This presentation aims to improve forensic assessment of multiple possible causes of children’s resistance or refusal to have contact with their parents. The assessment of multiple possible causes is necessary in both child custody/parenting time cases and in child welfare cases. Three possible causes provide reasonable justifications for parent rejection. They are all related to child maltreatment: child sexual abuse, psychological maltreatment, and adverse parenting. One provides an unreasonable justification for rejecting a parent: alienation. There will be: 1) a review of scientifically validated factors associated with each of the child maltreatment causes and proposed, but not scientifically validated, factors associated with alienation; 2) an analysis of the risk of misinterpreting children’s factors as evidence of alienation when the children’s behaviors could just as logically indicate defensiveness or a cry for help in response to undetected abuse; and 3) an analysis of misinterpreting parent behaviors as evidence of alienation when the behaviors could just as logically indicate protective parenting. A protocol will be presented, the Multidimensional Assessment of Contact Resistance/Refusal (Multimodal Assessment Project [MAP]), for assessing the 4 possible causes. The MAP provides specific behavioral factors for each cause, discusses the need to organize multidimensional causal assessment into a sequence that puts safety first, explains the need to rule out child maltreatment before assessing alienation or identifying it as a primary cause, discusses how to relate the behavioral factors to the totality of the evidence in the case, and explains how to formulate expert opinions that represent the complexity of the case. Forensic evaluators should resist oversimplified assessments of causes of contact resistance/refusal that lead to oversimplified identification of alienation cases and oversimplified remedies. Forensic evaluators should help decision-makers base their decisions on adequate evidence and reasoning rather than on their own version of Complexity Resistance and Refusal (CRR).