Existing study shows that small-strain shear modulus is a promising parameter for characterizing soil liquefaction resistance, while liquefaction resistance is liquefaction type dependent. In this study, firstly a revisit of laboratory tests on saturated sands was conducted to explore the relationship between liquefaction resistance CRR and small-strain shear modulus Gmax with emphasis on cyclic mobility type of liquefaction. The investigation indicates that in the stress-normalized space of cyclic resistance and small-strain shear modulus, the fitting curve of soil testing data does not always approach to the coordinate origin and there will be an intercept on the abscissa axis. Based on this finding, a more general form of the power function between liquefaction resistance and small-strain shear modulus is proposed. Then, undrained cyclic triaxial tests were conducted in conjunction with the data available from LEAP to establish the power function between CRR and Gmax for medium dense to dense Ottawa F-65 sand, which leads to an updated characterization model on the basis of Zhou-Chen model. Finally, centrifuge model tests of submerged gently sloping ground of Ottawa F-65 sand conducted at Zhejiang University (i.e., ZJU) for LEAP were used to compile liquefaction and non-liquefaction case histories with shear wave velocity measurement to investigate the validity of the updated model for evaluating the cyclic mobility type of liquefaction. The test results show that the updated model could classify the case history datasets produced by centrifuge model tests well. And the further consideration of initial shear stress acting on the slope could enhance the evaluation performance of this characterization model, which is worth of further research.
Read full abstract