Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

Advanced biologic therapies are associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

Abstract Background Chronic inflammation is an important contributor to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and associated events. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory conditions, and meta-analyses of cohort studies demonstrate an increased risk of ASCVD events in IBD patients. Advanced biologic therapies (ABT) targeting the immune system revolutionized treatment of IBD patients but the impact of these therapies on ASCVD events is not known. Purpose To investigate the impact of ABT on ASVCD events in IBD patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX Diamond Network, a multi-institutional database providing real-time access to de-identified electronic health records, with data updated on 02/14/2024. ABT were defined as one or more the following: infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, ustekinumab, risankizumab, vedolizumab, or natalizumab. ASCVD events were based on ICD codes for ischemic heart, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular diseases. Individuals >40 years with IBD were included. ASCVD events in (1) patients on ABT and (2) patients not on ABT (NABT) were compared. Propensity score matching was performed on sex, aspirin use, and the following ASCVD risk factors: age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, tobacco use, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results This study includes 72,650 individuals in each of the two matched cohorts. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two propensity-score matched cohorts (Table). The probabilities of experiencing any ASCVD event at one, three, and five years in the ABT group were all significantly lower than in the NABT group (8.3% vs. 12.4%, OR 0.64; 13% vs. 18.6%, OR 0.66; and 15% vs. 21.2%, OR 0.65; respectively, all p<0.01). Similarly, the probability of experiencing an ischemic heart disease event at one, three, and five years in the ABT group were all significantly lower than in the NABT group (5.2% vs. 7.9%, OR 0.64; 8% vs. 11.7%, OR 0.66; and 9.2% vs. 13.4% OR 0.66; respectively, all p<0.01). The probability of cerebrovascular disease events at one, three, and five years in the ABT group were all significantly lower than in the NABT group (2% vs. 3.3%, OR 0.59; 3.5% vs. 5.7%, OR 0.59; and 4.2% vs. 6.8% OR 0.60; respectively, all p<0.01) and the probability of a peripheral artery disease event at one, three, and five years in the ABT group were also all significantly lower than in the NABT group event (2.8% vs. 4.5%, OR 0.62; 5.1% vs. 7.6%, OR 0.65; and 6.2% vs. 9.3% OR 0.65; respectively, all p<0.01). Conclusions ABT are associated with significantly fewer ASCVD events in the IBD patient population. Future studies examining the differential benefit of drug subclasses on ASCVD outcomes and mechanisms responsible for the ABT benefit, as well as prospective study designs have the potential to identify new therapeutic targets in IBD patients and with applicability beyond IBD patients.Table

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a Brazilian tertiary hospital population

Abstract Background/Introduction Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are a strong risk marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, as well as of aortic valve calcification and stenosis. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of high Lp(a) levels in patients followed at a tertiary hospital specialized in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In addition, there is scant information about Lp(a) concentrations in Brazilian individuals. Purpose The aim of the study was to describe the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of patients with at least one measure of Lp(a) at a tertiary treatment center for CVD in our city – Brazil. Methods Patients treated at a heart institute had their data extracted between the years 1999 and 2021. Data were obtained through direct electronic extraction of patients' medical records. The patients were categorized according to different Lp(a) cutoff levels (> 50 and < 70, > 70 and < 90, and > 90 mg/dL) and by quartiles. Results Of 4,970 unique patients included in the study, the mean age at baseline was 59.9 years (SD ± 14.5), 2,634 (53%) were male, and the median Lp(a) was 23.2 mg/dL (interquartile range 8.9 - 56.8 mg/dL). In the whole cohort, 460 (9.3%) had Lp(a) > 50 and < 70, 344 (6.9%) > 70 and < 90, 612 (12.3%) > 90 mg/dl and 138 (2.8%) > 150 mg/dL. Established ASCVD was reported in 1,223 (24%) of the individuals, with a progressively higher prevalence across the Lp(a) categories above (31.2%, 33.8%, 34.2%, respectively) (table 1). Moreover, the Lp(a) median (interquartile range) in mg/dL was significantly higher in those with baseline history of ASCVD (31.4 [10.8-71.2] vs 21.2 [8.3-52]), MI (27.8 [10.6-65.9] vs 22.3 [8.5-54.7]) and stroke (24.9 [10-69.5] vs 23.1 [8.9-56.5]), all p < 0.05 (table 2). Lp(a) was also significantly higher among those with LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL relative to LDL-C < 100 mg/dl (25.5[9.5-63.2] vs 21.4[8.4 vs 52.2] p < 0.05). Conclusions In this cohort of patients followed at a tertiary center specialized in CVD, approximately a third had Lp(a) levels above 50 mg/dL, a cutoff robustly associated with ASCVD. This finding likely represents an important source of cardiovascular residual risk, particularly in those with established ASCVD, exposing the need of further therapies.

Circulating Amyloid beta 1-40 is independently associated with statin treatment and LDL cholesterol reduction: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background Accumulating evidence suggests that circulating amyloid beta 1-40 (Aβ40), a pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic peptide, is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), providing incremental prognostic value and risk stratification refinement in primary and secondary prevention settings. Existing evidence supports conflicting off-target effects of statins on plasma Aβ40. We aim to explore the impact of cardiovascular risk reduction through statin therapy on Aβ40 plasma levels in subjects with dyslipidemia and with/without ASCVD. Methods In this prospective study, patients with dyslipidemia who visited for the first time our lipid clinic for risk stratification and treatment plan assessment (n=146) were consecutively recruited. Αβ40 was measured in plasma samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 5.2 and 15 months. Patients in whom statin treatment was initiated or intensified in terms of dose or regimen (n= 68) were compared against patients not treated with statins or with unchanged statin intensity (n = 78). Statin intensity treatment was defined based on the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Results Increased Aβ40 plasma levels at baseline were associated with ASCVD presence, decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and history of heart failure (p<0.05 for all). An increase in Aβ40 circulating levels between baseline and follow-up 1 was observed in patients in whom statin treatment was initiated or intensified (p=0.041). However, in patients not treated with statins or treated with unchanged statin intensity, an increase in Aβ40 circulating levels was observed between follow-up 1 and follow-up 2 (p=0.05, Figure 1A). These changes in Aβ40 were significantly different between the two groups during the short follow-up period (β=0.226, p for interaction =0.025) independently from age and changes in GFR, systolic blood pressure, and LDL-C. Additionally, patients who achieved a reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 50% in follow-up 2 have unchanged Aβ40 levels during the long follow-up period, while an increase in Aβ40 was observed in the rest population (p=0.012, Figure 1B). These changes were significantly different between the two LDL-C groups independently of statin treatment and changes in high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (β= -0.231, p for interaction=0.035). Conclusion In a dyslipidemic population, statin initiation or intensification and LDL-C decrease showed a short-term increase and a long-term return to initial levels, respectively, in circulating Aβ40 levels. From a mechanistic point of view, our findings suggest that statins have an impact on Aβ40, possibly through an LDL-C-dependent and a non-LDL-C-dependent pathway. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of circulating Aβ40 as a novel biomarker in ASCVD risk reduction assessment.

Moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy for secondary cardiovascular risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol levels is recommended for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) [1]. Statins are the first-line therapy for secondary prevention [1]. Recent studies such as the RACING trial suggest that the combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe (MIS+EZE) may achieve a greater LDL cholesterol reduction and a lower adverse event rate than high-intensity statins alone (HIS) [2]. Purpose The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess cardiovascular outcomes and clinical safety of MIS+EZE versus HIS in patients with ASCVD. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for studies that compared MIS+EZE to HIS in patients with ASCVD and included studies reporting cardiovascular mortality, all cause mortality, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, heart failure, and LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL. Studies with the same statin dose in both treatment groups and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Treatment effects for binary endpoints were compared using pooled risk-ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Out of 6238 studies, we included 6 RCTs and 2 retrospective cohort studies with 40,236 patients of whom 10,254 were treated with MIS+EZE (25,5%). Mean follow-up ranged from 90 days to 3 years. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.94; p=0.003), all-cause mortality (RR 0.90; CI95% 0.82-0.98; p=0.02) and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.83; CI95% 0.73-0.93; p=0.002) were significantly lower in patients treated with MIS+EZE compared to those treated with HIS. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the MIS+EZE group reached an LDL-C ≤ 70mg/dL (RR 1.26; CI95% 1.19-1.34; p<0.00001). No statistically significant difference was found for non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.87; CI95% 0.64-1.17; p=0.36), coronary revascularization (RR 1.03; CI95% 0.78-1.35; p=0.83), heart failure (RR 0.95; CI95% 0.86-1.06; p=0.38) and unstable angina (RR 1.52; CI95% 0.62-3.75; p=0.36). A RCT sub-analysis was feasible for cardiovascular mortality and showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (RR 1.01; CI95% 0.42-2.42; p=0.98). Regarding safety endpoints, the risk of adverse events (RR 0.84; CI95% 0.74-0.95; p=0.004) and the risk of muscle-related adverse events (RR 0.67; CI95% 0.49-0.92; p=0.01) were significantly lower in MIS+EZE group. The significant reduction in muscle-related adverse events was maintained in the RCT sub-analysis (RR 0.61; CI95% 0.41-0.91; p=0.02). There was no difference between groups in the risk of liver-related adverse events (RR 0.63; CI95% 0.29-1.41; p=0.26) or new-onset malignancy (RR 0.99; CI95% 0.87-1.12; p=0.85). Conclusion The combination of moderate-intensity statins and ezetimibe may be considered as an alternative therapeutic strategy to reduce secondary cardiovascular risk with lower rates of drug intolerance.

Advancing care in type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: assessing pharmacist-led strategies in England's primary care - a retrospective observational study

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus is a complex multi-system disorder with a tendency to develop complications. ‘Persistence to therapy’ plans affect almost 50% of all people with T2D, leading to suboptimal glycaemic and cardiovascular (CVD) risk factor control. The interplay between T2D and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) underscores the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to care that addresses both glycaemic control and CVD risk factors. Purpose This study retrospectively analysed pharmacist-led interventions in patients living with T2D and established ASCVD in general practices in a large UK city. Methods A retrospective pre-post observational study was conducted using electronic health record data from men and women diagnosed with T2D and ASCVD. Participants attended an independent prescribing pharmacist-led clinic within 21 general practices. The practices operated linked and comprehensive electronic health records systems, facilitating access to high-quality longitudinal data that align with study objectives. Results A total of 380 patients received pharmacist-led interventions. Comparisons of pre-intervention and post-intervention data revealed a significant decrease in HbA1c levels (73.7 ± 10.7 mmol/mol vs 67.2 ± 8.5 mmol/mol, p < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (132 ± 10.2 mmHg vs 125.9 ± 9.9 mmHg, p < 0.01), and diastolic blood pressure (76.8 ± 5.9 mmHg vs 72.4 ± 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). Additionally, total cholesterol levels significantly reduced from 4.4 ± 0.7 mmol/L to 3.9 ± 0.7 mmol/L (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving the triple target of HbA1c (≤58 mmol/mol), BP (≤140/80 mmHg), and total cholesterol (≤5 mmol/L) increased significantly from 2.4% before the intervention to 23.4% afterward (p < 0.001). The initiation of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) therapies was the most common prescribing intervention (67%). Conclusions Pharmacist-led interventions in a general practice setting significantly improved several critical diabetes and CVD risk related outcomes. These findings underscore the potential benefits of integrating pharmacist-led care models into the management of T2D, particularly for patients with concurrent ASCVD and adopting an individualised, evidence-based approach to prescribing interventions.

Burden of systemic inflammation and associated health outcomes in adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease managed in routine care

Abstract Background The burden and outcomes of inflammation in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are poorly defined, particularly beyond the controlled settings of trials and research cohorts. Methods We conducted a longitudinal observational study of adults with ASCVD undergoing C-reactive-protein (CRP) testing in routine healthcare in Stockholm, Sweden. After excluding CRP tests associated with acute illness and patients with medications/conditions that bias CRP interpretation, the systemic inflammation of participants was defined over a 3-month ascertainment window. Baseline determinants of CRP≥2 mg/L were explored with logistic regression, and baseline CRP categories were compared via Poisson and Cox regression for subsequent healthcare resource utilization and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death. Result After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, we identified 84,399 adults with ASCVD with a mean age of 71 years and of which 54% were men. In total, 60% had CRP≥2 mg/L. At baseline, female sex, older age, lower kidney function, albuminuria, diabetes, hypertension, and recent anemia, were associated with CRP≥2 mg/L. Conversely, the use of RASi, antiplatelets, and lipid-lowering therapy were associated with lower odds. Over a median follow-up of 6.4 years and compared to people with CRP <2 mg/L, those with CRP≥2 mg/L had a higher rate of hospitalizations, days spent in hospital, outpatient consultations, and dispensed medications during follow-up (P<0.05 for all). They also had a higher rate of MACE [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.30; 95% CI, 1.27–1.33], heart failure hospitalization [1.24; 1.20–1.39], and all-cause death [1.35; 1.20–1.30]. Results were consistent across subgroups and more granular CRP categories, and robust to the exclusion of extreme CRP values or early events. Conclusions Two in three adults with ASCVD have systemic inflammation. A CRP≥2 mg/L is associated with excess healthcare resource utilization as well as increased rates of MACE, heart failure, and death.

Lipoprotein(a) cardiovascular disease risk not captured by low density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B

Abstract Background Elevated lipoprotein(a) affects 1 in 5 individuals and is considered a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis (AVS). However, lipoprotein(a) measurements are not widely implemented in clinical practice. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) measurements include contributions from lipoprotein(a), yet whether these measurements can replace measurements of lipoprotein(a) in assessing cardiovascular disease risk from this causal risk factor is unknown. Purpose We tested the hypotheses that lipoprotein(a) risk of ASCVD and AVS is captured by LDL cholesterol or ApoB. Methods We included 70,189 individuals from a prospective contemporary cohort study of the general population. Mediated risk by LDL cholesterol and ApoB in the association between lipoprotein(a) and risk of ASCVD and AVS was examined using four-way decomposition analyses stratified by statin treatment at baseline. Results During a median follow-up of 10.8 years, 7,127 developed ASCVD and 1,516 AVS. Per 50 mg/dL higher lipoprotein(a), multivariable adjusted hazard ratios were 1.22 (95% CI: 1.18-1.26) for ASCVD and 1.36 (1.28-1.46) for AVS. In individuals without statin use, LDL cholesterol mediated 19% (15%-24%) of the risk of ASCVD from lipoprotein(a) and 7.7% (1.5%-14%) of the risk of AVS from lipoprotein(a) (Figure 1). Corresponding values for ApoB were 14.0% (11%-18%) and 6.6% (2.8%-10%). In statin users (n=9,570), LDL cholesterol did not mediate risk of ASCVD from lipoprotein(a) but mediated 8.0% (0.8%-15%) of the risk of AVS from lipoprotein(a). Correspondingly, ApoB mediated 9.8% (2.2%-17%) of the risk of ASCVD and 4.2% (0.4%-8.0%) of the risk of AVS from lipoprotein(a). Conclusion Lipoprotein(a) risk of ASCVD and AVS is not adequately captured by LDL cholesterol and ApoB. Therefore, lipoprotein(a) measurement is needed in all individuals to capture the cardiovascular disease risk from this causal risk factor.

Lipoprotein(a) levels and cholesterol efflux capacity: inverse association and impact on atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia patients on lipid-lowering therapy

Abstract Backgrounds Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients have higher serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels than non-FH patients, and high Lp(a) levels raise atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 1). We previously reported that decreased cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is a risk marker for ASCVD in patients with statin-treated FH 2). Others have reported that Lp(a) interferes with the enhancement of ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux by plasminogen and that ABCA1-mediated CEC is lower in patients with Lp(a) >50 mg/dL. However, the association of CEC, not necessarily ABCA1-mediated, with Lp(a) is not clear and has not been studied in patients with FH. It is also unclear whether high Lp(a) and low CEC in patients with FH are associated with the severity of atherosclerosis. Purpose We examined whether Lp(a) levels are negatively associated with ABCA1-independent CEC in patients with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. We also examined the impact of the combination of high Lp(a) and low CEC on the presence of corneal arcus, Achilles tendon thickness, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and pre-existing ASCVD. Methods This cross-sectional study included 371 patients clinically diagnosed with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. CEC was measured in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma and 3H-cholesterol-labeled J774.1 cells without cAMP-stimulated ABCA1 overexpression. Lp(a) was measured by enzymatic methods (Sekisui Medical, Tokyo, Japan) using an automated analyser. Achilles tendon thickness was measured by X-ray and carotid IMT by ultrasound. Results Mean age was 55±16 years, and 191 (51%) were women. The median serum Lp(a) level was 18.7 mg/dL, higher than the previously reported median level (13 mg/dL) in a Japanese population. One hundred nineteen patients (32%) had serum Lp(a) levels of 30 mg/dL or higher, and they had significantly lower CEC (P=0.0015). This negative association persisted after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, serum LDL-cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and eGFR in a multiple linear regression model (beta-coefficient: -0.047, 95% CI: -0.075 - -0.019, P=0.0011). In addition, patients with both Lp(a) > 30 mg/dL and CEC lower than the median had a higher percentage of corneal arcus, thicker Achilles tendons, greater carotid IMT, and a higher prevalence of pre-existing ASCVD compared to patients with either or neither. Conclusions We found an inverse relationship between Lp(a) levels and CEC in FH patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Our results suggest that Lp(a) may also inhibit ABCA1-independent CEC, including passive cholesterol diffusion from peripheral cells. Furthermore, the combination of high Lp(a) and low CEC may be a residual risk for patients with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Future studies are needed to determine whether agents that decrease Lp(a) levels will increase CEC and thereby resolve part of the residual ASCVD risk in FH.

Exploring the association between hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in adults with familial hypercholesterolemia: insights from the HELLAS-FH registry

Abstract Aim While the link between hypertension and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is well-established, its impact on patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains less explored. This study aims to assess the association between hypertension and ASCVD in adult FH patients. Material-Methods: Participants from the HELLAS-FH registry were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of hypertension. We compared demographic information, lipid profile and history of ASCVD between the two groups. Results The study included 2367 FH patients, of whom 602 (25.4%) had a diagnosis of hypertension. Hypertensive patients were generally older and exhibited higher rates of ASCVD risk factors such as increased body mass index (28.6 vs 26.3 kg/m2), waist circumference (98 cm in men and 97 cm in women compared with 95 cm and 88 cm in non-hypertensive counterparts), and more prevalent history of smoking (44.2% vs 35.8%) (p<0.01 for all comparisons). Patients with hypertension had higher triglyceride levels (148 vs 123 mg/dL; p<0.05), lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (48 vs 53 mg/dL; p<0.05) while total cholesterol and non-HDL-C levels were not significantly different. When adjusted for age, sex, and major ASCVD risk factors, hypertension was significantly associated with prevalent coronary artery disease (CAD) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.10; 95% CI 2.29-4.19; p<0.001), ischemic stroke (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.02-3.49; p=0.04), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.62-6.13; p<0.001). Conclusions Hypertension is frequent and is independently associated with an increased risk of CAD, stroke, and PAD in patients with FH.

Healthcare resource utilisation and cost of care of systemic inflammation in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease

Abstract Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a chronic disease, progressed by localised or systemic inflammation (SI). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) facilitates the presence of SI and is associated with an increased risk of ASCVD. Previous studies have estimated that 1–2% of the population in Western countries suffer from both conditions. Purpose To investigates the healthcare costs and resource utilisation for individuals diagnosed with ASCVD and CKD, with or without SI. Method The study applied data from the Danish national health and administrative registries from 1994-2022. Patients with ASCVD were identified by ICD-10 codes. CKD was identified by eGFR [15-59mL/min/1.73m2], in the Register of Laboratory Results for Research (RLRR). The latter date of diagnosis of the two diseases were used as index date. CRP-test results were extracted from RLRR. Individuals with conditions associated with CRP-levels and tests observed in association with CVD events or antibiotic/antiviral drug use were excluded. Individuals with at least two valid CRP tests were included. If two CRP-test results ≥2mg/L to <20mg/L were observed less than six month apart, and within two years of index, the individuals were classified to have SI. Individuals diagnosed in the first year of available eGFR were excluded to ensure only incident individuals in the study. Outcomes included costs and use of inpatient (duration ≥12h) and outpatient (<12h) hospital care, cost of primary care and prescription drugs (adjusted to 2022 currency). Results were derived using linear regression models. Results A total of 19,162 individuals’ incident between 2012-2022 were identified – 68% had SI. SI individuals had higher healthcare costs from five years before to three years after index. Individuals generated a total healthcare cost of EUR 69,554 (SI) and EUR 39,540 (no SI) in the study period (difference EUR 30,014, p<0.001). In adjusted analysis, the attributable cost in the three years following index was 1.4 times higher for individuals with SI, compared to individuals with no SI (difference EUR 12,922, p<0.001). Inpatient care accounted for 85% of the cost. SI individuals had significantly more inpatient hospital contacts from four years before to five years after index (7 attributable contacts total, 4.7 attributable contacts after index, 1.2 times more, p<0.001), and more outpatient contacts from five years before to three years after index (6.2 attributable contacts total, 2.3 attributable contacts after index, 1.3 times more, p<0.001). The largest difference was found in the year following index, where the difference was EUR 7,666 (1.5 times higher, p<0.001) cost, 1.5 (1.3 times higher, p<0.001) inpatient hospital contacts, and 1.1 (1.3 times higher, p<0.001) outpatient hospital contacts (adjusted estimates). Conclusion Individuals with SI represent a significant burden to the healthcare system, both in terms of healthcare cost and healthcare resource utilisation.Total healthcare costsAttributable hospital contacts

Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography predicts 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background The ACC/AHA pooled cohort equations (PCE) calculates the 10-year primary risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), an indication to initiate primary prevention statin therapy in international guidelines. The validity of PCE is limited by its overestimation of risk in high-risk cohorts and an ethnic heterogeneity. Electrocardiography (ECG) has not been incorporated in current ASCVD risk estimation tools. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models are capable to capture patterns that are informative for cardiovascular prognosis. Purpose We explored the predictive value of a discrete-time survival model in 10-year ASCVD risk in comparison to PCE. Methods We developed an AI-ECG model to predict the 10-year ASCVD risk in an unselected secondary care population from the USA comprised of 1,163,401 ECGs from 189,539 patients. Data was split into training/validation and hold-out test sets by patient ID. Our AI-ECG model uses deep learning with a residual convolutional neural network with a discrete-time survival loss function to output subject-specific survival curves, accounting for both time to event and censorship (i.e., loss to follow up). We compared the performance of out AI-ECG model using a subset of outpatient data (n=4590) of the BIDMC dataset to PCE and ASCVD risk factors including systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, hypertension, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, and ethnicity. Performances were evaluated using cox survival analysis. Our AI-ECG model was externally validated in the UKB Biobank (UKB), where we compared the performance of our AI-ECG model to predictions of existing AI-ECG models such as the Stanford Estimator of Electrocardiogram Risk (SEER) model. Results Our AI-ECG successfully predicted future ASCVD events in individuals (C-index 0.721 (0.719-0.723), 5-year AUC 0.761 (0.758-0.763), and differentiated between high and low risk group with an adjusted HR of 2.33 (2.26-2.41). Upon internal validation our AI-ECG model showed a superior performance (C-index 0.679 (0.651-0.708)) than PCE (0.605 (0.577-0.634)) and all risk factors combined (C index 0.642 (0.613-0.672)). When combining AI-ECG predictions with all risk factors, the model showed additional predictive value (0.686 (0.657-0.715)) (Figure 1). Our AI-ECG model showed modest predictive value within the UKB dataset (C-index 0.655 (0.637-0.673)), but significantly outperformed the SEER model (C-index 0.547 (0.527-0.567), p <0.0001 for comparison with AIRE). Conclusion We have shown the potential of AI-ECG models in predicting future ASCVD risks. AI-ECG models demonstrated accurate discrete time survival prediction and good classification performance superior to that of the SEER model, as well as PCE and ASCVD risk factors. . Accurate risk assessment of ASCVD may help prevent adverse events in high risk subjects and save unnecessary pharmacological interventios in low risk subjects.Figure 1

Biomimetic porphyrin-lipid nanoparticles - novel nanoscale theranostics for multimodal imaging and therapy in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background High-density lipoprotein (HDL) mimetic nanoagents have unrealized potential for atherosclerosis theranostics. Porphyrin-lipid HDL mimetic nanoparticles (Por-HDL-NPs) incorporate a porphyrin-lipid conjugate which permits near infrared fluorescence imaging and positron emission tomography (PET) through chelation of Copper-64 (64Cu). The outer shell contains apolipoprotein A-I mimetic peptide R4F designed to interact with scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), enabling macrophage-targeting and therapeutic effects. Purpose To investigate the multimodal imaging, macrophage-targeting and therapeutic properties of Por-HDL-NPs and applications in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods In vitro, the cholesterol efflux capacity of PBS (control), reconstituted HDL (rHDL) and Por-HDL-NPs was determined in immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages (iBMDMs) loaded with [³H]-cholesterol. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assessed mRNA levels of inflammatory mediators. ELISAs and Western blotting measured changes in protein levels. Apolipoprotein (Apo)e-/- mice were fed high-cholesterol diet (HCD) for 6 weeks, for early-stage plaque, and 13 weeks for the unstable plaque model in which two partial stenoses were made in the right carotid artery. PET and fluorescence (IVIS, flow cytometry, microscopy) imaging identified Por-HDL-NPs in plaques, circulating and aortic cells. Histological techniques assessed plaque area and composition in aortic sinus and carotid artery sections. Results Por-HDL-NPs were internalized by iBMDMs, visualized via fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Por-HDL-NPs increased cholesterol efflux (49%, P<0.05), compared to rHDL. Por-HDL-NPs reduced macrophage mRNA levels of Il-1b (88%), Il-18 (54%) and Ccl5 (75%), and protein secretion of IL-1β (69%) and CCL5 (82%), P<0.05. Por-HDL-NPs suppressed inflammasome components Nlrp3 (69%) and Asc (36%), and activation of inflammatory transcription factor p65-NF-κB (53%), P<0.05. SR-BI siRNA knockdown and methyl-β-cyclodextrin, revealed that the anti-inflammatory properties of Por-HDL-NPs were independent of SR-BI and cholesterol efflux. In Apoe-/- mice, PET imaging showed 64Cu-Por-HDL-NPs localized in hearts and could detect increases in plaque size over time with HCD feeding. Por-HDL-NP fluorescence was detected within aortic sinus and unstable carotid plaques, co-localized with CD68+ macrophages. Por-HDL-NP-treated mice had smaller early-stage (22%) and unstable plaques (52%) than control PBS-treated mice, P<0.05. Por-HDL-NP mice had fewer circulating (32%) and aortic monocytes (81%), and a reduction in aortic arch Rela (26%), P<0.05. Conclusions Por-HDL-NPs present as potential nanoscale theranostics for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Por-HDL-NPs can detect plaques using multiple imaging modalities and exhibit atheroprotective effects.Atherosclerosis imaging with Por-HDL-NPs

Awareness and perceptions of cardiologists towards systemic inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A multi-national survey across 5 geographical regional sub-groups

Abstract Background Despite improvement in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (ASCVD+CKD), cardiovascular (CV) mortality remains unacceptably high. Evidence suggests that systemic inflammation (SI) is one of the key drivers for disease progression, yet clinical perceptions towards SI amongst cardiologists is poorly understood. Purpose FLAME-ASCVD (systemic inFLAMmation and rolE of hsCRP as a biomarker in AtheroSclerotic CardioVascular Disease) survey assessed cardiologist’s perceptions and awareness towards the role of SI and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in patients (pts.) with ASCVD+CKD. Overall results were reported earlier1 and here we present results by sub-groups across 5 geographical regions. Methods This was a multinational, cross-sectional, online survey-based study conducted during March-May 2023. Eligible participants were cardiologists (interventional and general) who treated ≥15 ASCVD+CKD pts./month and practiced for ≥3 years. To minimize selection bias, specific study objective was not disclosed until eligibility criteria was met. An online questionnaire was used. Analysis included 5 sub-groups: Europe (EU: France, Germany, Italy, UK), Asia Pacific (AP: Australia, India), East Asia (EA: China, Japan), LatAm (LA: Brazil), Middle East (ME: Saudi Arabia). Descriptive statistics were used. Results Of the 1755 respondents, 602 eligible cardiologists (~60/country) completed the survey across the EU (n=241), AP (n=121), EA (n=120), LA (n=60), and ME (n=60). Hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and lifestyle (diet/exercise) were consistently amongst the top 3-5 CV risk factors discussed with pts, across all regions. SI as a CV risk factor was discussed consistently less across regions (overall 10th at 43%, ³9th across regions, EU: 30%) (Table 1). Across regions, >70% of cardiologists acknowledged an intention to consider testing for SI, with the lowest being in the EU at 46%. Of those in the EU who did not consider testing, 53% (n=129) cited lack of medication as the reason. Across all regions, SI was consistently perceived as a risk factor for recurrent CV events (³65%) and residual inflammatory risk (47-85%), yet a noticeable proportion (52-92%) cardiologists acknowledged a need to learn more about SI in ASCVD+CKD (highest in ME, 92%). While overall (aided: 47% [n= 571]; unaided: 24%) considered hsCRP test for SI, few variations were observed (EA/AP/EU, aided: 55/52/33 and unaided: 22/24/03) (Table 2). Proven efficacy of hsCRP test, availability of medication for SI, and guideline recommendation were acknowledged as unmet needs to inform clinical care in ASCVD+CKD. Conclusion In this survey across regional sub-groups, discussion of SI as a CV risk factor was consistently low. Barring few noticeable variations in testing patterns in EU, perceptions towards SI were generally consistent. There is a need for better understanding and guidance on SI and hsCRP testing in practice.

Pregnancy complications and long-term risk of cardiovascular events in women with heart disease

Abstract Background/Introduction Women with congenital heart or acquired heart disease are at increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Pregnancy complications are established risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the general population, but their prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes in the population with congenital or acquired heart disease is unknown. Purpose To determine the frequency and prognostic value of pregnancy complications for the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in women with congenital or acquired heart disease. Methods This nationwide registry-based cohort study included women in Sweden with heart disease (pulmonary arterial hypertension, congenital heart disease or acquired valvular heart disease) with singleton births registered in the national Medical Birth Register between 1973 and 2014. Exposures of pregnancy complications (preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, preterm birth or birth of an infant small for gestational age) were collected from the Medical Birth Register, and cardiovascular outcomes (mortality and hospitalizations) from the Cause of Death Register and the National Inpatient Register. Cox regression models were performed with time-dependent covariates, to determine the possible prognostic value of the studied pregnancy complications for cardiovascular outcomes including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and arrythmias after adjustment for major confounding including smoking and body mass index. Results Among the total of 2,134,239 women included from the Medical Birth Register, 2,554 women with 5,568 singleton births were affected by heart disease. Preeclampsia/gestational hypertension affected 5.8% of pregnancies, preterm birth 9.7%, and birth of an infant small for gestational age 2.8%. Preterm birth (adjusted HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.38-2.64)) was associated with an increased risk of maternal all-cause mortality. Preeclampsia/gestational hypertension (adjusted HR 1.64 (95% CI 1.18-2.29)) and preterm birth (adjusted HR 1.56 (95% CI 1.19-2.04)) were associated with an increased risk of hospitalizations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Conclusions Pregnancy complications were frequent in women with congenital or acquired heart disease. With a median follow-up time of 22 years, preterm birth was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality, and preeclampsia/gestational hypertension and preterm birth were associated with cardiovascular morbidity. In women with heart disease, pregnancy complications may provide additional information for the risk assessment of future cardiovascular outcomes.Overview of study designPrevalence and risk estimation

Lp(a) testing and LDL-C levels among australian ASCVD patients in 2022: a cross-sectional study from the advara heartcare network (PREVAIL)

Abstract Background The proportion of Australians with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who meet secondary prevention low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets is uncertain, particularly among those undergoing lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) testing. This study describes the characteristics and achievement of LDL-C targets in ASCVD patients, both with and without Lp(a) tests. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed utilising secondary data from the Advara HeartCare cardiology network electronic medical records (EMR). Natural language processing (NLP) was used to extract data from clinical letters between 2011 and 2022 for patients attended during 2022. The 2022 baseline report captures clinical characteristics (i.e,. comorbidities, medications, lab values) in those with and without Lp(a) tests. Results In 2022, a total of 55,427 ASCVD patients were identified, predominantly male (65.1%) with a mean age of 71.2 (12.3). 61% had dyslipidaemia, 58.6% had hypertension, and 21.4% had diabetes. 72.7% were on statins, 19.4% on ezetimibe and 5.6% on PCSK9i. LDL-C information was available for 60.2% (33,381) of all ASCVD patients, with a mean LDL-C of 2.0 mmol/dL. 47.6% and 21.4% had LDL-C levels <1.8 mmol/dL and <1.4 mmol/dL respectively. Lp(a) test results were available for 2.6% (n=1,460) of ASCVD patients, with 87.7% having LDL-C information available, and a mean LDL-C of 1.9 mmol/dL. Among this group, 54.5% and 25.1% had LDL-C levels <1.8 mmol/dL and <1.4 mmol/dL respectively. Conclusions The study highlights suboptimal achievement of LDL-C targets among both ASCVD patients and those tested for Lp(a), underscoring the need to improve secondary prevention strategies and Lp(a) measurement in the ASCVD population.

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), affects approximately 18.6 million individuals worldwide, poses an important healthcare challenge. Despite the established efficacy of both high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) and moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) in ASCVD management, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. Purpose This meta-analysis seeks to assess the impact of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) versus high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) on LDL < 70mg/dl; Total Cholesterol; LDL; High Density Cholesterol (HDL) and triglycerides levels. Our goal is to synthesize the existing evidence and pinpoint areas that warrant further investigation. Methods A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe with high-intensity statin monotherapy in ASCVD patients. Results In the 13 included studies, involving 8,592 patients, of which 4,525 (52.67%) received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe treatment. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 219 weeks, with participant ages varying from 66 to 76.5 years in the MIS+EZT group and from 67 to 75.9 years in the HIS group. Analysis revealed significant MIS+EZT-associated with greater percentages in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) < 70 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.76; 95% CI [1.26; 2.45]; p=0.001; I²=73%), LDL reduction (Mean Difference (MD) -5.05 mg/dL; 95% CI [-9.02;-1.07]; p<0.013; I²=56%;); Total Cholesterol reduction (MD -7.91 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-14.90; -0.91]; p<0.027; I²=60%); Triglycerides reduction (MD -8.20 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-13.05; -3.35]; p<0.001; I²=2%;); There was no statistical difference between groups in Drug Adverse reaction (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.19; 95% CI [0.79; 1.78]; p=0.404; I²=0%); and Drug intolerance (RR 0.78 ; 95% CI [0.32; 1.92]; p=0.584; I²=35%). Conclusions This meta-analysis underscores the effectiveness of MIS+EZT in enhancing significant clinical outcomes for ASCVD patients, as evidenced by improvements in a greater percentage of patients achieved the LDL <70 target, LDL, Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides levels . Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups.

Enhancing primary prevention: the incremental predictive value of NTproBNP beyond ASCVD risk assessment

Abstract Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a global health challenge, prompting widespread use of conventional risk assessment tools (SCORE2 in Europe and the ASCVD Risk calculator in the United States) to guide preventive strategies. Emerging evidence indicates that NTproBNP may help refine risk stratification. We investigate whether measuring NTproBNP in primary prevention correlates with mortality and enhances prediction compared to conventional risk score stratification. Methods Utilizing National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (1999 to 2004) linked to the National Death Index, our cohort included individuals without a history of CVD at baseline and suitable for assessment of the ASCVD ACC/AHA risk score. Individuals were grouped based on computed 10-year risk (low: <5%; borderline: 5-7.5%; intermediate: 7.5-20%; high: ≥ 20%). NTproBNP levels were measured (Roche assay, cut-off > 125pg/mL considered as positive). Cox regression estimated the association between ASCVD risk categories, with or without NTproBNP, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Results Among 5257 adults, 47% male, mean age 54 ± 9.1 years, the mean 10-year ASCVD risk was 8.17 ± 8.2%, grouped as: low: 53.3%; borderline: 11.5%; intermediate: 23.9%; and high: 11.3%. NTproBNP > 125pg/mL was measured in 12.2%, 16%, 23.2% and 48.6% individuals, respectively (p < 0.001). Over 16.2 ± 3.4 years, all-cause and cardiovascular death was 22.3% and 5.6%, respectively. Compared to low-risk, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death increased to 2.85 (2.2-3.7), 5.6 (4.2-7.5), and 15.3 (11.7-19.9) for borderline, intermediate, and high-risk, respectively. A significant interaction with NTproBNP was observed (low: HR 1.96 (1.33-2.9); borderline: HR 2.5 (1.6-3.9); intermediate: HR 2 (1.6-2.6), high: HR 1.7 (1.4-2.2), p<0.01 for all interactions, see Fig. 1). For cardiovascular death, a significant interaction also occurred across the groups, but of higher magnitude in low and borderline groups (low: HR 3.2 (1.4-7.3); borderline: HR 5.5 (2.5-12.4), p < 0.001 for both). Conclusion Our findings suggest that NTproBNP provides incremental predictive value, approximately doubling the hazard of all-cause death across all risk categories, and more than tripling the hazard of CV death in low/borderline risk groups, compared to ASCVD risk alone. The integration of NTproBNP measurements into risk assessment strategies could refine primary prevention approaches.

Red cell distribution width as a predictor of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with statin intolerance: post-hoc analysis of the CLEAR Outcomes trial

Abstract Background Despite optimal lipid-lowering therapy there is up to 70% residual risk of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events, motivating further testing of alternative risk factors and disease pathways. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a simple and reproducible marker of heterogeneity of cell size in the peripheral blood. High RDW is associated with an increased risk of ASCVD and death, independent of established risk factors. Recent data suggest no significant impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on hsCRP or RDW. In CLEAR Outcomes, baseline hsCRP predicted risk for future cardiovascular (CV) events and death more strongly than elevated LDL-C. It has been shown that bempedoic acid (BA) reduces hsCRP, but its effects on RDW are unknown. Purpose To analyze the effect of BA on a 4-component composite of incident myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or cardiovascular death (MACE-4) and for CV death by baseline RDW, and to confirm the association of increased RDW with elevated risk of MACE. Methods A total of 13,970 individuals with statin intolerance, with or at high risk for ASCVD, were randomized in the multinational CLEAR Outcomes trial with a median follow up of 3.4 years. Compared to placebo, BA reduced mean LDL-C by 21% and median hsCRP by 22% at 6 months. Quartiles of increasing baseline RDW were assessed as predictors of future adverse events after adjustment for traditional risk factors, hsCRP, and randomized treatment assignment. Results Compared to placebo, BA reduced mean RDW by 0.28% at 6 months and 0.13% at 36 months (p<0.0001). There was a weak positive correlation between hsCRP and RDW at baseline (Figure 1). In the placebo group, higher baseline RDW was associated with an increase in the likelihood of MACE-4 and CV death, and the hazard ratios (HR) associated with a 1% increase in RDW after adjusting for covariates and hsCRP were 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.11) and 1.22 (1.15-1.29), respectively. When grouped by quartiles of baseline RDW, compared with a reference group with lowest RDW (<13.7%), there was a notable increase in the risk of MACE-4 and CV death among the higher quartiles in the placebo group (Table 1). Those in the 4th quartile demonstrated a 3-fold increase in the risk of CV death (HR, 3.03, 2.00-4.60). The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for BA vs placebo for MACE-4 were generally lower in individuals with elevated baseline RDW than in those in the first quartile [Q1: RDW≤13.7%; 0.96 (0.79-1.17), Q2: RDW 13.7%-14.4%; 0.81 (0.67-0.97), Q3: RDW 14.4%-15.2%; 0.90 (0.75-1.09), and Q4: RDW>15.2%; 0.84 (0.7-1.01)]. Conclusions In a large randomized controlled clinical trial setting, we confirmed an association between elevated RDW and MACE-4. Compared with placebo, BA demonstrated efficacy in reducing CV risk in patients with moderately increased RDW.Figure 1.Correlation of hsCRP and RDWTable 1.Risk of Outcome by RDW Quartile

Estimation of individual lifetime cardiovascular disease risk and treatment benefit in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the updated SMART-REACH2 model

Abstract Background The 2021 ESC Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Prevention in Clinical Practice recommend using (lifetime) risk to guide preventive treatment intensification. Purpose Updating and systematically recalibrating the SMART-REACH lifetime prediction model for the estimation of lifetime risk of recurrent CVD in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) to various European and international risk regions. Methods The updated SMART-REACH (i.e., SMART-REACH2) model was derived using data from 9,477 individuals between 40-90 years with coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, or abdominal aortic aneurysms included in the UCC-SMART cohort in whom 2,090 ASCVD events were observed during a median follow-up of 8.9 years (interquartile range 4.5–14.1). Coefficients for type of CVD, estimated glomerular filtration rate, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, duration of CVD, C-reactive protein, current smoking, and presence of diabetes were derived using sex-stratified cause-specific Cox models with age as the time axis, adjusted for the competing risk of non-CVD mortality. Lifetables were used to estimate 10-year and lifetime CVD-risk and CVD-free life expectancy. The SMART-REACH2 model was externally validated in 121,701 patients from the NOR-COR, Nor-COAST, HUNT3, SWEDEHEART, Bialystok PLUS/Polaspire, REACH-EU, and REACH non-EU (Asia, Japan, Latin America, North America) covering 43 countries. The model was recalibrated to specific risk regions based on the expected-observed ratios from representative cohorts. Performance was assessed by calibration of predicted and observed risk and Harrel’s C-statistic for discrimination. Results 16,689ASCVD events were observed in the external validation cohorts. The model was visually well calibrated for the various risk regions. The pooled C-statistic across risk regions was 0.665 [95% confidence interval 0.640-0.691], with adequate performance in the separate regions (Figure 1). Using SMART-REACH2 to estimate potential gain in CVD-free life expectancy upon treatment initiation showed varying projections. For example, two comparable 55-year-old males from the low-risk region and very high-risk region would gain an estimated 2.2 and 3.9 CVD-free life years as a result of smoking cessation (Figure 2). Conclusion(s) By using larger and more contemporary data sources, considering geographical differences, and extending the age range, the updated SMART-REACH2 model provides an improved algorithm for the estimation of lifetime risk and CVD-free life expectancy for individuals with established ASCVD, facilitating shared decision-making for cardiovascular prevention as recommended by the 2021 ESC Prevention of CVD guidelines.C-statistics across global risk regionsCase vignette

Enhancing primary prevention: the incremental predictive value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T beyond ASCVD risk assessment

Abstract Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a global health challenge, prompting widespread use of conventional risk assessment tools (SCORE2 in Europe and the ASCVD Risk calculator in the United States) to guide preventive strategies. Emerging evidence indicates that high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) may refine risk stratification. Objective We investigate whether measuring hsTnT in primary prevention correlates with mortality and enhances prediction compared to conventional risk score stratification. Methods Utilizing National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (1999 to 2004) linked to the National Death Index, our cohort included individuals without a history of CVD at baseline and suitable for assessment of the ASCVD ACC/AHA risk score. Individuals were grouped based on computed 10-year risk (low: <5%; borderline: 5-7.5%; intermediate: 7.5-20%; high: ≥ 20%). hsTroponin T levels were measured (Roche assay, 99 th percentile 22ng/L for men and 17ng/L for women). Cox regression estimated association between ASCVD risk categories, with or without hsTnT, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Results Among 5257 adults, 47% male, mean age 54 ± 9.1 years, the mean 10-year ASCVD risk was 8.17 ± 8.2%, grouped as: low: 53.3%; borderline: 11.5%; intermediate: 23.9%; and high: 11.3%. hsTnT above the 99 th percentile was measured in 1.1%, 2.7%, 4.9% and 13.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Over 16.2 ± 3.4 years, all-cause and cardiovascular death was 22.3% and 5.6%, respectively. Compared to low-risk, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death increased to 2.85 (2.2-3.7), 5.6 (4.2-7.5), and 15.3 (11.7-19.9) for borderline, intermediate, and high-risk, respectively. A significant interaction with hsTnT above 99 th percentile was observed (low: HR 3.5 (1.3-9.2); borderline: HR 4.75 (2.1-10.8); intermediate: HR 2.6 (1.8-3.7), high: HR 2.2 (1.7-2.9), p<0.01 for all interactions, see Fig. 1). For cardiovascular death, a significant interaction occurred in intermediate (HR 3.3 (2-5.4), p<0.001) and high-risk (HR 3.6 (2.2-6), p<0.001) groups. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hsTnT provides incremental predictive value, at least doubling the hazard of all-cause death across all risk categories, and tripling the hazard of CV death in intermediate and high-risk groups, compared to ASCVD risk stratification alone. The integration of troponin measurements into risk assessment strategies could refine primary prevention approaches.