Aspirin Users Research Articles

Dietary and lifestyle factors effect erythrocyte PIG-A mutant frequency in humans.

It is well understood that poor diet and lifestyle choices can increase the risk of cancer. It is also well documented that cancer is a disease of DNA mutations, with mutations in key genes driving carcinogenesis. Measuring these mutations in a minimally invasive way may be informative as to which exposures are harmful and thus allow us to introduce primary preventative measures, in a bid to reduce cancer incidences. Here, we have measured mutations in the phosphatidylinositol glycan class A (PIG-A) gene in erythrocytes from healthy volunteers (n = 156) and from non-cancer patients attending the local endoscopy department (n = 144). The X-linked PIG-A gene encodes an enzyme involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor synthesis. A silencing mutation in which leads to the absence of GPI anchors on the extracellular surface which can be rapidly assessed using flow cytometry. The background level of PIG-A mutant erythrocytes was 2.95 (95% CI: 2.59-3.67) mutant cells (10-6). Older age increased mutant cell frequency (P < 0.001). There was no difference in mutant cell levels between males and females (P = 0.463) or smokers and non-smokers (P = 0.186). In the endoscopy group, aspirin users had lower mutant frequencies (P = 0.001). Further information on diet and exercise was available for the endoscopy patient group alone, where those with a higher health promotion index score had lower mutant frequencies (P = 0.011). Higher dietary intake of vegetables reduced mutant cell levels (P = 0.022). Participants who exercised for at least 1 h a week appeared to have reduced mutant frequencies than those who did not exercise, although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.099). This low background level of mutant erythrocytes in a population makes this assay an attractive tool to monitor exposures such as those associated with lifestyles and diet, as demonstrated here.

Aspirin use predicts prolonged survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer: Nationwide Veterans Affairs database study.

Single-institution studies suggest that aspirin reduces the risk of death in head and neck cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of aspirin use on overall survival (OS) in veterans with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). A total of 23 083 veterans with OPC were identified between 2005 and 2018 from the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse. Records were queried for clinical-demographic data, aspirin prescriptions, and outcomes. Three-year OS was estimated. A Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for aspirin use. Among the 23 083 identified veterans, 17 206 veterans met inclusion criteria. 21.8% used aspirin. Three-year OS was prolonged for aspirin users (66%) compared to nonaspirin users (54%; P < .001). Adjusted HR for death for nonaspirin users was 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.60-1.91]). The average treatment effect of aspirin on survival using inverse probability weighting was 10% (95% CI [0.08-0.11]). Aspirin use following OPC diagnosis was independently associated with improved 3-year OS among veterans nationwide.

Aspirin for primary prevention of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in persons with diabetes and multiple risk factors.

BackgroundControversy exists as to whether low-dose aspirin use may give benefit in primary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events. We hypothesized that the benefits of aspirin are underevaluated.MethodsWe investigated 12,123 Caucasian patients presenting to hospital with acute coronary syndromes as first manifestation of CV disease from 2010 to 2019 in the ISACS-TC multicenter registry (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01218776). Individual risk of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and its association with 30-day mortality was quantified using inverse probability of treatment weighting models matching for concomitant medications. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale.FindingsThe risk of STEMI was lower in the aspirin users (absolute reduction: 6·8%; OR: 0·73; 95%CI: 0·65–0·82) regardless of sex (p for interaction=0·1962) or age (p for interaction=0·1209). Benefits of aspirin were seen in patients with hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and in smokers. In contrast, aspirin failed to demonstrate a significant risk reduction in STEMI among diabetic patients (OR:1·10;95%CI:0·89–1·35) with a significant interaction (p: <0·0001) when compared with controls (OR:0·64,95%CI:0·56–0·73). Stratification of diabetes in risk categories revealed benefits (p interaction=0·0864) only in patients with concomitant hypertension and hypercholesterolemia (OR:0·87, 95% CI:0·65–1·15), but not in smokers. STEMI was strongly related to 30-day mortality (OR:1·93; 95%CI:1·59–2·35)InterpretationLow-dose aspirin reduces the risk of STEMI as initial manifestation of CV disease with potential benefit in mortality. Patients with diabetes derive substantial benefit from aspirin only in the presence of multiple risk factors. In the era of precision medicine, a more tailored strategy is required.FundingNone.

Aspirin might reduce the incidence of breast cancer: An updated meta-analysis of 38 observational studies.

Many epidemiologic studies were performed to clarify the protective effect of regular aspirin use on breast cancer risks, but the results remain inconsistent. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of 38 studies to quantitatively assess the association of regular aspirin use with risk of breast cancer. We performed a bibliographic database search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Scopus, and Google Scholar from January 1939 to December 2019. Relative risk (RR) estimates were extracted from eligible case-control and cohort studies and pooled using a random effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study design, aspirin exposure assessment, hormone receptor status, menopausal status, cancer stage as well as aspirin use duration or frequency. Furthermore, sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed. Thirty eight studies of 1,926,742 participants involving 97,099 breast cancer cases contributed to this meta-analysis. Compared with nonusers, the aspirin users had a reduced risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.95, P value of significance [Psig] < .001) with heterogeneity (P value of heterogeneity [Phet] < .001, I = 82.6%). Subgroup analysis revealed a reduced risk in case-control studies (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.78-0.89, Psig < .001), in hormone receptor positive tumors (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94, Psig < .001), in situ breast tumors (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71-0.88, Psig < .001), and in postmenopausal women (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, Psig = .002). Furthermore, participants who use aspirin for >4 times/wk (RR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, Psig = .003) or for >10 years (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, Psig = .025) appeared to benefit more from the reduction in breast cancer caused by aspirin. Our study suggested that aspirin use might be associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, particularly for reducing the risk of hormone receptor positive tumors or in situ breast tumors, and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Aspirin reduces cardiovascular events in patients with pneumonia: a prior event rate ratio analysis in a large primary care database.

Ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) are common after pneumonia and are associated with long-term mortality. Aspirin may attenuate this risk and should be explored as a therapeutic option. We extracted all patients with pneumonia (aged over 50 years) from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a large UK primary care database, from inception until January 2019. We then performed a prior event rate ratio (PERR) analysis with propensity score matching (PSM), an approach that allows for control of measured and unmeasured confounding, with aspirin usage as the exposure and ischaemic events as the outcome. The primary outcome was the combined outcome of ischaemic stroke and MI. Secondary outcomes were ischaemic stroke and MI individually. Relevant confounders (smoking, comorbidities, age and gender) were included in the analysis. 48 743 patients were eligible for matching. Of these, 9864 were aspirin users who were matched to 9864 non-users. Aspirin users had a reduced risk of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.79) in the PERR analysis. For both secondary outcomes, aspirin use was also associated with a reduced risk for MI (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.72) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.91), respectively. This study provides supporting evidence that aspirin use is associated with reduced ischaemic events after pneumonia in a primary care setting. This drug may have a future clinical role in preventing this important complication.

Use of metformin and aspirin is associated with delayed cancer incidence

BackgroundWhile the chemoprevention effect of aspirin is well-established, the effects of metformin in cancer prevention is still controversial. This study is to investigate the use of aspirin, metformin, or the combination of both is associated with delayed cancer incidence. MethodThis dataset is based on the electronic medical record of public hospitals in Hong Kong. Patients were classified into 1. aspirin user, 2. metformin user, 3. both aspirin and metformin user and 4. control group with neither aspirin nor metformin used. Aspirin and/or metformin must have been taken for over 6 months in the treatment group and cancer incidences was counted at least 6 months after exposure to such medications. The primary outcome of this study was overall incidence of cancer during the follow-up period. The secondary outcomes were cancer incidences of specific sites, including colon/rectum, liver, oesophagus, pancreas, stomach, lung, breast, kidney, bladder and prostate. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios of cancer risks. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for the medication effects. ResultsA total of 120,971 aspirin users, 11,365 metformin users, and 6630 aspirin plus metformin users, were identified. Compare to the control groups, those who used aspirin alone demonstrated a significant reduction in overall cancer risk (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87). Similarly, those who used metformin alone also showed an overall reduction in cancer risk (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88). Patients who received both aspirin and metformin showed the most significant reduction in overall cancer risk (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45-0.63). Metformin showed a significant reduction in cancer risk of lung, oesophagus and bladder. ConclusionThere is a similar decrease in overall cancer rate with the use of aspirin or metformin alone. A more significant reduction in overall cancer risk was found with the use of both agents.

Platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR) in predicting acute coronary syndromes before aspirin use

Introduction: Platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR) test is one of the test parameters that is routinely calculated in the hemogram test, and expressed as the ratio of platelets with platelet volume greater than 12 fL. Large platelets are relatively younger and contain more intracellular granules, meaning that platelets have more thrombogenic potential. In the literature investigating the relationship between the acute coronary syndrome and P-LCR levels, the use of aspirin in patients and its effects on platelet parameters were ignored. In our study, for the first time in the literature, the relationship between P-LCR levels and acute coronary syndromes were investigated by means of including the patients before they took aspirin which ensures that P-LCR test is not affected by aspirin. Method: Retrospectively, patients aged 18-70 years were screened and those whose hemogram tests were completed before aspirin usage were included. A total of 109 patients diagnosed with unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included and compared in the study. Results: The mean P-LCR values were 23.61% (95% CI: 21.97-25.25) in UA patients, 28.34% (95% CI: 24.86-31.83) in NSTEMI, and 25.71% (95% CI: 22.07-29.35) in STEMI patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the P-LCR values among the groups (p=0.022). Conclusion: The increase in P-LCR, free of aspirin effects, was found to be statistically significant in acute coronary syndromes.

Aspirin and Growth of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study.

The role of aspirin in unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) growth remains largely unknown. We aim to identify whether aspirin is associated with a lower rate of UIA growth in patients with UIA <7 mm. This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients with UIAs <7 mm with ischemic cerebrovascular disease between January 2016 and December 2019. Baseline and follow-up patient information, including the use of aspirin and blood pressure level, were recorded. Patients were considered aspirin users if they took aspirin, including standard- and low-dose aspirin, ≥3× per week. The primary end point was aneurysm growth in any direction or an indisputable change in aneurysm shape. Among the 315 enrolled patients, 272 patients (86.3%) underwent imaging examinations during follow-up (mean follow-up time, 19.6±12.7 months). A total of 113 patients were continuously treated with aspirin. UIA growth occurred in 31 (11.4%) patients. In the multivariate Cox analysis, specific aneurysm locations (anterior communicating artery, posterior communicating artery, or middle cerebral artery; hazard ratio, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.22-6.88]; P=0.016) and a UIA size of 5 to <7 mm (hazard ratio, 7.61 [95% CI, 3.02-19.22]; P<0.001) were associated with a high risk of UIA growth, whereas aspirin and well-controlled blood pressure were associated with a low risk of UIA growth (hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.11-0.77]; P=0.013 and hazard ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.66]; P=0.005, respectively). The cumulative annual growth rates were as high as 40.0 and 53.3 per 100 person-years in the high-risk patients (>1 risk factor) with and without aspirin, respectively. Aspirin therapy and well-controlled blood pressure are associated with a low risk of UIA growth; the incidence of UIA growth in high-risk patients in the first year is high, warranting intensive surveillance in this patient group. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02846259.

An Update on Venous Thromboembolism Rates and Prophylaxis in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in 2020.

Patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) with an incidence of approximately 0.6–1.5%. Given the high volume of these operations, with approximately one million performed annually in the U.S., the rate of VTE represents a large absolute number of patients. The rate of VTE after total hip arthroplasty has been stable over the past decade, although there has been a slight reduction in the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but not pulmonary embolism (PE), after total knee arthroplasty. Over this time, there has been significant research into the optimal choice of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for individual patients, with the objective to reduce the rate of VTE while minimizing adverse side effects such as bleeding. Recently, aspirin has emerged as a promising prophylactic agent for patients undergoing arthroplasty due to its similar efficacy and good safety profile compared to other pharmacologic agents. However, there is no evidence to date that clearly demonstrates the superiority of any given prophylactic agent. Therefore, this review discusses (1) the current prevalence and trends in VTE after total hip and knee arthroplasty and (2) provides an update on pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in regard to aspirin usage.

Abstract 1133: Risk effect of primary prevention strategy with aspirin on lung cancer incidence depends on high-level use, bodyweight and age: A U.S. adults evidence

Abstract Chemoprevention of cancer with aspirin is of particular interest as a primary prevention strategy, which was still in controversial. Using 101,462 individual participants' data from a U.S. adult's cohort, Cox regression model was used to detect the aspirin dosage effect on lung cancer risk. We calculated the effects of irregular use, low-dose use, and high-dose use of aspirin on lung cancer risk in population stratified by bodyweight and age. High-dose use of aspirin raised up 28% risk of lung cancer compared to no use (HR = 1.28, 95%CI = [1.14-1.45], P = 3.37×10-5). Meanwhile, the risk effect of high-dose aspirin significantly decreased with bodyweight increasing, indicating an antagonistic interaction (HRinteraction = 0.96, 95%CI = [0.94-0.99], P = 1.26×10-2). Furthermore, for these participants prone to lung cancer with bodyweight less than 80 kg, high-dose aspirin usage showed an elevated risk if their age less than 76 (HRage≤76 = 1.47, 95%CI = [1.25-1.73], P = 3.81×10-6), but did not exhibit risk effect in elders (HRage&amp;gt;76 = 1.13, 95%CI = [0.46-2.69], P = 0.80). The three-way interaction among dose of aspirin, bodyweight and age indicated that these vulnerable people (age ≤76 years and bodyweight &amp;lt;80 kg) with high lung cancer risk should be cautious to use high-dose aspirin for lung cancer chemoprevention. Citation Format: Xuesi Dong. Risk effect of primary prevention strategy with aspirin on lung cancer incidence depends on high-level use, bodyweight and age: A U.S. adults evidence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1133.

The Risk of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Low-Dose Aspirin Users with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Our aim was to assess the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage associated with diabetes among patients taking low-dose aspirin (≤325 mg/day). Methods A systematic search was conducted for publication in English and Chinese using term equivalents for “GI hemorrhage”, “aspirin”, and “diabetes mellitus” up till April 2020. Electronic databases include PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP Database. Two independent authors searched databases and reviewed abstracts for comprehensive studies keeping adequate study quality. Data of weighted odds ratios were statistically evaluated and potential bias was checked. Results Among 446 publications, eight case-control researches, including 1601 patients, were deemed for this meta-analysis. Patients with diabetes were associated with a higher risk of GI hemorrhage than patients without diabetes: the summary ORs were 3.10 (95% CI, 2.35–4.09). The heterogeneity of the reports was not significant (Chi2 = 3.39, P = 0.85; I2 = 0%). Conclusion The meta-analysis showed that aspirin users with diabetes were more likely to have GI hemorrhage. Hence, when treating diabetics with aspirin, the increased risk of GI bleeding should be taken in consideration.

Aspirin use during pregnancy and the risk of bleeding complications: a Swedish population-based cohort study

Aspirin is offered to pregnant women to prevent preeclampsia, a severe obstetrical complication. Large studies of nonpregnant populations have consistently shown that aspirin prophylaxis increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications. However, there have not been any population-based studies investigating this in a pregnant population. This study aimed to investigate whether aspirin use during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. We performed a register-based cohort study using the Swedish Pregnancy Register wherein we examined 313,624 women giving birth between January 2013 and July 2017. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hemorrhage. A propensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting was used to generate an odds ratio that corrects for differences in baseline characteristics. Aspirin use was registered in 4088 (1.3%) women during pregnancy. Compared with women who did not take aspirin, aspirin use was not associated with bleeding complications during the antepartum period (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.54). However, aspirin users had a higher incidence of intrapartum bleeding (2.9% aspirin users vs 1.5% nonusers; adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.05), postpartum hemorrhage (10.2% vs 7.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.39), and postpartum hematoma (0.4% vs 0.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-4.34). The risk of a neonatal intracranial hemorrhage was also increased (0.07% vs 0.01%; adjusted odds ratio, 9.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-49.48). After stratifying by mode of birth, a higher incidence of bleeding among aspirin users was present for those who had a vaginal birth but not those who had a cesarean delivery. Using aspirin during pregnancy is associated with increased postpartum bleeding and postpartum hematoma. It may also be associated with neonatal intracranial hemorrhage. When offering aspirin during pregnancy, these risks need to be weighed against the potential benefits.

Corrigendum: Influence of Polymorphisms Involved in Platelet Activation and Inflammatory Response on Aspirin-Related Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case-Control Study

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00860.].

History of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and Functional Outcomes After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested a potential benefit from COX-2 inhibition on secondary injury activation after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pre-admission NSAID use on functional recovery in spontaneous ICH patients. Consecutive adult ICH patients enrolled in the Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes Project (2009-2018) with available 90-day follow-up data were included. Patients were categorized as NSAID (daily COX inhibitor use ≤ 7days prior to ICH) and non-NSAID users (no daily COX inhibitor use ≤ 7days prior to ICH). Primary outcome was the ordinal 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Outcomes were compared between cohorts using multivariable regression and propensity score-matched analyses. A secondary analysis excluding aspirin users was performed. The NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts comprised 228 and 361 patients, respectively. After 1:1 matching, the matched cohorts each comprised 140 patients. The 90-day mRS were comparable between the NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts in both the unmatched (aOR = 0.914 [0.626-1.336], p = 0.644) and matched (aOR = 0.650 [0.392-1.080], p = 0.097) analyses. The likelihood of recurrent ICH at 90days was also comparable between the NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts in both the unmatched (aOR = 0.845 [0.359-1.992], p = 0.701) and matched analyses (aOR = 0.732 [0.241-2.220], p = 0.581). In the secondary analysis, the non-aspirin NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts comprised 38 and 361 patients, respectively. After 1:1 matching, the matched cohorts each comprised 38 patients. The 90-day mRS were comparable between the non-aspirin NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts in both the unmatched (aOR = 0.615 [0.343-1.101], p = 0.102) and matched (aOR = 0.525 [0.219-1.254], p = 0.147) analyses. The likelihood of recurrent ICH at 90days was also comparable between the non-aspirin NSAID and non-NSAID cohorts in both the unmatched (aOR = 2.644 [0.258-27.091], p = 0.413) and matched (aOR = 2.586 [0.228-29.309], p = 0.443) analyses. After the exclusion of patients with DNR or withdrawal of care status, NSAID use was associated with lower mRS at 90days (aOR = 0.379 [0.212-0.679], p = 0.001), lower mRS at hospital discharge (aOR = 0.505 [0.278-0.919], p = 0.025) and lower 90-day mortality rates (aOR = 0.309 [0.108-0.877], p = 0.027). History of nonselective COX inhibition may affect functional outcomes in ICH patients. Pre-admission NSAID use did not appear to worsen the severity of presenting ICH or increase the risk of recurrent ICH. Additional clinical studies may be warranted to investigate the effects of pre-admission NSAID use on ICH outcomes.

Relationship between aspirin use of esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer patient survival: a meta-analysis

BackgroundMany studies have found that use of aspirin can lengthen survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the survival benefit of aspirin use compared with non-aspirin use for patients with esophageal, gastric or colorectal cancer.MethodsWe searched online databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and www.clinicaltrials.gov for studies that were conducted, before April 30th, 2020, to identify relevant studies. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival of esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancers among aspirin users were compared with those among non-aspirin users. Data extraction and quality evaluation were independently conducted by 2 investigators. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) for overall survival and cancer-specific survival by using either a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model.ResultsA total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with more than 74,936 patients. There were no significant differences between postdiagnosis aspirin use and overall survival for esophageal and gastric cancers. For colorectal cancer, a benefit that was associated with postdiagnosis aspirin use was observed for overall survival and cancer-specific survival [HR = 0.83, 95%CI(0.75, 0.9.);HR = 0.78, 95%CI(0.66, 0.92), respectively. However, a prediagnosis of aspirin use did not provide a benefit for overall or cancer-specific survival in colorectal cancer. HR values for overall and cancer-specific survival benefits for colorectal cancer associated with both prediagnosis and postdiagnosis aspirin were as follows: HR = 0.75, 95%CI(0.61, 0.92) and HR = 0.78, 95%CI(0.73, 0.85), respectively. In addition, the survival benefit of postdiagnosis aspirin use appeared to be confined to patients with mutated PIK3CA tumors [HR = 0.78, 95%CI(0.50, 0.99)] and was positive for PTGS2 (COX-2) expression [HR = 0.75, 95%CI(0.43, 1.30)].ConclusionsThese findings provide further indications that postdiagnosis aspirin use improves overall survival and cancer-specific survival in colorectal cancer, especially for patients who are positive for PTGS2 (COX-2) expression and PIK3CA-mutated tumors. However, aspirin therapy does not improve overall survival in esophageal and gastric cancers, although the meta-analysis was mainly limited to retrospective studies.

Bleeding associated with low-dose aspirin: Comparison of data from the COMPASS randomized controlled trial and routine clinical practice

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have strong internal validity but often have limited external validity. Observational studies have good generalizability and an increasing role in key healthcare decision making. We compared incidence rates of intracranial and major gastrointestinal bleeds in the low-dose aspirin arm (N = 9126) of the COMPASS double-blind RCT (conducted at 602 centres in 33 countries) with those from an observational cohort of preventative low-dose aspirin users (N = 54,140) in a primary care database representative of the UK general population – The IQVIA Medical Research Data UK (IMRD-UK). In our observational study analysis, we restricted follow-up to 2 years to be comparable with the duration of the COMPASS trial. Among low-dose aspirin users, incidence rates per 1000 person-years (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) in the IMRD-UK cohort and COMPASS trial participants, respectively, were 0.6 (0.5–0.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9–2.1) for intracranial bleeds, and 3.5 (3.1–3.8) vs. 3.7 (2.9–4.8) for major gastrointestinal bleeds. These broadly comparable bleeding rates among COMPASS trial participants and an observational cohort of low-dose aspirin users in IMRD-UK support the use of the latter for generating robust therapeutic evidence, and indicate that the rates from the COMPASS trial are broadly consistent with realistic population-based rates.

Risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and colorectal neoplasms following initiation of low-dose aspirin: a Danish population-based cohort study

ObjectiveAspirin may increase the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) from precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated whether use of low-dose aspirin, through initiation of LGIB, may lead patients...

Association of Aspirin and Other Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs With Vertebral Trabecular Bone: Data From Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a Population-Based Multicenter Cohort Study.

The objective of this article was to study the association of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with bone mineral density (BMD). Spine BMD was evaluated in a subset of 2028 participants from the Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort who were NSAID users (including aspirin) and underwent both lumbar and thoracic imaging. Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis is a prospective cohort study that includes 4 ethnic groups (white, Asian, African American, and Hispanic). Trabecular BMD was evaluated by quantitative computed tomography based on cardiac computed tomography images, which were obtained during coronary calcium scans. The analyses were cross sectional using baseline examination data for exposure and outcomes. After adjustment for potential confounders including age, sex, race, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, a small association between trabecular BMD and baseline use of COX-2-selective NSAID was observed. COX-2-selective NSAID use was associated with 7.4 mg/cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-13.3; P = 0. 013) higher trabecular BMD in thoracic spine and 10.6 mg/cm higher at lumbar spine (95% CI, 5.1-16.1; P < 0.001). Among regular aspirin users, there was no association between drug use and trabecular BMD. Considering all spine fractures together, the prevalence ratio of fractures among aspirin users was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.6-1.6) and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5-2.3) among COX-2-selective NSAID users. Regular use of aspirin has no significant association with trabecular BMD in either the thoracic or lumbar spine and no association with fracture prevalence. COX-2-selective NSAIDs may have modest positive association with BMD, but the mechanisms were not assessed and the observational study design makes residual confounding a possible alternate explanation. Potential pathological mechanisms warrant further longitudinal exploration.

Is Concomitant Therapy with Acetaminophen and Low-dose Aspirin a Risk Factor for CKD Progression? A 6-Year Cohort Study

Concomitant therapy with acetaminophen (APAP) and low-dose aspirin is often used in clinical settings; however, it is unclear whether this combination is involved in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We hypothesized that concomitant therapy with APAP and low-dose aspirin may cause CKD progression. We carried out a retrospective 6-year cohort study that included all patients who received low-dose aspirin from January 2011 to December 2016 at Kaetsu Hospital. Primary outcome was defined as CKD progression at the end of the study compared with baseline. Among the 441 patients treated during the study period, we identified 89 cases of CKD progression. Multivariate regression analysis showed that exposure to APAP>50 g [odds ratio (OR), 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-6.70], age increase by 1 year (OR, 1.05, 95% CI, 1.02-1.08), and diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.40, 95% CI, 1.41-4.08) had positive associations with CKD progression. Our findings suggested that concomitant therapy with APAP and low-dose aspirin increased the risk of CKD progression. Therefore, we recommend more thorough monitoring of serum creatinine when patients are on such concomitant therapy. Moreover, it is important to advise users of low-dose aspirin to avoid unnecessary use of APAP, in order to reduce the risk of CKD progression.

Low-Dose Aspirin Use Significantly Improves the Survival of Late-stage NPC: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Background: Aspirin use has been associated with improved survival rates in various cancers. However, it remains unclear if aspirin confers a survival benefit on patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The aim of this study was to assess the associations between aspirin use and survival in different stages of NPC. Methods: This is a 10-year retrospective cohort study of NPC patients. A total of 565 NPC patients were recruited after we performed a 1:4 propensity score match between aspirin users and non–users. Cox regression models with adjusted covariates were employed to evaluate factors that influence the survival rate of NPC patients. Results: The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the overall survival (p < 0.0001) and disease-specific survival (p < 0.0001) rates of 180-day aspirin users increased. Increased survival rates were also observed in 180-day aspirin users with Stages III and IV, T, N1 and 2, and N3 categories. Cox regression models indicated that factors, including aspirin use (univariate: HR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14–0.55, p < 0.001; multivariate: HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.12–0.46, p < 0.001), were independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusions: Aspirin use for more than 180 days is associated with an increased survival rate and is a positive independent prognostic factor in NPC.