Β-arrestin Signaling Pathways Research Articles

Comparing CB1 receptor GIRK channel responses to receptor internalization using a kinetic imaging assay

The type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) mediates neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system. Endogenous, plant-derived, synthetic cannabinoids bind to CB1R, initiating the inhibitory G-protein (Gi) and the β-arrestin signaling pathways. Within the Gi signaling pathway, CB1R activates G protein-gated, inwardly-rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. The β-arrestin pathway reduces CB1R expression on the cell surface through receptor internalization. Because of their association with analgesia and drug tolerance, GIRK channels and receptor internalization are of interest to the development of pharmaceuticals. This research used immortalized mouse pituitary gland cells transduced with a pH-sensitive, fluorescently-tagged human CB1R (AtT20-SEPCB1) to measure GIRK channel activity and CB1R internalization. Cannabinoid-induced GIRK channel activity is measured by using a fluorescent membrane-potential sensitive dye. We developed a kinetic imaging assay that visualizes and measures CB1R internalization. All cannabinoids stimulated a GIRK channel response with a rank order potency of WIN55,212-2 > (±)CP55,940 > Δ9-THC > AEA. Efficacy was expressed relative to (±)CP55,940 with a rank order efficacy of (±)CP55,940 > WIN55, 212-2 > AEA > Δ9-THC. All cannabinoids stimulated CB1R internalization with a rank order potency of (±)CP55,940 > WIN55, 212-2 > AEA > Δ9-THC. Internalization efficacy was normalized to (±)CP55,940 with a rank order efficacy of WIN55,212-2 > AEA > (±)CP55,940 > Δ9-THC. (±)CP55,940 was significantly more potent and efficacious than AEA and Δ9-THC at stimulating a GIRK channel response; no significant differences between potency and efficacy were observed with CB1R internalization. No significant differences were found when comparing a cannabinoid’s GIRK channel and CB1R internalization response. In conclusion, AtT20-SEPCB1 cells can be used to assess cannabinoid-induced CB1R internalization. While cannabinoids display differential Gi signaling when compared to each other, this did not extend to CB1R internalization.

Structure-based identification of a G protein–biased allosteric modulator of cannabinoid receptor CB1

Cannabis sativa is known for its therapeutic benefit in various diseases including pain relief by targeting cannabinoid receptors. The primary component of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and other agonists engage the orthosteric site of CB1, activating both Gi and β-arrestin signaling pathways. The activation of diverse pathways could result in on-target side effects and cannabis addiction, which may hinder therapeutic potential. A significant challenge in pharmacology is the design of a ligand that can modulate specific signaling of CB1. By leveraging insights from the structure-function selectivity relationship (SFSR), we have identified Gi signaling-biased agonist-allosteric modulators (ago-BAMs). Further, two cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures reveal the binding mode of ago-BAM at the extrahelical allosteric site of CB1. Combining mutagenesis and pharmacological studies, we elucidated the detailed mechanism of ago-BAM-mediated biased signaling. Notably, ago-BAM CB-05 demonstrated analgesic efficacy with fewer side effects, minimal drug toxicity and no cannabis addiction in mouse pain models. In summary, our finding not only suggests that ago-BAMs of CB1 provide a potential nonopioid strategy for pain management but also sheds light on BAM identification for GPCRs.

Identification of an Antagonist Targeting G Protein and β-Arrestin Signaling Pathways of 5-HT7R.

In consideration of the limited number of FDA-approved drugs for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), significant efforts have been devoted to identifying novel drug candidates. Among these, 5-HT7R modulators have garnered considerable attention due to their potential in alleviating autism-like behaviors in ASD animal models. In this study, we designed and synthesized biphenyl-3-ylmethylpyrrolidines 3 and biphenyl-3-yl-dihydroimidazoles 4 as 5-HT7R modulators. Through extensive biological tests of 3 and 4 in G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways of 5-HT7R, it was determined that 2-(2'-methoxy-[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole 4h acted as a 5-HT7R antagonist in both signaling pathways. In in vivo study with Shank3-/- transgenic (TG) mice, the self-grooming behavior test was performed with 4h, resulting in a significant reduction in the duration of self-grooming. In addition, an immunohistochemical experiment with 4h restored reduced neurogenesis in Shank3-/- TG mice, which is confirmed by the quantification of doublecortin (DCX) positive neurons, suggesting the promising therapeutic potential of 4h.

Snapshot of the cannabinoid receptor 1-arrestin complex unravels the biased signaling mechanism

Cannabis activates the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), which elicits analgesic and emotion regulation benefits, along with adverse effects, via Gi and β-arrestin signaling pathways. However, the lack of understanding of the mechanism of β-arrestin-1 (βarr1) coupling and signaling bias has hindered drug development targeting CB1. Here, we present the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of CB1-βarr1 complex bound to the synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-Fubinaca (FUB), revealing notable differences in the transducer pocket and ligand-binding site compared with the Gi protein complex. βarr1 occupies a wider transducer pocket promoting substantial outward movement of the TM6 and distinctive twin toggle switch rearrangements, whereas FUB adopts a different pose, inserting more deeply than the Gi-coupled state, suggesting the allosteric correlation between the orthosteric binding pocket and the partner protein site. Taken together, our findings unravel the molecular mechanism of signaling bias toward CB1, facilitating the development of CB1 agonists.

Beta-arrestin-biased agonism promotes TRPC6-mediated calcium influx in human podocytes

Background: Angiotensin Receptor blockers (ARBs) are the first-line treatment for hypertension and other chronic kidney diseases and act by inhibiting signaling through the angiotensin 1 receptor (AT1R). AT1R activation initiates signaling through G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) effector signaling and β-arrestins. Recently, a novel AT1R agonist TRV120027 (TRV) that selectively activates the β-arrestin cascade without impacting the GCPR pathway has become available. Therefore, we hypothesized that β-arrestin and G-protein signaling pathways via AT1R have distinct downstream effects in podocytes. Furthermore, we propose that β-arrestin signaling initiates TRPC6-mediated Ca 2+ entry. Methods: We used a conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell line to determine β-arrestin’s involvement in podocyte calcium signaling and cytoskeletal reorganization. Intracellular Ca 2+ influx (Fluo-4 AM) and NO response (DAF-FM) to Ang II or TRV applications were analyzed with confocal microscopy. The role of TRPC channels was tested by single-channel electrophysiology and confocal imaging using a variety of commercially available inhibitors (AC1903 for TRPC5 and GSK283350A, SAR7334 for TRPC6). Western blotting for apoptosis-associated proteins, TUNEL staining to detect DNA cleavage, and actin cytoskeleton rearrangements were performed in podocytes exposed to TRV or Ang II treatment. Results: Our experiments determined that TRV-mediated β-arrestin pathway activation in podocytes promotes rapid elevation of intracellular Ca 2+ in a dose-dependent manner (IC 50 =15μM, ligand-receptor binding fit modeled with Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, adj. R 2 =0.93). Interestingly, the amplitude of β-arrestin-mediated Ca 2+ influx was four times higher than the response to similar Ang II concentrations (t-test, n≥30, p<0.05). Moreover, the TRV response was significantly increased under hyperglycemic stress conditions, and promoted rapid apoptosis in podocytes (one-way ANOVA, n≥21, p=0.003). The pharmacological blockade of TRPC6, but not TRPC5, significantly attenuated Ca 2+ influx in response to β-arrestin. In contrast to Ang II, TRV does not induce AT1R-mediated NO production, suggesting that β-arrestin activation only targets AT1R, and not AT2R. Single-channel analyses show rapid activation of TRPC activity in response to acute TRV application in podocytes (one-way ANOVA, n=8, p=0.004). Overall prolonged activation of the β-arrestin pathway in podocytes results in enhanced actin bundle thickness, abnormal actin cytoskeleton distribution, and increased apoptotic cell markers. Conclusions: TRV-mediated β-arrestin signaling in podocytes promotes high ionotropic TRPC6 channel-mediated Ca 2+ influx, cytoskeleton rearrangement, and apoptosis, possibly leading to severe defects in glomerular filtration barrier integrity and kidney health. Under these circumstances, the potential therapeutic application of TRV for hypertension treatment is controversial and requires further investigation. DK126720 (to OP), DK129227 (to AS and OP), and NIH/NCATS/SCTR UL1TR001450/SCTR 2214 (to OP), endowed funds from the SC SmartState Centers of Excellence (to OP), Veterans Affairs Support Veterans Affairs (Merit Award I01 BX000820 to JL), research grant from Dialysis Clinic, Inc (to JL). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Mechanism of activation and biased signaling in complement receptor C5aR1

The complement system plays an important role in the innate immune response to invading pathogens. The complement fragment C5a is one of its important effector components and exerts diverse physiological functions through activation of the C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1) and associated downstream G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. Dysfunction of the C5a-C5aR1 axis is linked to numerous inflammatory and immune-mediated diseases, but the structural basis for activation and biased signaling of C5aR1 remains elusive. Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of the activated wild-type C5aR1–Gi protein complex bound to each of the following: C5a, the hexapeptidic agonist C5apep, and the G protein-biased agonist BM213. The structures reveal the landscape of the C5a–C5aR1 interaction as well as a common motif for the recognition of diverse orthosteric ligands. Moreover, combined with mutagenesis studies and cell-based pharmacological assays, we deciphered a framework for biased signaling using different peptide analogs and provided insight into the activation mechanism of C5aR1 by solving the structure of C5aR1I116A mutant–Gi signaling activation complex induced by C089, which exerts antagonism on wild-type C5aR1. In addition, unusual conformational changes in the intracellular end of transmembrane domain 7 and helix 8 upon agonist binding suggest a differential signal transduction process. Collectively, our study provides mechanistic understanding into the ligand recognition, biased signaling modulation, activation, and Gi protein coupling of C5aR1, which may facilitate the future design of therapeutic agents.

Biased agonists differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles in Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

The structural features that contribute to the efficacy of biased agonists targeting G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) towards G proteins or β-arrestin (β-arr) signaling pathways is nebulous, although such knowledge is critical in designing biased ligands. The dynamics of the agonist-GPCR complex is one of the critical factors in determining agonist bias. Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) is an ideal model system to study the molecular basis of bias since it has multiple β-arr2 and Gq protein biased agonists as well as experimentally solved three dimensional structures. Using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations for the Angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) bound to ten different agonists, we infer that the agonist bound receptor samples conformations with different relative weights, from both the inactive and active state ensembles of the receptor. This concept is perhaps extensible to other class A GPCRs. Such a weighted mixed ensemble recapitulates the inter-residue distance distributions measured for different agonists bound AT1R using DEER experiments. The ratio of the calculated relative strength of the allosteric communication to β-arr2 vs Gq coupling sites scale similarly to the experimentally measured bias factors. Analysis of the inter-residue distance distributions of the activation microswitches involved in class A GPCR activation suggests that β-arr2 biased agonists turn on different combination of microswitches with different relative strengths of activation. We put forth a model that activation microswitches behave like rheostats that tune the relative efficacy of the biased agonists toward the two signaling pathways. Finally, based on our data we propose that the agonist specific residue contacts in the binding site elicit a combinatorial response in the microswitches that in turn differentially modulate the receptor conformation ensembles resulting in differences in coupling to Gq and β-arrestin.

G protein–biased GPR3 signaling ameliorates amyloid pathology in a preclinical Alzheimer’s disease mouse model

Biased G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands, which preferentially activate G protein or β-arrestin signaling pathways, are leading to the development of drugs with superior efficacy and reduced side effects in heart disease, pain management, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although GPCRs are implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), biased GPCR signaling is a largely unexplored area of investigation in AD. Our previous work demonstrated that GPR3-mediated β-arrestin signaling modulates amyloid-β (Aβ) generation invitro and that Gpr3 deficiency ameliorates Aβ pathology invivo. However, Gpr3-deficient mice display several adverse phenotypes, including elevated anxiety-like behavior, reduced fertility, and memory impairment, which are potentially associated with impaired G protein signaling. Here, we generated a G protein-biased GPR3 mouse model to investigate the physiological and pathophysiological consequences of selective elimination of GPR3-mediated β-arrestin signaling invivo. In contrast to Gpr3-deficient mice, G protein-biased GPR3 mice do not display elevated anxiety levels, reduced fertility, or cognitive impairment. We further determined that G protein-biased signaling reduces soluble Aβ levels and leads to a decrease in the area and compaction of amyloid plaques in the preclinical AppNL-G-F AD mouse model. The changes in amyloid pathology are accompanied by robust microglial and astrocytic hypertrophy, which suggest a protective glial response that may limit amyloid plaque development in G protein-biased GPR3 AD mice. Collectively, these studies indicate that GPR3-mediated G protein and β-arrestin signaling produce discrete and separable effects and provide proof of concept for the development of safer GPCR-targeting therapeutics with more directed pharmacological action for AD.

Biased agonists of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 differentially signal through Gαi:β-arrestin complexes.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors and signal through the proximal effectors, G proteins and β-arrestins, to influence nearly every biological process. The G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways have largely been considered separable; however, direct interactions between Gα proteins and β-arrestins have been described that appear to be part of a distinct GPCR signaling pathway. Within these complexes, Gαi/o, but not other Gα protein subtypes, directly interacts with β-arrestin, regardless of the canonical Gα protein that is coupled to the GPCR. Here, we report that the endogenous biased chemokine agonists of CXCR3 (CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11), together with two small-molecule biased agonists, differentially formed Gαi:β-arrestin complexes. Formation of the Gαi:β-arrestin complexes did not correlate well with either G protein activation or β-arrestin recruitment. β-arrestin biosensors demonstrated that ligands that promoted Gαi:β-arrestin complex formation generated similar β-arrestin conformations. We also found that Gαi:β-arrestin complexes did not couple to the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK, as is observed with other receptors such as the V2 vasopressin receptor, but did couple with the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2, which suggests context-dependent signaling by these complexes. These findings reinforce the notion that Gαi:β-arrestin complex formation is a distinct GPCR signaling pathway and enhance our understanding of the spectrum of biased agonism.

Discovery of G Protein-Biased Antagonists against 5-HT7R.

5-HT7R belongs to a family of G protein-coupled receptors and is associated with a variety of physiological processes in the central nervous system via the activation of the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT). To develop selective and biased 5-HT7R ligands, we designed and synthesized a series of pyrazolyl-diazepanes 2 and pyrazolyl-piperazines 3, which were evaluated for binding affinities to 5-HTR subtypes and functional selectivity for G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways of 5-HT7R. Among them, 1-(3-(3-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1,4-diazepane 2c showed the best binding affinity for 5-HT7R and selectivity over other 5-HTR subtypes. It was also revealed as a G protein-biased antagonist. The self-grooming behavior test was performed with 2c in vivo with Shank3-/- transgenic (TG) mice, wherein 2c significantly reduced self-grooming duration time to the level of wild-type mice. The results suggest that 5-HT7R could be a potential therapeutic target for treating autism spectrum disorder stereotypy.

Critical APJ receptor residues in extracellular domains that influence effector selectivity.

Human APJ receptor/apelin receptor (APJR), activated by apelin peptide isoforms, regulates a wide range of physiological processes. The role of extracellular loop (ECL) domain residues of APJR in ligand binding and receptor activation has not been established yet. Based on multiple sequence alignment of APJ receptor from various organisms, we identified conserved residues in the extracellular domains. Alanine substitutions of specific residues were characterized to evaluate their ligand binding efficiency and Gq -, Gi -, and β-arrestin-mediated signaling. Mutation-dependent variation in ligand binding and signaling was observed. W197 A in ECL2 and L276 L277 W279 -AAA in ECL3 were deficient in Gi and β-arrestin signaling pathways with relatively preserved Gq -mediated signaling. T169 T170 -AA, Y182 A, and T190 A mutants in ECL2 showed impaired β-arrestin-dependent cell signaling while maintaining G protein- mediated signaling. Structural comparison with angiotensin II type I receptor revealed the importance of ECL2 and ECL3 residues in APJR ligand binding and signaling. Our results unequivocally confirm the specific role of these ECL residues in ligand binding and in orchestrating receptor conformations that are involved in preferential/biased signaling functions.

Potent and Subtype-Selective Dopamine D2 Receptor Biased Partial Agonists Discovered via an Ugi-Based Approach.

Using a previously unexplored, efficient, and versatile multicomponent method, we herein report the rapid generation of novel potent and subtype-selective DRD2 biased partial agonists. This strategy exemplifies the search for diverse and previously unexplored moieties for the secondary/allosteric pharmacophore of the common phenyl-piperazine scaffold. The pharmacological characterization of the new compound series led to the identification of several ligands with excellent DRD2 affinity and subtype selectivity and remarkable functional selectivity for either the cAMP (22a and 24d) or the β-arrestin (27a and 29c) signaling pathways. These results were further interpreted on the basis of molecular models of these ligands in complex with the recent DRD2 crystal structures, highlighting the critical role of the secondary/allosteric pharmacophore in modulating the functional selectivity profile.

Discovery of G Protein-Biased Ligands against 5-HT7R.

There has been significant attention concerning the biased agonism of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and it has resulted in various pharmacological benefits. 5-HT7R belongs to a GPCR, and it is a promising pharmaceutical target for the treatment of neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Based on our previous research, we synthesized a series of 6-chloro-2'-methoxy biphenyl derivatives 1, 2, and 3 with a variety of amine scaffolds. These compounds were evaluated for their binding affinities to 5-HTR subtypes and their functional selectivity toward the Gs protein and the β-arrestin signaling pathways of 5-HT7R. Among them, 2-(6-chloro-2'-methoxy-[1,1'-biphenyl]-3-yl)-N-ethylethan-1-amine, 2b, was found to be a G-protein-biased ligand of 5-HT7R. In an in vivo study with Shank3 transgenic mice, the self-grooming behavior test was performed with 2b, which increased the duration of self-grooming. The experiments further suggested that 5-HT7R is associated with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and could be a therapeutic target for the treatment of stereotypy in ASDs.

A G protein-biased S1P1 agonist, SAR247799, protects endothelial cells without affecting lymphocyte numbers.

Endothelial dysfunction is a hallmark of tissue injury and is believed to initiate the development of vascular diseases. Sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor-1 (S1P1) plays fundamental physiological roles in endothelial function and lymphocyte homing. Currently available clinical molecules that target this receptor are desensitizing and are essentially S1P1 functional antagonists that cause lymphopenia. They are clinically beneficial in autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis. In patients, several side effects of S1P1 desensitization have been attributed to endothelial damage, suggesting that drugs with the opposite effect, namely, the ability to activate S1P1, could help to restore endothelial homeostasis. We found and characterized a biased agonist of S1P1, SAR247799, which preferentially activated downstream G protein signaling to a greater extent than β-arrestin and internalization signaling pathways. SAR247799 activated S1P1 on endothelium without causing receptor desensitization and potently activated protection pathways in human endothelial cells. In a pig model of coronary endothelial damage, SAR247799 improved the microvascular hyperemic response without reducing lymphocyte numbers. Similarly, in a rat model of renal ischemia/reperfusion injury, SAR247799 preserved renal structure and function at doses that did not induce S1P1-desensitizing effects, such as lymphopenia and lung vascular leakage. In contrast, a clinically used S1P1 functional antagonist, siponimod, conferred minimal renal protection and desensitized S1P1 These findings demonstrate that sustained S1P1 activation can occur pharmacologically without compromising the immune response, providing a new approach to treat diseases associated with endothelial dysfunction and vascular hyperpermeability.

Etrasimod, a Selective S1P1,4,5 Receptor Modulator, Exhibits Differential G Protein Signaling Compared to Other S1P Receptor Modulators

BackgroundEtrasimod (APD334) is an oral, selective sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator in development for atopic dermatitis and inflammatory bowel disease. In humans, S1P receptor modulators decrease heart rate at first‐dose due to initial on‐target S1P receptor 1 (S1P1) agonism in cardiac tissue. S1P1 agonism activates Gi and β‐arrestin signaling pathways: β‐arrestin activation leads to receptor internalization, the proposed mechanism by which S1P receptor modulators regulate lymphocyte trafficking; Gi‐coupled signaling activates G‐protein coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels, that may contribute to the regulation of heart rate. Approved or investigational S1P receptor modulators have demonstrated different degrees of heart rate reduction and atrioventricular block in clinical studies. Such differences may be the result of differential signaling through the Gi coupled GIRK pathway.AimTo investigate S1P receptor expression in human sinoatrial (SA) node tissue, and the relative S1P1 mediated signaling events and GIRK channel activation of etrasimod and other S1P receptor modulators in the context of first dose heart rate effects.MethodsS1P receptor profiling was performed by qPCR in normal human primary SA node and right atrium samples. Potencies for multiple S1P receptor modulators to activate different S1P1 downstream signaling pathways (GTPγS, cAMP, β‐arrestin, S1P1 internalization) were measured in recombinant human‐S1P1 expressing cells. Gi mediated inhibition of cAMP was also measured in primary HUVEC. GIRK channel activation was measured in isolated adult human primary atrial myocytes.ResultsProfiling of S1P receptors in normal human atrial tissue and SA node demonstrated enriched expression of S1P1,2,3 with only minor expression of S1P4,5. Etrasimod was equipotent to other S1P receptor‐ modulators such as ozanimod, fingolimod, and siponimod in promoting β‐arrestin recruitment and S1P1 receptor internalization. Etrasimod was significantly less potent than ozanimod, fingolimod, and siponimod in assays measuring G‐protein activation (GTPγS binding and cAMP inhibition). In comparisons of GIRK activation, etrasimod was found to be a less potent activator of human atrial GIRK channels than ozanimod.ConclusionsWhen compared to other S1P1 modulators, the pharmacological profile of etrasimod at the S1P1 receptor suggests diminished capacity for signaling through Gi‐protein dependent pathways believed to be responsible for transient reductions in heart rate, while maintaining potent signaling in the β‐arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization related pathways underpinning the therapeutic efficacy of S1P1 modulators in immune‐mediated inflammatory disease settings.Support or Funding InformationThe study was sponsored by Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Residues and residue pairs of evolutionary importance differentially direct signaling bias of D2 dopamine receptors

The D2 dopamine receptor and the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT2A) are closely-related G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from the class A bioamine subfamily. Despite structural similarity, they respond to distinct ligands through distinct downstream pathways, whose dysregulation is linked to depression, bipolar disorder, addiction, and psychosis. They are important drug targets, and it is important to understand how their bias toward G-protein versus β-arrestin signaling pathways is regulated. Previously, evolution-based computational approaches, difference Evolutionary Trace and Evolutionary Trace-Mutual information (ET-Mip), revealed residues and residue pairs that, when switched in the D2 receptor to the corresponding residues from 5-HT2A, altered ligand potency and G-protein activation efficiency. We have tested these residue swaps for their ability to trigger recruitment of β-arrestin2 in response to dopamine or serotonin. The results reveal that the selected residues modulate agonist potency, maximal efficacy, and constitutive activity of β-arrestin2 recruitment. Whereas dopamine potency for most variants was similar to that for WT and lower than for G-protein activation, potency in β-arrestin2 recruitment for N124H3.42 was more than 5-fold higher. T205M5.54 displayed high constitutive activity, enhanced dopamine potency, and enhanced efficacy in β-arrestin2 recruitment relative to WT, and L379F6.41 was virtually inactive. These striking differences from WT activity were largely reversed by a compensating mutation (T205M5.54/L379F6.41) at residues previously identified by ET-Mip as functionally coupled. The observation that the signs and relative magnitudes of the effects of mutations in several cases are at odds with their effects on G-protein activation suggests that they also modulate signaling bias.

The Utilization of Mu-Opioid Receptor Biased Agonists: Oliceridine, an Opioid Analgesic with Reduced Adverse Effects.

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current understanding of opioid pathways in mediating and/or modulating analgesia and adverse effects. Oliceridine is highlighted as a novel mu-opioid receptor agonist with selective activation of G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. Oliceridine (TRV130; [(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]({2-[(9R)-9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethyl})amine) is a novel MOR agonist that selectively activates G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. A growing body of evidence suggests that compared to existing MOR agonists, Oliceridine and other G protein-selective modulators may produce therapeutic analgesic effects with reduced adverse effects. Oliceridine provides analgesic benefits of a pure opioid agonist while limiting related adverse effects mediated through the β-arrestin pathway. Recent insights into the function and structure of G protein-coupled receptors has led to the development of novel analgesic therapies.

Discovery of β-Arrestin Biased Ligands of 5-HT7R.

Though many studies have been published about therapeutic potentials of selective 5-HT7R ligands, there have been few biased ligands of 5-HT7R. The development of potent and selective biased ligands of 5-HT7R would be of great help in understanding the relationship between pharmacological effects and G protein/β-arrestin signaling pathways of 5-HT7R. In order to identify 5-HT7R ligands with biased agonism, we designed and synthesized a series of tetrahydroazepine derivatives 1 and 2 with arylpyrazolo moiety or arylisoxazolo moiety. Through several biological evaluations such as binding affinity, selectivity profile, and functions in G protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways, 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydropyrazolo[3,4- d]azepine 1g was discovered as the β-arrestin biased ligand of 5-HT7R. In an electroencephalogram (EEG) test, 1g increased total non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep time and decreased total rapid eye movement (REM) sleep time.

Angiotensin II cyclic analogs as tools to investigate AT1R biased signaling mechanisms

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) produce pleiotropic effects by their capacity to engage numerous signaling pathways once activated. Functional selectivity (also called biased signaling), where specific compounds can bring GPCRs to adopt conformations that enable selective receptor coupling to distinct signaling pathways, continues to be significantly investigated. However, an important but often overlooked aspect of functional selectivity is the capability of ligands such as angiotensin II (AngII) to adopt specific conformations that may preferentially bind to selective GPCRs structures. Understanding both receptor and ligand conformation is of the utmost importance for the design of new drugs targeting GPCRs. In this study, we examined the properties of AngII cyclic analogs to impart biased agonism on the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R). Positions 3 and 5 of AngII were substituted for cysteine and homocysteine residues ([Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII, [Sar1Cys3Hcy5]AngII and [Sar1Cys3,5]AngII) and the resulting analogs were evaluated for their capacity to activate the Gq/11, G12, Gi2, Gi3, Gz, ERK and β-arrestin (βarr) signaling pathways via AT1R. Interestingly, [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII exhibited potency and full efficacy on all pathways tested with the exception of the Gq pathway. Molecular dynamic simulations showed that the energy barrier associated with the insertion of residue Phe8 of AngII within the hydrophobic core of AT1R, associated with Gq/11 activation, is increased with [Sar1Hcy3,5]AngII. These results suggest that constraining the movements of molecular determinants within a given ligand by introducing cyclic structures may lead to the generation of novel ligands providing more efficient biased agonism.

Effects of acute and repeated treatment with the biased mu opioid receptor agonist TRV130 (oliceridine) on measures of antinociception, gastrointestinal function, and abuse liability in rodents.

TRV130 (oliceridine; N-[(3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl]-2-[(9 R)-9-pyridin-2-yl-6-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-9-yl]ethanamine) is a novel mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist that preferentially activates G-protein versus β-arrestin signaling pathways coupled to MORs. Prevailing evidence suggests that TRV130 and other G-protein-biased MOR agonists may produce therapeutic analgesic effects with reduced adverse effects compared to existing MOR agonists. This study compared the effects of acute and repeated TRV130 administration on measures of antinociception, gastrointestinal function, and abuse liability in rodents. We hypothesized that TRV130 would produce robust and sustained antinociception and abuse-related effects during repeated treatment, but that tolerance would develop to gastrointestinal inhibition. Antinociception was assessed using a warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure in mice. Gastrointestinal function was assessed in mice using an in vivo measure of fecal output and in vitro assays of colonic propulsion and of colon and ileum circular muscle contraction. Abuse liability was assessed in rats using an intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure. (+)-TRV130 was administered with acute and repeated dosing regimens, and (-)-TRV130 was also examined in the ICSS procedure to assess stereoselectivity. Acute (+)-TRV130 treatment produced robust antinociception, complete inhibition of gastrointestinal function, and weak abuse-related effects. Repeated (+)-TRV130 treatment failed to produce tolerance to antinociception or gastrointestinal inhibition, and abuse-related effects were enhanced by repeated treatment. Effects of acute and repeated (+)-TRV130 in these procedures resemble effects of morphine, with the exception that TRV130 antinociception was more resistant to tolerance. (-)-TRV130 was inactive. These results suggest that TRV130 retains undesirable constipating and abuse-related effects during repeated treatment despite its bias for G-protein signaling.