Australian General Practitioners Research Articles

A qualitative analysis of the barriers and enablers faced by Australian rural general practitioners in the non-pharmacological management of congestive heart failure in community dwelling patients

BackgroundCongestive heart failure (CHF) is a significant health problem in Australia, and disproportionately affects rural Australians. Management of CHF in Australia is heavily centred around the general practitioner (GP). Australian and international literature indicates there is a gap between current and best practice in CHF management. There is little known about the non-pharmacological aspects of management, or CHF management in a rural Australian context. This study aimed to identify what Australian GPs practicing in the Northern Rivers Region of New South Wales, Australia, perceived were the barriers and enablers in the non-pharmacological management of CHF amongst community dwelling patients, to inform healthcare access, resourcing and delivery in Australian rural environments.MethodsQualitative study involving a realist thematic analysis of data collected from semi-structured face-to-face interviews.ResultsFifteen GPs and GP trainees participated. Four interlinked key themes underpinning GPs’ experiences with non-pharmacological management of CHF were interpreted from the interview data: (1) resources, (2) complexity of heart failure, (3) relationships, and (4) patient demographics, priorities and views affect how patients engage with non-pharmacological management of CHF.ConclusionRural Australian GPs face considerable barriers to non-pharmacological management of CHF. The data suggests that increased rural Australian health services and community transportation, multidisciplinary management, and stronger professional networks have the potential to be invaluable enablers of CHF management. Further research exploring non-pharmacological management of CHF in other rural contexts may provide additional insights to better inform rural healthcare access and resourcing.

Australian general practitioners’ perceptions of the barriers and opportunities for community-based care of patients with viral hepatitis: a mixed methods study.

Introduction Engagement of general practitioners (GPs) is essential to improving rates of diagnosis and treatment of viral hepatitis, as traditional tertiary hospital-based models of care often face challenges. Aim We investigated Australian general practitioners' perceptions of a community-based model of care for patients with viral hepatitis. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study using survey questionnaires (23 GPs) and an open-ended interview guide (10 GPs) at primary care clinics in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics in Stata 15.1 and qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis following an inductive approach. Results Patient loss to follow up and high cost of diagnostic tests were identified as the biggest challenges to providing care for patients with viral hepatitis. Most GPs interviewed believe a more community-based model of care with support to GPs may improve uptake of care and increase both GP and patient engagement. General practitioners felt a community-based model of care could also improve viral hepatitis testing and follow-up rates. Discussion For Australian GPs, improving patient retention and diagnostics access were key pressure points in the viral hepatitis care pathway. A broader and more profound capacity-building allows community-based viral hepatitis care to be sustainable.

Mental health symptoms in Australian general practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic.

General practitioners (GPs) play a central role during the COVID-19 pandemic, and yet awareness of their mental health is limited. A nationwide online survey of self-identified frontline healthcare workers was conducted between 27 August and 23 October 2020. Participants were recruited through health and professional organisations, colleges, universities, government contacts, and media. A subset of the findings on GPs and hospital medical staff (HMS) was used for this study. Of 9518 responses, there were 389 (4%) GPs and 1966 (21%) HMS. Compared with HMS, GPs received significantly less training on personal protective equipment usage or care for COVID-19 patients, and less support or communication within their workplace. GPs were significantly more concerned about household income, disease transmission to family and being blamed by colleagues if they became infected, all of which were associated with worse psychological outcomes. Significantly more GPs reported burnout, and experienced moderate-to-severe emotional exhaustion than HMS. Both groups used similar coping strategies, except fewer GPs than HMS used digital health applications or increased alcohol consumption. Less than 25% of either group sought professional help. GPs are vital in our healthcare systems, yet face unique workplace challenges and mental health stressors during the pandemic. Targeted workplace and psychological support is essential to protect wellbeing among the primary care workforce.

'We are largely left out': workplace and psychosocial experiences of Australian general practitioners during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to exert a significant toll on the Australian primary healthcare system. Although wellbeing challenges faced by hospital-based healthcare workers are widely discussed, less is known about the experiences of general practitioners (GPs) during the initial phases of the pandemic. This paper reports qualitative survey data from Australian GPs, examining their workplace and psychosocial experiences during the initial months of the pandemic. An Australia-wide, cross-sectional, online survey of frontline healthcare workers was conducted in 2020. A qualitative approach using content analysis was utilised to examine responses to four free-text questions from GPs. A total of 299 GPs provided 888 free-text responses. The findings reveal that general practice was overlooked and undervalued within the pandemic response, resulting in negative impacts on GP wellbeing. Four themes were identified: (1) marginalisation of GPs; (2) uncertainty, undersupported and undervalued in the workplace; (3) isolation and disrupted personal lives; and (4) strategies to support GPs during times of crises. Key concerns included poor access to personal protective equipment, occupational burnout and poor wellbeing, insufficient workplace support, and conflicting or confusing medical guidelines. Primary healthcare constitutes an essential pillar of the Australian healthcare system. This study presents the many factors that impacted on GP wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Enabling GP voices to be heard and including GPs in decision-making in preparation for future crises will enhance the delivery of primary care, reducing the burden on hospital services, and help sustain a safe and effective health workforce long term.

Provision of other medical work by Australian early-career general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

Introduction There is a trend towards GPs diversifying their role by working in health areas beyond general practice. However, little is known about whether this trend is apparent among early-career GPs once they make the transition from training to independent practice. Aim To describe the prevalence of and characteristics associated with early-career GPs providing other medical work. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of GPs ('alumni') who had fellowed within the past 2 years from three of Australia's nine regional training programs. The outcome factor was provision of medical work in addition to clinical general practice. Associations of independent variables (encompassing alumni demographics, current practice characteristics and vocational training experience) with the outcome were estimated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 339 responding alumni, 111 (33%) undertook other regular medical work. Sixty-five (59%) of these were in medical education. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with providing other medical work were having a spouse/partner not in the workforce (odds ratio (OR) 5.13), having done any training part-time (OR 2.67), providing two or more of home visits, nursing home visits and after-hours care (OR 2.20), working fewer sessions per week (OR 0.74), and currently working in an area of lower socio-economic status (OR 0.84). Having dependent children (OR 0.27), and being female (OR 0.43) were associated with not providing other medical work. Discussion In this study, many early-career GPs are providing other medical work, particularly medical education. Acknowledging this is important to general practice workforce planning and education policy.

Uptake of Team Care Arrangements for adults newly diagnosed with cancer.

Medicare-subsidised Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) support Australian general practitioners to implement shared care between collaborating health professionals for patients with chronic medical conditions and complex needs. We assessed the prevalence of TCAs, factors associated with TCA uptake and visits to TCA-subsidised allied health practitioners, for adults newly diagnosed with cancer in New South Wales, Australia. We carried out a retrospective individual patient data linkage study with 13 951 45 and Up Study participants diagnosed with incident cancer during 2006-16. We used a proportional hazards model to estimate the factors associated with receipt of a TCA after cancer diagnosis. In total, 6630 patients had a TCA plan initiated (47.5%). A TCA was more likely for patients aged ≥65years, those with higher service utilisation 4-15months prior to cancer diagnosis, a higher number of comorbidities, lower self-rated overall health status, living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage, lower educational attainment and those with no private health insurance. A total of 4084 (61.6%) patients with a TCA had at least one TCA-subsidised allied health visit within 24months of the TCA. TCAs appear to be well targeted at cancer patients with chronic health conditions and lower socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, not all patients with a TCA subsequently attended a TCA-subsidised allied healthcare professional. This suggests either a misunderstanding of the plan, the receipt of allied health via other public schemes, a low prioritisation of the plan compared to other health care, or suboptimal availability of these services.

Kidney trajectory charts to assist general practitioners in the assessment of patients with reduced kidney function: a randomised vignette study

ObjectiveTo investigate the decisional impact of an age-based chart of kidney function decline to support general practitioners (GPs) to appropriately interpret estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and identify patients with...

Working with Young People at Risk of Suicidal Behaviour and Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Australian General Practitioners' Perspectives.

General Practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in the identification and support of young people at risk of suicidal behaviour and self-harm; however, no studies have explored GPs’ perspectives, approaches, challenges, and resource needs when working with this cohort in an Australian setting. This was a qualitative study where fifteen GPs (Mage = 45.25 years) from multiple clinics in Western Australia took part in semi-structured interviews, and data were analysed thematically. Seven main themes were identified: (1) working with young people has its unique challenges; (2) screening and assessment tools can help to manage uncertainty and discomfort; (3) going beyond tools–the dialogue and relationship are most important; (4) there are limits to what we can offer in the time available; (5) the service access and referral pathways lack clarity and coordination; (6) the provision of mental health support should not fall on GPs alone; and (7) more comprehensive training in suicide and self-harm is needed. The findings highlight a number of opportunities to enhance care and better assist GPs working with young people who present with suicidal behaviour and self-harm, including considerations for conducting assessments, targeted resources such as training, and system and service improvements.

Assessment, referral and management of obstructive sleep apnea by Australian general practitioners: a qualitative analysis

BackgroundThe high and increasing demand for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) care has exceeded the capacity of specialist sleep services prompting consideration of whether general practitioners could have an enhanced role in service delivery. However, little is known about the current involvement, experiences and attitudes of Australian general practitioners towards OSA. The purpose of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of Australian general practitioners’ experiences and opinions regarding their care of patients with OSA to inform the design and implementation of new general practice models of care.MethodsPurposive sampling was used to recruit participants with maximum variation in age, experience and location. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and were analysed using Thematic Analysis.ResultsThree major themes were identified: (1) General practitioners are important in recognising symptoms of OSA and facilitating a diagnosis by others; (2) Inequities in access to the assessment and management of OSA; and (3) General practitioners currently have a limited role in the management of OSA.ConclusionsWhen consulting with patients with symptoms of OSA, general practitioners see their primary responsibility as providing a referral for diagnosis by others. General practitioners working with patients in areas of greater need, such as rural/remote areas and those of socio-economic disadvantage, demonstrated interest in being more involved in OSA management. Inequities in access to assessment and management are potential drivers for change in future models of care for OSA in general practice.

Knowledge of end-of-life law: A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners working in aged care.

To describe the knowledge of end-of-life law and experiences in practice at the end of life amongst Australian general practitioners (GPs). A cross-sectional online survey of GPs practising in aged care settings in Queensland (QLD), New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC). From 521 potential GPs, 160 (response rate 30.7%) were included in the final sample. Most participants (62%) reported experience with six key end-of-life areas at least 'a few times', including 74% administering medication for pain and symptom relief, and 67% facilitating advance care planning 'several' or 'many times' and perceiving they had 'some' knowledge of end-of-life law (53%, n=84). However, low-to-moderate actual levels of end-of-life legal knowledge were identified (mean correct response of 5.24 out of 9). Australian GPs working in aged care may have low-to-moderate knowledge about end-of-life law despite frequently making end-of-life decisions in clinical practice.

Management of dental emergencies amongst Australian general medical practitioners - A case-vignette study.

In Australia, because of inequity in dental service accessibility and affordability, patients can see general medical practitioners (GPs) for acute dental conditions. This cross-sectional study consisted of surveys distributed to the board registered GPs practising in Australia. The main outcome measures included statistical analysis of GPs managing different dental emergency scenarios and their confidence and expectations in managing dental emergencies. A total of 425 GPs participated in the study. The sample primarily consisted of GPs practising in metropolitan clinics (n = 315). Most participants reported that they would refer to the dentist for mobilized tooth (n = 402). There was a negative correlation between GPs with 5-29 years of experience and traumatized tooth management (P < 0.05). GPs aged between 40 and 49 years were more inclined to treat patients with mobilized teeth [Multivariate (MV): 0.42(0.09-0.74)]. However, GPs with 0-5 years of experience were less likely to manage patients with dental abscess [MV: -0.52(-0.80 to -0.24)]. Most GPs referred dental emergencies to dentists. GP management of dental emergencies were predominantly palliative. Therefore, opportunities for collaborative practice models amongst GPs and dentists may be needed to bridge the gap in the regional and remote locations.

P044 Primary care management of chronic insomnia by general practitioners: an Australian perspective

Abstract Introduction Chronic insomnia is a common sleep disorder, with an estimated 15% of Australian adults reporting symptoms of insomnia. Australian general practitioner (GP) guidelines recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) as first-line treatment for insomnia however research suggests that GPs instead rely heavily on sleep hygiene and pharmacotherapy. GPs commonly provide treatment for insomnia; however, little is known about the experiences of Australian GPs and their interest when managing patients with insomnia. This study was conducted to explore the perspectives of GPs towards insomnia management and to identify factors that could influence the implementation of new models of insomnia care within general practice. Methods A pragmatic, inductive qualitative study. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 28 Australian GPs varying in age, experience, and distance from specialist sleep services. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes were identified: 1) Responsibility for insomnia care; 2) Complexities in managing insomnia; and 3) Navigating treatment pathways. Whilst GPs accepted insomnia care as part of their role, they often found it difficult to provide evidence-based care within the time and funding limitations of general practice. Co-morbidity of mental health conditions and insomnia, and long-term use of benzodiazepines presented challenges for GPs. GPs’ knowledge and experience of CBTi and access to specialised referral pathways for insomnia was limited. Discussion Insomnia presents complexities for GPs. Education about insomnia treatments, funding that enables recommended treatment, and pathways to specialist services would support insomnia management within general practice.

Essential components of health assessment for older people in primary care: a cross‐sectional survey of Australian general practitioners

ObjectiveTo examine general practitioners’ views about how health assessments for older people should be conducted. MethodsGeneral practitioners were randomly sampled from a national database of medical practitioners and invited to complete a survey. Survey items explored general practitioners’ views about essential components of a 75+ Health Assessment and who should assess each component, consultation time, use of standardised templates and tools, and home visits. ResultsOverall, 185 (19.2%) general practitioners participated. Of 61 items presented, 24 were rated ‘essential’ by ≥70% of practitioners, with an average estimated consultation time of 65 minutes. Of the 24 essential items, it was perceived that 21 could be assessed by either a general practitioner or clinic nurse. Most practitioners indicated a standardised template (86%) and standardised tools for complex issues (79%) should be used, and home visits conducted (75%). ConclusionsGeneral practitioners agreed on 24 items as essential for every health assessment, with assessments estimated to take more than one hour. Implications for public healthIncreases to remuneration for prolonged assessments or mechanisms for improving efficiency and quality of assessments are needed. Acceptable mechanisms may include standardised patient‐reported tools, standardised templates and the use of non‐medical staff to assist with assessments.

General practitioners' views on genomics, practice and education: A qualitative interview study.

Genomics is moving rapidly into mainstream medicine through clinical genomic testing and consumer-initiated online DNA testing. The aim of this study was to identify Australian general practitioners' (GPs') views on genomics, impact on practice and educational needs to inform continuing education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, with constant comparative inductive analysis and governance from anational taskforce. Twenty-eight GPs (43% female) were interviewed; 71% worked in a metropolitan workplace. Most initially reported little experience with genetic/genomic tests but, when prompted, recognised encountering genomics, mainly non-invasive prenatal and single-gene tests. Many GPs referred patients for cancer screening to genetic services or specialists. GPs reported needing continuing education and resources, with preferences underpinned by relevance to practice. GPs are integrating genomic testing into care, mainly through prenatal screening, and anticipate further impact. They want diverse and context-dependent education but are unaware of some available resources, such as The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' Genomics in general practice guideline.

Uptake of advance care planning and its circumstances: Annationwide survey in Australian general practice.

There are potential benefits associated with advance care planning (ACP), and general practitioners (GPs) are well placed to coordinate ACP initiatives with their patients. Few studies have reported on the uptake of different forms of advance care plan conducted by GPs and how this affects patients' place of death. The primary aims of the study were to examine uptake of verbal (conversations regarding care preferences) and written (documented care preferences) advance care plans and their associated factors from the perspective of Australian GPs. The secondary aim was to determine the impact of different types of advance care plans on place of death. Sixty-one GPs from three Australian states used a validated clinic-based data collection process to report on care provided for decedents in the last year of life, including provision of services, place of death, and uptake of ACP. We found that 58 (27.9%), 91 (43.7%) and 59 (28.4%) reported decedents had no advance care plans, verbal plans or written plans, respectively. There were increased uptake of both verbal plans (relative risk ratio [RRR]=13.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18-77.34) and written plans (RRR=10.61, 95% CI: 1.72-65.57) if GPs foresaw the death for >90days versus <7days. Palliative care training history for GPs predicted uptake of verbal plans (RRR=5.83, 95% CI: 1.46-31.93). Patients with verbal plans versus no plans were more likely to die at a private residence (odds ratio=4.97, 95% CI: 1.32-18.63). Our findings suggest that expectation of death for at least three months prior to the event (where clinically possible) and palliative care training for GPs improve the uptake of ACP in general practice. Larger pragmatic trials are required to determine the impact of ACP on patients' place of death.

How do Australian general practitioners spend their time? A cross-sectional analysis of Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) data examining ‘non-billable workload’

While Australian general practitioners (GPs) gain most of their income from direct patient interactions, they alsospend time attending to professional or practice responsibilities. The aim of this study was to determine the time Australian GPs spend on work away from direct patient care ('non-billable work'), and practice and practitioner factors associated with non-billable work. This study was a cross-sectional analysis of GPs practising >7.5 hours/week in the 2016 Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL) dataset. The amount of time that GPs spend on non‑billable work was examined, and ordinal logistic regression was used to determine an association between the amount of this work and practice and practitioner factors. The sample of 2907 GPs spent 5.1hours (95% confidence interval: 4.88, 5.27), or14.2% of their time, on non-billable activities. Non-billable work was associated with female gender, college fellowship, location of medical degree, and rural practice. The amount of non-billable work is likely to increase with population ageing and increasing feminisation of the GP workforce. The lack of reimbursement for much of this work challenges economic viability and GP job satisfaction.

Implications of new clinical practice guidance on familial hypercholesterolaemia for Australian general practitioners.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a monogenic lipid disorder that may be overlooked in the diagnostic process. The aim of this article is to review the key areas for identification and management of FH that affect Australian general practitioners (GPs). Recent consensus advice on the care of patients with FH in Australia provides an opportunity for GPs to increase their awareness and skills in diagnosing and managing FH. New Medicare Benefits Schedule items for genetic testing and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing for the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors offer GPs additional supports to improve the care of patients with FH. Ashared-care approach between GPs and non-GP specialists with expertise in multiple disciplines offers the best option to facilitate genetic testing and management of index cases and affected family relatives. Implementation of this guidance in the primary care setting remains an ongoing challenge and needs to be embraced as a high priority.

Management of heavy menstrual bleeding in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data.

The 'Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) clinical care standard' was released in October 2017. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and management of HMB by Australian general practitioners (GPs) prior to release of the Standard. Data collected between April 2000 to March 2016 (inclusive) in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program were analysed for HMB management. The rate at which GPs managed HMB increased over the study period. The combined oral contraceptive pill was the most frequently prescribed treatment, except among women aged 45-54 years. There were low prescribing/insertion rates of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for women aged 25-54 years, and none for patients aged12-24 years. Improved understanding of patient and GP perspectives, and further education and training, could increase use of the LNG-IUS and other pharmaceutical treatments where appropriate, as recommended by the HMB clinical care standard.

Primary care management of chronic insomnia: a qualitative analysis of the attitudes and experiences of Australian general practitioners

BackgroundChronic insomnia is a highly prevalent disorder, with ten to thirty percent of Australian adults reporting chronic difficulties falling asleep and/or staying asleep such that it causes significant daytime impairment. Current Australian general practice guidelines recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBTi) as first line treatment for insomnia, however research suggests that most general practice consultations for insomnia result in a prescription for hypnotic or sedative medicines. Although the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms of insomnia is often general practice, little is known about the current role, experiences and capacity of Australian general practitioners to manage insomnia. This study aimed to address that gap by exploring the attitudes and opinions of general practitioners regarding insomnia management, to inform the development and implementation of new models of best practice insomnia care within general practice.MethodsA descriptive, pragmatic qualitative study. Purposive sampling was used to recruit practising Australian general practitioners, varying in age, years of experience and geographic location. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data analysed using thematic analysis. ResultsTwenty-eight general practitioners participated in the study. Three major themes were identified: 1) Responsibility for insomnia care; 2) Complexities in managing insomnia; and 3) Navigating treatment pathways. Whilst general practitioners readily accepted responsibility for the management of insomnia, provision of care was often demanding and difficult within the funding and time constraints of general practice. Patients presenting with comorbid mental health conditions and insomnia, and decision-making regarding long-term use of benzodiazepines presented challenges for general practitioners. Whilst general practitioners confidently provided sleep hygiene education to patients, their knowledge and experience of CBTi, and access and understanding of specialised referral pathways for insomnia was limited. ConclusionsGeneral practitioners report that whilst assessing and managing insomnia can be demanding, it is an integral part of general practice. Insomnia presents complexities for general practitioners. Greater clarity about funding options, targeted education about effective insomnia treatments, and referral pathways to specialist services, such as benzodiazepine withdrawal support and psychologists, would benefit insomnia management within general practice.

The effect of rural placements on future rural general practice

Background: Providing health care to rural populations is a major issue in Australia. Disease burdenand health risk factorsincrease with remoteness, but the access to appropriate service decrease. The introduction of Rural Clinical Schools, rural locations for internship and residency, and decentralisation of the Australian General Practitioner Training Programaim to address this disparity. This systematic review aimed at determining if rural placements throughout medical training are associated with future rural general practice in Australia.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Pubmed, CINAHL and Science Direct were searched for the period January 2000 to July 2019. Included studies related specifically to rural general practitioners in Australia and studies were excluded if they reported only on intention to practice rurally. Evidence was assessed using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence Guidelines.Results: Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria. Three studies examined the effect of rural placements in medical school on future rural general practice. Three studies looked at placements as a junior doctor on future rural general practice. Four studies looked at the effect of rural general practitioner training on future rural general practice. One study reported on the effect of rural placements during both medical school and junior doctor years on future rural general practice. The studies supported an association between rural placements and future rural general practice, particularly for Australian born doctors, Australian graduates and individuals from rural backgrounds.Discussion: This review suggests that rural placements during medical training increase the likelihood of future rural general practice. The interplay of personal and professional life influence whether rural intention is sufficient to result in rural practice. Addressing human factors that influence rural practice will contribute to achieving equitable rural health care.