Some effects of preparation and examination methods and their implications for the interpretation of pteridosperm leaf cuticles are discussed on the basis of three examples of well-known taxa whose cuticles have often been misinterpreted, i.e. Autunia (al. Callipteris) conferta from the European Rotliegend (Lower Permian), Alethopteris zeilleri from the Stephanian B of the Autun Basin, and Karinopteris sp. from the Indiana Paper Shale (Pennsylvanian). Autunia confera has long been regarded as hypostomatic but it appears to be amphistomatic and the cuticles of the lower leaf surface have been confused with those of the upper leaf surface. The cuticles of the lower leaf surface of Alethopteris zeilleri, which are often lost during maceration, are described in detail. The cuticles of the lower leaf surface of Karinopteris sp. are described for the first time. This plant had hypostomatic leaves. The structures of the cuticles of the upper leaf surface and the axes, interpreted as stomata by some previous authors, appear to be hair bases. The new data on features which have previously been overlooked or misinterpreted can be essential for taxonomic and/or palaeoecological interpretations.
Read full abstract