Assertive Treatment Research Articles

Evaluation of an assertive outreach intervention for problem families: intervention methods and early outcomes

Families who experience a chronic complex of socio-economic and psycho-social problems are hard to reach with mainstream care. Evidence exists that the core of this problem lies in a problematic interaction between this type of family and current systems of care. The adults and children involved have needs in multiple domains, while the care system is fragmented and highlights well-defined requests for help. To improve access to this target group, an assertive outreach intervention was implemented into the preventive child healthcare system in The Netherlands. Evaluation research was carried out to get a detailed insight into the content of this intervention. Also, early outcomes were examined. Information was gathered by interviews, attending meetings on method development, analysing registration forms and a survey on client satisfaction. Five intervention stages were identified: case finding, making contact, sustaining contact, developing a family plan and linking (arranging for services to be delivered). Practical support was used to build rapport and clear the way to the uptake of follow-up help. The professionals delivering the intervention need a broad range of competencies to establish a working relation with the families and to link them to care and services. A good care network across professionals from various organisations must exist to provide a variety of linking options. Early outcomes indicate that professionals were able to get in touch with the families within a mean of 13.2 days. Goals of the intervention were mainly practical support (73%), starting new assistance for a child (63%) and starting new assistance for a parent (43%). Linking to care and services was attained in the majority of the cases and parents expressed satisfaction. The findings indicate that the studied intervention is a promising one. Some potent components can be indicated: the outreach approach, practical support, maximising participation of the family and building bridges between the family and (in)formal support and assistance.

The effect of five years versus two years of specialised assertive intervention for first episode psychosis - OPUS II: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe Danish OPUS I trial randomized 547 patients with first-episode psychosis to a two-year early-specialised assertive treatment programme (OPUS) versus standard treatment. The two years OPUS treatment had significant positive effects on psychotic and negative symptoms, secondary substance abuse, treatment adherence, lower dosage of antipsychotic medication, and a higher treatment satisfaction. However, three years after end of the OPUS treatment, the positive clinical effects were not sustained, except that OPUS-treated patients were significantly less likely to be institutionalised compared with standard-treated patients. The major objective of the OPUS II trial is to evaluate the effects of five years of OPUS treatment versus two years of OPUS treatment.MethodsThe OPUS II trial is designed as a randomized, open label, parallel group trial with blinded outcome assessment. Based on our sample size estimation, 400 patients treated in OPUS for two years will be randomized to further three years of OPUS treatment versus standard treatment. The specialized assertive OPUS treatment consists of three core elements: assertive community treatment, psycho-educational family treatment, and social skills training.DiscussionIt has been hypothesized that there is a critical period from onset up to five years, which represents a window of opportunity where a long-term course can be influenced. Extending the specialized assertive OPUS treatment up to five years may allow the beneficial effects to continue beyond the high-risk period, through consolidation of improved social and functional outcome.Trial registrationClinical Trial.gov NCT00914238

Intervenção precoce na psicose: primeiro episódio psicótico e período crítico.

Besides intervention in prepsychotic period, early intervention in psychosis includes interventions done after the onset of the first-episode psychosis, namely psychopharmacological and psychosocial phase-specific intervention. The main aim is to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and to ensure that besides remission of the symptoms there is also a psychosocial recovery. Many centers set up an assertive and integrated early intervention program, involving an active search of patients with a treatment that includes antipsychotic medication, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, family and vocational interventions. The authors of this review explain the concepts and main studies that support this kind of treatment in early psychosis. The results of published data show that is possible to reduce the DUP and improve the clinical and functional outcomes with this intervention. Critical period hypothesis proposes that deterioration occurs aggressively in the first 2 to 5 years of early psychosis, so it is crucial to intervene in this period to ensure a functional recovery. Cost-benefit ratio seems to be favorable to early intervention model, with reduction of in-stay period, which is an important component of the direct costs of psychotic illness. Early intervention service model organization is also reviewed by the authors of this research. The results of many studies show favorable outcomes for the integrative early intervention and so many countries included it in their political mental health directives and attributed funds for early intervention in psychosis.

Programmes pour premiers épisodes psychotiques : une revue systématique de la littérature

Schizophrenia and its related disorders are prevalent, disabling and costly. Recent longitudinal studies found that the first two to five years of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders are characterised by symptomatic and functional deterioration. This led to the hypothesis of the existence of a critical period in the treatment of individuals suffering from psychosis: an assertive intervention during the first two to five years of psychosis could improve long term outcomes and prevent the emergence of psychosocial deficits.The objectives of this review are to describe different specialised first-episode psychosis services (FEP) and report their results at different times of follow-up in order to determine what specific approaches they should include, the optimal duration of treatment, and the characteristics of the patients who benefit the most from such programs.We systematically reviewed psycINFO and MEDLINE in search of studies dealing with efficacy or efficiency of specialized FEP programs. We only included research that had at least one comparison group and excluded those dealing with primary prevention of psychosis or prodromal interventions.Five, all Scandinavian, programs and their results at different follow-up times are presented. The Parachute project started in 1994 in Sweden with the objectives to use low dosages of antipsychotics (AP), to minimize hospitalisations, to offer specialized individual and familial psychotherapy, and to assure continuity of care during a five-year period. It compared the Parachute study group with a prospective and a historical group. At three years, the Parachute group had spent less days hospitalised (but more days in a crisis home), was associated with a lower percentage of patients receiving disability allowances and had a trend toward better efficiency than the control groups. The Danish National schizophrenia project started in 1997 and included 16 centers that offered a two-year specialised FEP treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TU), treatment as usual enriched with support psychodynamic psychotherapy (SPP) and integrated treatment (IT). At the end of the two-year treatment period, patients receiving IT had significantly less positive symptoms, less negative symptoms and better scores in the global assessment scale (GAS) than TU. The Opus project started in 1998 in Denmark. It is a randomised, controlled study comparing a two-year FEP integrated treatment (IT) with standard treatment (ST). After the two-year period, patients were transferred to ST and were assessed at five years (three years after the end of the IT). At the end of the active phase of treatment, patients in IT group had better positive, negative and GAS scores, used lower dosages of AP and used less illicit drugs. At five-years, the only difference between IT and ST groups was that the IT group was associated with more patients living independently. The Open Dialogue project started in 1994 in Finland. It compared conventional treatment (CT) with acute psychosis integrated treatment (API) and Open dialogue approach in acute psychosis treatment (ODAP). At the two-year assessment, API and ODAP groups had less relapses, spent less days hospitalised, used less AP and had better GAS scores than CT. The ODAP group had better scores on the brief psychiatric rating scale than the API group and was associated with fewer patients receiving disability allowances than the CT group. At five-years, there was no difference in the outcomes between API and ODAP, but the authors suggest that the ODAP group was more efficient, because it had similar results as the API group while using less resources. The Soteria Nacka project started in 1990 in Sweden. It compared patients receiving only outpatient specialised FEP treatment (CE) with those receiving outpatient and crisis home specialised FEP treatment (CC). At the five-year assessment, the CC group had better GAS scores than the CE group, but only for patients suffering from a psychosis in the schizophrenia-spectrum. Also, less patients in the CC group used AP and when they did, they had lower dosages. The CC group was also associated with more patients working or studying at the end of the five-year follow-up and with significantly more patients in remission compared to the CE group. Finally, the Opus project, Parachute project and Soteria Nacka found that patients suffering from a psychosis in the schizophrenia-spectrum are those who benefit the most from the specialized, comprehensive, FEP-programs.The programs specialised in the treatment of FEP show encouraging results mainly during their active phase. This review suggests that a two-year treatment period is not long enough to enable patients to maintain the improvements obtained during the active phase of an integrated treatment. Future studies should aim to determine--the characteristics of the patients that most benefit from--the specific interventions that should be included in and--the ideal duration of treatment of the comprehensive FEP programs.

Assessing the efficacy of a modified assertive community-based treatment programme in a developing country

BackgroundA number of recently published randomized controlled trials conducted in developed countries have reported no advantage for assertive interventions over standard care models. One possible explanation could be that so-called "standard care" has become more comprehensive in recent years, incorporating some of the salient aspects of assertive models in its modus operandi. Our study represents the first randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of a modified assertive treatment service on readmission rates and other measures of outcome in a developing country.MethodsHigh frequency service users were randomized into an intervention (n = 34) and a control (n = 26) group. The control group received standard community care and the active group an assertive intervention based on a modified version of the international model of assertive community treatment. Study visits were conducted at baseline and 12 months with demographic and illness information collected at visit 1 and readmission rates documented at study end. Symptomatology and functioning were measured at both visits using the PANSS, CDSS, ESRS, WHO-QOL and SOFAS.ResultsAt 12 month follow-up subjects receiving the assertive intervention had significantly lower total PANSS (p = 0.02) as well as positive (p < 0.01) and general psychopathology (p = 0.01) subscales' scores. The mean SOFAS score was also significantly higher (p = 0.02) and the mean number of psychiatric admissions significantly lower (p < 0.01) in the intervention group.ConclusionsOur results indicate that assertive interventions in a developing setting where standard community mental services are often under resourced can produce significant outcomes. Furthermore, these interventions need not be as expensive and comprehensive as international, first-world models in order to reduce inpatient days, improve psychopathology and overall levels of functioning in patients with severe mental illness.

Psychosocial child adjustment and family functioning in families reached with an assertive outreach intervention

Families who experience a chronic complex of socio-economic and psychosocial problems are hard to reach with mainstream care. Evidence exists that the core of this problem is a problematic interaction between this type of family and current systems of care and services. To improve access to problem families, an assertive outreach intervention was implemented into the field of preventive child health care, The Netherlands. The study aimed to provide a more detailed insight into characteristics of the target group. Although there is consensus about some general features of hard to reach problem families, little is known about their specific characteristics because empirical studies among this group are rarely conducted. Especially, the problems of the children is shed insufficient light on. The studied population consisted of families included in the assertive outreach intervention delivered during one year (N=116). To assess psychosocial adjustment of the children, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was filled in by the parents. Furthermore, a Dutch questionnaire on family functioning was completed by professional carers. Descriptive data were calculated. The findings show that by using the assertive outreach intervention, programme staff came into contact with families characterised by a considerably higher than average proportion of single parents and unemployed households receiving social benefits. The families faced a high level of risk and a wide range of severe and multiple difficulties, including a lack of basic child care, an inadequate social network and poor parenting. Children in these families were also facing a number of risks. The proportion of psychosocial problems was well above the (inter)national average. The findings reveal the problem areas of unreached families and a need to improve the access to care for these families.

Rethinking alliance and the economy: American hegemony, path dependence, and the South Korean political economy

The alliance with the United States has not only provided South Korea with a credible military deterrence against North Korea, but also helped normalize its economy through extensive military and economic assistance and assertive policy intervention for macroeconomic stabilization and export drive. South Korea was also one of major beneficiaries of the American-built liberal international economic order. No matter how strong the alliance tie would be, however, major external economic crises or subsequent critical junctures (e.g. the Asian financial crisis of 1997 and the global financial crisis of 2008) tempted South Korea to seek an alternative arrangement by attempting to depart from the USled economic and financial architecture. Nevertheless, such moves were fundamentally constrained because of the preference of continuing stability in international economic and financial institutions and its renewed emphasis on the alliance in face of North Korea’s nuclear

Deinstitutionalization revisited: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of hospital-based rehabilitation versus specialized assertive intervention (OPUS) versus standard treatment for patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders

The effects of hospital-based rehabilitation including weekly supportive psychodynamic therapy compared with specialized assertive intervention and standard treatment has not previously been investigated in first-episode psychosis. The aim of the study was to examine long-term effect on use of institutional care of different intensive interventions for patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorder on use of psychiatric bed days and days in supported housing. A total of 94 severely ill patients with first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders were included in a special part of the Copenhagen OPUS trial and randomized to either the specialized assertive intervention program (OPUS), standard treatment or hospital-based rehabilitation. It was a stable pattern that patients randomized to hospital-based rehabilitation spent more days in psychiatric wards and in supported housing throughout the 5-year follow-up period compared with the two other groups. Patients in OPUS treatment spent significantly fewer days in psychiatric wards and supported housing in the first 3 years compared with patients in hospital-based rehabilitation. Due to attrition and small sample size, differences in level of psychotic and negative symptoms at 5-year follow-up could not be evaluated. The study indicates that hospital-based rehabilitation together with weekly supportive psychodynamic therapy was associated with a continued increased use of psychiatric bed days and days in supported housing. The data cannot justify using hospital-based rehabilitation in first-episode psychosis.

S25-02 - Preventive and intensive treatment of psychosis for high-risk and first-episode subjects

IntroductionIt is unknown if the positive effects of intensive early intervention programmes are sustainable over time. Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is associated with outcome of schizophrenia, and it has been proved that DUP can be shortened. Randomized clinical trials have tested possibilities for interventions in high risk groups.MethodsWe conducted a single-blinded randomized controlled trial of two years of specialized assertive early intervention programme (OPUS) versus standard treatment. A total of 547 first-episode patients with first episode psychosis or schizotypal disorder were included in the trial and reinterviewed after one, two and five years. OPUS treatment consisted of ACT with family involvement and social skills training.ResultsAt five-year follow-up, the positive effect on psychotic and negative symptoms of the treatment seen after two years had disappeared. A significantly smaller percentage of patients from the experimental group were living in supported housing and were hospitalized fewer days during the five-year period. Among patients with schizotypal disorder, the proportion who had a transition to psychosis after one year was 8.1 vs. 28.0 percent for patients randomized to OPUS vs. standard treatment, respectively. At two-year follow-up the figures were 28.1 vs. 44.0. Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) median was 48 weeks. Longer DUP was independently associated with more psychotic symptoms at entry and at one-year and two-year follow-up.DiscussionDue to previous findings, we have started a new trial in which we will randomize 400 patients to two years versus five years of specialized assertive treatment.

Impact of persistent substance misuse on 1-year outcome in first-episode psychosis

Substance misuse is a common comorbid problem in people presenting with first-episode psychosis and is associated with a poor short-term outcome. The aim of this study is to examine differences in baseline characteristics and 1-year outcome between individuals with first-episode psychosis who have never misused substances, those who stop misusing substances after initial presentation and those who persistently misuse substances over the 1-year assessment period. Patients were recruited to the Northern Ireland First Episode Psychosis Study (n = 272). Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and at 1 year (n = 194) and data were collected from the case notes. Individuals with persistent substance misuse had more severe depression, more positive symptoms, poorer functional outcome and greater rates of relapse at 1 year than those who stopped and those who had never misused substances. There were no differences in outcome between people who had never misused substances and those who stopped misusing after presentation. These results support assertive intervention targeted at comorbid substance misuse in individuals with first-episode psychosis.

Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Members of a Psychoeducational Assertiveness Group

This study describes qualitatively a psychoeducational assertiveness intervention for 20 women's perceptions of positive and negative experiences, undertaken to identify whether therapeutic mechanisms operating in group therapy as described by Yalom might be inferred. There were 14 90-min. weekly sessions organized around educational material. Two groups were conducted with 10 university women each (M= 20.9 yr., SD= 1.9). Qualitative analysis of the 20 interviews identified five of Yalom's therapeutic mechanisms, namely, self-understanding, universality, acceptance, catharsis, and self-disclosure. The positive experiences were group cohesiveness, self-understanding, self-disclosure, positive views about the self and learning, and cognitive benefits. Self-disclosing at the early stages of group development was the most frequently reported negative experience or difficulty in the group. Although participants stated they improved interpersonal communication skills, analysis suggested the cultural context was an important mediator of assertive behavior.

What do consultants think about the development of specialist mental health teams?

Aims and MethodThe UK Government is promoting three types of specialist team in psychiatry: assertive outreach, crisis resolution and early intervention in psychosis. Policy guidance suggests that psychiatrists be recruited to work exclusively within these teams, but little is known about the views of psychiatrists regarding their development. A postal survey was undertaken to seek the views of consultant psychiatrists in the North West.ResultsSeventy per cent of psychiatrists responded to the questionnaire. Equal numbers agreed and disagreed with the development of specialist roles. Few services had been able to recruit to extra consultant sessions within the new teams and only a third of consultants believed the resources so far available to be reasonable. Overall views of the new teams were positive (mean scores 6.36, 6.51 and 6.03 on a 1–10 visual analogue scale for assertive outreach, crisis resolution and early onset psychosis teams). Consultants are particularly likely to believe that the new teams will increase patient satisfaction and provide a welcome change in role for some psychiatrists. A total of 64% of consultants believe that crisis resolution services could reduce hospital admissions, compared with 41% for assertive outreach and 31% for early onset psychosis teams. The concern most often voiced was that new services are being developed at the expense of existing teams.Clinical ImplicationsConsultants perceive benefits associated with the new teams but are concerned about their impact on the rest of the organisation. If resource and recruitment issues can be addressed, consultants could prove to be supportive of these new models of service.

Interventions to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia.

Although nonadherence with the antipsychotic medication regimen is a common barrier to the effective treatment for schizophrenia, knowledge is limited about how to improve medication adherence. This systematic literature review examined psychosocial interventions for improving medication adherence, focusing on promising initiatives, reasonable standards for conducting research in this area, and implications for clinical practice. Studies were identified by computerized searches of MEDLINE and PsychLIT for the years between 1980 and 2000 and by manual searches of relevant bibliographies and conference proceedings. Key articles were summarized. Thirteen (33%) of 39 identified studies reported significant intervention effects. Although interventions and family therapy programs relying on psychoeducation were common in clinical practice, they were typically ineffective. Concrete problem solving or motivational techniques were common features of successful programs. Interventions targeted specifically to problems of nonadherence were more likely to be effective (55%) than were more broadly based treatment interventions (26%). One-half (four of eight) of the successful interventions not specifically focused on nonadherence involved an array of supportive and rehabilitative community-based services. Psychoeducational interventions without accompanying behavioral components and supportive services are not likely to be effective in improving medication adherence in schizophrenia. Models of community care such as assertive community treatment and interventions based on principles of motivational interviewing are promising. Providing patients with concrete instructions and problem-solving strategies, such as reminders, self-monitoring tools, cues, and reinforcements, is useful. Problems in adherence are recurring, and booster sessions are needed to reinforce and consolidate gains.

Verbal Abuse

Of the 151 nurses responding to a survey conducted at a 400-bed acute care hospital, 85% had experienced verbal abuse and 45% had experienced verbal abuse within the last 15 working days. Recommendations, assertiveness or crisis intervention techniques, and patient/family education help nurses manage their feelings about abuse and the verbally abusive patient and family.

Outreach interventions for the homeless mentally ill.

There has been a steady rise in the number of homeless mentally ill in Britain. This article reviews the scale of the problem and identifies the need for change within mental health services in order to address this challenge. It is argued that mainstream psychiatric services need to become more diverse and open in their approach to this potentially isolated group of users. The authors suggest that this could be achieved by embracing assertive outreach interventions. Innovative projects using a range of care providers, including voluntary workers, past users of the service and professional mental health workers, are discussed as an alternative framework to traditional services. In conclusion, the article highlights some of the professional and social implications for psychiatric nurses and mental health practice.

Two varieties of helping in drunk-driving intervention: personal and situational factors.

This study examined personal characteristics and contextual factors among college students who had made an attempt to prevent someone from driving drunk. The study was guided by findings from prior research and the arousal/cost-benefit model of helping. Both passive and assertive interventions and their efficacy were considered. Questionnaire data were obtained from 388 students: 206 (68%) had intervened in a DUI situation (63% women). Self-reports of the person (e.g., moral obligation), the situation (e.g., perceived danger) and the type (passive, assertive) and success of the interventions were gathered. Of all interventions used 73% were successful; the median number of interventions used was three. Of the assertive interventions used in DUI situations 57% were successful compared to 47% of the passive interventions. Path analyses revealed that being older relative to the intervenee and greater sobriety of the intervenor predicted more interventions of both types. Personal commitment to intervention, amount of perceived danger and less alcohol consumption increased assertive interventions, whereas talking with someone about the potential DUI person increased the number of passive interventions. The success of both passive and assertive interventions were dependent upon the number of each of these interventions used. However, the more passive interventions were attempted, the less likely the success of an assertive intervention. The current findings extend our understanding of the psychosocial factors associated with informal DUI intervention, particularly concerning the choice and success of passive versus assertive interventions. Several of these significant predictors support laboratory research findings on helping and the arousal/cost-benefit model, while others do not.

The varied outcomes of schizophrenia.

To review variations in outcomes in schizophrenia across individual, historical, and cross-cultural boundaries, as well as within specific domains of functioning. Research literature on the outcomes of schizophrenia appearing within the last 8 years was reviewed. First, a review of follow-up studies published in the developed world suggests that heterogeneity in outcome across individuals with schizophrenia remains the rule, with affective symptoms, later and acute onset, and responsiveness to biological treatments predictive of good outcome. Negative symptoms are associated with poor outcome, cognitive impairments, and incapacity in social and work domains. Deterioration appears to occur within the first few months of onset if not already in the prodrome, with recent early-course studies finding longer duration of untreated psychosis associated with insidious onset, negative symptoms, social and work incapacity, and poor outcome. Second, a review of recent cross-cultural and historical studies provides evidence that outcome varies across time and place, schizophrenia having a more favourable outcome in the developing world and becoming a more benign disorder over the course of this century. Third, a review of studies of the domains of functioning within individuals identifies 4 relatively independent dimensions of depression and negative, psychotic, and disorganized symptoms. Cognitive deficits, which are associated with negative symptoms, also constitute a relatively stable dimension over time, showing neither marked deterioration nor improvement once established early in the course of disorder. The early appearance and stability over time of negative symptoms and cognitive impairments call for assertive intervention efforts early in the course of disorder to prevent chronicity and prolonged disability.

A Technique for Overcoming Denial in Problem Drinking Students

A procedure for overcoming denial in problem drinking college students is presented. Based on research suggesting that negative consequences due to drinking are a reflection of alcohol misuse, the paper recommends an assertive intervention strategy. By using a standardized assessment device, the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test, explicitly extracted from a compendium of psychological tests, students are confronted with an objective measure of the students' alcohol use.

The natural history of alcohol abuse: implications for definitions of alcohol use disorders

Is the DSM-III-R category of alcohol abuse validly differentiated from the DSM-III-R category of alcohol dependence, or is abuse primarily a mild, prodromal condition that typically deteriorates into dependence? A 4-year longitudinal epidemiologic study of male drinkers provided data to answer this question. The study used identical questions at baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, 70% of the subjects who were initially classified as alcohol abusers were still abusers or were classified as remitted. This contrasted significantly with outcome in the subjects who initially reported alcohol dependence. Although additional research is needed, these results indicate that alcohol abuse often has a course distinct from that of alcohol dependence.

Passive and assertive student interventions in public and private drunken driving situations.

The types and frequency of interventions used to prevent drunken driving across four different locations is examined. A drinking survey of 247 students provided 97 subjects who indicated that someone had attempted to prevent them from driving under the influence (DUI). Results suggest that the location of the drinking modestly influences the type of intervention, that the more assertive intervention has a higher success rate and that private or more intimate gatherings promote less assertive interventions. Given the failure of deterrence, further understanding of how, why, when and who does and does not intervene, and what, when and who is and is not successful are promising research directions. Most importantly, however, is the need to conceptualize drunken drivers and the reactions to their potential DUI. It is suggested that the social support-stress literature may be useful in that it provides us with a social psychology of both effective and ineffective crises management. Status and age characteristics are the sociological parameters that must be included if we are to clarify and improve our understanding and move toward an informed policy.