This study aims to examine the 50/50 polypropylene/polyamide 6 (iPP/PA6) system molded under confined flow conditions, both in its original state and after being modified by two different interfacial agents. This study provides two main insights. Firstly, it focuses on a polymer blend close to phase inversion. Secondly, it investigates the impact of using two different types of interfacial agents (derived from polymer waste) to enhance the compatibility between iPP and PA6. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) has been employed to achieve these objectives. It is important to note that the investigation of the 50/50 iPP/PA6 system is a crucial focus predicted in previous studies, where a series of mechanical properties were evaluated using Box-Wilson design of experiments (DOEs) over the whole compositional range on the iPP/PA6 binary system. Thus, two interfacial modifiers, namely succinic anhydride (SA)-grafted atactic polypropylene with terminal, side, and bridge SA grafts (aPP-SASA) and succinyl-fluoresceine (SF) with bridge succinic anhydride grafting atactic polypropylene (aPP-SFSA), were employed. The authors obtained and characterized these agents. The quantity of these agents used in the blend was identified as a critical coordinate in prior studies conducted by the authors. The processing method used, compression molding under confined conditions, was chosen to minimize any orientation effect on the emerging morphology. All characterization procedures were performed on samples processed by contour machining to retain the blend morphologies as they emerged from the processing stage. Results from WAXS and SAXS synchrotron tests concluded there were no changes in the crystal morphology of the iPP or the PA6 in the blends nor any co-crystallization process throughout the compositional range. These findings, and the long period fits on the PP crystalline phase for the fifty/fifty blends we are discussing, will support the present DMA study. Finally, the efficiency of these interfacial modifiers has been concluded, even in this unfavorable scenario.
Read full abstract