IntroductionEmpire and (Post-)Colonialism in Austrian Studies Tim Corbett (bio) Globalization, migration, transnationalism, empire/imperialism, (post-)colonialism/decolonization, heterogeneity, diversity, interculturality, cosmopolitanism: These are some of the most influential concepts that have shaped not only academic research but also public and political discourses across the globe in recent years. The field of Austrian studies has already been engaging innovatively and productively with these issues for quite some time now. With a number of pioneering research institutions and corresponding journals on both sides of the Atlantic,1 the field of Austrian studies has since its inception in the postwar period been rooted in a transnational, intercultural, and multilingual context (see most recently Lorenz). Unlike many comparable fields, Austrian studies has therefore from the outset been largely unfettered by the artificial boundaries imposed by language, by the often linguistically imagined "nation-state," or by "culture" however defined in the past century or more (see for example Arens; "Forum: Austrian Studies"). Indeed, it is the very polysemy of the concept "Austria" in multiple geographical, political, cultural, and historical contexts that makes the field of Austrian studies—and its practitioners—so diverse and dynamic. It has been a decade since, in 2012, one of the flagship organizations in the field of Austrian studies, the Association of Modern Austrian Literature, was renamed the Austrian Studies Association, with the association's journal being renamed accordingly, in order to reflect the growing interdisciplinarity of the field. When the journal's former editors, Hillary Hope Herzog and Todd Herzog, handed the baton over to the current editors during the course of [End Page 1] 2021, I saw this as a momentous opportunity to take stock of this vibrant and expanding field and the range of exciting research being conducted therein. Hence the idea for a special volume of the Journal of Austrian Studies dedicated to "New Directions in Austrian Studies" arose, with a call for articles going out in November 2021. The aim of this special volume was to solicit short pieces of no more than about 3,500 words in length, with a twofold reasoning: First, this would allow for a greater number of contributions to the volume, thus offering a more diverse overview of current research being conducted in the field of Austrian studies. Second, this would allow the authors to offer ludic overviews of broad yet incisive concepts, methods, or themes rather than in-depth research articles including expansive references to source materials, which might only have appealed to specialists in their particular areas. This editorial concept was inspired by the 2016 volume Habsburg neu denken (Feichtinger and Uhl), which comprises thirty snapshot articles from the field of Habsburg studies and managed to total only 250 pages. This struck me as an innovative approach to making large research fields accessible to a broad readership. We—the journal editors and I—were astounded by the response we received to our call. As a stocktaking of the current state of the field, the disciplinary and thematic range of the proposals in itself made for interesting reading. We received altogether 42 submissions from 48 authors based in ten different countries, reflecting research projects of an exceptionally high quality across the board. About half the proposals came from scholars based in Austria itself, the rest spread across (East-)Central and Western Europe and the United States, including all career levels, from PhD candidates to professors as well as a number of independent scholars. There was a conspicuous disciplinary concentration on history (albeit with a great diversity of thematic and geographical foci therein), but we also received numerous submissions from the fields of literature studies, film studies, ethnology, musicology, educational studies, political science, and sociology. Given the overarching theme of "Austrian" studies, the geographic scope of the proposed topics was also astounding, covering not only the territory of the modern Austrian Republic and the many disparate lands connected to the former Habsburg Empire but also extending to Eastern, Southern/Southeastern, and Western Europe as well as to North and South America and even further afield to Africa and Asia. The pool of submissions also revealed certain glaring absences. For example, [End Page 2] while we received several contributions focusing...
Read full abstract