The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) correlates best with clinical outcomes. However conventional methods for measuring AUC require many blood samples. Therefore AUC measurement must be simplified using a limited sampling strategy. Traditionally trough blood concentrations are measured routinely for approximation of the AUC. The question is: are trough concentrations optimal for prediction of tacrolimus AUC? This was a preliminary study to evaluate traditional trough concentration for prediction of tacrolimus AUC. Blood concentration curves over 12 h of eight stable renal transplant patients were determined. Mean (range) patient characteristics were: age 50.9 (32.7–67.8) years, gender male/female 7/1, time after transplantation 209 (151–864) days, medication tacrolimus and prednisolone (n = 8), mycophenolate (n = 1). Tacrolimus concentrations were measured with MEIA immunoassay (Abbott). Blood samples were collected just before, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.5, 9 and 12 h after tacrolimus administration. Predictability of the time point measurements was calculated with multiple (stepwise) regression analysis (SPSS 8.0). Prediction algorithms, found with multiple stepwise regression, are demonstrated in Table 1. Table 1 The sample times with the best predictive algorithms were respectively C5, the combination of C5 and C2 and the combination of C5 and C2 and C1. The predictability of the algorithms based on trough levels, C0 and C12, was much lower. Predictability (r2) of the other isolated sampling time points was respectively, C0.25, 0.879; C0.5, 0.007; C0.75, 0.006; C1, 0.502; C2, 0.801; C3, 0.806; C4, 0.863; C7.5, 0.868; C9, 0.879. As can be seen the predictive power of the trough concentrations was lowest of all sampling time points with exception of C0.5, C0.75 and C1. Measuring trough concentrations has several important advantages such as experience with interpretation and logistic simplicity. However better predictability can be obtained with other sample time points, especially C5. Moreover analytical error is smaller at higher concentrations. For prediction of AUC the gain of addition of more time points to C5 seems small. In comparison with most other sampling times predictability of trough concentrations is poor. More extensive investigations are necessary to determine the optimal sampling strategy.
Read full abstract