Background: This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of antigen testing compared to RT-PCR in asymptomatic collegiate athletes and describes outcomes of a surveillance testing program.Methods: Quidel Sofia-2 SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Tests were performed daily prior to sport participation for high-risk of transmission (HROT) sports from September 29, 2020-February 28, 2021. Paired RT-PCR and antigen tests were performed at least once a week. Positive antigen tests were reflexed to RT-PCR.Findings: There were 1,931 athletes in 6 HROT sports. A total of 81,175 antigen and 42,187 RT-PCR tests were performed (including 23,463 paired antigen/RT-PCR surveillance tests). There were 346 athletes (17·9%) with a positive RT-PCR test during the study period. Of the positive RT-PCRs, 83 (4·4%) occurred on paired testing days. The clinical sensitivity of antigen tests varied with the frequency of RT-PCR testing and prevalence of COVID-19. With once-a-week PCR testing, the clinical sensitivity of antigen testing was 35·7% (95% CI: 17%, 60%) and specificity 99·8% (95% CI: 99·7%, 99·9%), after adjusting for school prevalence. Daily antigen testing was similar to PCR testing 2-3 times a week in identifying infection, however, antigen testing identified infection prior to the next scheduled PCR on 89 occasions. This resulted in a 234 days where potentially infectious athletes were isolated prior to when they would have been isolated with RT-PCR testing alone. Among athletes who had RT-PCR testing 4 times a week, daily antigen testing did not increase sensitivity. Two (14%) athletic-related outbreaks occurred but 86% of infections were community-acquired.Interpretation: Screening for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 can be successful using different strategies. Physical mitigation is important even with frequent screening.Funding Statement: This study was funded by Quidel Corporation. Declaration of Interests: Kimberly G. Harmon declares grants from American Medical Society for Sports Medicine for Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Outcomes in Athletes; grants from Pac-12 Conference as Research Development Director, she is also the President of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Foundation Board. All other authors have nothing to declare. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was considered exempt by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board. Data sharing agreements for data in the Pac 12 HAP were in place for all institutions.
Read full abstract