This paper presents observations of the F2-layer peak height (hmF2) compared with predictions from the IRI-2020 model over Southeast Asia. hmF2 is derived from the propagation factor at 3,000 km (M(3000)F2) using Shimazaki’s formula. M(3000)F2 data are manually scaled from three ionosonde stations: two stations in Thailand, namely Chiang Mai (CMU) and Chumphon (CPN), and one station in Indonesia, namely Kototabang (KTB). These ionosonde stations are located within the Southeast Asia equatorial ionization anomaly. The derived hmF2 from January 2009 to December 2018 is investigated for long-term variations and different solar activities (low in 2009 and high in 2015), and compared with three options of the IRI-2020 model: BSE-1979, AMTB-2013, and SHU-2015. Comparison results of the observed hmF2 at the three stations show asymmetrical variations, with hmF2 observed at Kototabang higher than at the other stations during the daytime and fluctuating at night. Results between the derived hmF2 (Observed) and predicted hmF2 (BSE-1979, AMTB-2013, SHU-2015) show similar diurnal variations and variability with solar activity. All three IRI options underestimated hmF2 during the daytime and overestimated it during nighttime, particularly around 22-02 LT. However, the BSE option shows the best prediction for all three stations, except in some times at Chiang Mai when the SHU option demonstrates the best prediction with the lowest RMSE. Therefore, we recommend the BSE-1979 option for the Southeast Asia region. Similarly, the SHU option can be selected for Chiang Mai, as it shows the best accuracy in certain years. These comparisons will contribute to improving the IRI model in the future.
Read full abstract