Average Wearing Time Research Articles

Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols

Objective: To study auditory acclimatization and outcome in first time hearing aid users fitted with state of the art hearing aids as a function of different hearing aid fitting protocols. Methods: Twenty-eight adult subjects participated in the study. Each subject was assigned to one of three study groups (named audiologist driven, AD; patient driven, PD; set-to-target, STT according to the fitting protocol used) and fitted with digital hearing aids (Bernafon Symbio). Speech recognition scores were measured in aided and unaided conditions over a 6-month period. Results: Five subjects (three from the PD-group, two from the STT group) decided to withdraw from the study during the 6-month-study period, leaving a total of 23 complete data sets for analysis. Aided speech understanding increased significantly over this time period in all three groups. However, average hearing aid insertion gain changes were small over the same period. There were no statistically significant differences in aided or unaided speech recognition scores between the three groups after 2 weeks or after 6 months. On average, twice as many fine tunings of the hearing aids were requested by the patients in the AD and the STT group than in the PD group and subjects in the AD and STT group used their hearing aids approximately twice as much as subjects in the PD group. Conclusions: The substantial increase in speech intelligibility without significant changes of the insertion gain of the hearing aids over a 6-month period in all three groups suggests a significant acclimatization effect. Although the speech recognition with hearing aids did not differ significantly among the three study groups after 6 months, the lower average wearing time and the higher number of withdrawals from the study in the PD group suggest that the patients’ needs are not adequately met. In terms of aided speech recognition scores and hearing aid wearing time the STT group and the AD group were very similar. However, comments of the patients and the higher rate of withdrawals in the STT group suggest an over-all advantage for the AD fitting protocol.

Acceptance and compliance with external hip protectors: a systematic review of the literature.

Hip fractures may be prevented by the use of external hip protectors, but compliance is often poor. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the determinants of compliance with hip protectors by systematically reviewing the literature. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Primary acceptance with hip protectors ranged from 37% to 72% (median 68%); compliance varied between 20% and 92% (median 56%). However, in most studies it was not very clear how compliance was defined (e.g., average wearing time on active days and during waking hours, number of user-days per all available follow-up days, percentage falls with hip protector) and how it was measured. To provide more insight in the compliance percentages, the different methods of defining and measuring compliance were presented for the selected studies, when provided. Because of the heterogeneity in study design of the selected studies and the lack of quantitative data in most studies, results regarding the determinants of compliance could not be statistically pooled. Instead a qualitative summary of the determinants of compliance was given. The reasons most frequently mentioned for not wearing hip protectors, were: not being comfortable (too tight/poor fit); the extra effort (and time) needed to wear the device; urinary incontinence; and physical difficulties/illnesses. In conclusion, compliance is a very complex, but important issue in hip protector research and implementation. Based on the experiences of elderly people who wear the hip protectors, adjustments should be made to the protector and the underwear, while maintaining the force attenuation capacity. Furthermore, methods to improve the compliance should be developed, and their effectiveness tested.

Corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers.

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that contribute to corneal staining in hydrogel lens wearers by examining the following variables: type of lens worn, wearing time and lens replacement schedule, lens care system, and topical and systemic medication use. Five hundred full-time, successful hydrogel contact lens wearers were evaluated for corneal fluorescein staining at 20 clinical sites. Corneal staining was evaluated in five regions and was graded on a scale of 0 (no staining) to 4 (severe staining) in 0.5 steps for severity. Corneal fluorescein staining was present in at least one eye in 55.7% of the hydrogel lens wearers examined in this study, and 8.0% had moderate-to-severe staining (defined as a cumulative staining score of > or = 3 with at least one quadrant score > or = 2). Staining was most severe for the inferior portion of the cornea (mean +/- SD; OD: 0.34 +/- 0.57, OS: 0.30 +/- 0.54). All other areas of the cornea showed lesser amounts of staining, all of which were approximately equal (mean range, 0.13 to 0.16). Staining was observed in two or more quadrants in 24% of right eyes and 22.4% of left eyes. When questioned about care system compliance, 81.1% of subjects reported compliance. Patients who were noncompliant with their lens care system (chi 2 p = 0.0037), used rewetting drops (chi 2 p = 0.0005), or wore conventional lenses without a planned replacement schedule (chi 2 p = 0.0008) were more likely to have some degree of corneal staining. Noncompliance with care system (chi 2 p = 0.0147), replacement schedule (chi 2 p = 0.0039), and lens power (chi 2 p = 0.0224) were associated with moderate-to-severe staining. The following factors were not significantly associated with corneal staining: patient age, gender, medication use including oral contraceptives, type of wear (extended, flexible, or daily), average wearing time, wearing time at the examination, lens type (spherical or toric), water content of lenses (high or low water content), type of care system, use of enzymes, and pinching the contact lens directly off the cornea. Staining occurs to some extent in many hydrogel contact lens patients, and is influenced by many factors. Moderate-to-severe staining, which may be more clinically significant, is associated with noncompliance with care system, a conventional replacement schedule, and lens power.

Acceptance of wearing hearing aids by children: a longitudinal analysis

There exist no systematic longitudinal studies concerning the acceptance of hearing aids in Germany. This study examines the acceptance of a hearing aid (defined by its daily/weekly use) in the management of children with persistent sensorineural hearing loss over a period of years. 35 children with monaural or binaural hearing loss were treated with a hearing aid. All children had at least a 25-dB averaged mid-frequency pure-tone hearing loss (500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz). The data consist of standardized parent ratings at 4 points in time over a period of nearly 30 months. Unilateral-impaired children wore their hearing aids less often than bilateral-impaired children. This effect was not significant at the beginning (P = 0.85) but increased over time. By the end the difference was significant (P = 0.004). Mild to moderate monaural hearing-impaired children accepted their hearing aids, whereas children with severe to profound hearing loss refused to wear them. Bilateral hearing-impaired children demonstrated, a priori, a better wearing acceptance that even improved with time. There was never a significant difference between boys and girls in their average wearing time. A significant correlation of age and wearing acceptance was also not observed at any time. Hearing aids are an effective treatment with high acceptance and compliance, especially by children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The quality of acceptance of monaural hearing-impaired children needs to be studied further.

Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent-replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study.

This was a retrospective study of 47 patients who wore frequent-replacement contact lenses on a daily basis and replaced them every 1 day to 12 weeks. The incidence of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) was determined, and potential risk factors were assessed. These patients had no previous contact lens experience. Forty-seven of 260 patients met the criteria for inclusion, and 10 (21.27%) of the patients developed GPC. The incidence varied, according to how often the contact lenses were replaced. Incidence was 36% in patients who replaced their lenses at 4 weeks or longer and 4.5% in patients who replaced their lenses at less than 4 weeks. Lenses were coated more often in patients who replaced their lenses at 4 weeks or longer. A significantly greater number of patients in the GPC group incorporated enzyme into their contact lens care system. A history of allergy was present, markedly more often in patients who developed GPC. There was no notable difference between the groups in age, sex, average daily wearing time, Food and Drug Administration classification of contact lens material, time in contact lenses from fitting to diagnosis or last follow-up period, or the parameters and fitting characteristic of the contact lenses. The authors concluded that the frequency of contact lens replacement appears to be an important variable in development of GPC. Although frequent replacement contact lenses do not eliminate GPC, patients on a 1-day or 3-week replacement cycle had a markedly lower risk of developing GPC than patients who replaced their lenses at longer intervals. Coating was present less often on lenses that were replaced every 1 day to 3 weeks. In patients who are at high risk for GPC, replacing lenses at intervals of 1 day to 2 weeks appears to offer a better strategy to avoiding GPC than incorporating enzymatic cleaning into their lens care system.—Thomas J. Liesegang

Biomicroscopy of Papillae Associated with Hard Contact Lens Wearing

We studied the macrostructural characteristics of papillary changes of the upper tarsal conjunctiva associated with the wearing of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) contact lenses. Fifty subjects with elevated conjunctival papillae >0.3 mm in diameter were studied. Macrostructural characteristics recorded were location, diameter, and number of papillae, presence or absence of staining at the apices of papillae, and degree of hyperemia of the upper tarsal conjunctiva. Patient information collected included age, duration of lens wear, average daily lens wearing time, presence or absence of itching or mucus, refractive status, and atopic history. The tarsal conjunctiva was divided into three zones of equal size. Papillae were present in various zones and combinations of zones; however, papillae were never confined exclusively to either (1) the zone adjacent to the tarsal folds or (2) the latter zone in combination with the zone adjacent to the eyelid margin without also occurring in the intervening zone. The diameter of the papillae ranged from >0.3 mm to 2.0 mm. The number of papillae per eyelid ranged from two to over 100. The apices of the papillae were frequently flattened and craterlike, and often stained with fluorescein.

COMPARISON OF SOFLENS CONTACT LENSES (POLYMACON) WITH HARD CONTACT LENSES AND SPECTACLES*

A study, comparing Soflens TM contact lenses (polymacon) with hard contact lenses and spectacles, and using 150 male and female patients, has been done. Volunteers qualified for the study if they had healthy eyes and had worn one type of corrective lenses for six months before they were interviewed and examined. During each patient's examination, his type of correction was not known. Such matters as visual acuity, corneal measurements and average wearing time were considered. (Soflens contact lenses were felt to be safer than hard contact lenses.)