR imaging vendors. Lesions were segmented and voxel-based kurtosis fitting adapted to account for fat signal contamination was performed. A radiomics feature model was developed by using a random forest regressor. The fixed model was tested on an independent test set. Conventional interpretations of MR imaging were also assessed for comparison. Results The radiomics feature model reduced false-positive results from 66 to 20 (specificity 70.0% [46 of 66]) at the predefined sensitivity of greater than 98.0% [60 of 61] in the independent test set, with BI-RADS 4a and 4b lesions benefiting from the analysis (specificity 74.0%, [37 of 50]; 60.0% [nine of 15]) and BI-RADS 5 lesions showing no added benefit. The model significantly improved specificity compared with the median apparent diffusion coefficient (P < .001) and apparent kurtosis coefficient (P = .02) alone. Conventional reading of dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging provided sensitivity of 91.8% (56 of 61) and a specificity of 74.2% (49 of 66). Accounting for fat signal intensity during fitting significantly improved the area under the curve of the model (P = .001). Conclusion A radiomics model based on kurtosis diffusion-weighted imaging performed by using MR imaging machines from different vendors allowed for reliable differentiation between malignant and benign breast lesions in both a training and an independent test data set. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

AB205. 249. Analysis of the outcomes of B3 lesions detected at Breast Check Unit at University Hospital Galway over 6 years

AB205. 249. Analysis of the outcomes of B3 lesions detected at Breast Check Unit at University Hospital Galway over 6 years

Does patient age affect the PPV3 of ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound categories 4 and 5 in the diagnostic setting?

To calculate the positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) of the Ultrasound section of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS US) atlas categories 4 and 5 in different age groups and to determine whether patient age influences the PPV3 of each category in the diagnosis of breast lesions. We identified 2,433 ACR BI-RADS US categories 4 and 5 lesions with a known pathological diagnosis in 2,433 women. The patients were classified into three age groups (<35, 35-50, and >50 years). The age-related PPV3 of each category in the three age groups were calculated based on the pathological diagnoses and compared using the chi-squared test. The overall PPV3 of each category was within the reference range provided by the ACR in 2013. PPV3 gradually increased with increasing age in patients with category 4 lesions. PPV3 in the oldest group with subcategories 4A and 4B lesions were close to or exceeded the reference values. PPV3 and age were significantly associated in patients with category 4 lesions according to the newest edition of ACR BI-RADS US in the diagnostic setting. Closer attention should be given to older patients when assigning a final assessment category. • In patients with category 4 lesions , the likelihood of malignancy is associated with age. • In patients with category 5 lesions, the association is not definite. • Closer attention should be given to older patients in applying the ACR BI-RADS US.