AutoCapture Algorithm Research Articles

Autocapture algorithm behaviour in left bundle branch pacing

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Autocapture algorithms allow remote monitoring of patients, reducing the need for face-to-face hospital consultations and increasing patient safety. These algorithms are widely validated in patients with conventional pacing and are not recommended in His bundle pacing, but there is no information on its behaviour in left bundle branch pacing (LBBP). Purpose The objective was to analyse the autocapture algorithm behaviour in LBBP and its differences with conventional pacing and manual thresholds during device first programming (acute phase), after 1-7 days (subacute phase) and 1-3 months later (chronic phase). Methods Prospective non-randomised single-centre comparative study. Consecutive patients with an indication for cardiac pacing were included. The implant was performed in the left bundle branch area or in the right ventricle endocardium (outflow tract or apex) at the discretion of the operator. LBBP was considered according to published criteria. Autocapture algorithm was activated in both groups whenever allowed by the device. The thresholds manual measurement was performed with the intracavitary electrogram and the surface electrocardiogram. Results Sixty patients were included, 40 with LBBP and 20 with conventional pacing. Baseline characteristics of patients are shown in Figure 1. The feasibility of the autocapture algorithm was more frequent in late phases, with a favourable trend toward bipolar pacing (Figure 2A). The failures in the activation of the algorithm were mainly due to the absence of adequate safety margins (90.9% in conventional pacing and 86.6% in LBBP), the rest were attributable to atrial tachyarrhythmias (9.1 and 6.7%, respectively) and electrical noise (remaining 6.7% in LBBP). In LBBP group, there were not statistically significant differences between manual and automatic thresholds except in subacute phase (unipolar) (Figure 2B), and both remained stable during follow-up (average increase of 0.46V). Conclusions Autocapture algorithm is feasible in LBBP, with a favourable trend toward bipolar pacing. Automatic thresholds are similar to manual in patients with LBBP, and they remain stable during follow-up.

A Novel, Smartphone-Based, Teleophthalmology-Enabled, Widefield Fundus Imaging Device With an Autocapture Algorithm.

PurposeWidefield imaging can detect signs of retinal pathology extending beyond the posterior pole and is currently moving to the forefront of posterior segment imaging. We report a novel, smartphone-based, telemedicine-enabled, mydriatic, widefield retinal imaging device with autofocus and autocapture capabilities to be used by non-specialist operators.MethodsThe Remidio Vistaro uses an annular illumination design without cross-polarizers to eliminate Purkinje reflexes. The measured resolution using the US Air Force target test was 64 line pairs (lp)/mm in the center, 57 lp/mm in the middle, and 45 lp/mm in the periphery of a single-shot retinal image. An autocapture algorithm was developed to capture images automatically upon reaching the correct working distance. The field of view (FOV) was validated using both model and real eyes. A pilot study was conducted to objectively assess image quality. The FOVs of montaged images from the Vistaro were compared with regulatory-approved widefield and ultra-widefield devices.ResultsThe FOV of the Vistaro was found to be approximately 65° in one shot. Automatic image capture was achieved in 80% of patient examinations within an average of 10 to 15 seconds. Consensus grading of image quality among three graders showed that 91.6% of the images were clinically useful. A two-field montage on the Vistaro was shown to exceed the cumulative FOV of a seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study image.ConclusionsA novel, smartphone-based, portable, mydriatic, widefield imaging device can view the retina beyond the posterior pole with a FOV of 65° in one shot.Translational RelevanceSmartphone-based widefield imaging can be widely used to screen for retinal pathologies beyond the posterior pole.

Proarrhythmic effect of automatic threshold testing algorithm in dual chamber devices.

Operation of auto-threshold testing (ATT) algorithmin current dual chamber cardiac devices require temporary shortening of atrio-ventricular (AV) delay to accurately measure evoked potential (capture) after a pacing pulse. Near simultaneous AV pacing causes atrial pressure elevation and may be associated with atrial arrhythmias. We evaluated the prevalence of atrial arrhythmias induced by ATT in Abbott devices. Device clinic records were reviewed at a single center for patients with dual chamber Abbott pacemaker/ICD. ATT-induced atrial fibrillation (AF)cases were defined as new appropriate mode switch episodes while the ATT was operating. The auto-capture test trends were defined as unstable if there were deviations >1 V in capture threshold trend events that did not correlate with routine in-office testing. One hundred and seventy patients were programmed in dual chamber pacing mode. The ventricular ATT was active in 118 patients and of these 78 had true mode switch episodes. Six patients developed AF during ventricular ATT. Three patients had most recorded atrial arrhythmias in close association with ATT (63%, 66%, 100% vs2%,9%, 33% in other patients with known prior AF). An unstable auto-capture trend curve was seen in 33 patients (6 showing ATT-induced AF) versus85 patients with stable auto-capture curve and no ATT-induced AF (P = .0001, the χ2 test). Ventricular auto-capture algorithm use is associated with induction of AF in dual chamber Abbott devices with a prevalence of over 5%. AF occur more frequently (18%) in patients with erratic ventricular ATT trend results.

Effectiveness of Ventricular Intrinsic Preference (VIP™) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC) algorithms in pacemaker patients: Results of the validate study

BackgroundSeveral past clinical studies have demonstrated that frequent and unnecessary right ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and compromised atrio-ventricular conduction (AVC) produces long-term adverse effects. The safety and efficacy of two pacemaker algorithms, Ventricular Intrinsic Preference™ (VIP) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC), were evaluated in a multi-center study in pacemaker patients. MethodsWe evaluated 80 patients across 10 centers in India. Patients were enrolled within 15 days of dual chamber pacemaker (DDDR) implantation, and within 45 days thereafter were classified to either a compromised AVC (cAVC) arm or an intact AVC (iAVC) arm based on intrinsic paced/sensed (AV/PV) delays. In each arm, patients were then randomized (1:1) into the following groups: VIP OFF and VAC OFF (Control group; CG), or VIP ON and VAC ON (Treatment Group; TG). Subsequently, the AV/PV delays in the CG groups were mandatorily programmed at 180/150ms, and to up to 350ms in the TG groups. The percentage of right ventricular pacing (%RVp) evaluated at 12-month post-implantation follow-ups were compared between the two groups in each arm. Additionally, in-clinic time required for collecting device data was compared between patients programmed with the automated AutoCapture algorithm activated (VAC ON) vs. the manually programmed method (VAC OFF). ResultsPatients randomized to the TG with the VIP algorithm activated exhibited a significantly lower %RVp at 12 months than those in the CG in both the cAVC arm (39±41% vs. 97±3%; p=0.0004) and the iAVC arm (15±25% vs. 68±39%; p=0.0067). In-clinic time required to collect device data was less in patients with the VAC algorithm activated. No device-related adverse events were reported during the year-long study period. ConclusionsIn our study cohort, the use of the VIP algorithm significantly reduced the %RVp, while the VAC algorithm reduced in-clinic time needed to collect device data.

Limitations of the AutoCapture™ Pacing System in patients with cardiac stimulation devices.

AutoCapture (St Jude Medical) is a technological development that confirms ventricular capture analysing the evoked response after a pacing impulse and adjusts the energy output to changes in the stimulation threshold. Although this algorithm is aimed to assure capture minimizing energy consumption, some patients might not benefit from it. The objective of this study is to identify them. Long-term AutoCapture efficiency was assessed using the data recorded in the programmer reports of patients undergoing scheduled pacemaker check-ups during 2012 in our institution. We have evaluated 160 consecutive patients (58% men) aged 78 ± 9 years. Pacemaker stimulation mode was DDD in 116 patients (72.5%) and VVI in 44 patients (27.5%). During the scheduled visits for pacemaker check-up, 73 patients (45.6%) showed abnormalities in the long-term AutoCapture function report (high variability in the AutoCapture stimulation threshold and/or out-of-range values). After multivariate analysis, abnormal AutoCapture pattern was associated to the presence of atrial fibrillation [odds ratio (OR) 3.96 (1.59-9.82; P < 0.05)]; and a ventricular pacing ≤25% of the time [OR 4.80 (2.09-11.05; P < 0.05)]. AutoCapture abnormalities were also described in three (1.8%) patients with very low stimulation threshold. Although AutoCapture algorithm has shown both efficacy and safety, our findings suggest that some patients with atrial fibrillation or those requiring ventricular pacing ≤25% of the time may not benefit from it. Activation of the algorithm should be individualized according to the patient's characteristics and long-term AutoCapture pattern checked in the routine follow-up.

Abnormal AutoCapture algorithm phenomenon after pacemaker implantation in patients with low stimulation threshold

Abnormal AutoCapture algorithm phenomenon after pacemaker implantation in patients with low stimulation threshold

Two pacing spikes on the QRS complex in a single-chamber pacemaker

AutoCapture algorithm helps the pacemakers to automatically adjust output close to the pacing threshold. This algorithm monitors the evoked response signal of myocardial depolarization, and delivers a high output back-up pulse if there is a loss of capture. This case, with two pacemaker spikes on the QRS complexes in a patient with VVI pacemaker, simulating a sensing failure, demands clear understanding of AutoCapture function before labeling the pacemaker malfunction.

Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia initiated by an atrioventricular search algorithm to minimize right ventricular pacing

We report the initiation of pacemaker-mediated tachycardia by a St Jude implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with a programmed Ventricular Intrinsic Preference algorithm used for minimizing or inhibiting right ventricular pacing. This feature prolongs the atrioventricular (AV) delay periodically to determine if ventricular sensed events follow atrial events. Retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction and pacemaker-mediated tachycardia were initiated by long extended AV delays of 300 and 400 milliseconds. The 400-millisecond AV delay consisted of the programmed sensed AV delay (100 milliseconds) plus the Ventricular Intrinsic Preference increment (200 milliseconds) plus 100 milliseconds imposed by the AutoCapture algorithm when it detected loss of ventricular capture.

Electrical Performance and Automatic Capture Characteristics of a 3.5‐mm2 Passive Fixation Lead during 1‐Year Follow‐Up

Bipolar low polarization electrodes are recommended for a regular AutoCapture (St. Jude Medical, Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA) function in order to effectively detect the evoked response (ER) signal. The objective of this national multicenter registry was to evaluate the electrical performance and the AutoCapture characteristics of the bipolar ventricular pacing lead IsoFlex S, model 1636T or 1646T (St. Jude Medical), in combination with single- and dual-chamber pacemakers. Ventricular pacing and sensing thresholds, lead impedance, ER amplitude, and polarization signals were measured at discharge and routine follow-up visits after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. AutoCapture activation was recommended based on the results of the ER sensitivity test. Of the 252 patients initially included, 109 (43%) have completed the follow-up. The mean ventricular pacing threshold was 0.43 +/- 0.19 V at discharge and 0.68 +/- 0.32 V at 12 months postimplant. The values for the ventricular sensing threshold were between 9.51 +/- 4.12 and 9.99 +/- 4.09 mV at discharge and at the 12-month follow-up. The unipolar lead impedance decreased from 533 +/- 94 to 476 +/- 73 ohms during the follow-up. The mean ER amplitude was 16.47 +/- 6.70 mV at discharge and 17.42 +/- 7.43 mV after 12 months, and the corresponding mean polarization signals were 0.59 +/- 1.00 and 0.74 +/- 1.24 mV, respectively. AutoCapture activation was recommended in at least 95% of the patients investigated over the 12-month follow-up. The bipolar ventricular pacing lead IsoFlex S 1636/1646T shows a good electrical performance and is mostly compatible with the AutoCapture algorithm.

Role of ventricular autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study

Autocapture is an algorithm for automatic adaptation of ventricular output to capture threshold. The aim of this prospective study was to estimate the effects of ventricular Autocapture algorithm on DDD-DDDR pacemaker longevity. Eighty-three patients implanted with a DDD-DDDR pacemaker (Affinity or Entity; St Jude Medical, USA) were enrolled and the Autocapture function was activated pre-discharge. Ventricular pulse duration was randomly programmed at 0.3 or 0.4 ms, with a cross-over at 8-12 weeks and again at 13-14 months. Diagnostic data were retrieved from device memory and by calculating battery current drain from long-term threshold recordings; device longevity was estimated at the following settings: Autocapture with a pulse duration of 0.3 and 0.4 ms, respectively, standard output (3.5 V, 0.4 ms) and conventional low output programming (2.5 V, 0.4 ms). According to a series of assumptions, Autocapture was associated with a 55-60% increase in estimated device longevity compared with standard output programming and a 6-7% increase in longevity compared with low output programming. No significant differences were found between Autocapture programmed with a pulse duration of 0.3 or 0.4 ms. In projections to a 10-year follow-up, use of the Autocapture function resulted in a 42% reduction in pacing-related estimated costs compared with standard output programming at 3.5 V, 0.4 ms. Pacing with constant adaptation of ventricular output in dual-chamber devices has the potential to increase generator longevity and to reduce sizeably pacing-related costs compared with standard programming.

516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

AutoCapture with Dual‐Coil Leads of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

AutoCapture (AC) can confirm ventricular capture with true bipolar single coil leads of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The compatibility of AC with a new, true bipolar, dual-coil ICD lead needed to be evaluated. This multicenter study enrolled 46 patients (69 +/- 10 years, 37 men) undergoing ICD implantation. All patients received a true bipolar, dual-coil lead. Evoked response (ER) sensitivity and AC threshold tests were performed using a pulse generator with the AC algorithm. Mean capture threshold was 0.85 +/- 0.67 V, pacing impedance 612 +/- 225 Omega, R wave amplitude 13.85 +/- 6.17 mV, and defibrillation threshold 14.4 +/- 5.1 J. AC was recommended in 45 patients (97.8%) with ER and polarization values of 14.86 +/- 7.32 mV and 0.87 +/- 0.69 mV, respectively. The AC algorithm was highly compatible with true bipolar, dual-coil ICD leads. An AC algorithm specifically designed for an ICD may improve the generator longevity. Further examination of AC compatibility with other leads is warranted.

Automatic threshold evolution -- New algorithms: 516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

Automatic threshold evolution -- New algorithms: 516 Improved performance of new AutoCapture algorithm with non low polarization ventricular pacing leads

Evaluation of the Atrial Evoked Response for Capture Detection with High‐Polarization Leads

AutoCapture based on the evoked response can be confounded by electrode polarization. In this study, polarization was measured in human subjects who had chronic atrial leads. The aim of the study was to determine whether electrode polarization can be measured using a time integral atrial evoked-response integral (AERI) of the negative portion of the atrial paced ER evoked-response signal and to determine whether high-polarization atrial leads unsuitable for AutoCapture can be identified a priori. Atrial intracardiac-electrogram (IEGM) signals from 39 patients with implanted pacemakers were recorded and analyzed. The signals were recorded during conventional atrial-threshold searches. A total of 221 atrial-capture thresholds were recorded, ranging from 0.25 to 2.75 V with a mean of 0.79 V. Each evoked response was evaluated using the AERI in a 36 ms window following the 0.4 ms atrial stimulus. The polarization was estimated as a linear function of stimulus voltage using the evoked-response signal integral of captured beats identified on the IEGM. The 221 threshold-search datasets were obtained using leads with eight different electrode materials. Polarization could be measured using AERI as a function of stimulus voltage. Furthermore, this polarization measure can be used to identify high-polarization leads, which are ill suited for the atrial AutoCapture algorithm.

Antibradycardia pacing in patients with congenital heart disease: experience with automatic threshold determination and output regulation (Autocapture™)

The purpose of this study was to reevaluate whether St Jude Medical's Autocapture algorithm (AC) with beat-to-beat capture confirmation, automatic pacing threshold determination and output adjustment can be applied to paced patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). 30 patients with CHD received a transvenous (group A: n=22) or epicardial (group B: n=8) single (n=7) or dual chamber (n=23) AC pacemaker for antibradycardia pacing. As a safe AC function is ensured only if a sufficient evoked response (ER) and a low lead polarization amplitude (LPA) are present, these parameters were reevaluated from 112 follow-up studies with respect to AC-function. In all but one transvenous system AC correctly functioned. AC was recommended in 5/8 patients with epicardial leads but correct AC function was preserved in only 3 patients. These data suggest that the application of the AC algorithm is safe in patients with CHD when transvenous leads are used. Whether appropriate AC function is possible with epicardial leads needs individual verification.

Documentation of Acute Rise in Ventricular Capture Thresholds Associated with Flecainide Acetate

Treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with flecainide acetate resulted in a 4-fold increase in ventricular capture thresholds. The detailed time course of the threshold increase and decrease was documented using the AutoCapture algorithm and graphic summary.

Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Autocapture pacing system during a 5-year follow-up period. The study was conducted retrospectively between May 1996 and May 2001. Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone VVI pacemaker implantation using an Autocapture program with leads 1402T (n: 31) and 1452T (n: 29) were included in the study. Intraoperative measurements including a ventricular stimulation threshold test, sensing of intrinsic R wave (mV), and lead impedance (W) were done by a standard pacing system analyzer. Evoked responses (ER, mV) and polarization signals (PS, mV) were measured after the pocket was closed. Pacing thresholds by Autocapture (AC thrd, V) and Vario (Vario thrd, V), battery current (mA), and battery impedance (kW) were also repeated during predischarge and 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 months after discharge. According to the ER and PS values an Autocapture algorithm could be activated in 49 patients (88%). The Autocapture algorithm remained active during the follow-up in all of these patients. In patients with inappropriate ER and PS values (11 patients, 12%), pacemakers were programmed to a VVIR pacing mode and Autocapture algorithm was inactivated. ER and PS values did not reach appropriate values to activate the Autocapture algorithm in any of these patients in consecutive follow-ups. Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring could be conducted in 32 patients (53%). In all recordings, when the loss of capture occurred, it was confirmed that back-up pacing continued. When the first measurements recorded during implantation were compared to approximately the 5th year measurements; ER (9.2 mV vs 9.6 mV), PS signal (1.13 +/- 0.30 mV vs 1.15 +/- 0.72 mV), AC thrd (0.4 V vs 1.2 V), Vario thrd (0.7 V vs 1.3 V), and lead impedance (502 ohm vs 620 ohm) were not changed significantly. Battery impedance increased 1 kOhm between 30-40 months of the implantation. Seven deaths occurred during follow-up. Three patients had fatal myocardial infarction, one died due to a non-cardiac event, and the remaining three died due to progressive heart failure. ER, R wave amplitude, and PS, which are the main parameters for the continuation of Autocapture function, did not change significantly during long-term follow-up. High output back up pacing provided additional safety for sudden rises in threshold. The Autocapture pacing algorithm was found to be effective and reliable during long-term follow-up.

Intraoperative study of polarization and evoked response signals in different endocardial electrode designs.

Some new generation pacemakers use an algorithm based on evoked response (ER) detection to verify beat-to-beat capture and to enable automatic adjustment of output. This is a prospective acute study of polarization signal (PS) and ER in nine currently available electrodes. Intraoperative testing of ventricular bipolar electrodes used the Autocapture (AC) algorithm. The intrinsic R wave, PS, ER, acceptance of AC function, and stimulation thresholds (STs) were obtained. Ventricular electrodes were categorized as follows: titanium nitride (TiN)-coated passive and active fixation, high impedance (HI), passive fixation (VP), iridium oxide-coated titanium (IROX) (VI), and platinum helix (PH) active fixation. Acute testing was performed in 217 patients with an average age of 74.26 years, 59.6% were men with primary pacing indication-SSS (46.3%). There were no significant differences found with respect to R wave and threshold between the various electrodes. PH active-fixation electrodes had significantly higher ER and PS than other groups including the TiN-coated active-fixation electrodes. TiN-coated electrodes (active and passive fixation) had significantly lower PS than other electrodes. As a result, TiN electrodes had a significantly higher functional rate of AC (91.7%), whereas PH had the lowest rate (0%). In conclusion, (1) polarization characteristics are significantly different for commercially available ventricular electrodes, (2) certain physical features at the tissue to electrode interface like TiN coating appears to be more important in determining PS than electrode tip size and fixation method, and (3) the current algorithm for AC requires electrodes that provide low polarization for satisfactory performance.

Adjustment of the Evoked Response Sensitivity After Hospital Discharge in Pacemaker Patients with Automatic Ventricular Threshold Tracking Activated

Automatic threshold tracking in cardiac pacemakers allows ventricular capture verification and self-adaptive pacing output regulation. The Autocapture algorithm detects the evoked response (ER) signal immediately after the pacing pulse to verify the efficacy of ventricular pacing. Before hospital delivery, the ER sensitivity must be programmed individually so that the pacemaker detects the ER signal adequately without sensing lead polarization. The aims of the study were to assess the frequency of patients in whom Autocapture could be activated and whether the ER sensitivity had to be adjusted after hospital discharge. The study included 44 patients who received the VVIR pacemaker Regency SR+ (St. Jude Medical) connected to the model 1450 T pacing lead. ER signal, lead polarization, and ER sensitivity were evaluated before hospital discharge and 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation. The system recommended activating Autocapture in 42 of 44 patients. The mean ER signal was 8.4+/-1.2 mV at discharge, 9.0+/-3.9 mV at month 1, 8.9+/-4.9 mV at month 3, and 9.3+/-4.5 mV at month 6. Polarization was 1.0+/-0.1 mV at discharge, 1.1+/-0.5 mV at month 1, 1.1+/-0.2 mV at month 3, and 1.1+/-0.5 mV at month 6. Mean ER sensitivity was 3.7+/-1.8 mV at discharge, 4.0+/-1.8 mV after 1, 4.1+/-2.2 mV after 3, and 4.1+/-1.8 mV after 6 months. ER sensitivity could remain unadjusted in 14 patients. Programming to a less sensitive ER setting from 2.9+/-1.2 mV to 4.3+/-1.5 mV was possible in 21 patients. Programming to a more sensitive ER setting from 4.1+/-1.1 mV to 2.5+/-0.9 mV was required in nine patients because of the decrease of the ER signal. The automatic threshold tracking algorithm Autocapture could be activated in 95% of patients. Programming to more sensitive ER settings was recommended in 21% of the patients after hospital discharge. Therefore, ER signal and polarization must be checked at each follow-up, as a decrease in ER signal amplitude can make reprogramming of the ER sensitivity necessary. There is no risk for the patient if the ER is not sensed, as high voltage backup stimulation is present.