Reviewed by: Sportswomen in Cinema: Film and the Frailty Myth by Nicholas Chare Zachary Ingle Sportswomen in Cinema: Film and the Frailty Myth Nicholas Chare London: I. B. Tauris, 2015 Despite the monumental gains in women's athletics arising from the passage of Title IX over forty years ago, sporting women still rarely get their due on networks such as ESPN and Fox Sports. Unfortunately, a similar imbalance is evident in narrative films and documentaries on sports. A notable exception is Nicholas Chare's Sportswomen in Cinema: Film and the Frailty Myth. An art historian by training whose previous books examined Francis Bacon's paintings as well as Auschwitz and the abject, Chare brings a fresh, multidisciplinary approach to how women, and particularly sportswomen, are depicted in film. Each chapter covers a different sport: climbing, boxing, team sports, track and field, bodybuilding, tennis, and surfing. Chare seems especially interested in how women filmmakers have depicted sportswomen, with discussions of films by Karyn Kusama (Girlfight, 2000), Ida Lupino (Hard, Fast and Beautiful, 1951), Gurinder Chadha (Bend It Like Beckham, 2002), Leni Riefenstahl (Olympia, 1938), Jane Anderson (When Billie Beat Bobby, 2001), and Drew Barrymore (Whip It, 2009, which serves as the epilogue) among those directed by men. In each chapter, Chare analyzes various visual texts about sporting women, but reveals an interest in their subnarrative dimensions, as well as a greater emphasis on the aural qualities of these films than most books akin to this one. Futhermore, the author sets each chapter within a different framework. For instance, in the chapter on women's team sports films, Chare examines how gesture functions as a challenge to gender stereotypes and restrictions. The title ("frailty myth") refers to Iris Marion Young and her now controversial work ("Throwing Like a Girl") on the feminine body in motion, suggesting that women differ in how they use their bodies for simple physical actions. Although the frailty myth forms the backbone of the first chapter, the author rarely returns to it thereafter, despite its prominence in the title. Chare even discovers connections in films that otherwise seem dissimilar, save for their sport: "Olympia, Personal Best and Fast Girls are all, however, united in their focus on sheens, either of sweat or of light reflective synthetic materials. There is a common fetish across the films" (103). He thus presents a new way of looking at these three films. Undaunted by the overwhelming profusion of scholarship on Riefenstahl, Chare compares the way female bodies are objectified and compartmentalized in films like Fast Girls to the male bodies and fascist aesthetics of Olympia. The chapter on tennis films compares its visual sportswomen texts—Wimbledon, Hard, Fast and Beautiful, among others—with the living "texts" of tennis stars who challenged gender and sexual norms: Martina Navratilova and Renée Richards. The strongest chapter may be the one on bodybuilding films, even if the plural is misleading: Chare focuses exclusively on one, Pumping Iron II: The Women (1985, George Butler). Thinking outside the box, he likens the film to the pornographic writings of Nathalie Gassel, whose erotic work privileges the fetishization of the muscle. Aside from the book's obvious value for gender studies courses or film courses addressing the representation of women in cinema, Sportswomen in Cinema could be used in sports media courses, particularly since there are so few book-length treatments on representations of women in sports media. Useful for both undergraduate and graduate courses, Sportswomen in Cinema might be paired with Viridiana Lieberman's Sports Heroines on Film: A Critical Study of Cinematic Women Athletes, Coaches and Owners (McFarland, 2014), or one could simply enhance the curriculum by adding an in-class screening of Pumping Iron II in tandem with Chare's chapter. The popularity of sports film continues to grow, and the genre has finally drawn substantial work in recent years. Yet most scholarship— [End Page 65] as reflective of sports in our televisual and media landscape in general—is resolutely androcentric. Chare's work offers a corrective to this scholarly neglect. Zachary Ingle University of Kansas Copyright © 2018 Center for the Study of Film and History
Read full abstract