Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Research Articles

STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN BUPIVACAINE 0.5% & ROPIVACAINE 0.5%IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY BRACHIAL PLEXUS FOR ELECTIVE UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

Background: This study contains comparison between Bupivacaine 0.5% &Ropivacaine 0.5% in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in elective upper limb surgeries. It is safer technique compared to GA .Study aims comparison of both local anaesthetic drugs in terms of volume , onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade & duration of analgesia. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double blinded study at tertiary care center compared effect of bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5%. Adults meeting specific inclusion criteria were divided in 2 equal groups 30 patients in each. All patients were given USG guided axillary block. Group A received Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 2.5-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml) while group B received Inj. Ropivacaine 0.5% 2-3 mg/kg (20-30 ml). Outcome measured included volume of drug, onset of motor & sensory blockade, duration of motor & sensory blockade. Hemodynamic parameters, VAS score, requirement of rescue analgesic (VAS >4) observed during perioperative period at different intervals. Sensory & motor block were assessed by 3-point scale.VAS score is evaluated by asking the patients to describe their pain between 0 to 10. p-value ≤0.05was considered statistically significant. Results: Comparison between both groups showed that onset of motor blockade (11.3 ±1.48 min ) & sensory blockade (7.46 ± 1.40 min ) was slower in group A , whereas onset of motor blockade (6.91± 1.39 min) & sensory blockade (3.13 ± 0.84 min) was faster in group B. While duration of motor blockade (681.16 ± 15.23 min) & sensory blockade (745 ± 25.12 min) was prolonged in group A compared to shorter duration of motor blockade (480.83 ± 31.67 min ) & sensory blockade (550.16 ± 39.62 min ) in group B. Duration of Analgesia was longer in group A(1388.83 ± 162.85 min ) compared with group B (856.16 ± 139.51 min ). Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.5% is associated with faster recovery of sensory & motor function with better safety profile compared to Bupivacaine 0.5%.

Ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block in children, a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveIn this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant treatment to ropivacaine in children undergoing upper limb surgeries under ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks and general anesthesia.MethodsWe enrolled 90 children (aged 1–8 years; ASA I-II) undergoing closed reduction and internal fixation for upper extremity fractures at the Xiamen Children's Hospital and randomly assigned them to one of two groups: L (injection with 0.25% ropivacaine) or D (injection with 0.25% ropivacaine containing 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine) using the random number table method. The main outcome indicators recorded were the facial expression, leg activity, position, crying, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale scores of children after surgery and the duration of block and analgesia maintenance. The secondary outcome indicators were vital sign data at the time of ultrasound probe placement (T1), at the time of block completion (T2), prior to the beginning of surgery (T3), 5 min after the beginning of surgery (T4), and at the end of surgery (T5), as well as the time of postoperative recovery, the number of cases of remedial analgesia, and complications.ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of general data, block completion time, postoperative recovery time, and complications (P > 0.05). Compared to the L group, the D group had significantly lower FLACC scores at 6 h after surgery, as well as significantly lower systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate values at T4 and T5, and significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia maintenance (all P < 0.05).ConclusionDexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) as a local anesthetic adjuvant to ropivacaine can alleviate pain at 6 h postoperatively, prolong analgesia maintenance, and reduce intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate in pediatric patients undergoing closed reduction and internal fixation for upper extremity fractures, with no obvious complications or delayed recovery.Clinical registry numberRegistration website: www.chictr.org.cn, Registration number: ChiCTR2200065163, Registration date: October, 30, 2022.

Evaluation of Brachial Plexus Nerve Variations in Axilla by Ultrasonography

The use of ultrasound in peripheral blocks has now become the gold standard. Ultrasound is a method that is easy to apply and most importantly does not carry any risk, and its only disadvantage is based on the skill and knowledge of the practitioner. Injury to vascular structures, which is the most common occurrence in peripheral block applications, has been significantly reduced by the use of ultrasound. The aim of this study is to determine the location of nerve branches and to determine the most common anthropometric parameters in the axillary fossa. In this way, the common anatomy of the axillary BP will be determined and will guide the practitioners while performing the axillary plexus block. Observational Clinical Study. The patients were positioned with forearm abducted 90 degrees and elbow flexed 90 degrees. A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe was placed on the lateral border of the pectoralis major muscle in the transverse plane. Pulsation of the axillary artery was visualized and shifted slowly to view the nerves around the artery. The axillary vein was also visualized to facilitate the movement of the transducer and to find the nerve localization more easily. The regions on the prepared wheel were marked. At the same time, demographic information such as gender, age, weight, and height of the patients were also recorded. The sample was 248 patients, 61.3% female and 38.7% male. Our results showed that only 59% were compatible with the most common nerve locations in cadaveric dissections and the locations described in anatomy textbooks. Since there are many anatomical variations, validation of nerves with a nerve stimulator as well as simultaneous visual application under ultrasound guidance will increase the success chance of axillary brachial plexus block and protect it from unwanted complications.

Comparison of the effects of axillary brachial plexus block, inhalation anesthesia, and total intravenous anesthesia on tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury in upper extremity surgery.

Post-ischemia reperfusion can lead to oxidative stress and an increase in oxidative markers. Employing preventive strategies and antioxidant agents may help mitigate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The use of a tourniquet in extremity surgery has been associated with IRI. This study aims to investigate the impact of three different approaches- brachial plexus block, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), and inhalation anesthesia-on IRI during upper extremity surgery using a tourniquet. Patients aged 18 to 45 with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II scores were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received an axillary block with bupivacaine; Group I underwent inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane; and Group T received TIVA with propofol and remifentanil infusion. Blood samples were collected to measure glucose, lactate, total anti-oxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels at various time points: before anesthesia (t1), 1 minute before tourniquet release (t2), 20 minutes after tourniquet release (t3), and 4 hours after tourniquet release (t4). In Group I, lactate levels at t3, and glucose levels at t2 and t3, were higher compared to the other groups. Group A exhibited lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 than the other groups. Additionally, Group I had lower IMA levels at t2, t3, and t4 compared to Group T. TAS levels were higher in Group I at t2, t3, and t4 compared to the other groups. TOS levels at t2 and t3 were lower in Group A than in Group I. Axillary anesthesia results in a sympathetic block, promoting better perfusion of the upper extremity. This study demonstrated lower levels of oxidative stress markers with axillary plexus block. Therefore, these results suggest that the axillary block has the potential to mitigate IRI.

Comparative study on the efficacy of perineural vs intravenous dexamethasone as an adjunct to bupivacaine to prolong analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block in a tertiary care center, Pokhara

Comparative study on the efficacy of perineural vs intravenous dexamethasone as an adjunct to bupivacaine to prolong analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block in a tertiary care center, Pokhara

Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Compared with Other Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Distal Upper Limb Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Several regional anesthesia (RA) techniques have been described for distal upper limb surgery. However, the best approach in terms of RA block success rate and safety is not well recognized. Objective: To assess and compare the surgical anesthesia and efficacy of axillary brachial plexus block with other RA techniques for hand and wrist surgery. The attainment of adequate surgical anesthesia 30 min after block placement was considered a primary outcome measure. Additionally, successful block outcomes were required without the use of supplemental local anesthetic injection, systemic opioid analgesia, or the need to convert to general anesthesia. Methods: We performed a systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CENTRAL. RCTs comparing axillary blocks with other brachial plexus block techniques, distal peripheral forearm nerve block, intravenous RA, and the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique were included. Results: In total, 3070 records were reviewed, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of adequate surgical anesthesia showed no significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and supraclavicular block (RR: 0.94 [0.89, 1.00]; p = 0.06; I2 = 60.00%), but a statistically significant difference between ultrasound-guided axillary block and infraclavicular block (RR: 0.92 [0.88, 0.97]; p < 0.01; I2 = 53.00%). Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks were performed faster than ultrasound-guided axillary blocks (SMD: 0.74 [0.30, 1.17]; p < 0.001; I2 = 85.00%). No differences in performance time between ultrasound-guided axillary and supraclavicular blocks were demonstrated. Additionally, adequate surgical anesthesia onset time was not significantly different between ultrasound-guided block approaches: ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.52 [-0.14, 1.17]; p = 0.12; I2 = 86.00%); ultrasound-guided axillary blocks versus ultrasound-guided infraclavicular blocks (SMD: 0.21 [-0.49, 0.91]; p = 0.55; I2 = 92.00%). Conclusions: The RA choice should be individualized depending on the patient, procedure, and operator-specific parameters. Compared to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular block, ultrasound-guided axillary block may be preferred for patients with significant concerns of block-related side effects/complications. High heterogeneity between studies shows the need for more robust RCTs.

Diaphyseal forearm fracture management in adolescent patients from 2011 to 2020: A multicenter study of surgery and regional anesthesia trends

BackgroundDiaphyseal forearm fractures are common traumatic injuries among children. There has been much debate on the use of intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plate fixation in the adolescent population (10–16 years of age). Furthermore, as ultrasound technology has advanced, the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block for children has dramatically improved. Therefore, anesthesia options for adolescent patients have increased in recent years. This study aimed to investigate recent surgical and regional anesthesia trends of diaphyseal forearm fractures in patients 10 to 16 years of age in Japan through a multicenter epidemiological survey from 2011 to 2020. MethodsThis retrospective, multicenter study included 226 pediatric patients with diaphyseal forearm fracture aged 10–16 years treated from January 2011 to December 2020. We divided the patients into four groups according to the period in which they were treated: early (2011–2013), middle (2014–2016), late (2017–2019), and COVID-19 (2020). Information from medical records was used to investigate the number of surgeries, types of anesthesia administered, and internal fixation methods used for diaphyseal forearm fracture in adolescent patients during each period. ResultsThe number of surgeries was generally constant in each period but decreased during the COVID-19 period. In the early, middle, late, and COVID-19 periods, the percentages of surgeries performed under regional anesthesia were 67.7, 85.5, 87.0, and 100% respectively (p = 0.003). During the same periods, the percentages of patients receiving IMN were 41.5, 49.3, 58.0, and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.033). ConclusionThe use of IMN and regional anesthesia to treat diaphyseal forearm fracture in patients 10 to 16 years of age steadily increased during the study period from 2011 to 2020. These results indicate that regional anesthesia is safe, effective, and well-tolerated by adolescent patients. The treatment strategy for diaphyseal forearm fractures in adolescents using regional anesthesia in combination with IMN worked well and was effective during COVID-19. Our evidence suggests this trend will continue. We anticipate that our findings can be extrapolated for upper extremity fractures in adolescent patients beyond the Tokai region of Japan where the study was based.

Diabetic Neuropathy and Minimum Effective Anesthetic Concentration of Mepivacaine for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Observational Study.

Nerves in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DN) show increased susceptibility to local anesthetics, potentially requiring a decreased dose. We investigated whether the minimum effective anesthetic concentration (MEAC) of mepivacaine for successful axillary block is lower in patients with DN than in those without. This prospective observational study included patients with DN (n = 22) and without diabetes (n = 22) at a tertiary care center. Patients received an ultrasound-guided axillary block with 30 mL of mepivacaine for anesthesia. The mepivacaine concentration used in each patient was calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method. A block was considered successful if all four sensory nerves had a score of 1 or 2 within 30 min with no pain during surgery. The primary outcome was the MEAC of mepivacaine, and the secondary outcomes included the minimal nerve stimulation intensity for the musculocutaneous nerve and the occurrence of adverse events. The MEAC50 was 0.55% (95% CI 0.33-0.77%) in patients without diabetes and 0.58% (95% CI 0.39-0.77%) in patients with DN (p = 0.837). The MEAC90 was 0.98% (95% CI 0.54-1.42%) in patients without diabetes and 0.96% (95% CI 0.57-1.35%) in patients with DN (p = 0.949). The stimulation threshold for the musculocutaneous nerve was significantly different between groups (0.49 mA vs. 0.19 mA for patients with vs. without diabetes; p = 0.002). In conclusion, the MEAC of mepivacaine for a successful axillary block is not lower in patients with DN.

Effectiveness of perineural administration of dexamethasone with lidocaine on onset time of sensory block and early postoperative analgesia in axillary brachial plexus block: a prospective cohort study, Ethiopia.

The axillary brachial plexus block is a popular nerve block for forearm, wrist, and hand surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of perineural administration of dexamethasone as an adjunct to lidocaine with adrenaline on the onset of sensory block and early postoperative analgesia in trans-arterial axillary brachial plexus block. This single-centered prospective cohort study recruited 68 adult patients, 34 in each groups. The frequently used 8mg dexamethasone combined with 1% lidocaine and adrenaline was investigated. The normality of the data was checked using the Shapiro-Wilk test. An independent t-test was used to compare the mean values of symmetric numeric data. Categorical variables between the two groups were analyzed using χ2. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test were used to compare asymmetric numeric data, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. The median onset time of sensory block was comparable between the nonexposed (24(6) min) and exposed group (24(6) min) (P=0.068). However, the duration of sensory block was significantly longer in the exposed group (235.5±37.51min) than the nonexposed group (172.76±28.19min) (P<0.001). The time to the first analgesic request was significantly longer in the exposed than the nonexposed group (P<0.01). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower at 4 and 8h in the exposed group (P<0.05). The addition of 8mg dexamethasone to 1% lidocaine with adrenaline solution in trans-arterial axillary brachial plexus block for ambulatory elective hand, wrist, and forearm surgeries prolonged the duration of sensory blockade and the first analgesic request time but did not reduce the onset time of sensory block. The authors recommend the addition of 8mg dexamethasone to 1% lidocaine with adrenaline solution to prolong the duration of sensory block and the first analgesic request time.

Comparison of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in continuous axillary brachial plexus block

Aims: This study compares bupivacaine – lidocaine and levobupivacaine – lidocaine administrations in terms of initiation and duration of motor and sensorial blockage, total number of additional analgesic applications, analgesic amount consumed in 24 hours, side-effects and hemodynamic effects in continuous axillary brachial pleksus block in hand and forearm surgery. Methods: Thirty ASA I &amp; II physical status patients, scheduled hand or forearm surgery were enrolled for of the two groups in a randomized study. Axillary catheter duly placed in both group with appropriate guided techniques. Patients in group B received 0. 5% bupivacaine 20 ml + 2% lidocaine 20 ml and group L received 0. 5% levobupivacaine 20 ml + 2% lidocaine 20 ml through the axillary catheter. Initiation and duration of motor and sensorial block, total number of additional analgesic applications and analgesic amount consumed in postoperative 24 hours were recorded. Pre-block, peri-operative and post-operative blood pressures and heart beat rates were also recorded. Block application duration, operation duration, tourniquet duration and demographic data of patients (age, sex, weight, and length) were recorded. Demanded and applied analgesic doses by the patient controlled analgesia devices, side effects and complications were also recorded. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of initiation and duration of motor and sensorial block, amount of analgesic consumed in 24 hours, demanded and applied analgesic doses by the patient controlled analgesia devices and hemodynamic data (p&gt;0. 05). There is a mild and positive relation between block application duration and patient weight. (p=0. 014; r=0. 444) Conclusion: Both bupivacaine+lidocaine and levobupivacaine+lidocaine combinations can safely be used in axillary continuous brachial plexus block without any difference in terms of initiation and duration of block, total analgesic amount consumed. Their duration of action and effect on hemodynamic responses are similar.

Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial plexus block in a patient with incidental thrombocytopenia: a case report and review of literature

Ultrasound guided Axillary Brachial plexus block in a patient with incidental thrombocytopenia: a case report and review of literature

The Advantages of Employing Single Injection Technique in Axillary Block for Upper Limb Surgery Within Anesthetic Practice

Abstract Introduction: The axillary plexus block is one of the most used regional anesthesia techniques in upper limb surgery. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the advantages of using the technique with a single injection in the axillary block, a technique that was used in the Orthopedic Clinic of SCJU between 1.01.2016 and 31.05.2016. Methods: The patients admitted to the study were those with ASA I-III in the number of 50 of which 35 were men and 15 women who underwent axillary brachial plexus block using the single injection technique with the help of the neurostimulator. All patients had surgical interventions in the region of the distal arm, elbow, forearm and hand. The axillary block was performed with the nerve stimulator, using a 22g and 50mm needle, the puncture site used was above the artery where, after obtaining the motor response to the 0.5 mA impulse, Ropivacaine 0.5% 20 ml was injected. Later we analyzed the installation time of the motor and sensory block, what success rate it had and the possible complications. Results: The average motor block installation time was 21+/-1.3 min in the 35 patients. The motor block installation time was 19.2+/-1.5 min and the sensory block a was 16.19+/-1.1 min. block success rate was 91.5 percent. There were no recent or late complications. Conclusions: Axillary plexus block using the single injection technique can be used with great benefits, few complications and low failure rate of the technique.

Puncture Site Bleeding Complications of Peripheral Nerve Block in Patients Taking Antithrombotic and Anticoagulant Drugs: An Umbrella Review.

While there are multiple guidelines for the management of bleeding complications and hematoma if being treated with antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs, these risks are not yet stratified for procedures with regional anesthesia. This study was an umbrella review of systematic studies and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines in databases of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Due to heterogeneity in evaluated outcomes and methods of studies, only the qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. AMSTAR checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included systematic reviews. After an extensive search of relevant studies, 971 primary cases were identified. Following a thorough screening process, 5 systematic reviews were selected. The evidence suggests that head and neck punctures generally do not result in bleeding complications, except for rare cases of hematoma associated with Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A deep cervical plexus block is not recommended. Interscalene blocks have varying findings, with some studies reporting hematoma incidence and spinal injury, while others consider them low risk. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block might be associated with hemothorax and infraclavicular blocks are not favored by reviews. Axillary brachial plexus blocks have a minor incidence of hematoma. Abdomen blocks, TAP blocks, ilioinguinal blocks, and rectus sheath blocks carry a higher risk of hematoma. Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have a relatively high risk, while paravertebral and intercostal blocks are considered high risk, but further research is needed regarding paravertebral blocks. The available evidence from systematic reviews and studies suggests varying levels of risk for different blocks and procedures that should be considered before decision-making.

The motor effects of 0.25% bupivacaine vs 0.19 bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block in pediatrics undergoing below-elbow orthopedic surgeries: A randomized controlled study

ABSTRACT Background The standard dose of bupivacaine used in axillary brachial plexus block (ABPB) in pediatrics is 0.5 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25%. However, bupivacaine (0.19%) is still to be investigated for peripheral nerve block in pediatrics regarding the efficacy and adequacy of intra- and postoperative analgesia and degree of motor affection. We aimed to compare different concentrations (0.25%, 0.19%) of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine mixture to perform US-ABPB in pediatrics undergoing upper limb surgery distal to the elbow regarding affecting the postoperative motor power and adequacy of intra- and postoperative analgesia. Methods This prospective, randomised-controlled, double-blinded work was performed on 60 pediatric individuals presenting for upper limb orthopedic surgeries in the wrist, hand, and elbow distal to cubital fossa with surgical time planned to not exceed 1 h. 0.25% bupivacaine plus 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group A) or 0.19% bupivacaine in addition to 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group B) were given at random to participants. Motor power and pain were assessed using the Modified Bromage scale, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score, respectively. Results A highly substantial variation was recorded between the two groups in Bromage 0 till Bromage 60 with higher values in group (B), and no substantial variation was found in Bromage 90 till Bromage 180 existed between the two groups. No substantial variation existed among the two groups with regard to FLACC score in FLACC0 (immediately after recovery), 1st hour after recovery, and 12th hour after recovery, and FLACC was significantly more (p < 0.05) in group B contrasted to group A in the 4th hour after recovery and 8th hour after recovery. Conclusion Using a lower concentration of bupivacaine (0.19%) plus dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) was associated with regain of postoperative motor power with the same postoperative analgesic efficacy compared to the standard concentration (0.25%) bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) in the early postoperative period in US-ABPB.

Efficacy of Perineural versus Systemic Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Surgical Anesthesia in Axillary Block

Objective: To compare the analgesic effect of different routes of Dexmedetomidine when given as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine in the axillary block for surgical correction of radius fracture.&#x0D; Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Sep 2021 to Feb 2022.&#x0D; Methodology: The patients were divided into two equal groups. Group-A (Perineural Dexmedetomidine) and Group B (Intravenous Dexmedetomidine). Group-A received 1ug/kg Perineural Dexmedetomidine along with 30ml of racemic Bupivacaine (0.5%), and Group-B participants received 1ug per kg intravenous Dexmedetomidine after axillary block with 30ml of 0.5% perineural racemic Bupivacaine. The mean duration of analgesia was the primary outcome, and adverse outcomes and sedation were the secondary outcomes.&#x0D; Results: The duration of analgesia was greater in the perineural Dexmedetomidine Group, with a mean duration of 610.20±29.92 minutes in comparison to the systemic Dexmedetomidine Group, which was 449±39.010 minutes, with pvalue&lt;0.001. Numerical rating scores were higher, and sedation scores were lower in the perineural Dexmedetomidine Group, making it a safer choice.&#x0D; Conclusion: Perineural Dexmedetomidine is superior to intravenous Dexmedetomidine when used as an adjuvant to Bupivacaine in axillary brachial plexus block. It prolongs analgesia and is a safer alternative to intravenous Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant.

Comparative Study of General Anesthesia and Regional Anesthesia in Upper Extremity Surgery: Anesthesia Time and Postoperative Hospital Day – A Retrospective Observation Study

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the differences in anesthetic time and hospital stay after surgery based on the anesthesia techniques used in upper extremity surgeries. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 453 patients who underwent upper extremity surgery from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: axillary brachial plexus block (BPB) and General Anesthesia (GA). Results: The induction time before starting the operation for axillary BPB was significantly longer than GA. However, the time required to awaken patients from GA was significantly longer than that for patients receiving axillary BPB. Patients who received axillary BPB exhibited significantly shorter stays in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and a reduced time until discharge after surgery (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: In upper extremity surgery, axillary BPB requires more induction time than GA. However, axillary BPB demonstrated advantages such as quicker awakening, shorter PACU stays, and reduced hospitalization days after surgery.

A comparative study between nalbuphine with Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine alone in USG guided axillary Brachial plexus block

A comparative study between nalbuphine with Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine alone in USG guided axillary Brachial plexus block

Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block by Costoclavicular Space Approach: A Narrative Review.

In recent years, ultrasound-guided costoclavicular brachial plexus block (CCB) has gained attention as a novel approach for brachial plexus nerve block. Human anatomy studies have identified the costoclavicular space as the area between the midpoint of the clavicle and the first rib. This space accommodates the brachial plexus, axillary arteries, and veins. Its superficial and fixed position makes it a promising option for infraclavicular brachial plexus blockage, providing a safe and reliable analgesic effect. CCB combines the benefits of real-time ultrasound visualization of the nerve block needle, avoidance of peripheral blood vessels, and targeted delivery of local anesthetics to the nerve. Consequently, it significantly reduces the associated complications of other classical approaches such as interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB), lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block (LS-ICB), and axillary brachial plexus block. These complications include phrenic paralysis, incomplete brachial plexus block, and pneumothorax. This narrative review examines the literature on brachial plexus block in the costoclavicular space, discussing the anatomical position, the procedure, clinical indications, choice of local anesthetic concentration and volume, and continuous nerve block of CCB. The aim is to provide a basis for future clinical practice and enhanced safety.

A comparison between axillary brachial plexus block and elbow block using ultrasound in patients undergoing surgeries of wrist and hand

Background: Both the axillary brachial block and elbow block are easy to learn and perform. Elbow block was previously used to as a rescue block to supplement the inadequacy of proximal nerve plexus block. Recently, elbow block is emerging as a primary anesthetic technique for wrist and hand surgeries. However, no such study in Indian scenario exists comparing axillary brachial plexus block and elbow block using ultrasound (US) guidance during wrist and hand surgeries. Aims and Objectives: The present study was designed to compare axillary brachial plexus block and elbow block for hand and wrist surgery in terms of duration of post-operative analgesia (Primary outcome), procedure times, other characteristics of block, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Materials and Methods: This open-label parallel-group randomized study was performed in 78 adults, aged 18–70 years, ASA I-II, undergoing elective surgeries of wrist and hand. The patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups to receive either axillary brachial plexus block (Group A, n=39) or elbow block (Group B, n=39), both under US guidance. The time to first rescue analgesia was the primary outcome measure. Other outcome measures were different characteristics of nerve blocks, procedure duration, 24-h analgesic consumption, patient’s satisfaction score, and adverse events. Results: The time to first analgesic administration was considerably higher in axillary block compared with elbow block (15 vs. 14 h, P&lt;0.001). However, the post-operative analgesia with elbow block was not clinically insignificant. The onset of blocks was faster with axillary block compared with elbow block (sensory block 15 vs. 24 min, P&lt;0.001; motor block 20 vs. 30 min, P&lt;0.001). Overall, a higher number of patients were more satisfied with elbow block. Conclusion: Using US, elbow block can be a better alternative to axillary block for hand surgeries in terms of sufficient post-operative analgesia, comparatively shorter motor block, and better patient satisfaction.

Comparison of the Effect of Intercostobrachial Nerve Block with and Without Ultrasound Guidance on Tourniquet Pain After Axillary Block of Brachial Plexus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

A tourniquet is used to control bleeding in the surgical field. Because part of the inner arm is innervated by the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN), a tourniquet can cause intolerable pain. The present study aimed to compare the effect of ICBN block with and without ultrasound (US) guidance on tourniquet pain after axillary block. This study was performed on 60 patients who were candidates for surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the control group (n = 22), the traditional ICBN (TICBN) blockade group (n = 19), and the US-guided ICBN blockade group (n = 19). After the intervention, the duration of the onset and intensity of pain was recorded for all patients according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Data analysis was performed using SPSS. No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). The pain intensity in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.001) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.001) groups was significantly less than in the control group. The mean duration of pain onset was significantly higher in the TICBN blockade (P = 0.021) and US-guided ICBN blockade (P = 0.013) groups than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the mean of pain intensity (P = 0.48) and the mean duration of pain onset (P = 0.44) between the US-guided ICBN blockade and TICBN blockade groups. The pain caused by a tourniquet can be managed by ICBN block during hand and forearm surgery. It is recommended to use US guidance for more success and safety.