The incorporation of 4D seismic data can be done at model characterization and data assimilation steps, the latter applying the observed data to update the model properties. In this work, we evaluate the impact of 4DS data in the production forecasting results investigating the influence on these distinct steps. We employ a prior model set generated without 4DS data and another prior set with 4DS in the characterisation. We perform, then, the DA in three different ways: (1) using only well history data with a prior set without 4DS; (2) using well history and 4DS data with this same prior set; and (3) using well history and 4DS data with the prior set generated with 4DS data. We employ the Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation method for data assimilation and implement a procedure to adjust the well productivities and injectivities after DA. This work assesses the differences among the three DA cases in terms of field oil production forecasting, model attributes and model misfits, the latter evaluated in terms of the assimilated data set and of a different data set for validation purposes only. We apply the work to a real heavy oil turbiditic field located offshore Brazil. The case application demonstrates a successful data assimilation study on a real field integrating well history and 4DS data. The results show that the utilisation of 4DS in both model characterisation and DA steps brought value to the final uncertainty reduction results. The posterior model ensemble with 4DS data in model characterization and DA provided the lowest model misfits overall to the full data set, being the best choice for application in field production forecasting studies. The case without 4DS data provided significantly more pessimistic field oil production than the cases with 4DS, making very evident the importance of employing 4DS at uncertainty reduction workflows.