Avelumab In Patients Research Articles

1210P - Phase Ib/II trial of TG4001 (Tipapkinogene sovacivec), a therapeutic HPV-vaccine, and Avelumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HPV-16+ cancers

BackgroundTG4001 is a vaccine targeting HPV E6 and E7. It has shown to provide histological clearance of cervical pre-cancerous lesions (Harper DM et al. 2019). We aimed to evaluate in the Ph Ib part the safety of TG4001 in combination with avelumab in HPV 16-positive cancers (NCT03260023). MethodsPatients with HPV-16 positive cancers who had received ≤ 2 prior regimens for R/M disease were enrolled to either one of the two doses of the vaccine (5x106 and 5x107 pfu). TG4001 was administered SC weekly for 6 weeks, every 2 weeks up to M6, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Avelumab was given IV at 10mg/kg every 2 weeks. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST 1.1. For translational and immunological assessments, PBMC samples were collected longitudinally and tissue samples were collected at baseline and D43. ResultsNine patients with oropharyngeal (5), anal (2), cervical (1) or vaginal (1) cancer, were enrolled in this trial, 3 patients on the low dose and 6 patients on the high dose of TG4001. No dose-limiting toxicity and no SAE have been observed. 3 patients had a confirmed partial response according to RECIST1.1. 3/5 evaluable patients for T-cell response by ELISPOT displayed detectable peripheric responses against E6 and/or E7 after treatment, and an overall trend to decreased circulating regulatory T cells (Treg). At the tissue level, 4/5 evaluable patients showed an increase of CD8 infiltration and/or a decrease in infiltrated Treg/CD8 ratio at day 43. The percentage of PD-L1+ cells doubled in all low or moderate expressors. The phenotypic findings were supported by increased expression of genes associated with both adaptive and innate immunity and with a shift from a “cold” tumor to a “hot” tumor gene signature. ConclusionsThe combination of TG4001 and avelumab is safe and provides anti-tumor activity in HPV-16+ cancer patients. The treatment induces immune changes in patients with poor baseline immune contexture. The combination is being evaluated in the ongoing Ph II part. Clinical trial identificationNCT03260023. Legal entity responsible for the studyTransgene SA. FundingTransgene. DisclosureC. Le Tourneau: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Nanobiotix; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK. J. Delord: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. P. Cassier: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Blueprint Medicines; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Plexxikon; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): Toray Industries; Research grant / Funding (institution): Transgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Loxo; Research grant / Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline; Research grant / Funding (institution): Innate Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen. D. Loirat: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD. A. Tavernaro: Full / Part-time employment: Transgene SA. B. Bastien: Full / Part-time employment, Employed by sponsor of the study: Transgene SA. K. Bendjama: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Transgene.

1224P - Phase Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours

BackgroundM9241 is a tumor-targeting immunocytokine composed of IL-12 heterodimers fused to a monoclonal antibody targeting DNA in necrotic tumor regions. Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types. Preclinical data predicted a potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) between M9241 and avelumab. We report an interim analysis of safety and PK/PD from the dose-escalation part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953), a phase Ib study of M9241 and avelumab in pts with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic solid tumors. MethodsAt data cutoff (20 Aug 2018), 29 pts in dose levels (DLs) 1-4 received M9241 4, 8, 12, or 16.8μg/kg SC every 4 weeks (Q4W) and avelumab 10mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Three pts in DL5 received 12-week induction with avelumab 800mg IV once weekly (Q1W) and M9241 16.8μg/kg SC Q4W and then continuation treatment with avelumab 800mg IV Q2W and M9241 16.8μg/kg SC Q4W. The primary endpoint was overall safety and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). ResultsDLs 1-4 were well tolerated. One DLT occurred at DL3 (grade 3 autoimmune hepatitis), but no DLTs occurred at other DLs. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. PK analyses suggested a DDI at DLs 1-4, evidenced by decreased avelumab exposure concurrent with increased IFN-γ levels; therefore, DL5 was introduced. At DL5, PK data showed no evidence of a DDI. DL5 was also well tolerated and showed a similar safety profile to DL4, with treatment-emergent adverse events limited to grade 1/2. Prolonged clinical responses (CR/PR) were seen, including in a checkpoint inhibitor–refractory pt. ConclusionsCombining avelumab 800mg IV Q1W and M9241 16.8μg/kg SC Q4W as 12-week induction followed by avelumab 800mg IV Q2W and M9241 16.8μg/kg SC Q4W as continuation treatment had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and was therefore declared as recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The observed DDI is likely driven by M9241-mediated IFN-γ induction, causing PD-L1 upregulation in the periphery and tumor and target-mediated clearance of avelumab. Based on available data, this DDI mechanism is likely saturated at the RP2D. This trial continues recruitment into expansion cohorts at the RP2D. Clinical trial identificationNCT02994953. Editorial acknowledgementClinicalThinking, funded by Merck Healthcare KGaA and Pfizer Inc. Legal entity responsible for the studyMerck Healthcare KGaA. FundingMerck Healthcare KGaA and Pfizer Inc. DisclosureJ. Strauss: Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono; Licensing / Royalties, Patent: dual blockade of PD-L1 and TGF beta for HPV+ cancer: Not applicable. Y. Vugmeyster: Full / Part-time employment: EMD Serono; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: EMD Serono; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Alexion; Licensing / Royalties: EMD Serono; Licensing / Royalties: Wyeth; Licensing / Royalties: Pfizer. M. Sznol: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech/Roche ; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca/MedImmune ; Advisory / Consultancy: Kyowa Hakko Kirin ; Advisory / Consultancy: Nektar; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Biodesix; Advisory / Consultancy: Adaptimmune; Advisory / Consultancy: Theravance; Advisory / Consultancy: Modulate Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Omniox; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Inovio Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Torque; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Amphivena Therapeutics; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Intensity Therapeutics; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Adaptive Biotechnologies ; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Actym Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Newlink Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Molecular Partners; Advisory / Consultancy: Genmab; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie; Advisory / Consultancy: Allakos; Advisory / Consultancy: Hinge; Advisory / Consultancy: Symphogen; Advisory / Consultancy: Pieris Pharmaceuticals; Advisory / Consultancy: Gritstone Oncology; Advisory / Consultancy: Innate Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Celldex; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Almac Diagnostics; Advisory / Consultancy: immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: Array BioPharma. R.K. Pachynski: Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Jounce Therapeutics; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Dendreon; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Genentech/Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Sanofi; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Genomic Health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen Oncology. K. Trang: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Merck KGaA/EMD Serono. S. Chennoufi: Full / Part-time employment: Merck KGaA. J.L. Gulley: Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bavarian Nordic; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Medivation; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): NantBioScience, Inc.; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck.

1374TiP - PRIME002: Early phase II study of azacitidine and carboplatin priming for avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy

BackgroundMelanoma patients with disease progression on immunotherapy have very limited treatment options. Low-dose azacitidine results in demethylation and increase in neoantigen expression and carboplatin increases DNA-damage and cellular stress. This trial is testing if sequential treatment with azacitidine and carboplatin “primes” for immunotherapy rechallenge with anti-PDL1 antibody Avelumab, via a decrease in the disease burden and re-establishment of immune sensitivity. Primary Objective: Quantify complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) after 2 cycles of priming (1 cycle= azacitidine x 5 days followed by Carboplatin Day 8/28 days) according to RECIST 1.1 and 6 cycles of immunotherapy (1 cycle= 1 dose of Avelumab/14 days) according to irRECIST criteria. Secondary Objectives: 1. Determine DNA methylation levels before, and immediately after priming with azacitidine and carboplatin treatment i.e. at study entry and after 2 months; 2. Quantify immune-response markers (PDL-1, PD-1, CD4/CD8, and CD68) in blood, tumour and microenvironment and immune response in blood before treatment, after 2 priming cycles and after 6 immunotherapy cycles. Trial designInterventional early phase II study that consists of 2 cycles of azacitidine 40mg/m2 IV/day for 5 days followed by Carboplatin AUC 4.5 IV on D8/ 28day cycle and RECIST1.1 after completion of priming; followed by Avelumab 10mg/kg IV/14day cycle until disease progression according to irRECIST. A favourable or stable response in 20% patients and no grade 4 or persistent (>4 weeks) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) is required for continuation of the trial. This early phase II study will assess the feasibility and determine outcome measures required to calculate sample sizes and develop a statistical plan for multi-centre Phase II study. This study has been approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District HREC, reference number HREC/17/HAWKE/55’. Clinical trial identificationACTRN12618000053224; registered 16th January 2018. Legal entity responsible for the studyAndre van der Westhuizen. FundingRamaciotti Foundation and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Australia. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A phase II, open label, multicenter trial of avelumab in patients with advanced, metastatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas NEC G3 (WHO 2010) progressive after first-line chemotherapy (AVENEC).

4103 Background: High grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasias (NEN) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis and no established second line therapy when progressive after first line platinum-based chemotherapy resulting in a median overall survival (OS) of 5 months. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody Avelumab in patients (pts) with NEN G3 progressing after first-line chemotherapy. Methods: In a multicenter, national, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial the efficacy and safety of Avelumab was evaluated in patients with metastatic progressive Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC G3) according to WHO 2010, excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer. Results: From 12/2017-11/2018 a total of 29 pts (20 male, 69%), were enrolled (16 NEC G3 and 11 moderately differentiated NETG3). Mean age was 59.2±10.2 ys (range 33-75), median follow up 16.5 weeks (3-48). Median Ki67 was 60% (range 20-95%). Site of origin included pancreas (12), genito-urinary tract (4), stomach-esophagus (3), colo-rectum (3), lung (2), ear-nose-throat (2), papilla of Vater (1). In an interim analysis the DCR (stable disease or partial remission according to irRECIST) after 8 weeks was 32% (4 SD, 2 PR). In responders, mean duration of disease control was 20 (±13.8) weeks, with 4 pts. showing stable disease or partial remission ≥6 months. Median OS was 4.2 months (range 1- >12). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 of 29 pts (38%) and were mainly mild to moderate (CTCAE-grade 1 [52%], 2 [44%] and 3 [4%]) and included fatigue (n=6; 20.6%), diarrhea (n=4; 13.7%), fever/chills after infusion (n=4; 13.7%), loss of appetite and nausea (n=4; 13.7%), skin rash (n=1; 3%), deterioration of preexisting psoriasis (n=1; 3%) and abdominal pain (n=1; 3%). Conclusions: Immune checkpoint blockade with avelumab in pretreated high grade NEN shows relevant activity in a subset of patients with excellent tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT03352934.

Oral DNA vaccination targeting VEGFR-2 combined with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma, a phase I/II study: NCT03750071.

TPS2076 Background: The vaccine (VXM01) is a VEGFR-2 coding DNA vaccine, using a Salmonella Ty21a carrier for oral application. VEGFR-2 is over-expressed in glioblastoma and serves as a promising target for VEGFR-2 primed T cells with the potential to alter tumor angiogenesis and/or eliminate VEGFR-2 expressing tumor cells. VXM01 was well tolerated in a previous phase I/II study involving 14 patients with progressive glioblastoma multiforme. Immunological correlates of vaccination and anti-tumor immunity in the blood and in the tumor were detected. At least one objective clinical response was attributed to vaccine monotherapy, with one more PR achieved in combination with nivolumab. Prolonged overall survival was associated with peripheral immune responses against VEGFR-2, J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 2017). A combination study with the anti PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibody avelumab is currently underway. Methods: A multicentre, open-label phase I/II study ( EudraCT.gov no. 2017-003076-31), will enrol 30 patients with progressive glioblastoma, previously treated with temozolomide/radiotherapy. The primary objective is to evaluate safety and tolerability of the vaccine in combination with avelumab. In a 1+2 safety run in, two cohorts of non-reoperable patients will be vaccinated with one of 2 doses of the oral vaccine (106 or 107 CFU) with concurrent intravenous avelumab. After safety evaluation and recommendation of study continuation by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, 18 non-re-operable and 6 re-operable patients will be treated with 107 CFU of the vaccine + avelumab. Vaccinations for all patients will be on day 1, 3, 5, and 7, followed by 4-weekly boosts until progression. Avelumab 800 mg will be administered every two weeks until progression. The enrolment of cohort 1 started with inclusion of the 1st patient in November 2018. The end of study is week 60. Follow up visits will be on months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24. Objective response rate (ORR), clinical response using iRano criteria, immunological correlates before and after treatment using ELISpot, FACS, TCR-sequencing, IF, and IHC laboratory methods. Clinical trial information: NCT03750071.

Phase 2, two-group, two-stage study of avelumab in patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS), microsatellite instable (MSI), and polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutated recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer (EC).

5502 Background: This non-randomized phase 2 study evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in two cohorts of EC: i) MSI/ POLE cohort including ECs with immunohistochemical (IHC) loss of expression of at least one of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or documented mutation in the exonuclease domain of POLE and ii) MSS cohort including ECs with normal IHC expression of all MMR proteins. Methods: Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, unlimited prior therapies, and any EC histology. Co-primary endpoints were confirmed objective response (OR) and progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6). Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV was given every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. In the 1st stage, 16 pts were enrolled in each cohort; if there were ≥2 ORs or ≥2 PFS6 responses, accrual would continue to the 2nd stage with enrollment of 19 additional pts. Overall, if there are ≥4 ORs or ≥8 PFS6 responses, avelumab would be considered worthy of further study in each cohort. Results: As of 12/2018, 33 pts were enrolled. The MSS cohort was closed at the 1st stage due to futility; of 16 pts in the MSS cohort, only 1 pt exhibited an OR and PFS6 response [ORR and PFS6 rate 6.25% (95% CI 0.16%-30.2%)]. Conversely, the MSI/POLE cohort reached the primary endpoint of 4 ORs after accrual of only 17 pts. Two pts in the MSI/POLE cohort did not initiate protocol therapy and were excluded from all analyses. Of 15 pts in the MSI/POLE cohort, 4 pts exhibited OR [1CR+3PRs, OR rate (ORR) 26.7% (95% CI 7.8%-55.1%)] and 6 pts (including the 4 pts with OR) exhibited PFS6 responses [PFS6 rate 40.0% (95% CI 16.3%-66.7%)], 4 ongoing and 3 approaching 2 yrs. Twenty-two pts (71%) reported treatment related toxicities, 6 patients (19%) G3 toxicities; there were no treatment-related G4 and G5 toxicities. In the MSI/POLE cohort, 5 of 6 PFS6 responses were observed in pts with ≥3 lines of prior therapy (p = 0.011) and in tumors who were PD-L1 negative by IHC. Further correlative work will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: In EC pts stratified by MSI/POLE status, MSI vs MSS status appears to be correlated with avelumab response even in PD-L1 negative tumors. Responses in the MSI/POLE cohort were more frequent in more heavily pretreated patients, a finding that warrants further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT02912572.

Safety and clinical activity of PD-L1 blockade in patients with aggressive recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

BackgroundRecurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven disorder that causes substantial morbidity and can lead to fatal distal airway obstruction and post-obstructive pneumonias. Patients require frequent surgical debridement of disease, and no approved systemic adjuvant therapies exist.MethodsA phase II study was conducted to investigate the clinical activity and safety of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade with avelumab in patients with RRP.ResultsTwelve patients were treated. All patients with laryngeal RRP displayed improvement in disease burden, and 5 of 9 (56%) displayed partial responses. None of 4 patients with pulmonary RRP displayed a response. Using each patient’s surgical history as their own control, patients required fewer surgical interventions after avelumab treatment (p = 0.008). A subset of partial responders developed HPV-specific reactivity in papilloma-infiltrating T-cells that correlated with reduced HPV viral load and an increased Tissue Inflammation Signature.ConclusionsAvelumab demonstrated safety and clinical activity in patients with laryngeal RRP. Further study of immune checkpoint blockade for RRP, possibly with longer treatment duration or in combination with other immunotherapies aimed at activating antiviral immunity, is warranted.Trial registrationNCT, number NCT02859454, registered August 9, 2016.

Budget impact model of avelumab in patients with metastatic merkel cell carcinoma in the US.

Objective: To estimate the budget impact of avelumab as a treatment option for patients with treatment-naïve first-line (1L) and previously treated second-line or later (2L+) metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) in the US.Methods: A budget impact model was developed to evaluate the addition of avelumab for the treatment of mMCC patients using a hypothetical 30 million-member US health plan over a 3-year time horizon (2019–2021). The comparator treatments included in the analysis were pembrolizumab and nivolumab (other immuno-oncology agents); and the chemotherapies routinely used in the eligible mMCC population. Model inputs included market share uptake of avelumab and other comparators, duration of treatments, and costs (drugs, health care resource utilization, adverse events). The model was evaluated from a commercial payer perspective. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test uncertainties arising from the input values used in the model.Results: In a hypothetical commercial health plan of 30 million members, 285 patients with mMCC were identified over 3 years; 43 patients received avelumab as a 1L treatment over 3 years. In a world without avelumab, the total health care costs of treating patients with mMCC over 3 years were estimated to be US$11,710,115 from a commercial health plan perspective. With avelumab, there were estimated savings of $2,643,173 considering the total costs related to the treatment of mMCC over 3 years (23% reduction in the budget). The incremental cost per member per month over 3 years was −$0.0025.Conclusion: The model results indicate that the adoption of avelumab as a treatment option for mMCC would likely result in minimal budget impact from a US health plan perspective. Patients with mMCC, a rare condition with a poor prognosis and high unmet need, may benefit greatly from recently approved immunotherapies.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma: phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial

BackgroundWe report phase 1b data from patients enrolled in the JAVELIN Solid Tumor clinical trial (NCT01772004) with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma that had progressed after ≥1 line of therapy for metastatic disease.Patients and methodsPatients received avelumab (10 mg/kg)—a human anti–PD-L1 antibody. Assessments included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsAs of December 31, 2016, 51 patients were treated and followed for a median of 24.2 months (range, 16.1–31.5). Most patients had cutaneous (n = 28 [54.9%]) or ocular (n = 16 [31.4%]) melanoma and had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 0–4), including ipilimumab (n = 26 [51.0%]). The confirmed ORR was 21.6% (95% CI, 11.3–35.3; complete response, 7.8%; partial response, 13.7%). The median duration of response was not estimable (95% CI, 2.6 months-not estimable). Median PFS and OS were 3.1 months (95% CI, 1.4–6.3) and 17.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-not estimable), respectively. Subgroup analyses suggested meaningful clinical activity (ORR [95% CI]) in patients with non-ocular melanoma (31.4% [16.9–49.3]), PD-L1–positive tumors (42.1% [20.3–66.5]), or prior ipilimumab therapy (30.8% [14.3–51.8]). Thirty-nine patients (76.5%) had a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), most commonly infusion-related reaction (29.4%), fatigue (17.6%), and chills (11.8%); 4 patients (7.8%) had a grade 3 TRAE. Five patients (9.8%) had an immune-related TRAE (all were grade 1/2). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths were reported.ConclusionAvelumab showed durable responses, promising survival outcomes, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01772004.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: phase 1b results from the JAVELIN solid tumor trial

BackgroundWe assessed the efficacy and safety of avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with previously treated metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (mACC).MethodsIn this phase 1b expansion cohort, patients with mACC and prior platinum-based therapy received avelumab at 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Continuation of mitotane was permitted; however, mitotane levels during the study were not recorded. Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1.ResultsFifty patients received avelumab and were followed for a median of 16.5 months. Prior treatment included ≥2 lines in 74.0%; mitotane was continued in 50.0%. The objective response rate (ORR) was 6.0% (95% CI, 1.3% to 16.5%; partial response in 3 patients). Twenty-one patients (42.0%) had stable disease as best response (disease control rate, 48.0%). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.0), median overall survival (OS) was 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 15.0), and the 1-year OS rate was 43.4% (95% CI, 27.9% to 57.9%). In evaluable patients with PD-L1+ (n = 12) or PD-L1− (n = 30) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 16.7% vs 3.3% (P = .192). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 82.0%; the most common were nausea (20.0%), fatigue (18.0%), hypothyroidism (14.0%), and pyrexia (14.0%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 16.0%; no grade 4 to 5 TRAEs occurred. Twelve patients (24.0%) had an immune-related TRAE of any grade, which were grade 3 in 2 patients (4.0%): adrenal insufficiency (n = 1), and pneumonitis (n = 1).ConclusionsAvelumab showed clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with platinum-treated mACC.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01772004; registered January 21, 2013.

Phase II, two-stage study of avelumab in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), microsatellite instable (MSI) and polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutated recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer

Phase II, two-stage study of avelumab in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), microsatellite instable (MSI) and polymerase epsilon (POLE) mutated recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer

Safety of axitinib plus avelumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

e14082 Background: Both PD-L1 and VEGFR are legitimate therapeutic targets in recurrent glioblastoma (rGB). Axitinib, a potent, selective small molecule VEGFR 1-3 inhibitor with single-agent activity in rGB, may synergize with the PD-L1 blocking IgG1 mAb avelumab for the treatment of rGB. Methods: A phase II clinical trial investigating avelumab plus axitinib in patients (pts) with rGB is ongoing (NCT03291314). Pts with rGB are stratified according to their baseline use of corticosteroids (CS). Pts without baseline CS use initiated treatment with axitinib (AXI, 5 mg po BID) plus avelumab (AVELU, 10 mg/kg IV Q2w) (Cohort A). Pts with baseline CS use initiated AXI monotherapy (AXI mono); AVELU could be added after 6w if the CS dose could be tapered to ≤ 10 mg prednisolone (Cohort B). Results: From Jun 2017 to Jan 2018, 32 pts (med age 50y [range 29-70]; 62% male; 56% WHO PS 1 or 0) initiated study treatment (16 in Cohort A and 16 in -B) . All pts had failed prior radiotherapy and temozolomide. In Cohort B, 7 pts (44%) initiated treatment with AXI+AVELU after 6w of AXI mono. Treatment with AXI+AVELU was ongoing in 10 pts (across both cohorts). Safety data are available for a total of 280 AXI+AVELU treatment weeks (median 8w [range 4-30]/pt). Treatment-related AEs (TRAE) of any grade occurred in 100% of pts. All-cause grade 3 AE occurred in 10 (43%) pts; 7 [30%] pts experienced a grade 3 TRAE. There were no gr 4 or 5 AE. PD was the only reason for stopping AXI+AVELU treatment. Conclusions: The safety profile of avelumab plus axitinib appears manageable in pts with rGB. This clinical trial is currently being continued for the evaluation of efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03291314. CTCAEv4 Grade 1 or 2 3 n % n % Worse lab value Lymphopenia 16 69.6 0 0 Thrombocytopenia 8 34.8 0 0 Increased Hb 7 30.4 0 0 Increased TSH 5 21.7 0 0 Leukocytosis 5 21.7 0 0 Hb decreased 4 17.4 0 0 ALT increased 4 17.4 0 0 AST increased 3 13.0 0 0 TSH decreased 3 13.0 0 0 Adverse event Hypertension 12 52.2 4 17.4 Dysphonia 13 56.5 0 0 Fatigue 10 43.5 1 4.3 Diarrhea 7 30.4 1 4.3 Oral dysesthesia/mucositis 7 30.4 0 0 Anorexia 4 17.4 1 4.3 Fever 4 17.4 0 0 Nausea 3 13.0 0 0 Confusion 2 8.6 1 4.3

A phase 2, single-arm trial of neoadjuvant axitinb plus avelumab in patients (pts) with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are at high risk of relapse after nephrectomy (NeoAvAx).

TPS4604Background: Surgery is the standard treatment for non-metastatic RCC. Despite curative intent, pts with a high risk of relapse have a 5-year metastasis-free survival rate of only 30 % and pr...

Phase 1b results of avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic melanoma enrolled in the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial, including updated subgroup analyses.

e21531Background: Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum the...

Safety profile of avelumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: A pooled analysis of data from the phase 1 JAVELIN solid tumor and phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 clinical trials.

BACKGROUNDAntibodies targeting the programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) checkpoint may cause adverse events (AEs) that are linked to the mechanism of action of this therapeutic class and unique from those observed with conventional chemotherapy.METHODSPatients with advanced solid tumors who were enrolled in the phase 1 JAVELIN Solid Tumor (1650 patients) and phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 (88 patients) trials received avelumab, a human anti–PD‐L1 IgG1 antibody at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Treatment‐related AEs (TRAEs) were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). In post hoc analyses, immune‐related AEs (irAEs) were identified via an expanded AE list and medical review, and infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) occurring ≤2 days after infusion and symptoms occurring ≤1 day after infusion and resolving ≤2 days after onset were identified based on prespecified Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms.RESULTSOf the 1738 patients analyzed, grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 177 (10.2%); the most common were fatigue (17 patients; 1.0%) and IRR (10 patients; 0.6%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 107 patients (6.2%) and death in 4 patients (0.2%). Grade ≥3 irAEs occurred in 39 patients (2.2%) and led to discontinuation in 34 patients (2.0%). IRRs or related symptoms occurred in 439 patients (25.3%; grade 3 in 0.5% [9 patients] and grade 4 in 0.2% [3 patients]). An IRR occurred at the time of first infusion in 79.5% of 439 patients who had an IRR, within the first 4 doses in 98.6% of 439 patients who had an IRR, and led to discontinuation in 35 patients (2.0%).CONCLUSIONSAvelumab generally was found to be well tolerated and to have a manageable safety profile. A minority of patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs or irAEs, and discontinuation was uncommon. IRRs occurred mainly at the time of first infusion, and repeated events were infrequent. Cancer 2018;124:2010‐7. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated mesothelioma: Updated phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

166 Background: Avelumab, a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report updated phase 1b data for avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated mesothelioma. Methods: Pts with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma whose disease had progressed after platinum and pemetrexed therapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Tumors were assessed every 6 wks (RECIST 1.1). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 53 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.8 mos (range 16.8–27.8). Median age was 67 y (range 32–84). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1–8). Confirmed ORR was 9.4% (95% CI 3.1–20.7; complete response in 1.9%, partial response in 7.5%). In pts with 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 15) or ≥3 (n = 20) prior lines of therapy, ORR was 5.6%, 13.3% and 10.0% respectively. Median duration of response was 15.2 mos (95% CI 11.1–not estimable). 26 pts (49.1%) had stable disease as best response and the disease control rate was 58.5%. Median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 1.4–6.2) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 38.0% (95% CI 24.2–51.7). Median OS was 10.9 mos (95% CI 7.5–21.0) and the 12-mo OS rate was 45.9% (95% CI 31.9–58.8). In evaluable pts with PD-L1+ (n = 16) and PD-L1− (n = 27) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 18.8% (95% CI 4.0–45.6) and 7.4% (95% CI 0.9–24.3), and the 6-mo PFS rate was 37.5% (95% CI 14.1–61.2) and 42.0% (95% CI 23.1–59.8). 43 pts (81.1%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) infusion-related reaction (35.8%; all grade 1/2), chills (15.1%), fatigue (15.1%) and pyrexia (11.3%). 5 pts (9.4%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 14 pts (26.4%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 3 pts (5.7%; pneumonitis, colitis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in pts with previously treated mesothelioma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

18-month efficacy and safety update from JAVELIN Merkel 200 part A: A phase II study of avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma progressed on chemotherapy.

192 Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer. Avelumab, a human anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, is FDA and EMA approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC (mMCC). Here, we report efficacy and safety data for avelumab in patients (pts) with mMCC at ≥18-mo of follow-up. Methods: Pts with mMCC and progression on prior chemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W. Objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by independent review committee (RECIST v1.1) with tumor assessment every 6 wks; overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0) were also evaluated. Results: As of Mar 24, 2017, 88 pts were treated and followed for a median of 23.0 mo (range 18.7–32.0). Median treatment duration was 17 wks (range 2–132; mean 35 wks ±37). Treatment was ongoing in 15 pts (17%); 7 pts (8%) voluntarily discontinued with continuing responses (5 complete responses [CR] and 2 partial responses). Other reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (n = 42; 48%), death (n = 10; 11%), AE (n = 8; 9%), or consent withdrawal/other (n = 6; 7%). Confirmed ORR of 33% (95% CI 23.3–43.8; CR in 11.4%) remained unchanged from previous analysis and median DOR has not been reached (range 2.8–24.9 mo; 95% CI 18.0–not estimable). Responses were ongoing in 20/29 pts (69%), including 5 pts with > 2 y of follow-up. PFS curve showed a plateau with identical 12- and 18-mo rates of 29% (95% CI 19–39). Median OS was 12.6 mo (95% CI 7.5-19.0) and the 12- and 18-mo OS rates were 51% (95% CI 40–61) and 40% (95% CI 29–50), respectively. 66 pts (75%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) fatigue (25%), infusion-related reaction (15%; all grade 1/2), nausea (11%), and diarrhea (11%); 8 (9%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 17 pts (19%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 4 pts (4.5%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Updated results demonstrate continued durable antitumor activity of avelumab in pts with mMCC, beyond that expected with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The median OS exceeding 1 y and manageable safety profile of avelumab signify a clinically meaningful benefit in pts with mMCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

191 Background: Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report phase 1b data for avelumab in a cohort of patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Methods: Pts with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma progressed after ≥1 line of therapy for metastatic disease received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 51 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.2 mo (range 16.1–31.5). Median age was 64 y (range 31–84). Site of primary tumor was cutaneous (n = 28, 54.9%), ocular (n = 16, 31.4%), mucosal (n = 2, 3.9%), or unknown (n = 5, 9.8%). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy for advanced disease (range 0–4), including ipilimumab (n = 26, 51.0%). Confirmed ORR was 21.6% (95% CI 11.3–35.3), with complete response in 7.8% and partial response in 13.7%. In pts with cutaneous melanoma, ORR was 28.6% (95% CI 13.2–48.7). There were no objective responses in pts with ocular melanoma; however, 7 pts (43.8%) had stable disease. In pts with ≤1 (n = 25), 2 (n = 17), or ≥3 (n = 9) prior lines, ORR was 36.0% (95% CI 18.0–57.5), 11.8% (95% CI 1.5–36.4), and 0% (95% CI 0–33.6), respectively. Antitumor activity by PD-L1 status will be presented. Median duration of response was not estimable (NE) (95% CI 2.6 mo–NE). Median PFS was 3.1 mo (95% CI 1.4–6.3) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 39.2% (95% CI 25.2–52.9). Median OS was 18.5 mo (95% CI 9.3–NE) and the 12-mo OS rate was 62.3% (95% CI 46.9–74.4). 39 pts (76.5%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly infusion-related reaction (25.5%), fatigue (17.6%), and chills (11.8%). 4 pts (7.8%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 5 pts (9.8%) had an immune-related AE; all were grade 1/2. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed durable responses, promising survival outcomes, and an acceptable safety profile in pts with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Updated efficacy of avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma after \u22651\xa0year of follow-up: JAVELIN Merkel 200, a phase 2 clinical trial

BackgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with distant metastatic disease (mMCC). In an initial analysis from JAVELIN Merkel 200, a phase 2, prospective, open-label, single-arm trial in mMCC, avelumab—a human anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody—showed promising efficacy and a safety profile that was generally manageable and tolerable. Here, we report the efficacy of avelumab after ≥1 year of follow-up in patients with distant mMCC that had progressed following prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease.Patients and methodsPatients received avelumab 10 mg/kg by 1-h intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was best overall response. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsPatients (N = 88) were followed for a minimum of 12 months. The confirmed objective response rate was 33.0% (95% CI, 23.3%-43.8%; complete response: 11.4%). An estimated 74% of responses lasted ≥1 year, and 72.4% of responses were ongoing at data cutoff. Responses were durable, with the median DOR not yet reached (95% CI, 18.0 months-not estimable), and PFS was prolonged; 1-year PFS and OS rates were 30% (95% CI, 21%-41%) and 52% (95% CI, 41%-62%), respectively. Median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.5-not estimable). Subgroup analyses suggested a higher probability of response in patients receiving fewer prior lines of systemic therapy, with a lower baseline disease burden, and with PD-L1–positive tumors; however, durable responses occurred irrespective of baseline factors, including tumor Merkel cell polyomavirus status.ConclusionsWith longer follow-up, avelumab continues to show durable responses and promising survival outcomes in patients with distant mMCC whose disease had progressed after chemotherapy.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02155647.

Budget Impact Analysis of Avelumab in Patients with Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma in The US

Budget Impact Analysis of Avelumab in Patients with Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma in The US