AbstractThe field of English as a second language has gone through a number of changes in the last decades and has seen extreme adjustments throughout the methods of teaching and curriculum planning. This article finds the relevance of the old methods to the new methods. After providing the background it becomes apparent that almost all the older methods have some relevance to the contemporary classroom and linguists are reaching out and calling on teachers to use the old techniques alongside the new techniques. Emphasis in this article, however, is put on the relevance of introducing grammar to the learner, what to introduce, how and when is discussed in light what we know of the communicative.Keywords: Communicative approaches, Teaching grammar1. IntroductionIt has been noted that a great deal of development has been taking place in the field of foreign language teaching. Paradoxically, most of these changes have been taking place in the field of methods and strategies of teaching rather than teaching content. Over the years a great diversity has developed in the methods of teaching as opposed to stability in the principles underlying the choices of the materials prepared for teaching. Syllabus is seen rather to be controlled in terms of grammatical and pedagogical considerations.2. Historical BackgroundSince it has been accepted that language learning consists of acquiring a mastery of the grammatical system, it is not surprising that language programs have a grammatical basis. There are, however, varieties of ways in which language can be presented to the learner. Wilkins drew the attention to two main approaches, the synthetic and the analytic, in his book Notional Syllabus.2.1 The Synthetic ApproachesIn planning courses based on this approach, language items to be taught are broken down to grammatical structures and lexical items. These grammatical structures are taught to the learner carefully and a step-by-step. Such approaches accentuate what Chomsky calls competence as opposed to performance as we will see later on in the development of the communicative syllabuses. (Canal and Swain 1980, Quoted in Brown, 1987: 199) The synthesis of the elements usually takes place in the final stages of learning. Using such syllabus the teacher may use the grammar-translation method or the audio-lingual approach for teaching.Over the years, syllabus constructors have learned to reduce the number of items to be learned in a given unit. By doing so the learning task is simplified. As a result the same linguistic content can be spread over more units and over a longer period of time and the method of presentation differ from course to another. Thus, the presentation may be explicit grammatical rules or it may be embedded in a dialogue. The vocabulary content, however, can be chosen according to certain criteria. The criteria for choosing words are formed in relation to their usefulness, frequency, range, availability, familiarity, and coverage.Syllabus constructors commonly choose vocabulary items that mainly operate the basic patterns of the language. The term frequency, however, refers to the words that are thought to have an immediate use in the classroom. Range refers to the distribution of lexical items over a number of different types of text; whilst availability refers to the lexical items which may not be frequent, but are available to the speaker when he needs them. Familiarity is commonly measured by means of the speaker's responses rather than by the statistical analysis of texts. The term coverage refers to the lexical items which have a wide range of meaning and which could replace other items in a particular context (Wilkins 1976).It is equally important also to select and grade the grammatical component of the foreign language course in using a synthetic approach. The criteria that are most often related to grammatical content of teaching are: simplicity, regularity, frequency, and contrastive difficulty. …
Read full abstract