Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients Research Articles

Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Authors' reply.

Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. Authors' reply.

β-Hydroxybutyrate and Citrate Synthase as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers in Aging-Related Atrial Fibrillation.

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) increases with age; however, the precise mechanisms by which aging elevates AF risk and the effective biomarkers for managing AF in elderly patients remain unclear. We analyzed plasma samples from 100 elderly AF patients, 100 young and 100 elderly patients without atrial fibrillation (NAF), along with left atrial tissues obtained from both AF and NAF patients following valve replacement. Our findings indicate reduced levels of β-OHB and citrate synthase (CS) activity in elderly AF patients compared to their NAF counterparts. Statistical analysis revealed a protective association between β-OHB and CS activity concerning the occurrence of elderly AF. Furthermore, atrial tissues from elderly AF patients exhibited mitochondrial dysfunction, structural remodeling, and low-voltage areas. These results suggest that dysregulation of β-OHB levels and CS activity may contribute to aging-related AF by affecting mitochondrial function and atrial remodeling, highlighting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for this condition.

The efficacy and safety of NOAC in very elderly atrial fibrillation patients; data from the Korean national health insurance cohort registry

Abstract Background Data regarding efficacy and safety on anticoagulation in very elderly atrial fibrillation patients are relatively sparse. Purpose We investigated the clinical benefit of anticoagulation with NOAC in very elderly AF patients through national healthcare insurance registry. Methods Clinical data of 862,935 patients who were diagnosed with AF from 2015 to 2020 were collected for analysis. Patients under the age of 85, prior history of ICH, GI bleeding and prior prescription days of aspirin, warfarin and NOAC exceeding 90 along with follow up period less than 90 days were excluded. Results A total of 10,625 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients with OAC (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.53-0.69), p<0.001) showed higher efficacy regarding systemic embolism compared to aspirin (HR: 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, p=0.008) and no treatment group. Individual comparison of NOAC and aspirin via propensity score matching showed that patients with NOAC (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.85), p<0.001) showed higher event free survival regarding systemic embolism compared to aspirin. Bleeding risk was also higher for NOAC (HR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.56, p=0.006) group but did not result in commensurate increase in mortality (HR:0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81, p<0.001). Conclusions Anticoagulation with NOAC in very elderly patient showed higher event free survival regarding systemic embolism. Despite having higher event rate of bleeding, eventual death did not show any association with NOAC.

Temporal trends in initiation of oral anticoagulants and stroke-free survival among elderly and very elderly patients with new onset atrial fibrillation - a 20-year perspective.

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulants (OACs) significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, evidence regarding efficacy of OACs are lacking in the very elderly patients. Aim To examine temporal trends in initiation of OACs and five-year stroke-free survival in the very elderly patients with new onset AF over a time span of 20 years. Methods From the Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients ≥ 65 years of age with new onset AF from 1999 to 2018. The index date was defined as the day of AF diagnosis for outpatients and as the day of discharge for inpatients. Patients with a prescription of OAC, history of bleeding events, or history of stroke/transient ischemic attack prior to index were excluded. Patients were divided into two age groups based on their age at index: 1) 65-84 years (elderly); and 2) ≥ 85 years (very elderly). Patients were further divided into four calendar year groups from 1999-2018, based on the year of inclusion. We investigated the initiation of OACs and calculated the absolute five-year probability of stroke-free survival in both age groups. Results We included 167,122 patients with new-onset AF between January 1st, 1999, and December 31st, 2018. Among the patients, 23.1 % were aged 85 years or older, 48 % were male and 80.5 % had a CHA2DS2-VASc score equivalent to 2 or higher for men and 3 or higher for women. Initiation of OACs increased in both age groups after the guideline implementation of DOACs in 2010 (Figure 1). In the elderly age group, the proportion of patients receiving OACs increased from 50% in 2010 to almost 90% in 2018. In the very elderly age group, the proportion increased from 25% in 2010 to almost 90% in 2018. The probability of the five-year stroke-free survival improved by approximately 15% from 1999 to 2018 in the elderly age group, with no significant changes in the very elderly age group. Conclusion The proportion of elderly AF patients receiving OAC has increased markedly in the last 20 years. Even so, stroke-free survival remains the same among the very elderly patients.Five-year stroke-free survival

Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Predictive value of platelet-to-albumin ratio combined with the C2HEST score for New-Onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundNew-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common adverse outcome in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with a worse prognosis. The platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) has been utilized to predict the severity and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to investigate the predictive value of PAR combined with the C2HEST score for NOAF in the elderly population with STEMI undergoing PCI.Methods445 elderly STEMI patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent PCI were consecutively enrolled in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for NOAF after PCI.Results50 patients (11.2%) developed NOAF after PCI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that heart rate (HR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), uric acid (UA), PAR, and C2HEST score were independent risk factors for NOAF. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined PAR and C2HEST score was 0.839, and Delong’s test indicated that the combined model had superior predictive value compared to individual markers (AUC of PAR: 0.738; AUC of C2HEST score: 0.752) (P < 0.05). The addition of PAR and C2HEST score to this model (HR, SII, and UA) significantly improved the reclassification and discrimination ability (IDI 0.175; NRI 0.734, both P < 0.001). During regular follow-up, the incidence of MACE was higher in the NOAF group compared to the non-NOAF group.ConclusionThe combination of PAR and the C2HEST score has a high predictive value for NOAF in elderly STEMI patients following PCI.

Impact of adherence on the cost-effectiveness of apixaban and rivaroxaban in stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States

ABSTRACT Objective Despite the beneficial effects of DOACs, suboptimal adherence is widely documented, and real-world adherence is lower than in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention by incorporating real-world adherence from the US payer’s perspective. Methods We developed a Markov model with three health states to evaluate the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. The population was a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with moderate to high stroke risk. The transition probabilities of healthy adherent, nonadherent, and stroke were obtained from a Medicare Advantage Plan. The utilities and costs were obtained from prior clinical studies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Apixaban was cost-effective than rivaroxaban at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. Apixaban yielded an additional 0.12 QALYs at a cost of $1904.39, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $16,279.25 per QALY gained. The Monte Carlo simulations indicated that apixaban was cost-effective at 89.67% of simulations. The ICER results were impacted by the medical costs among nonadherent patients. Conclusion After incorporating adherence, apixaban 5 mg was a cost-effective alternative to rivaroxaban 20 mg for stroke prevention among elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with dementia.

Developing an effective stroke prevention strategy is crucial for elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with dementia. This is due to the limited and inconsistent evidence available on this topic. In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, we aim to compare the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in AF patients with dementia. We identified AF patients with dementia, aged 50 years or older, from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalizations due to ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, or major bleeding, as well as all-cause mortality. We used 1:1 propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for confounding factors when comparing outcomes between warfarin and DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) users or warfarin and each individual DOAC. There were 2952 patients in the DOAC-warfarin matched cohort. The apixaban-, dabigatran-, edoxaban-, and rivaroxaban-warfarin matched cohorts had 2346, 2554, 1684, and 2938 patients, respectively. The DOAC group, when compared to warfarin, was associated with a lower risk of both the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.95) and ischemic stroke (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48-0.87). Apixaban (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94), dabigatran (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.53-0.77), and rivaroxaban (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.97) were also associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome. Compared to warfarin, DOACs, whether as a group or apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban individually, were associated with a reduced risk of the composite outcome in elderly patients with concurrent AF and dementia.

Left atrial strain after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation linac-based cardiac radioablation in elderly population.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may increase the risk of complication in aged patients. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a non-invasive therapeutic alternative for cardiac arrhythmia. This sub-study evaluated left atrial strain (LAS) in elderly AF patients underwent STAR. Symptomatic paroxysmal AF patients aged > 70 years, with antiarrhythmic drugs failure or intolerance, enrolled in a phase II trial that have demonstrated the feasibility of LINAC-based STAR (total dose of 25Gy single fraction delivered in 3min), performed a 15-day electrocardiogram Holter monitoring to detect AF episodes (≥ 30s) and an echocardiographic LAS evaluation before and after STAR (at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month). Out 18 patients underwent STAR in the trial, 16 (7 males, 78 ± 5 years) completed the follow-up for LAS study. No baseline difference in echocardiographic and LAS parameters was observed between the 9 patients with AF recurrence during follow-up and those who maintained sinus rhythm. At 6- and 12-month after STAR, LAS reservoir was lower in patients with AF episodes than those without (respectively, p = 0.039 and p = 0.001). Values of left atrial area and volume as well as LAS conduit and contractile phase were not statistically significant different by patient's outcome across evaluations. Although no baseline LAS parameter before STAR seems predict AF recurrence after treatment in elderly patients, lower values of reservoir phase were observed during follow-up in those experiencing AF episodes. More research is needed to better assess the value of LAS monitoring in paroxysmal AF patients underwent Stereotactic cardiac radioablation.

Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing high risk cardiac surgery

BackgroundEvaluating outcomes of concurrent Cox-Maze procedures in elderly patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery.MehodsWe retrospectively identified patients aged over 70 years with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) from 2011 to 2017 who had two or more other cardiac procedures. They were subdivided into two groups: 1. Cox-Maze IV AF ablation. 2. No-Surgical AF treatment. A propensity match score was used to generate a homogeneous cohort and to eliminate confounding variables. Heart rhythm was assessed from Holter reports or 12-lead ECG. Follow-up data was collected through telephone consultations and medical records.ResultsThere were 239 patients. Median follow up was 61 months. 70 patients had Cox-Maze IV procedures (29.3%). Demographic, intra- and post-operative outcomes were similar between groups although duration of pre-operative AF was shorter in Cox-Maze group (p = 0.001). There was no significant 30-day mortality difference in propensity matched cohorts (n = 84. P = 0.078). Sinus rhythm at annual and latest follow-up was 84.9% and 80.0% respectively in Maze group – 160 patients (66.9%) were alive at long-term follow-up with good survival outcomes in Cox Maze group. There was a high proportion of patients in NYHA 1 status in Cox-Maze group. No differences observed in freedom from stroke (p = 0.80) or permanent pacemaker (p = 0.33) between the groups.ConclusionsSurgical ablation is beneficial in elderly patients undergoing high-risk surgery - promoting excellent long-term freedom from AF and symptomatic / prognostic benefits, without added risk. Therefore, surgical risk should not be reason to deny benefits of concomitant AF-ablation.Clinical trial registrationNot required.

Risk Factors and Prognosis of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients Undergoing VATS Lung Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has become the most common postoperative arrhythmia of thoracic surgery. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and complications of perioperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) in elderly patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Data were collected from patients who underwent VATS between January 2013 and December 2022 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH). Univariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the factors correlated with PoAF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination of the indicators to predict PoAF. The study enrolled 2920 patients, with a PoAF incidence of 5.2% (95% CI 4.4%-6.0%). In the logistic regression analyses, male sex (OR=1.496, 95% CI 1.056-2.129, P=0.024), left atrial anteroposterior dimension (LAD) ≥40 mm (OR=2.154, 95% CI 1.235-3.578, P=0.004), hypertension (HTN) without regular treatment (OR=2.044, 95% CI 0.961-3.921, P=0.044), a history of hyperthyroidism (OR=4.443, 95% CI 0.947-15.306, P=0.030), surgery of the left upper lobe (compared to other lung lobes) (OR=1.625, 95% CI 1.139-2.297, P=0.007), postoperative high blood glucose (BG) (OR=2.482, 95% CI 0.912-5.688, P=0.048), and the time of chest tube removal (per day postoperatively) (OR=1.116, 95% CI 1.038-1.195, P=0.002) were found to be significantly associated with PoAF. The area under the ROC curve was 0.707 (95% CI 0.519-0.799). 86.9% patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm. Compared with the non-PoAF group, the PoAF group had significantly greater risks of prolonged air leakage, postoperative acute coronary syndrome, longer ICU stays, and longer hospital stays. Male sex, LAD≥40 mm, HTN without regular treatment, a history of hyperthyroidism, surgery of the left upper lobe, postoperative BG, and the time of chest tube removal were associated with PoAF. These findings may help clinicians identify high-risk patients and take preventive measures to minimize the incidence and adverse prognosis of PoAF.

Acute safety and efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients by means of pulsed field ablation

Abstract Background It is well known that age affects the efficacy of pharmacological treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Thermal ablation (radiofrequency or cryoballoon) is an established strategy for AF. However, there is no evidence evaluating efficiency, effectiveness, and safety outcomes in elderly patients in the context of the novel pulsed-field ablation (PFA) technology. Purpose We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of PFA in elderly (age≥75 years) patients with AF compared to non-elderly (age&amp;lt;75 years) patients with AF. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with the Farapulse system at 10 centers were included. Protocol-directed PVI was delivered using 2000 V with eight applications per vein, that is, four applications each in the basket and flower poses. Additional lesions were performed at the operator’s discretion. Results A total of 851 consecutive patients were included: 83 (9.8%) had ≥75 years (median of 77[75-78] years) whereas 768 (90.2%) had &amp;lt;75 years (median of 62[56-68] years, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Older patients had more comorbidities compared to younger patients (kidney disease: 9.6% vs 1.2%, p&amp;lt;0.0001; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 8.4% vs 3%, p=0.021; cancer history: 18.1% vs 6.1%, p=0.0004; hypertension: 61.4% vs 43.8%, p=0.002), whereas they exhibited a higher LVEF (60±6% vs 57±8%, p=0.0243). No differences between older and younger patients were found in terms of underlying AF type (paroxysmal AF: 66.3% vs 68.9%, p=0.62), procedure type (repeat ablation: 8.4% vs 13.4%, p=0.29), more extensive lesion set than PVI only (28.9% vs 22.5%, p=0.22) and the use of 3D mapping system (22.9% vs 21.1%, p=0.67). By looking at procedural metrics, no differences were also found between groups: 73±28 min vs 72±32 min for skin-to-skin time, p=0.41; 93±41 min vs 88±43 min for preparation plus skin-to-skin time, p=0.11; 18±9 min vs 17±9 min for fluoroscopy time, p=0.61 and 32[32-40] vs 32[32-38] PFA spots to achieve PVI, p=0.29. PVI was achieved in all patients. No major procedure-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion In our experience, the use of Farapulse PFA system for AF ablation in elderly patients was rapid, safe and effective, with no differences compared to the younger population.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: prespecified All Nippon Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry subgroup analysis

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding control is critical in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving oral anticoagulants (OAC). This subgroup analysis aimed to clarify the actual state and significance of GI bleeding in elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) patients. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors of GI bleeding during the 2-year follow-up and examined the GI bleeding impact on mortality. Of the 32,275 patients in the ANAFIE Registry, 1139 patients (3.5%) experienced GI bleeding (incidence rate, 1.92 events per 100 person-years; mean follow-up, 1.88 years); 339 upper and 760 lower GI bleeding events occurred. GI bleeding risk factors included age ≥ 85 years, body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m2, prior major bleeding, hyperuricaemia, heart failure, P-glycoprotein inhibitor use, GI disease, and polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs). No significant differences in GI bleeding risk were found between direct OAC (DOAC) vs warfarin users (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval], 1.01 [0.88–1.15]). The 1-year post-GI bleeding mortality rate was numerically higher in patients with upper (19.6%) than lower GI bleeding (8.9%). In elderly Japanese NVAF patients, this large-scale study found no significant difference in GI bleeding risk between DOAC vs. warfarin users or 1-year mortality after upper or lower GI bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there is paucity of data for elderly patients. We aimed to assess long-term efficacy and safety of CA for elderly patients with AF. Medline, BVS, Cochrane, and Embase were searched through April 2023 to investigate comparative outcomes between elderly patients > 75 or 80years, as per-study cutoff, and individuals ≤ 75/80years, undergoing CA. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints (AF recurrence and procedure-related major complications) were pooled with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 software. Subgroup analyses were performed by age groups and type of procedure (radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon). Four thousand eight hundred twenty-nine titles were screened, and 27 studies were included, being 26 observational and 1 randomized trial, comprising 117,869 patients, being 8714 (7.4%) elderly > 75/80years, with follow-up from 11.7 to 72.3months. In comparative studies (N = 17 studies), elderly > 75/80years had a higher risk of AF recurrence compared to those ≤ 75/80: relative risk (RR) 1.16 (95% CI 1.05-1.27, p = 0.002. However, funnel plot indicated publication bias, and after imputation of 5 studies, the groups were similar (RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.19)). The rates of major complications (N = 14 studies) were higher in elderly > 75/80years (RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.10-1.54), I2 = 0, p = 0.002), but were similar in cryoablation studies (N = 7) (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.29, p = 0.24, I2 = 0.0). Results were similar when individual study arms (N = 27 studies) were pooled. AF ablation is feasible in elderly patients > 75/80years, with success rates compared to younger individuals. Complication rates, however, were higher.

Clinical outcomes and anticoagulation therapy in elderly non-valvular atrial fibrillation and heart failure patients.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist. Older age is strongly associated with stroke, HF, and mortality. The association between coexistence of HF and a risk of clinical outcomes and the effectiveness of anticoagulation therapy including direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in elderly patients with AF and HF have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate 2years of outcomes and to elucidate the efficacy of DOACs or warfarin in elderly AF patients in the All Nippon AF In the Elderly (ANAFIE) Registry with and without a history of HF. The ANAFIE Registry is a multicentre, prospective observational study following elderly non-valvular AF patients aged ≥75years for 2years. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated based on the presence or absence of an HF diagnosis and DOAC or warfarin use at enrolment. Among 32275 eligible patients, 12116 (37.5%) had been diagnosed with HF. Patients with HF had significantly higher rates of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 1.94, P<0.001), cardiovascular events (HR 1.59, P<0.001), cardiovascular death (HR 1.49, P<0.001), all-cause death (HR 1.32, P<0.001), and net clinical outcome including stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death (HR 1.23, P<0.001), compared with those without HF; however, HRs for stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.96, P=0.56) and major bleeding (HR 1.14, P=0.13) were similar. DOAC use was associated with a low risk of stroke/systemic embolism (HR 0.86, P=0.19 in HF; HR 0.79, P=0.016 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.56), major bleeding (HR 0.71, P=0.008 in HF; HR 0.75, P=0.016 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.74), HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 0.81, P<0.001 in HF; HR 0.78, P<0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.26), cardiovascular events (HR 0.83, P<0.001 in HF; HR 0.82, P=0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.65), cardiovascular death (HR 0.84, P=0.12 in HF; HR 0.75, P=0.035 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.18), all-cause death (HR 0.89, P=0.082 in HF; HR 0.80, P=0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.091), and net clinical outcome (HR 0.88, P=0.019 in HF; HR 0.81, P<0.001 in non-HF; P for interaction=0.21) compared with warfarin, irrespective of the presence or absence of HF. Analysis using the propensity score matching method showed similar associations. Non-valvular AF patients aged ≥75years with a history of HF had higher risks of cardiovascular events and mortality. DOACs were favourable to warfarin regardless of the coexistence of HF. These results might encourage the use of DOACs in elderly patients with non-valvular AF with or without HF.

The Efficacy and Safety of NOAC in Very Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Data From the Korean National Health Insurance Cohort Registry.

We investigated the clinical benefit of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) in very elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients through national healthcare insurance registry. Clinical data was acquired from the National Health Insurance Service of south Korea. Medical records of 862,935 patients who were diagnosed with AF from 2015 to 2020 were collected for analysis. Patients under the age of 85, prior history of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding and prior prescription days of aspirin, warfarin or NOAC exceeding 90 along with follow up period less than 90 days were excluded. A total of 10,625 patients were eligible for analysis. Patients with oral anticoagulant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.69, p<0.001) showed higher efficacy regarding cerebrovascular accident (CVA) compared to aspirin (HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.74-0.95, p=0.008) and no treatment group. Individual comparison of NOAC and aspirin via propensity score matching showed that patients with NOAC (HR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.61-0.85, p<0.001) showed higher event free survival regarding CVA compared to aspirin. Bleeding risk was also higher for NOAC (HR, 1.28, 95% CI, 1.07-1.56, p=0.006) group but did not result in commensurate increase in mortality (HR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.45-0.81, p<0.001). Anticoagulation with NOAC in very elderly patient showed higher event free survival regarding CVA. Despite having higher event rate of bleeding, eventual death was lower for NOAC.

Optimal Dose of Edoxaban for Very Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding: The LEDIOS Registry.

Optimal anticoagulation in very elderly patients is challenging due to the high risk of anticoagulant-induced bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of on-label reduced-dose edoxaban (30 mg) in very elderly patients who had additional risk factors for bleeding. This was a multi-center, prospective, non-interventional observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of on-label reduced-dose edoxaban in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients 80 years of age or older and who had more than 1 risk factor for bleeding. A total of 2448 patients (mean age 75.0±8.3 years, 801 [32.7%] males) was included in the present study, and 586 (23.9%) were 80 years of age or older with additional risk factors for bleeding. Major bleeding events occurred frequently among very elderly AF patients who had additional bleeding risk factors compared to other patients (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-4.02); however, there were no significant differences in stroke incidence (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 0.98-3.55). There were no significant differences for either factor after adjusting for age and sex (adjusted HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.75-3.62 for major bleeding; adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.51-2.50 for stroke). In very elderly AF patients with comorbidities associated with greater risk of bleeding, the incidence of major bleeding events was significantly increased. In addition, risk of stroke showed tendency to increase in same population. Effective anticoagulation therapy might be important in these high-risk population, and close observation of bleeding events might also be required. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03554837.

Factors influencing early recurrence of atrial fibrillation among elderly patients following radiofrequency catheter ablation and the impact of different antiarrhythmic regimens.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) necessitate the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs to prevent early recurrence. The clinical outcomes among these patients may be influenced by varying antiarrhythmic regimens. To identify the risk factors associated with early recurrence and compare the clinical outcomes among different antiarrhythmic regimens in elderly patients with AF following radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) during a 3-month period. A retrospective observational study encompassed 420 elderly patients with AF following RFCA. Baseline data were collected during the initial postoperative visit and clinical outcomes were carefully monitored over a 3-month follow-up period. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between various antiarrhythmic regimens and the clinical outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (p = 0.001), left atrial diameter (p < 0.001), left ventricular diameter (p = 0.015), reactive hyperemia index (RHI) (p < 0.001), antiarrhythmic drug (p < 0.001) and hs-cTnI (p = 0.017) were independent risk factors of early recurrence. Furthermore, in cox survival regression analysis model, survival rate of early recurrence in the amiodarone group was higher than in the propafenone group (HR 2.30, 95%CI 1.17-4.53, p = 0.016) and in the sotalol group (HR 3.60, 95%CI 2.17-5.95, p < 0.001). Compared to the amiodarone group, the incidence of liver dysfunction was lower in the dronedarone group (p = 0.046) and the propafenone group (p = 0.021). The incidence of bradyarrhythmia (p = 0.003), QT interval prolongation (p = 0.035) and atrioventricular transmission block (p = 0.021) were higher in the sotalol group than in the amiodarone group. RHI was identified as an independent risk factor for early recurrence among elderly AF patients after RFCA. Compared to amiodarone, propafenone and sotalol exhibited an elevated risk of early recurrence. Although there was no significant difference in early recurrence between amiodarone and dronedarone, dronedarone emerged as the preferred option due to its lower frequency of adverse drug reactions than amiodarone.

Efficacy and safety of the vein of Marshall ethanol infusion with radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in elderly patients.

Increasing age is a significant risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). We accomplished this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) with CA in elderly patients with persistent AF (PsAF). This retrospective observational study included 360 consecutive adult patients with PsAF, of which 141 were in the Elder group (age ≥65 years) and 219 were in the Younger group (age <65 years), who underwent the VOM-EI and radiofrequency CA (RFCA) between May 2020 and April 2022. The efficacy endpoint was no recurrence of AF within one year after CA. The VOM-EI was successfully performed in 90.8% of patients from the Elder and 88.6% from the Younger group. All patients achieved PVI; 97.9% of patients from the Elder and 98.6% from the Younger group reached LA roof block, and 93.6% of patients from the Elder and 95.9% from the Younger group achieved MI block. There was no significant difference in 1-year survival without recurrence of AF between the two groups (83.0% and 84.5%, respectively). The incidence of complications within 30 days after the procedure from the two groups was low and did not differ significantly. The VOM-EI combined with RFCA proved to be an effective and safe strategy for treating PsAF in elderly and younger patients.

Standardized community management on the diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors control for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in elderly patients

BackgroundBy investigating the knowledge, medication, occurrence of complications, and risks among elderly non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients in Shanghai communities, and providing standardized comprehensive management and follow-up, we aim to explore the impact of standardized community management on improving disease awareness, standardizing atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, reducing the risk of complications occurrence, and addressing risk factors for AF patients.MethodsThis research selected elderly atrial fibrillation patients from Zhuanqiao Community Health Service Center, Minhang District, Shanghai from July 2020 to October 2022. Their personal health records and examination results were reviewed, and the incidence of AF, awareness, medication, and complications were investigated. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI), CHA2DS2-VASc score, and HAS-BLED score were used to evaluate disease burden, thromboembolic risk, and bleeding risk, respectively. The patients were subjected to standardized community management, and the compliance rate of disease awareness, treatment, resting heart rate, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed at the baseline, 6 months and 1 year after management.ResultsA total of 243 NVAF patients were included, with an average aCCI score of (4.5 ± 1.1). Among them, 28% of the patients were aware of their AF, and 18.1% of the patients were aware of the hazards of AF. Of the patients, 11.9% used anticoagulant drugs, including 6.6% and 5.3% for warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), respectively. 7% of patients used antiplatelet drugs. 26.7% of the patients used heart rate control drugs. 10.3% of the patients experienced thromboembolic events, and 0.8% of the patients experienced bleeding events. 93.0% of the patients were at high risk of thromboembolism, and 24.7% of the patients were at high risk of bleeding. Compared with the baseline, there were significant statistical differences (P < 0.001) in disease awareness, awareness of the hazards of AF, use of anticoagulant drugs and heart rate control drugs, and control of risk factors among NVAF patients after standardized community management. Moreover, with the extension of management time, there was a linear increase in the awareness of NVAF, awareness of the hazards of AF, utilization rate of anticoagulant drugs, utilization rate of heart rate control drugs, blood pressure, blood glucose, and BMI compliance rate (P < 0.001).ConclusionCurrently, the awareness, treatment, and control of risk factors for AF in elderly NVAF patients in Shanghai community are not satisfactory. Standardized community management helps to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and control of risk factors in AF.