Axial Hernia Research Articles

Features of treatment tactics for some clinical and pathogenetic variants of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Relevance Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a disease that has a complex mechanism of formation, causing a variety of clinical and pathogenetic features, realised during the development of the pathological process. The variety of tactical and methodological solutions in its treatment is formed from this premise. Material and Methods The authors have 25 years of experience, which consists in direct participation in the diagnostic and therapeutic process in several thousand patients with gastroesophageal reflux, including several hundred patients with cylindrocellular metaplasia and Barrett’s oesophagus. Results Determination of indications for surgical treatment of complicated and uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease is a complex and responsible decision. It is necessary to take into account: the nature and severity of cylindrocellular metaplasia, the size of axial hernia and its combination with insufficiency of cardiac jejunum, the severity of jejunal insufficiency and preservation of diaphragmatic constriction, the state of Gis angle, the type and severity of reflux - esophagitis, as well as the presence of irreversible changes in the mucosa to determine the indications for correction and surgical tactics. It is necessary to pay attention to the severity of clinical manifestations of the disease.

State of evidence and future perspectives in minimally invasive management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

The future of minimally invasive treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) will be realized through collaborative precision medicine more than any foreseeable new technology. Multidisciplinary foregut societies are fostering the collaboration and expertise needed to provide a personalized treatment of GERD. Patient-centric therapy will consider combination therapies’ clinical successes. Taking a patient uncontrolled on medication to controlled via a combination of medicine and a procedure will replace the historical mutual exclusivity of acid-suppressive medication or surgery as a treatment for GERD. Research directed at precision medicine will focus on subgroup analysis rather than randomized controlled trials. Recognition of the crural diaphragm as a reflux barrier which fails in GERD patients regardless of the presence of an axial hernia has resulted from modalities such as 3-D high-resolution impedance manometry, endoscopic ultrasound, functional luminal impedance planimetry. More precise patient selection for purely endoscopic therapies will be possible.The concept of hernia reduction will be replaced by calibration of the crural repair to restore its sphincteric function. Partnering a surgically calibrated hernia repair partnered with interventional gastrointestinal endoscopic reinforcement of the lower esophageal sphincter will foster physician alliances and offer patient-centric alternatives to traditional fundoplication. As such, laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication will lose its historical primacy and be relegated to the most severe GERD. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®), varing degrees of partial fundoplication, and endoluminal therapies with or without hiatal hernia repair will become the mainstay of GERD AntiReflux Procedures. Radio Frequency modulation (Stretta®) may be an alternative to neuromodulators in treating the acid-sensitive esophagus. The nascent era of endoscopic robotics will improve precision, reproducibility and revive natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

High-resolution manometry features of paraesophageal hernia.

Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) can be associated with obstructive symptoms, but high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics have not been described in detail. HRM studies of confirmed PEH patients (n=60, 66.3±1.5years, 76.7% F), axial hernias (n=125, 56.1±1.1years, 58.4% F), and healthy controls (n=20, 27.9±0.7years, 45% F) were analyzed. Axial hernias (type 1) were compared to PEH subtyped as isolated PEH (type 2), PEH with axial hernia (type 3), PEH with herniated abdominal organs (type 4), and unknown. Distal contractile integral (DCI), esophageal length, lower esophageal sphincter pressures (LESP), EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were extracted. Intra-luminal pressures were measured proximal (intrabolus pressure, IBP) and distal (intragastric pressure, IGP) to EGJ. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to characterize esophageal and EGJ motor physiology in PEH. PEH patients had LESP and EGJ-CI similar to controls; axial hernia patients had lower LESP. While IRP was within normal limits, PEH had elevated IBP and IGP, and shorter esophageal length compared to axial hernia and normal controls (P≤.0001 across groups). Short esophageal length was consistent across PEH subtypes (P=.06). On multivariate regression analysis, IBP remained an independent predictor of PEH (P<.0001). Within PEH subtypes, gastric pressure was higher when axial HH was also present, in contrast to isolated PEH (P=.03); other metrics did not differ. Luminal pressure increase both upstream and downstream of the EGJ on HRM likely represents obstructive phenomena in PEH, identification of which may support suspicion of PEH.

Functional Results after Repair of Large Hiatal Hernia by Use of a Biologic Mesh.

The aim of this observational study is to analyze the results of patients with large hiatal hernia and upside-down stomach after surgical closure with a biological mesh (Permacol(®), Covidien, Neustadt an der Donau, Germany). Biological mesh is used to prevent long-term detrimental effects of artificial meshes and to reduce recurrence rates. A total of 13 patients with a large hiatal hernia and endothoracic stomach, who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2014, were included. Interviews and upper endoscopy were conducted to determine recurrences, lifestyle restrictions, and current complaints. After a mean follow-up of 26 ± 18 months (range: 3-58 months), 10 patients (3 men, mean age 73 ± 13, range: 26-81 years) were evaluated. A small recurrent axial hernia was found in one patient postoperatively. Dysphagia was the most common complaint (four cases); while in one case, the problem was solved after endoscopic dilatation. In three cases, bloat and postprandial pain were documented. In one case, an explantation of the mesh was necessary due to mesh migration and painful adhesions. In one further case with gastroparesis, pyloroplasty was performed without success. The data are compared to the available literature. It was found that dysphagia and recurrence rates are unrelated both in biological and in synthetic meshes if the esophagus is encircled. In series preserving the esophagus at least partially uncoated, recurrences after the use of biological meshes relieve dysphagia. After the application of synthetic meshes, dysphagia is aggravated by recurrences. Recurrence is rare after encircling hiatal hernia repair with the biological mesh Permacol(®). Dysphagia, gas bloat, and intra-abdominal pain are frequent complaints. Despite the small number of patients, it can be concluded that a biological mesh may be an alternative to synthetic meshes to reduce recurrences at least for up to 2 years. Our study demonstrates that local fibrosis and thickening of the mesh can affect the outcome being associated with abdominal discomfort despite a successful repair. The review of the literature indicates comparable results after 2 years with both biologic and synthetic meshes embracing the esophagus. At the same point in time, reconstruction with synthetic and biologic materials differs when the esophagus is not or only partially encircled in the repair. This is important since encircling artificial meshes can erode the esophagus after 5-10 years.

Laparoscopic anti-reflux revision surgery after transoral incisionless fundoplication is safe and effective

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) treats gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by creating a full-thickness esophagogastric plication using transmural fasteners. If unsuccessful, revision laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (rLARS) may be performed. This study evaluated operative findings and clinical outcomes of rLARS in 28 patients with prior primary TIF. Intraoperative findings, complications, and symptomatic outcomes with GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) were evaluated prospectively in patients having rLARS after TIF. Results are median with interquartile range (IQR). Between 03/2009 and 08/2013, 28 patients underwent rLARS at 14 (13-50) months post-TIF for recurrent symptoms after initial improvement. Pre-rLARS endoscopies found hiatal hernia (9) and wrap disruption (12). All revisions were completed laparoscopically in 88 (70-90) min. Eight patients underwent partial fundoplication, the rest Nissen. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Operative findings included: No axial hernia in 65%; Dense adhesions in 14%; Fasteners incorporating the lateral crus in 95%; Traction diverticuli from esophagus to crura in 21%. Residual plication was noted anteriorly in 75%, posteriorly in 0%. Operative approaches: (1) Areas where the TIF fundoplication remained were left intact. This necessitated rolling the fundoplication over the fused area to prevent an endoscopic appearance of 'fold'. (2) Fasteners were cut and left to migrate into the lumen, rather than being pulled out. (3) In 8 patients with fusion of the lateral crus to TIF fundoplication and no axial hernia, revision fundoplication was performed without mediastinal mobilization but with posterior hernia repair. One patient required subsequent surgery for small paraesophageal hernia, one for refractory gas-bloat after rLARS. Dysphagia in 2 patients resolved with dilation. GERD-HRQL improved from a median of 20 (8-27) pre-TIF and 10 (1-20) pre-rLARS to 3 (0-4) at 28 months (12-40) post-rLARS (p = 0.020 for pre-rLARS to post-rLARS). rLARS after TIF can be performed safely with excellent clinical outcomes.

Allograft dermal matrix hiatoplasty during laparoscopic primary fundoplication, paraesophageal hernia repair, and reoperation for failed hiatal hernia repair

BackgroundHiatal repair failure is the nemesis of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair as well as the major cause of failure of primary fundoplication and reoperation on the hiatus. Biologic prosthetics offer the promise of reinforcing the repair without risks associated with permanent prosthetics.DesignRetrospective evaluation of safety and relative efficacy of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using an allograft (acellular dermal matrix) onlay. Patients with symptomatic failures underwent endoscopic or radiographic assessment of hiatal status.ResultsGreater than 6-month follow-up was available for 252 of 450 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic allograft-reinforced hiatal hernia repair between January 2007 and March 2011. No erosions, strictures, or persisting dysphagia were encountered. Adhesions were minimal in cases where reoperation was required. Failure of the hiatal repair at median 18 months (6–51 months) was significantly (p < 0.005) different between groups: group A (primary fundoplication with axial hernia ≤ 2 cm), 3.7 %; group B (primary fundoplication with axial hernia 2–5 cm), 7.1 %; group G (giant/paraesophageal), 8.8 %; group R (reoperative), 23.4 %. Additionally, mean time to failure was significantly shorter in group R (247 days) compared with the other groups (462–489 days).ConclusionsUse of allograft reinforcement to the hiatus is safe at 18 months median follow-up. Reoperations had a significantly higher failure rate and shorter time to failure than the other groups despite allograft, suggesting that primary repairs require utmost attention and that additional techniques may be needed in reoperations. Patients with hiatal hernias >2 cm axially had a recurrence rate equal to that of patients undergoing paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, and should be treated similarly.

A neglected symptom of contained aortic laceration—Dysphagia aortica successfully treated by endovascular stentgrafting

Dysphagia aortica describes an esophageal swallowing disorder caused by external compression from an ectatic, tortuous, or aneurysmal thoracic aorta. Although well recognized among specialists, dysphagia aortica is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of dysphagia. We present the case of a 75-year-old woman with a history of swallowing difficulty and retrosternal pressure sensation. Her symptoms had been attributed to sliding axial hernia along with gastroesophageal reflux disease for the last 12 months. Diagnostic workup at our institution revealed a giant penetrating ulcer of the descending aorta as a culprit of esophageal compression. Expeditious endovascular stentgraft exclusion of the aneurysm was performed because of its symptomatic nature and high propensity of spontaneous rupture. On a recent consultation 2 years after the endovascular procedure, the patient confirmed a complete remission of impaired swallowing and freedom from thoracic discomfort. Dysphagia aortica should be considered in the numerous differential diagnoses of esophageal swallowing disorders in the elderly, as delayed identification may harbor catastrophic outcome for affected individuals.

Dynamic MR imaging of the gastroesophageal junction in healthy volunteers during bolus passage

To evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive dynamic fast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during swallowing in healthy volunteers, and to determine esophageal function at the gastroesophageal junction during swallowing. A total of 20 healthy volunteers underwent MRI while swallowing in the supine position. Dynamic gradient-echo (GRE) sequences (balanced fast field echo [B-FFE]) were employed in three planes on a 1.5T unit using a phased-array body coil. Buttermilk spiked with gadolinium (Gd) chelate (40:1) for bolus passage was used as an oral contrast agent. We evaluated visualization of esophageal bolus transit, bolus transit time (BTT), peristalsis, identification of the gastroesophageal junction, and reflux during the Valsalva maneuver. The mean visible length of the esophagus was 16.2+/-5.3 cm in the sagittal view, and 13.8+/-4.9 cm in the coronal view. In the sagittal view the BTT was defined in 15 of 20 volunteers and was 7.6+/-1.4 seconds. The BTT in the coronal view was measured in seven of 20 volunteers and was 8+/-1.3 seconds on average. The axial view yielded higher scores (2.25) than the coronal (1.98) and sagittal (1.78) views for identification of the cardia and during the Valsalva maneuver. Bolus contrast was better displayed in the sagittal (2.2) view than in the coronal (2.08) or axial (1.73) planes. In six volunteers, gastroesophageal abnormalities, such as axial hernia, reflux, and nonperistaltic contractions, were identified. For statistical analysis we used the Friedman test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results indicate that dynamic MR swallowing is a feasible and reproducible technique that warrants further studies in patients.

Cardiovascular findings in arterial tortuosity syndrome

A boy presented at birth with an axial diaphragmatic hernia, hyperelastic skin, hyperextensible joints, and arachnodactyly. During infancy, he developed bilateral inguinal herniae and generalized muscular hypotonia. Echocardiography showed an anomalous tortuous course of the pulmonary arteries with suspected stenosis of the left pulmonary artery. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging demonstrated elongation and tortuosity of the aortic arch and its branches (Panels A and B) and severe tortuosity …

Long-term experience of treating 185 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by anti-reflux surgery respecting the functional–morphological restoration of the esophagus

According to anatomical investigations the whole esophagus plays a crucial role as reflux barrier in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Morphologically, the spirally arranged muscle fibres present a tension-dependent "stretch closure" and in the event of any reduction of tension, as for example caused by an axial hiatus hernia, the organ may become inefficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life as the main success criterion after anti-reflux surgery based strictly on the restoration of functional morphology. Between January 1999 and December 2000, 185 patients with GERD were treated by surgery in accordance with functional-morphological principles. After dissecting the mediastinum, the gastroesophageal junction was displaced into the abdomen with consecutive retensioning the esophagus. The esophageal hiatus was reconstructed with non-absorbable single knot sutures and strengthened with alloplastic material. The application of a 180 degrees fundus cuff around the posterior esophageal circumference served as a "spacer" and also restored the angle of His. Preoperatively, all patients underwent endoscopy, pH metry and manometry. During postoperative follow-up, recurrence rate and quality of life were evaluated via a disease-specific scale. Preoperatively, 85% of the patients had an elevated DeMeester Score with a median of 81.4; 64% had reflux esophagitis and 37% had reduced lower esophageal sphincter pressure. All 185 operations were performed without conversion in a median operating time of 74 min. In one patient a lesion of the esophagus was treated during the operation; two patients had lesions of the splenic capsule which were also dealt with during the operation. Postoperatively, pleural effusions occurred in 15 patients and puncture was deemed necessary in one subject. Ninety-three percent were followed up for a median of 45 months and the recurrence rate was 2.3%. The quality of life index was 81.6+/-12.4 points preoperatively, and had significantly improved to 125.2+/-12.7 points in the follow-up. Through the functional-morphological concept of anti-reflux surgery comprising the restoration of the tension-dependent "stretch closure" of the esophagus, significant long-term improvement in quality of life with a low recurrence rate and perioperative morbidity can be achieved.

Barrett’s esophagus: prevalence and size of hiatal hernia

OBJECTIVE: Barrett’s esophagus is caused by gastroesophageal reflux and predisposes to adenocarcinoma. Hiatal hernia may cause reflux. The prevalence and size of hernias in patients with Barrett’s esophagus was investigated. METHODS: Axial hernia length and the width of the diaphragmatic hiatus were measured prospectively at endoscopy. RESULTS: A 2-cm or longer hernia was found in 96% of 46 patients with Barrett’s esophagus, in 42% of 103 controls ( p < 0.001), and in 72% of 18 patients with short segment Barrett’s esophagus ( p < 0.05 vs controls). A hernia was found in 71% of 31 controls with esophagitis and in 29% of 72 controls without esophagitis ( p < 0.001). Of 54 controls with neither esophagitis or reflux symptoms, 20% had a hernia. Mean hernia length was 3.95 cm in Barrett’s esophagus, and 2.81 cm in controls ( p < 0.005). Mean hiatus width was 3.52 cm in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and hernia, and 2.24 cm in controls with hernia. Hernia length was similar in patients with and without esophagitis, and in short segment Barrett’s esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with Barrett’s esophagus have hiatal hernia; their hernias are longer and the hiatal openings wider than in controls with or without esophagitis. Hiatal hernia likely contributes to the development of Barrett’s esophagus.

Barrett's esophagus: Prevalence and size of hiatal hernia

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Barrett’s esophagus is caused by gastroesophageal reflux and predisposes to adenocarcinoma. Hiatal hernia may cause reflux. The prevalence and size of hernias in patients with Barrett’s esophagus was investigated. METHODS: Axial hernia length and the width of the diaphragmatic hiatus were measured prospectively at endoscopy. RESULTS: A 2-cm or longer hernia was found in 96% of 46 patients with Barrett’s esophagus, in 42% of 103 controls (p CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with Barrett’s esophagus have hiatal hernia; their hernias are longer and the hiatal openings wider than in controls with or without esophagitis. Hiatal hernia likely contributes to the development of Barrett’s esophagus.

Clinical Management of Hiatus Hernias and Gastroesophageal Reflux

For clinical purposes, hernias should be classified as paraesophageal or axial. Each may be associated with reflux, a rather unusual complication in either, in fact. In the absence of reflux, axial hernias usually have no importance.