Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective Despite the beneficial effects of DOACs, suboptimal adherence is widely documented, and real-world adherence is lower than in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention by incorporating real-world adherence from the US payer’s perspective. Methods We developed a Markov model with three health states to evaluate the total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. The population was a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old patients with moderate to high stroke risk. The transition probabilities of healthy adherent, nonadherent, and stroke were obtained from a Medicare Advantage Plan. The utilities and costs were obtained from prior clinical studies. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Apixaban was cost-effective than rivaroxaban at a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000. Apixaban yielded an additional 0.12 QALYs at a cost of $1904.39, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $16,279.25 per QALY gained. The Monte Carlo simulations indicated that apixaban was cost-effective at 89.67% of simulations. The ICER results were impacted by the medical costs among nonadherent patients. Conclusion After incorporating adherence, apixaban 5 mg was a cost-effective alternative to rivaroxaban 20 mg for stroke prevention among elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
