Atrial Appendage Occlusion In Patients Research Articles

P6100Prognostic value of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fbrillation and high bleeding risk: a single center registry

P6100Prognostic value of left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fbrillation and high bleeding risk: a single center registry

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Previous Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding (from the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug Multicenter Registry)

History of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding may represent a frequent clinical indication for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to investigate the procedural safety and long-term outcome of patients with previous major GI bleeding (MGIB) who underwent LAAO. Data from the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug multicenter registry on 1,047 patients were analyzed. Patients with previous MGIB as indication for LAAO were compared with patients without previous MGIB. A total of 151 patients (14.4%) with previous MGIB were identified. Periprocedural major bleeding events were more frequent in patients with previous MGIB (4.0% vs 0.8%, p= 0.001). With an average follow-up of 1.3years, the observed annual rate of stroke/transient ischemic attack and major bleeding for patients with previous MGIB were 2.1% (61.4% relative reduction according to the Congestive Heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 (doubled), Diabetes, Stroke (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, and Sex (female) [CHA2DS2-VASc] score) and 4.6% (20.1% relative reduction according to the expected rate based on the Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function (1 point each), Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (>65 years), Drugs/alcohol concomitantly (1 point each) [HAS-BLED] score), respectively. In conclusion, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and previous MGIB, LAAO was associated with a low annual rate of stroke/transient ischemic attack. Periprocedural major bleeding events were more frequent in this specific population although the annual major bleeding rate showed a 20.1% relative risk reduction according to the HAS-BLED score.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high bleeding risk using aspirin alone for post-implant antithrombotic therapy.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amulet using aspirin alone (ASA) as post-implantation antithrombotic treatment. This was a single-centre, prospective, non-randomised study on LAAO with the ACP or Amulet in a consecutive cohort (n=110) treated by ASA alone post implantation. The primary outcome was device-related thrombosis, while secondary outcomes were ischaemic stroke or major bleeding. Clinical follow-up was conducted after six weeks and 12 months with TEE and cardiac CT. One hundred and seven patients were included in the analysis. Three patients were excluded due to a mechanical valve prosthesis. CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.4±1.6 and HAS-BLED 4.1±1.1. Successful implantation was obtained in all patients with a periprocedural complication rate of 4.6%. Median follow-up was 2.3 years, with a total of 265 patient-years. Device-related thrombosis was detected in 2/107 (1.9%) cases. Stroke occurred in 6/107 patients, with an annualised rate of 2.3%, which is a 61% risk reduction compared to the predicted rate. Annual risk of major bleeding was reduced by 57%. LAAO with the ACP or Amulet was safely performed with ASA monotherapy after implantation without an increased risk of device-related thrombosis or stroke.

Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation after Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Single Center Experience

Aims: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and indication to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), triple therapy is recommended. However, this issue is still largely debated. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) occlusion may represent an alternative therapeutic approach in this subset of patients, as it could lead to a reduction in the incidence of bleeding. Nevertheless, due to lack of clinical evidence, this approach does not represent the gold standard treatment for these patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of percutaneous LAA occlusion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and indication of concomitant DAPT for ACS. Methods and Results: Fifteen AF-patients with indications to anticoagulant and DAPT after ACS underwent LAA occlusion with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amulet ACP (St. Jude) from October 2014 to May 2016. Procedural success was achieved in 14/15 patients, while in 1 patient a clinically non-relevant pericardial effusion was registered before the trans-septal puncture, without implantation of the device. No peri-procedural death, major bleeding and dislocation or thrombi of the device were recorded. During a median follow-up of 182 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 169 to 183 days), one peri-procedural minor bleeding and two non cardiovascular death were described. Conclusions: LAA occlusion represents a relatively safe procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation and the need of DAPT due to ACS. Randomized trials should be designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in this clinical setting.

TCT-620 A comparison of clinical outcomes between triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antiplatelet with left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation

TCT-620 A comparison of clinical outcomes between triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antiplatelet with left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation

A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devices were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to November 2015. The incidence rates from individual studies were combined to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety, including all-cause death, cardiac/neurological death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade. Thirty-eight studies involving 3585 patients and 6 different occlusion devices were eligible for our inclusion criteria. The procedural failure rate for LAA closure was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02-0.03). The all-cause mortality was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02-0.03) and cardiac/neurological mortality was 0 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01). The stroke/TIA rate was estimated only 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.01). The incidence of thrombus on devices was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.02). The major hemorrhagic complication rate was estimated 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.01). Pericardial effusion/tamponade was estimated 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02-0.03). No heterogeneity was observed for above pooled estimates (I = 0). In devices subgroups analysis, the all-cause mortality and cardiac/neurological mortality of PLAATO group were the highest (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), whereas the incidence of thrombus on devices in the ACP group was the highest (P < 0.01). In follow-up period subgroups analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death, stroke/TIA, major hemorrhage, and pericardial effusion/tamponade events between the shorter and longer follow-up period subgroups (P < 0.05). However, the differences among the subgroups were numerically small. the pooled data demonstrated that transcatheter LAA occlusion was effective and safe in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not suitable for lifelong antithrombotic therapy.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: implantation and up to four years follow-up of the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be considered for stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data on device implantation safety and feasibility and long-term follow-up are limited. LAAO was performed using the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (ACP) device in 134 NVAF patients with long-term OAC contraindication, with median (interquartile range) CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores of four (3-5) and three (2-3.75), respectively. Follow-up data were collected over a mean follow-up period of 680 days (range: 42 days to 4.3 years) comprising a total implant experience of 238 patient-years. Device implantation was successful in 95.5% of the procedures and associated with a rate of major procedural complications of 2.2%. At the most recent follow-up, almost all patients were receiving antiplatelet therapy. Ischaemic stroke was observed at an annual rate of 0.8% and the annual rate of any thromboembolic (TE) event was 2.5%. Major bleeding during follow-up occurred at an annual rate of 1.3%. LAAO is a safe and effective stroke prevention therapy in a high-risk NVAF cohort, both at implantation and over longer follow-up periods. The long-term assessed ischaemic stroke rate in patients treated with LAAO is markedly reduced compared to the expected rate based on the patients' risk scores.

Long-term invasive follow-up of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: five-year results of multiple invasive imaging modalities.

Invasive imaging modalities have shown restoration of vasomotion, prevention of restenosis and, most importantly, increase in lumen area between six months and two years after first-generation everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) implantation. Our aim was to assess whether these positive findings were sustained in the long term. Patients included in the ABSORB cohort A from the Thoraxcenter Rotterdam cohort underwent coronary catheterisation including angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), virtual histology, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and vasomotion testing at five years. Eight out of 16 patients underwent catheterisation and scaffold assessment with multiple imaging modalities. A trend towards an increase in minimum luminal diameter was observed between two and five years by angiography (1.95±0.37 mm vs. 2.14±0.38 mm; p=0.09). IVUS data showed an increase in mean lumen area at five years (6.96±1.13 mm2) compared to six months (6.17±0.74 mm2; p=0.06) and two years (6.56±1.16 mm2; p=0.12), primarily due to a persistent reduction in plaque area size between six months and five years (9.17±1.86 mm2 vs. 7.57±1.63 mm2; p=0.03). The necrotic core area was reduced at five years compared to post-procedural results. In OCT, an increase in mean and minimal luminal area was observed. Moreover, no scaffold struts could be identified and a smooth endoluminal lining was observed. The scaffolded coronary segment did not show signs of endothelial dysfunction with acetylcholine testing. At five years, the Absorb BVS is no longer discernible by any invasive imaging method and endothelial function is restored. Late luminal enlargement persists up to five years of follow-up without adaptive vessel remodelling.

The case of stroke prevention by left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation-can we close the file?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and the prevalence is increasing. Future projections predict at least a doubling of AF patients by the year 2050 (1). One of the most devastating consequences of AF is stroke. The presence of AF increases the risk for thromboembolic complications 5-fold and strokes associated with AF have increased morbidity and mortality (2). For this reason stroke risk stratification and appropriate treatment in each patient with AF is of utmost importance. The last decade, the antithrombotic treatment of AF has changed significantly. Easy to use risk scores such as CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc have facilitated the use of antithrombotic agents (3). In addition, with the introduction of direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, an alternative to warfarin is available, which is at least as effective as warfarin, but with a lower incidence of intracranial bleeding (4).

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients Aged

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is emerging as a promising alternative to oral anticoagulation. Because aged patients present a greater risk of not only cardioembolic events but also major bleeding, LAAO might represent a valid alternative as this would allow oral anticoagulation cessation while keeping cardioembolic protection. The objective of the study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LAAO in elderly patients. Data from the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug multicenter registry were analyzed. The cohort was categorized in 2 groups (<75 vs ≥ 75 years). A total of 1,053 subjects were included in the registry. Of them, 219 were excluded because of combined procedures. As a result, 828 subjects were included (54.6% ≥ 75 years). Procedural success was high and similar in both groups (97.3%). Acute procedural major adverse events were not statistically different among groups (3.2% in <75 years vs 5.1%; p = 0.17) although stratified analysis showed a higher incidence of cardiac tamponade in elderly patients (0.5% vs 2.2%; p = 0.04). With a median follow-up of 16.8 months, no significant differences in stroke/TIA (1.9% vs 2.3%; p = 0.89) and major bleeding (1.7% vs 2.6%; p = 0.54) were observed. In conclusion, LAAO was associated with similar procedural success in patients aged <75 and ≥ 75 years although older patients had a higher incidence of cardiac tamponade. At follow-up, stroke and major bleeding rates were similar among groups.

GISE/AIAC position paper on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, facilities, competences, organizing and training requirements

Thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage is the most feared complication in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The cornerstone for the management of chronic nonvalvular AF is stroke reduction with oral anticoagulation (OAC). However, poor compliance, maintaining a narrow therapeutic window, and major side effects such as bleeding have severely limited its use, creating a therapeutic dilemma. About 20% of AF patients do not receive OAC due to contraindications and less than half of AF patients are not on OAC due to reluctance of the prescribing physician and/or patient non-compliance. Fortunately, over the past decade, the introduction of percutaneous approaches for left atrial appendage occlusion has offered a viable alternative to the management of nonvalvular AF in patients with OAC contraindication. Occlusion devices such as the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Watch man device have shown their noninferiority to OAC for stroke prophylaxis with less bleeding complications, while more recently some new devices have been introduced. The aim of this position paper is to review the most relevant clinical aspects of left atrial appendage occlusion from patient selection to periprocedural and follow-up management. In addition, the importance of a medical team and an organizational environment adequate to optimize all the steps of this procedure is discussed.

Leaving no hole unclosed: left atrial appendage occlusion in patients having closure of patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect.

To report procedural outcome of sequential occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and an interatrial septal communication and discuss possible indications. There are some patients who may have indications for both closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) or atrial septal defect (ASD), as well as closure of the LAA. The optimal procedural strategy is not known. A retrospective review of LAA and PFO/ASD cases at our center was performed. Demographic, echocardiographic, and procedural data were recorded. Closure of LAA and then PFO/ASD (Group I: 11 patients), closure of both in the same setting (Group II: 3 patients), and closure of the PFO/ASD and then the LAA (Group III: 3 patients) was performed in a total of 17 patients. Average age was 63.5 ± 9.8 years. Most patients were hypertensive with prior cerebrovascular event in 52.9% of patients. Procedural success was 100%. Procedural adverse events were 2 episodes of tamponade (in Group I after first LAA procedure) treated with pericardiocentesis and 1 access-site hematoma (Group II) treated conservatively. Sequential (staged or during the same procedure) closure of the LAA and interatrial communications can be performed safely in a carefully selected patient population. This is also the first known report of LAA occlusion in patients with prior septal closure devices.

1440 Echocardiographic follow-up after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with increased thromboembolic risk

1440 Echocardiographic follow-up after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with increased thromboembolic risk