Several recent studies dealing with reactions to labeled and unlabeled attitudes have brought certain aspects of attitudinal measurement more clearly into the open. Stagner (5) found that subjects may tend to reject items labeled fascist, yet may accept fascist principles, provided they are not labeled as such. The same conclusion was reached by Katz and Cantril (3) in their studies of students' attitudes toward and communism. Menefee (4), in his study of the effect of stereotyped words on political judgments, also found that the labeling of a statement with such a term as fascism would cause many students who had previously accepted it to now reject the same statement. Hartmann (2) also noted this same tendency. These studies seem to indicate that reactions to labels which operate as stereotypes and reactions to principles which the labels subsume are not one and the same. While the importance of knowing a subject's reaction to a labeled statement cannot be denied, the true attitude can be judged most accurately by measuring reactions to unlabeled statements of opinion. However, the true attitude cannot be measured by merely removing the label, as the item itself may reveal the objective of the investigator. This difficulty was partially surmounted by Stagner (5) in the construction of his attitude scale, by applying the principle of disguised measurement. His attitude scale was so skillfully constructed that the attitudes being measured were not disclosed to the subject. Stagner's scale, however, did not include the wider aspects of fascist ideology concerning such things as birth control, education, status of women, status of religion, etc. It dealt primarily with militarism, nationalism, contempt for lower classes, and opposition to labor unions. To remedy this defect and thus broaden the ideological concepts of covered by Stagner's scale, Edwards (1) constructed a more comprehensive scale of unlabeled fascist attitudes. The statements used were selected from a variety of sources, including first of all Stagner's study, and secondly, information from the writings of Childs, Mann, and Kolnai. Edwards' revised scale is the one used in the present study of fascist attitudes of The Kansas State Teachers College of Emporia students. The purpose of the present study was to measure the degree of acceptance of fascist principles by students of The Kansas State Teachers College of Emporia by means of an opinionnaire.