Background Hip Fractures are serious injuries leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The global incidence of hip fracture is rising. National hip fracture audits facilitate improvements in patient outcomes and care quality. There is a wealth of literature regarding hip fracture care, evidence-based standards, use of registry/clinical audit data for improvement, benchmarking and outcomes. There is however a gap in the literature for describing how to establish the governance for a national hip fracture audit. Objective This scoping review aims to identify the core governance components for national clinical audits (NCAs) of hip fractures. Methods The Joanna Briggs Institute guidance will be used in conducting the review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extensions for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidance for scoping reviews will be followed. has been used. Articles published in English, between 1988–2024 and indexed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier) and CINAHL (EBSCOHost) will be included in this review. Two reviewers will independently screen the articles, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers and shared with external stakeholders to ascertain whether there is documentation or reports that were missed and preliminary analysis will be shared to validate the data we have extracted. The results will be disseminated widely through publication in an international peer reviewed journal and through the Global Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Hip Fracture Audit Special Interest Group. Conclusions By identifying the core components for the governance of NCAs for hip fracture it is hoped that application of these components will support the existing NCAs for hip fracture to enhance their current governance and aid in the establishment of NCAs in the future.
Read full abstract