Asthma Control Questionnaire Score Research Articles

Dupilumab improves long-term outcomes in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe GINA-based type 2 asthma, irrespective of allergic status.

Previous research has shown greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with uncontrolled asthma and type 2 inflammation. We analyzed dupilumab's efficacy in patients from the TRAVERSE study with or without evidence of allergic asthma and type 2 inflammation per current GINA guidelines (≥150 eosinophils/μL or FeNO ≥20 ppb). All patients aged ≥12 years who rolled over from the placebo-controlled QUEST study (NCT02414854) to TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) received add-on dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks. We assessed annualized severe asthma exacerbation rates (AERs) and changes from parent-study baseline (PSBL) in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and 5-item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) score in patients with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma at PSBL. In TRAVERSE, dupilumab consistently reduced AER across all subgroups. By Week 96, dupilumab increased pre-bronchodilator FEV1 from PSBL by 0.35-0.41 L in patients receiving placebo during QUEST (placebo/dupilumab) and 0.34-0.44 L in those receiving dupilumab during QUEST (dupilumab/dupilumab) with an allergic phenotype at baseline. In patients without evidence of allergic asthma, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 improved by 0.38-0.41 L and 0.33-0.37 L, respectively. By Week 48, ACQ-5 scores decreased from PSBL by 1.63-1.69 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.74-1.81 (dupilumab/dupilumab) points across subgroups with allergic asthma, and 1.75-1.83 (placebo/dupilumab) and 1.78-1.86 (dupilumab/dupilumab) in those without. Long-term treatment with dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates and improved lung function and asthma control in patients with asthma with type 2 inflammation as per current GINA guidance and irrespective of evidence of allergic asthma.

Can we predict who will benefit most from biologics in severe asthma? A post-hoc analysis of two phase 3 trials

BackgroundIndividualized prediction of treatment response may improve the value proposition of advanced treatment options in severe asthma. This study aimed to investigate the combined capacity of patient characteristics in predicting treatment response to mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma.MethodsPatient-level data were pooled from two multinational phase 3 trials of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. We fitted penalized regression models to quantify reductions in the rate of severe exacerbations and the 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ5) score. The capacity of 15 covariates towards predicting treatment response was quantified by the Gini index (measuring disparities in treatment benefit) as well as observed treatment benefit within the quintiles of predicted treatment benefit.ResultsThere was marked variability in the ability of patient characteristics to predict treatment response; covariates explained greater heterogeneity in predicting treatment response to asthma control than to exacerbation frequency (Gini index 0.35 v. 0.24). Key predictors for treatment benefit for severe exacerbations included exacerbation history, blood eosinophil count, baseline ACQ5 score and age, and those for symptom control included blood eosinophil count and presence of nasal polyps. Overall, the average reduction in exacerbations was 0.90/year (95%CI, 0.87‒0.92) and average reduction in ACQ5 score was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.02‒0.35). Among the top 20% of patients for predicted treatment benefit, exacerbations were reduced by 2.23/year (95% CI, 2.03‒2.43) and ACQ5 score were reduced by 0.59 (95% CI, 0.19‒0.98). Among the bottom 20% of patients for predicted treatment benefit, exacerbations were reduced by 0.25/year (95% CI, 0.16‒0.34) and ACQ5 by -0.20 (95% CI, -0.51 to 0.11).ConclusionA precision medicine approach based on multiple patient characteristics can guide biologic therapy in severe asthma, especially in identifying patients who will not benefit as much from therapy. Patient characteristics had a greater capacity to predict treatment response to asthma control than to exacerbation.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01691521 (registered September 24, 2012) and NCT01000506 (registered October 23, 2009).

A Real-World Study of Achievement Rate and Predictive Factors of Clinical and Deep Remission to Biologics in Patients with Severe Asthma.

Recent advances in biologics have provided new insights into the clinical course of asthma, including disease modification, clinical remission (CR), and deep remission (DR). However, the extent to which biologics achieve CR and DR in severe asthma patients is poorly understood. To assess the achievement rate and predictors of CR and DR using long-term biologics, we retrospectively evaluated 54 severe asthma patients recently started on biologics. "CR" denotes the achievement of all three criteria: (1) absence of asthma symptoms, (2) no asthma exacerbations, and (3) no use of oral corticosteroids. DR denoted CR plus (4) normalized pulmonary function and (5) suppressed type 2 inflammation. CR and DR achievement rates were 68.5% and 31.5%, respectively. Compared with the non-deep remission group, the DR group had higher adult-onset asthma rates (94.1% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.078), shorter asthma duration (5 vs. 19 years, p = 0.006), and higher FEV1 (91.5% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, exacerbation frequency, or type 2 inflammation at baseline between groups. Asthma duration combined with FEV1 can stratify the achievement rates of CR and DR. the early introduction of biologics in severe asthma patients may help achieve CR and DR.

Characteristics of severe asthma patients on biologics: a real-life European registry study.

The use of anti-interleukin-5 (IL5) for severe asthma is based on criteria from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but in real-life patients might not fulfil the eligibility criteria but may benefit from biologics. We aimed to characterise patients starting anti-IL5(R) in Europe and evaluate the discrepancies between initiation of anti-IL5(R) in real life and in RCTs. We performed a cross-sectional analysis with data from the severe asthma patients at the start of anti-IL5(R) in the Severe Heterogeneous Asthma Research collaboration Patient-centred (SHARP Central) registry. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients starting anti-IL5(R) from 11 European countries within SHARP with the baseline characteristics of the severe asthma patients from 10 RCTs (four for mepolizumab, three for benralizumab and three for reslizumab). Patients were evaluated following eligibility criteria from the RCTs of anti-IL5 therapies. Patients starting anti-IL5(R) in Europe (n=1231) differed in terms of smoking history, clinical characteristics and medication use. The characteristics of severe asthma patients in the SHARP registry differed from the characteristics of patients in RCTs. Only 327 (26.56%) patients fulfilled eligibility criteria of all the RCTs; 24 patients were eligible for mepolizumab, 100 for benralizumab and 52 reslizumab. The main characteristics of ineligibility were: ≥10 pack-years, respiratory diseases other than asthma, Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤1.5 and low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. A large proportion of patients in the SHARP registry would not have been eligible for anti-IL5(R) treatment in RCTs, demonstrating the importance of real-life cohorts in describing the efficacy of biologics in a broader population of patients with severe asthma.

Association of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels with asthma control status in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

The long-term goals of asthma treatment are to achieve well control of symptoms and to minimize the future risk of asthma exacerbation. Identifying biomarkers for uncontrolled asthma is important for improving the asthma outcome. This study aimed to investigate the association of the levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) with asthma control status in specific asthma phenotype, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). A total of 136 adult asthmatics, including 47 asthmatics with AERD and 89 asthmatics with ATA, were enrolled. Plasma, sputum, and urine were collected at enrollment and the levels of EDN were measured by the K-EDN ELISA kit. Urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4 ) level was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS methods. Asthma control status was evaluated according to the GINA guideline, asthma control test and asthma control questionnaire scores. In the total study subjects, sputum levels of EDN as well as of urine and plasma EDN showed significantly higher levels in patients with uncontrolled asthma than in those with well-controlled or partly-controlled asthma (ANOVA, p<0.001); in patients with AERD, the sputum EDN levels showed significant correlations with ACT, ACQ, and AQLQ scores (p=0.010, r=-0.536, p=0.001, r=0.665, and p<0.001, r=-0.691, respectively), while no differences were noted in patients with ATA. Sputum EDN level was the only significant factor for ACT, ACQ, and AQLQ scores in patients with AERD (p=0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) in the multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, peripheral eosinophil count, and urine LTE4 . The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that sputum EDN can predict uncontrolled asthma with 80% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity for ACT≤19 (area under the ROC curve [AUC]=0.824, p=0.019); 71.4% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for ACQ≥1.5 (AUC=0.752, p=0.049) only in AERD patients. The level of sputum EDN may be a potential biomarker for identifying the asthma control status in patients with AERD.

Predictors of success/failure in the control of asthmatic smoking patients under conditions of clinical practice

Background Tobacco smoking directly affects the airway, where it triggers a very strong local inflammatory response. Objective To determine the predictors of improvement or worsening of asthma control in asthmatic smokers. Methods Observational, prospective, multicenter, single cohort study, carried out in the outpatient pulmonology departments with a follow-up period of 6 months. The treatment was adjusted according to the indications of standard clinical practice. Results 196 patients were included, with a mean age of 54.64 years.39% of the patients were active smokers. Interpreting an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score of ≤ 0.75 as asthma control, this was achieved in 30.2% of the cases. Patients with greater adherence were more likely to improve their asthma symptoms (p < 0.05), defined as a decrease in ACQ of 0.5 points or more at the final visit, while taking concomitant medication was a negative risk factor for improvement (p < 0.001). An eosinophil value >300 was a predictor for achieving control (p < 0.01). Patients treated with fluticasone propionate/formoterol versus those receiving budesonide/formoterol or beclomethasone/formoterol had a lower ACQ score (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion Asthmatic patients with active tobacco exposure and a higher number of anti-asthma medications are more likely to have poorer control. Correct adherence to treatment is the main intervention to be performed to achieve the control. An eosinophil count greater than 300 was the main predictor for achieving control. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol FP/FORM was associated with a greater likelihood of improving ACQ score.

Dupilumab long-term efficacy in patients with non–OCS–dependent asthma with and without evidence of allergic asthma

Objective The open-label extension TRAVERSE study (NCT02134028) assessed dupilumab long-term safety and efficacy in patients who completed Phase 2/3 dupilumab asthma studies. This post hoc analysis evaluated long-term efficacy in type 2 patients with and without evidence of allergic asthma who enrolled in TRAVERSE from Phase 3 QUEST (NCT02414854) and Phase 2b (NCT01854047) studies. Non–type 2 patients with evidence of allergic asthma were also assessed. Methods Unadjusted annualized exacerbation rates during parent study and TRAVERSE treatment period, and changes from parent study baseline in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and in 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were assessed in patients from QUEST and Phase 2b; change from parent study baseline in total IgE level was assessed in patients enrolled from Phase 2b. Results 2062 patients from Phase 2b and QUEST enrolled in TRAVERSE. Of these, 969 were type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma; 710 were type 2 without evidence of allergic asthma; and 194 were non–type 2 with evidence of allergic asthma at parent study baseline. In these populations, reductions in exacerbation rates observed during parent studies were sustained during TRAVERSE. Type 2 patients who switched from placebo arm to dupilumab in TRAVERSE experienced similar reductions in severe exacerbation rates, and improvements in lung function and asthma control to those patients who already received dupilumab during the parent study. Conclusion Dupilumab efficacy was sustained for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 inflammatory asthma, with or without evidence of allergic asthma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02134028

CT Mucus Score and 129Xe MRI Ventilation Defects After 2.5 Years’ Anti-IL-5Rα in Eosinophilic Asthma

We previously showed in patients with poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma that a single dose of benralizumab resulted in significantly improved Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) score and 129Xe MRI ventilation defect percent (VDP) 28days postinjection, and 129Xe MRI VDP and CT airway mucus occlusions were shown to independently predict this early ACQ-6 response to benralizumab. Do early VDP responses at 28days persist, and do FEV1, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and mucus plug score improve during a 2.5 year treatment period? Participants with poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma completed spirometry, ACQ-6, and MRI, 28days, 1 year, and 2.5 years after initiation of treatment with benralizumab; chest CT was acquired at enrollment and 2.5 years later. Of 29 participants evaluated at 28days post-benralizumab, 16 participants returned for follow-up while on therapy at 1 year, and 13 participants were evaluable while on therapy at 2.5 years post-benralizumab initiation. As compared with 28days post-benralizumab, ACQ-6 score (2.0 ± 1.4) significantly improved after 1 year (0.5 ± 0.6, P= .02; 95%CI, 0.1-1.1) and 2.5 years (0.5 ± 0.5, P= .03; 95%CI, 0.1-1.1). The mean VDP change at 2.5 years (-4%± 3%) was greater than the minimal clinically important difference, but not significantly different from VDP measured 28days post-benralizumab. Mucus score (3 ± 4) was significantly improved at 2.5 years (1 ± 1, P= .03; 95%CI, 0.3-5.5). In six of eight participants with previous occlusions, mucus plugs vanished or substantially diminished 2.5 years later. VDP (P< .001) and mucus score (P< .001) measured at baseline, but not fractional exhaled nitric oxide or FEV1, independently predicted ACQ-6 score after 2.5 years. In poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma, early MRI VDP responses at 28days post-benralizumab persisted 2.5 years later, alongside significantly improved mucus scores and asthma control.

Sputum Type 2 Markers Could Predict Remission in Severe Asthma Treated With Anti-IL-5

Biotherapies targeting IL-5 allow a tangible improvement of asthma. However, all patients do not respond the same way to these treatments. Even if high blood eosinophil counts seem to be associated with a reduction in exacerbations with treatment targeting IL-5, we lack biomarkers for the prediction of remission after these very expensive treatments. Are there biomarkers of remission after therapy targeting IL-5 in the sputum of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma? This observational study included 52 patients with severe asthma initiated with anti-IL-5 therapy and recruited from the asthma clinic of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Liege, Belgium. Remission was defined as patients who combined the following at 1 year after therapy: no chronic treatment with oral corticosteroids; no exacerbation; asthma control questionnaire score< 1.5, asthma control test score > 19, or both; FEV1 of≥ 80%predicted, improvement of FEV1 of≥ 10%, or both; and a blood eosinophil count< 300 cells/μL. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX), IgE, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, IL-33, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and eotaxin-1 levels were measured in the sputum of these patients before anti-IL-5 treatment. Among the 52 patients, 11 were classified as being in remission. These patients were characterized by higher sputum eosinophil, macrophage, and lymphocyte counts, whereas the sputum neutrophil percentage was lower than in the nonremission group. In addition, the sputum eotaxin-1, TSLP, IL-5, EPX, and IgE protein levels were higher at baseline in the remission group compared with the nonremission group. Univariate regression analysis revealed that male vsfemale sex, sputum neutrophil percentage, eotaxin-1, IL-5, and EPX were potential predictors of remission. Sputum type 2 markers seemed to be potentially predictive of remission after anti-IL-5 therapy in a cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. These results need validation on a larger cohort.

Adding a biologic to allergen immunotherapy increases treatment efficacy.

The application of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in combination with biological agents has been found to increase both the safety and efficacy of the desensitisation procedure in patients with food and insect venom allergy. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of AIT in patients with house dust mite (HDM)-driven asthma treated with and without omalizumab. The study was a placebo-controlled, three-armed, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre trial that included 52 patients with HDM-driven asthma. Only patients with monosensitisation to HDM were included. The study compared three patterns of therapy: omalizumab alone, HDM subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT-HDM)+ omalizumab, and SCIT alone. The main outcomes were evaluate the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, number of asthma exacerbations and reduction in the daily dose of inhaled steroids during 12 months of observation. All variants of therapy led to significantly improved ACQ scores and reduction of asthma exacerbations in all study groups after 12 months of treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids in the group with omalizumab alone (650±150 µg versus 500±50 µg for p=0.003) or SCIT-HDM+omalizumab (550±250 µg versus 375±75 µg for p=0.001) was observed, favouring the latter group. The efficacy of AIT for HDM-driven asthma is significantly increased by the combination of allergen vaccine with omalizumab.

Clinical response to benralizumab can be predicted by combining clinical outcomes at 3 months with baseline characteristics.

Benralizumab is highly effective in many, but not all, patients with severe asthma. Baseline characteristics alone are insufficient to predict an individual's probability of long-term benralizumab response. The objectives of the present study were to: 1) study whether parameters at 3 months, in addition to baseline characteristics, contribute to the prediction of benralizumab response at 1 year; and 2) develop an easy-to-use prediction tool to assess an individual's probability of long-term response. We assessed the effect of benralizumab treatment in 192 patients from the Dutch severe asthma registry (RAPSODI). To investigate predictors of long-term benralizumab response (≥50% reduction in maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose or annual exacerbation frequency) we used logistic regression, including baseline characteristics and 3-month Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) score and maintenance OCS dose. Benralizumab treatment significantly improved several clinical outcomes, and 144 (75%) patients were classified as long-term responders. Response prediction improved significantly when 3-month outcomes were added to a predictive model with baseline characteristics only (area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.85 versus 0.72, p=0.001). Based on this model, a prediction tool using sex, prior biologic use, baseline blood eosinophils, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and at 3 months OCS dose and ACQ-6 was developed which classified patients into three categories with increasing probability of long-term response (95% CI): 25% (3-65%), 67% (57-77%) and 97% (91-99%), respectively. In addition to baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes at 3 months contribute to the prediction of benralizumab response at 1 year in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Prediction tools as proposed in this study may help physicians optimise the use of costly biologics.

Different clinical characteristics of current smokers and former smokers with asthma: a cross-sectional study of adult asthma patients in China

Smoking is a trigger for asthma, which has led to an increase in asthma incidence in China. In smokers, asthma management starts with smoking cessation. Data on predictors of smoking cessation in Chinese patients with asthma are scarce. The objective of this study was to find the differences in clinical characteristics between current smokers and former smokers with asthma in order to identify factors associated with smoking cessation. Eligible adults with diagnosed asthma and smoking from the hospital outpatient clinics (n = 2312) were enrolled and underwent a clinical evaluation, asthma control test (ACT), and pulmonary function test. Information on demographic and sociological data, lung function, laboratory tests, ACT and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) scores was recorded. Patients were divided into a current smokers group and a former smokers group based on whether they had quit smoking. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors associated with smoking cessation. Of all patients with asthma, 34.6% were smokers and 65.4% were former smokers, and the mean age was 54.5 ± 11.5 years. Compared with current smokers, the former smokers were older, had longer duration of asthma, had higher ICS dose, had more partially controlled and uncontrolled asthma, had more pack-years, had smoked for longer, and had worse asthma control. The logistic regression model showed that smoking cessation was positively correlated with age, female sex, pack-years, years of smoking, partially controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma, and body mass index (BMI), but was negatively correlated with ACT, FEV1, FEV1%predicted, and widowed status. More than 30% of asthma patients in the study were still smoking. Among those who quit smoking, many quit late, often not realizing they need to quit until they have significant breathing difficulties. The related factors of smoking cessation identified in this study indicate that there are still differences between continuing smokers and former smokers, and these factors should be focused on in asthma smoking cessation interventions to improve the prognosis of patients with asthma.

Characterization and cluster analyses of elderly asthma in comparison with nonelderly patients with asthma in Japan

BackgroundAsthma is a heterogeneous disease with multiple phenotypes that are useful in precision medicine. As the population ages, the elderly asthma (EA, aged ≥ 65 years) population is growing, and EA is now a major health problem worldwide. ObjectiveTo characterize EA and identify its phenotypes. MethodsIn adult patients with asthma (aged ≥ 18 years) who had been diagnosed with having asthma at least 1 year before study enrollment, 1925 were included in the NHOM-Asthma (registered in UMIN-CTR; UMIN000027776), and the data were used for this study, JFGE-Asthma (registered in UMIN-CTR; UMIN000036912). Data from EA and non-EA (NEA) groups were compared, and Ward's minimum-variance hierarchical clustering method and principal component analysis were performed. ResultsEA was characterized by older asthma onset, longer asthma duration and smoking history, more comorbidities, lower pulmonary function, less atopic, lower adherence, and more hospital admissions because of asthma. In contrast, the number of eosinophils, total immunoglobulin E level, oral corticosteroid use, and asthma control questionnaire scores were equivalent between EA and NEA. There were 3 distinct phenotypes in EA, which are as follows: EA1: youngest, late onset, short duration, mild; EA2: early onset, long duration, atopic, low lung function, moderate; and EA3: oldest, eosinophilic, overweight, low lung function, most severe. The classification factors of the EA phenotypes included the age of onset and asthma control questionnaire—6. Similarities were observed between EA and NEA phenotypes after principal component analysis. ConclusionThe EA in Japan may be unique because of the population's high longevity. Characterization of EA phenotypes from the present cohort indicated the need for distinct precision medicine for EA. Trial RegistrationJFGE-Asthma registered in UMIN-CTR (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/); UMIN000036912.

Real-World clinical outcomes of asthma patients switched from reslizumab to mepolizumab or benralizumab.

Approximately 3%-10% of asthma patients will remain uncontrolled despite maximum, optimal conventional therapy. Treatment of severe refractory asthma often involves the use of targeted biological therapy. Randomised controlled trials have shown improvements in clinical parameters with these treatments but real-world data is lacking. The clinical parameters, frequency of exacerbations, number of hospital admissions, asthma control questionnaire score (ACQ), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose of twenty asthma patients switched from reslizumab to benralizumab or mepolizumab at 1 year prior and 6 months after switching were compared, with adjustments for time. The mean frequency of exacerbations (0.35 v 0.3) and the mean ACQ were essentially unchanged (1.6 v 1.5) following the switch. The number of hospital admissions was one in the 6 months post switch compared to one in 1-year pre switch. 25% of patients were on maintenance OCS before and after switching but one patient required an increased dose post switch resulting in an increase in the mean maintenance OCS dose (1.6 mg to 2.4 mg). The mean FEV1 was unchanged (80% v 77.9%) six months post switching. Regarding asthma control (n = 19), 47.4% were controlled pre and post switch (ACQ < 1.5), 36.8% remained uncontrolled despite switching, 10.5% improved control while 5.3% disimproved. We present real-world clinical outcomes of asthma patients switched from reslizumab to either benralizumab or mepolizumab without a loss of clinical effectiveness in the majority.

Dysfunctional breathing and its impact on asthma control in children and adolescents

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) has been shown to negatively affect asthma control in adults, but for children and adolescents, the knowledge is scarce. DB is among others characterized by dyspnea and hyperventilation. The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ) is often used as a marker for DB. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate the prevalence of DB in patients with asthma in a pediatric outpatient clinic and to determine the impact of DB on asthma control. Patients between 10 and 17 years were invited to complete the NQ and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and report the use of beta2 agonist (β2). Spirometry data and prescribed asthma medications were noted from the patient record. Three hundred and sixty-three patients (180 boys) completed the survey. Sixty-seven patients (18%) scored ≥23 points in the NQ predicting DB. The DB group was older (median (range)) 15.6 (10.5-17.9) vs. 13.7 (10.0-17.9) years) (p < .01), and girls were overrepresented (84%) (p < .01). FEV1% exp. was higher in the DB group (mean (SD)) (89.4 (9.0) vs. 85.7 (11.8)) (p < .02). ACQ score (median (range)) (2.0 (0-4) vs. 0.6 (0-3.4)) (p < .01) and the use of β2 (median (range)) (2 (0-56) vs. 0 (0-20) puffs/week) (p < .01) were higher. Inhaled corticosteroid dose (mean (SD) (416 (160) vs. 420 (150) mcg) and the use of a second controller were equal between the groups. Dysfunctional breathing was a frequent comorbidity, especially in adolescent girls. DB correlated with poorer asthma control and higher use of β2 and may be an important cofactor in difficult-to-treat asthma.

A comparative study of efficacy and safety of montelukast versus acebrophylline as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in bronchial asthma

Background: Non-responding to standard doses of inhalational corticosteroids (ICS) remains a challenge in the management of asthma, requiring add-on therapy. Acebrophylline, a theophylline derivative, with multiple mechanisms of action and properties, could work as a suitable alternative to montelukast as an add-on therapy. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of montelukast versus acebrophylline as an add-on therapy to ICS in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Materials and Methods: One hundred bronchial asthma patients, fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria, were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 50 each to receive either oral montelukast 10 mg OD or oral acebrophylline 200 mg OD with budesonide. Inhaled salbutamol was permitted as rescue medication during acute exacerbations. Primary outcome measures were change in pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) scores at baseline and 12 weeks. Adverse events, if any were recorded. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the improvement of mean PFT parameters at the end of 12 weeks in the montelukast group (P &lt; 0.001), but not in acebrophylline group (P = 0.253). Montelukast was more efficacious than acebrophylline in improving PFT parameters at 6 and 12 weeks. Both treatment modalities significantly improved ACQ score at 12 weeks (P &lt; 0.001), the difference between two groups was not statistically significant (1.4 ± 0.53 in Group A vs. 1.32 ± 0.44 in Group B, P = 0.436). No significant adverse effects were seen in both groups. Conclusion: Montelukast, with low-dose ICS, had better efficacy over acebrophylline. Both montelukast and acebrophylline improved the quality of life in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma patients by decreasing nocturnal symptoms and the need for rescue medications.

Comorbidities Modify the Phenotype but Not the Treatment Effectiveness to Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

Comorbidities in severe asthma are common and contribute to disease burden. The severe asthma phenotype and treatment response can be impacted by comorbid conditions. Real-world data on the use of mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) in the presence of comorbidities are needed to inform clinical practice. To investigate the impact of comorbid conditions on baseline phenotype in patients with SEA and assess the mepolizumab treatment effect by comorbidity status in SEA. Patients enrolled in the Australian Mepolizumab Registry (n= 309) were classified into subgroups defined by the presence or absence of comorbidities, including nasal polyps, aspirin-exacerbated airway disease, asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO), fungal sensitization, and obesity. Patient baseline characteristics were compared, and the impacts of comorbidity on phenotype, identified by differences in patient age and/or baseline biomarker levels and/or asthma severity, were assessed. The mepolizumab treatment effects on clinical and biological outcomes at 12 months were assessed. Across comorbidity subgroups, mepolizumab reduced the rate of clinically significant exacerbations (range: 47%-77%), maintenance oral corticosteroid use (dose reduction: 4.2-13.3 mg/d), and improved symptom control (Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score: 1.9-2.4 point reduction) and lung function (mean: 3.4-9.3 post-bronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second). Peripheral blood eosinophils were reduced (mean: 480-780 cells/μL). Comorbidities (nasal polyps, obesity, ACO, and fungal sensitization) modified the baseline phenotype. Mepolizumab treatment is associated with comparable clinical improvements in patients with SEA and comorbidities. Mepolizumab effectively minimizes the disease impact and corticosteroid burden in patients with SEA.

Efficacy of an education session by pharmacists for patients with asthma: A randomised controlled trial

Background: Asthma education interventions are provided by pharmacists in many developed countries, although it is still a matter of concern in developing countries. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist education sessions on asthma patients. Methods: A three-month single-blinded randomised control trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of pharmacist education sessions on asthma patients. The 60-minute pharmacist sessions provided education to patients about asthma management. The primary outcome of the study was to measure the change in the score of the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ). Results: The 82 participants who completed the study were grouped into two groups. A clinically significant improvement of p&gt;0.5 in the ACQ score was found in the symptoms and environment domains in the intervention group. A significant difference in the ACQ score was also found between the two groups (p=&lt;0.05) after 1 and 2 months of intervention. The proportion of patients with controlled asthma increased from 26 (63.4%) to 31 (75.6%) after the second follow-up in the intervention group. Furthermore, a significant increase (p=0.043) in the AQLQ score was noticed from 4.834 at baseline to 5.433 after the intervention. Conclusion: This study concluded that short-time pharmacist education sessions could improve patients asthma status and quality of life.

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma. We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma. The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Ten randomized controlled trials (n= 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL. In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

Dyslipidemia Is Associated With Worse Asthma Clinical Outcomes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Dyslipidemia has been widely documented to be associated with cardiovascular disease, and recent studies have found an association with asthma prevalence. However, longitudinal studies investigating the relationships between dyslipidemia, asthma phenotypes, and future asthma exacerbations (AEs) are lacking. To investigate the relationships between dyslipidemia, asthma phenotypes, and AEs. This study used an observational cohort study design with a 12-month follow-up. All subjects underwent serum lipid measurement, and they were then classified into 2 groups: the normal-lipidemia group and the dyslipidemia group. Demographic and clinical information and details regarding pulmonary function and asthma phenotypes at baseline were collected. All patients were followed up regularly to assess AEs. Associations of dyslipidemia with airway obstruction and asthma phenotypes were assessed at baseline, whereas dyslipidemia and AEs were assessed longitudinally. A total of 477 patients with asthma were consecutively enrolled in this study. At baseline, the dyslipidemia group (n= 218) had a higher proportion of uncontrolled asthma, defined by the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score (≥1.5). Furthermore, dyslipidemia was associated with severe asthma, nonallergic asthma, asthma with fixed airflow limitation, and older adult asthma phenotypes at baseline. In addition, dyslipidemia was associated with increased frequencies of severe AEs and moderate to severe AEs during the 12-month follow-up. In sensitivity analyses, after excluding the patients who were receiving statins, results did not differ significantly from those of the main analysis. We identified the clinical relevance of dyslipidemia, which is associated with specific asthma phenotypes and increased AEs, independent of other components of metabolic syndrome. These findings highlight the importance of considering dyslipidemia as an "extrapulmonary trait" in asthma management.