Axial Pullout Strength Research Articles

Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine.

Biomechanical testing with human cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies was used to determine the utility of an injectable carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement for improving the structural performance of pedicle screws subjected to axial pull-out or transverse cyclic loading. To ascertain whether augmentation with a carbonated apatite cement can enhance pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. The beneficial effects of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on pedicle screw pull-out strength have been demonstrated. Cancellous bone cement, however, may provide an attractive alternative in this application, as it is remodelable, biocompatible, and nonexothermic. Forty-three cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented with pedicle screws. In 20 of these specimens, axial pull-out strength was compared between the control screws and those augmented with cancellous bone cement. In the remaining 23 specimens, the screws were loaded in the superior-inferior direction with a peak displacement of +/- 1 mm at a frequency of 3 Hz for 5000 cycles. Three parameters were calculated from the force-versus-time data: 1) the energy dissipated, 2) the peak force at the start of the test, and 3) the peak force at the end of 5000 cycles. The pull-out strength of the augmented pedicles averaged 68% greater than that of the control side. In response to cyclic loading, all measures of bio-mechanical performance improved 30-63%. The data suggest that augmentation with this carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement can enhance immediate screw fixation.

Comparative pull-out strength of tapped and untapped pilot holes for bicortical anterior cervical screws.

This biomechanical study analyzed the axial pull-out strength of tapped versus untapped pilot holes for bicortical screws in the anterior cervical spine. To determine which pilot hole preparation method was mechanically better. Tapping pilot holes in the lumbar spine was previously shown significantly to reduce pull-out strength of pedicle screws. No study was found investigating the effect of tapping on pilot holes for anterior cervical bicortical screws. Twenty-five unembalmed human cadaveric cervical vertebrae (C3-C7) were tested. Two identical pilot holes were drilled into each vertebra: one pilot hole was tapped, and the control pilot hole was not tapped. A fully threaded cortical bone screw was inserted into each pilot hole. Screw pull-out strength was determined using a servocontrolled hydraulic materials testing system and an axial load cell. Force-deformation and failure curves were obtained. There were no statistically significant differences between the axial pull-out strength of tapped and untapped pilot holes at any vertebral level. Mean force to-failure was 386 +/- 42 N in the untapped pilot holes and 397 +/- 48 N in the tapped pilot holes. Tapping a pilot hole for bicortical screws of the anterior cervical spine neither weakens nor strengthens the axial pull-out strength of fully threaded cortical bone screws. Tapping may be unnecessary; however, it may be desirable in patients with dense bone to cut the thread profile into the bone or if the screws have dull tips and threads.

Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone.

Insertion torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws were compared in human cadaveric vertebral bodies. To compare the performance of the conical design with the cylindrical design, and to determine whether insertional torque correlates with pull-out strength. A tapered pedicle screw design may lessen the likelihood of implant failure. Its effect on thread purchase is not known. Previous studies of cylindrical designs on the relation between insertion torque and pull-out strength have been conducted in bovine and synthetic bone. Seventy-eight pedicles were assigned randomly to one of the following pedicle screw: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN), Steffee VSP (Acromed, Cleveland, OH), Diapason (Dimso, Paris, France), AO Schanz (Synthes, Paoli, PA), or Synthes USS (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Pedicle screws were inserted with a torque screwdriver. Each screw was extracted axially from the pedicle at a rate of 1.0 mm/sec until failure using an MTS machine (Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN). Force data were recorded. The conical design had the highest insertion torque. There were no significant differences in pull-out between any of the screw types. Correlation between insertional torque and pull-out strength was statistically significant only with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital and Steffee VSP in L4 and AO Schanz in L5. A conical screw profile increases insertion torque, although insertional torque is not a reliable predictor of pull-out strength in cadaveric bone. Screw profile (with similar dimensions) has little effect on straight axial pull-out strengths in cadaveric bone.

Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.

Experimental axial pullout tests of a new type of pedicle screw were done on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae. The manner in which specimens were secured in the testing apparatus was varied to determined influence of specimen fixation method on the maximum pedicle screw pullout force. To determine the appropriateness of embedding (i.e., potting) spinal specimens in polymer resin (e.g., bone cement or Plastic Padding [Plastic Padding Ltd., High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England]) for axial pullout tests of pedicle screws. Several different specimen fixation methods were examined to make recommendations for the standardization of future experimental testing protocols. Axial pullout of transpedicular screws, although not a likely clinical mode of failure, is a popular experimental testing mode for evaluating screw-bone biomechanics. A wide variety of techniques for securing a vertebral specimen to counter the axial pullout force has been reported (including the use of polymer resin) with a correspondingly wide range in the resulting axial pullout strengths. The possible influence of the specimen fixation method on pedicle screw axial pullout strength has not been addressed previously. Axial pullout tests of pedicle screws (DDS, Plus Endoprothetik, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) from the pedicles of 21 isolated lumber vertebral bodies were done using a Model 810 MTS Universal Testing Machine (MTS Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The specimens were secured in a custom-made vise fixture either as is or after the vertebral bodies were potted in Plastic Padding up to the pedicle origin. Some of the potted specimens were wrapped first in latex to prevent polymer resin intrusion, and the others were unprotected. Pullout tests were attempted on both the left and right pedicles of each specimen, and the maximum pedicle screw pullout force was recorded. Measurement of bone mineral density by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, in addition to macroscopic and scanning electron microscopy histologic analyses, microradiography, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, was done post-test to assist in the interpretation of the data. The maximum pedicle screw pullout force was found to be dependent on both the bone mineral density and the mode of fixation of the vertebrae. Embedding in polymer resin without protection of the specimen (i.e., latex wrapping) led to several instances of well-documented polymer resin intrusion; in these specimens, mean maximum pedicle screw pullout force was significantly greater than that of specimens secured without polymer resin and that of embedded specimens for which intrusion did not occur. Polymer resin intrusion can have a significant effect on the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-pedicle screw interface. When polymer resins are used to secure vertebral specimens for in vitro biomechanical tests of the bone-pedicle screw interface, it is important to either prevent intrusion (e.g., with a latex wrapping) or document post-test (e.g., through the methods described in this article) that intrusion did not occur for the specimens included in the analysis.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Gardner-Wells Tongs and Halo Device Used for Cervical Spine Traction

Unstable cervical spine fractures and dislocations are often reduced by the application of axial traction using a halo or Gardner-Wells tongs. Failure of tong or halo attachment can cause substantial morbidity and usually occurs at the pin-bone interface. Institutions commonly clean and reuse tongs. The effect of tong wear on pullout strength and the strength of the halo used as a traction device have not been documented. A skull model biomechanically similar to human calvarium was used to compare the axial pullout strengths of four sets of new tongs, three sets of rarely used tongs, and one set of heavily used tongs, as well as a standard four-pin halo. The pullout strength of tongs tightened to the manufacturer's recommended level appeared to decrease with increased use. Measurement of the pin force generated by each set of tongs and of the spring constant of each spring, as well as inspection of the tongs after testing, suggested that the decrease in pull-out strength may be partly attributable to spring and/or pin wear. The pullout strength of the halo or of the new or slightly used tongs but not the heavily used tongs exceeded the maximum weight used clinically in cervical spine traction. The data suggest that consideration be given to replacement or recalibration of heavily used tongs.

Relation of Vertebral Bone Screw Axial Pullout Strength to Quantitative Computed Tomographic Trabecular Bone Mineral Content

Noninvasive prediction of the maximum axial load that a spinal bone screw will be able to withstand after anterior surgical placement would be highly useful. To investigate if this is feasible, we first performed preliminary experiments to distinguish the trabecular and cortical contributions to overall stiffness; the trabecular component was found to dominate. We then used a commercial computed tomography bone mineral package to determine the mineral density of the trabecular region of 41 porcine vertebrae in terms of equivalent K2HPO4 concentration; values ranged from 104 to 343 mg/cm3. A 6.5-mm diameter cancellous bone screw was then inserted laterally in each vertebra, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the screw/bone interface was measured using a tensile testing machine. The UTS values ranged from 589 to 2,620 Newtons. A superlinear relation was found between UTS and the projected K2HPO4 concentration in the direction of the screw axis, expressed in units of mg/cm2.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Caspar Cervical Screws

Anterior cervical instrumentation is used as an adjunct to bone fusion; however, definitive biomechanical data to support some applications and techniques are lacking. In the absence of supportive experimental data, posterior cortical penetration has been recommended with the Caspar system. Previously, we compared the axial pull-out strength of Caspar screws with and without posterior cortical penetration. This study compares the stability of unicortical versus bicortical screw penetration groups under cyclical loading simulating physiological flexion-extension. Caspar screws were placed in human cadaveric vertebrae with or without posterior cortical purchase. Each screw was separately tested, simulating flexion-extension to 200 cycles. Deformation time data allowed a direct comparison of screw "wobble" with and without posterior cortical purchase. The mean deformation differences between subcortical and bicortical groups were statistically significant and increased over time within both groups. Enhanced stability was noted with bicortical purchase throughout most of the examined range, becoming more pronounced over longer periods of cyclical loading. Significant (P < 0.05) increases in deformation over time were noted for both groups, suggesting potentially significant deterioration at the screw-bone interface, despite bicortical purchase. Such deterioration with repeated flexion-extension loading may be of concern in the use of Caspar plates in the presence of multicolumn instability.

Sacral Screw Loads in Lumbosacral Fixation for Spinal Deformity

Fixation to the sacrum and pelvis is a problem in the operative treatment of spinal deformity. Previous testing of pedicle screws address axial pull-out strength, yet how screws are loaded in vivo remains unknown. The goals of this study were to determine the loads experienced by sacral screws when loaded as part of Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) sacral instrumentation and whether different anterior grafting methods would effect screw loads. Sacral screws were modified to become transducers capable of measuring axial and bending loads. The screw transducers were incorporated into the sacral fixation of CD instrumentation in seven calf spines. Specimens were loaded to simulate flexion. The sacral screws carried axial loads (1.1 N/[Nm of load]) and bending moments (1.1 Nm/[Nm of load]). The results suggest bending of the sacral screws may be important in their failure, and screw loading was not dependent on graft types used.

A pedicle screw bridging device for posterior segmental fixation of the spine: preliminary mechanical testing results

Mechanical assessment of a new pedicle screw bridge device for spinal surgery is reported. Results are given for a series of single tests to failure and a fatigue cyclical loading test. Comparative testing of torsional and lateral bending resistance on three surgical spinal fixation systems was carried out: Luque, wired Hartshill rectangle and pedicle screwed bridge with Hartshill rectangle and pedicle screwed bridge with Hartshill rectangle. The results show the superiority of the bridged Hartshill in both rotational and lateral bending resistance. The new bridge device could also improve the versatility of the Hartshill system to cover a wider spectrum of spinal fixations. A test to determine the axial pull-out strength of three screw designs was undertaken. The differences between the forces needed were insignificant. At failure a cylinder of bone tissues greater than the major diameter of the screw was pulled out without breaking the bone.