Prescription Of Aspirin Research Articles

Use of Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Preliminary Data from the Italian Atrial Fibrillation (ITALY-AF) Registry.

Atrial fibrillation (AFIB), the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke, heart failure, and death. Because of the recent advances in AFIB management and the availability of new oral anticoagulants (OACs), there is a need for a systematic and predefined collection of contemporary data regarding its management and treatment. The objective of the ongoing ITALY-AFIB registry is to evaluate the long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with AFIB and to verify the implementation of the current guidelines for stroke prevention in these patients. The registry includes consecutive in- and out-patients with first diagnosed, paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AFIB. In patients in sinus rhythm at entry, the qualifying episode of AFIB, confirmed by ECG diagnosis, had to have occurred within 1 year before entry. The clinical record form is web-based and accessible by personal keyword. Enrolment into the registry started in the year 2013. In a current cohort of 2470 patients (mean age 75 ± 11 years, males 56%), the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.7 ± 1.8, and the mean HAS-BLED was 1.6 ± 0.9. There were no significant sex differences in the AFIB subtypes. At the end of the inclusion visit and after receiving knowledge of the web-based electronic estimate of risk for stroke and bleeding, the proportion of patients discharged with OACs was 80%. After exclusion of patients with first diagnosed AFIB (n = 397), the proportion of patients with prescription of OACs rose from 66% before the visit to 82% on discharge (p < 0.0001). Prescription of aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs fell from 18% before the visit to 10% on discharge (p < 0.0001). A web-based management of AFIB with automated estimation of risk profiles appears to favorably affect adherence to AFIB guidelines, based on a high proportion of patients treated with OACs and a substantial decline in the use of antiplatelet drugs.

Early computed tomography coronary angiography and preventative treatment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial

Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) offers detailed assessment of the presence of coronary atherosclerosis and helps guide patient management. We investigated influences of early CTCA on the subsequent use of preventative treatment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. In this secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of early CTCA in intermediate-risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, prescription of aspirin, P2Y12 receptor antagonist, statin, renin-angiotensin system blocker, and beta-blocker therapies from randomization to discharge were compared within then between those randomized to early CTCA or to standard of care only. Effects of CTCA findings on adjustment of these therapies were further examined. In 1,743 patients (874 randomized to early CTCA and 869 to standard of care only), prescription of P2Y12 receptor antagonist, dual antiplatelet, and statin therapies increased more in the early CTCA group (between-group difference: 4.6% [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.9], 4.5% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-8.7], and 4.3% [95% confidence interval, 0.2-8.5], respectively), whereas prescription of other preventative therapies increased by similar extent in both study groups. Among patients randomized to early CTCA, there were additional increments of preventative treatment in those with obstructive coronary artery disease and higher rates of reductions in antiplatelet and beta-blocker therapies in those with normal coronary arteries. Prescription patterns of preventative treatment varied during index hospitalization in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Early CTCA facilitated targeted individualization of these therapies based on the extent of coronary artery disease.

Low-Dose Aspirin Use in Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Birth: A Swedish Register-Based Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Evidence has shown that low-dose aspirin can reduce the risk of preeclampsia in women with risk factors; more recent evidence has shown that aspirin may also be useful for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth, even among women without risk factors for preeclampsia. However, there are fewer studies examining the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin in this population, and the studies that have been done have generally been statistically underpowered. This study was meant to address this limitation in a large population of women who had previously experienced preterm birth, assessing whether low-dose aspirin treatment was associated with a lower risk for preterm birth. This study was a register-based cohort study performed using several different Swedish registries. The sample included all women with a first and second singleton birth between 2006 and 2019 and with a preterm birth in the first pregnancy. The primary outcome assessed was preterm birth during the second pregnancy, and secondary outcomes included assessment of preterm birth by severity (moderate preterm was between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation, and severe preterm was less than 32 weeks' gestation) and onset (spontaneous or medically indicated). The variable of interest was low-dose aspirin exposure or at least 1 dispensed prescription of 75 to 160 mg aspirin. The analysis included 22,127 women with a preterm birth in their first pregnancy followed by a second recorded pregnancy. Of this sample, 3057 (14%) were prescribed low-dose aspirin during their second pregnancy. Recurrent preterm birth occurred in 3703 individuals, of whom 547 (15%) had used low-dose aspirin. After adjusting for confounding variables, the incidence of preterm birth was lower in those using low-dose aspirin, with a marginal relative risk (mRR) of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.99). However, there was no difference in risk for moderate or severe preterm birth (moderate group: mRR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.78–1.03]; severe group: mRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.54–1.04]). In adjusted analyses, there were no statistically significant differences for either medically indicated or spontaneous preterm birth between individuals who used low-dose aspirin and those who did not. The study was limited by its retrospective nature. In addition, the authors acknowledge that a dispensed prescription for aspirin does not necessarily equate to consistent intake of low-dose aspirin throughout a pregnancy. In addition, the population for this study was limited to those who had already experienced a preterm birth, which could affect the generalizability of the results. Although limited differences were found, a small protective effect could not be ruled out, and randomized controlled trials to understand more fully the effect low-dose aspirin might have on preterm birth would be helpful. Further research should also focus on whether the benefits of aspirin use during pregnancy outweigh the potential risks, as well as what the lowest effective dose might be.

Aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention: the two faces of the coin and the importance of the Number Needed to Treat: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aspirin has been an essential treatment for the primary preven-tion of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Several randomized controlled studies do not support the routine use of aspirin, mainly due to its association with bleed-ing risk. This systematic review aims to advocate aspirin prescription based on the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and the Number Needed to Harm (NNH). This combination provides a good measure of the effort to avoid an unfavor-able outcome, weighed against possible associated risks. A search of random-ized studies on aspirin treatment was conducted in two separate periods. Four studies from 1988-1998 and six from 2001-2018 were included in the analysis (157,060 participants). The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction (NFMI), Non-fatal Ischemic Stroke (NFIS), and CV mortality. Major bleeding was a safety endpoint. We calculated the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR%), NNT, and NNH, alongside the Relative Risk (RR) and 95% CI of each primary endpoint. The results of all included studies (10) showed a net benefit with aspirin treatment for NFMI (NNT= 259) and the composite outcome (NNT=292) with a significant relative risk reduction of 20% (p=0.003; I2= 0%) and 10% (p&lt;0.001; I2= 0%), respectively. There was a relevant 60% in-crease in the bleeding risk (p&lt;0.0001, NNH=208; I2= 3%). The NNT and NNH may constitute measures of efficacy and risk in clinical shared decision-making. However, it is essential to consistently establish that patients’ benefit-risk should be individualized and not represent a clinical guide for everyone.

Association between use of low-dose aspirin and detection of colorectal polyps and cancer in a screening setting.

The possible protective effect of aspirin on risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still highly debated. We used data from Bowel Cancer Screening in Norway, a trial randomizing individuals from general population, aged 50-74 years, to flexible sigmoidoscopy or faecal immunochemical test (FIT), to study the association between aspirin use and detection of CRC and two CRC precursors: adenomas and advanced serrated lesions (ASL). Prescriptions of low-dose aspirin were obtained from Norwegian prescription database. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 64,889 screening participants (24,159 sigmoidoscopy, 40,730 FIT), 314 (0.5%) had CRC, 6,208 (9.6%) adenoma and 659 (1.0%) ASL. Overall and short-term use (<3 years) of low-dose aspirin, versus no use, were not associated with any colorectal lesion. Long-term use (≥3 years) was associated with lower detection of CRC (overall OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.46-0.93; sigmoidoscopy: 0.56, 0.33-0.97; FIT: 0.72, 0.45-1.15), adenomas in sigmoidoscopy arm (overall OR 0.95, 95%CI 0.87-1.03; sigmoidoscopy: 0.89, 0.80-0.99; FIT: 1.03, 0.89-1.18), but not ASLs. We did not observe significant differences in the effect of aspirin according to the location of colorectal lesions. Our results suggest that long-term use of aspirin might have a protective effect against adenomas and colorectal cancer, but not ASLs.

Aspirin and statin use in primary prevention after coronary artery calcium score

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction A coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of more than 100 places the 10-year cardiovascular risk above 7.5%, justifying the initiation of pharmacological measures in primary prevention. Purpose The present study explores the level of implementation of a primary prevention strategy after CAC score in patients without obstructive coronary disease. Methods The study cohort included all patients from the health area of our city (Galicia, Spain) who underwent a coronary computed tomography (CT) scan between July 2021 and February 2022. Subjects with obstructive coronary disease (CADRADS 3 or higher), atrial fibrillation patients and inconclusive studies were excluded. The final population of the study consisted of 209 patients. The sample was classified according to Agatston Score into three groups: no calcification (CAC=0), non-significant (CAC 1-100), and significant calcification (CAC &amp;gt;101). Multinomial and binomial logistic regression were performed to identify the predictors associated with the prescription of statin and aspirin, respectively. Results 41 patients (19.62%) had significant calcification (CAC &amp;gt;101). Of those, 16 (39.02%) started aspirin and 21 (51.22%) started statin (Figure 1). The CAC score allowed to increase the percentage of patients who benefited from lipid-lowering treatment, from 31.70% to 82.92% (Figure 2). Significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients who initiated aspirin and statins according to the degree of coronary calcification (Chi2 18.76; p=0.000), (Chi2 48.42; p=0.000) respectively. After multivariate adjustment, a CAC score &amp;gt;100 (OR 5.88 (2.29-15.07; p=0.000) and the presence of vulnerable plaque (OR 6.78 (1.01-47.46; p=0.050) were the only predictos which led clinicians to start antiplatelet therapy. Neither age, nor SIS (segment involvement score) were associated. Regarding to lipid-lowering therapy, CAC score 1-100 (OR 5.87 (1.68-20.51; p=0.006) and CAC score &amp;gt;100 (OR 30.78 (5.08-186.47; p=0.000) were independently associated with statin prescription. Conclusions The use of coronary CT allows optimization of the therapeutic strategy in primary prevention, increasing the percentage of patients who may benefit from statins. In this setting, aspirin is little established in our cohort. Therefore, we should transmit to the clinician the possibility of starting antiplatelet therapy, individualizing the indication.

National VQI Initiative Associated With Improved Prescription of Statin and Antiplatelet Medications Across Racial and Ethnic Groups

In 2017, the Vascular Quality Initiative announced the first national initiative intended to improve prescription of antiplatelets and statins. We hypothesized that this national quality initiative would be associated with an increase in prescription of these medications and a decrease in previously noted racial disparities in evidence-based medical management. A retrospective analysis using VQI data from the suprainguinal bypass, infrainguinal bypass, and peripheral vascular intervention modules from January 2015 through July 2022 was performed. Inclusion criteria were center participation during the entire study period, age over 18 years, and no documented contraindication to statin or antiplatelet therapy. Exclusion criteria were acute limb ischemia or inpatient death. Frequency of statin prescription by racial group prior to and following announcement of the national initiative were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed separately for statin and antiplatelet prescription at discharge. Finally, a time series analysis was performed to assess changes in disparities over time. Overall, 202,900 patients were included, of whom 149,059 identified as White, 35,871 identified as Black or African American, 11,039 identified as Latinx/Hispanic, 2015 identified as Asian, 1031 identified as Indigenous (including American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander), and 3861 were designated unknown or other, including patients who identified with more than one race. Almost all racial and ethnic groups had a statistically significant improvement in the frequency of any statin prescription and new statin prescription (Table). Moreover, while the difference between groups was statistically significant prior to announcement of the national quality improvement initiative (P < .001), there was no statistically significant difference between groups after (P = .05). On adjusted analysis, following the national quality improvement initiative, patients had an increased odds of both statin (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.6), new statin (OR, 1.4; P < .001; 95% CI, 1.4-1.5), nonaspirin antiplatelet (OR, 1.5, P < .001; 95% CI, 1.5-1.6), and new nonaspirin antiplatelet prescription (OR, 1.5, P < .001; 95% CI, 1.5-1.6). There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of new aspirin prescription. A time series analysis demonstrated continued improvement of statin prescription for all racial and ethnic groups, with a convergence around 90% (Figure). The first national VQI quality initiative was associated with a reduction in the disparities in statin prescription and nonaspirin antiplatelet prescription across all ethnic groups. These findings highlight the impact VQI-based national quality initiatives may have on racial and ethnic disparities in medical management.TableStatin prescription at dischargeAny statin prescriptionNew statin prescriptionPre-Post-DifferenceP valuePre-Post-DifferenceP valueWhite80.5%88.2%+7.8%.00126%37.8%+11.8%.001Black or African American79.7%88.2%+8.6%.00129.8%42.2%+12.4%.001Latinx/Hispanic82%87.7%+5.7%.00131.9%38.9%+7%.001Unknown or other77.6%86.6%+9%.00127.2%38.7%+11.5%.001Asian83.8%87%+3.2%.0527.9%37.9%+10%.05Indigenous (including American Indian, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander)77.2%86.5%+9%.00133.3%39.5%+6.2%.33 Open table in a new tab

Low-Dose Aspirin Prescription for Pregnant People at Risk for Preeclampsia [ID: 1356912

INTRODUCTION: Low-dose aspirin (LDA) prescription during pregnancy is recommended for preeclampsia prevention for patients with one or more high-risk factors and two or more moderate-risk factors. Despite recognition that LDA is beneficial for at-risk patients, there appear to be gaps in the practice of prescribing LDA. Our objective was to measure prescriber adherence in a Midwestern health network. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from the electronic health records (EHRs) of a Midwestern health network. Patients who began prenatal care prior to 28 weeks and gave birth between September 2021 and December 2021 were included. Risk factors for preeclampsia and LDA prescription were extracted from the EHRs, with public insurance serving as a proxy for low socioeconomic status. Patients were excluded if LDA was contraindicated or prescribed for a purpose other than preeclampsia prevention. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients qualified for LDA recommendation during the study period. Of the 120 patients with at least one high-risk factor, 86 (71.7%) were prescribed LDA. Of the 240 patients with at least two moderate-risk factors, 54 (22.5%) were prescribed LDA. Among the 34 patients with a high-risk factor who were not prescribed LDA, the most common missed indication was autoimmune disease. Among the 186 patients with two or more moderate-risk factors who were not prescribed LDA, the most common risk factors included sociodemographic risk, nulliparity, and obesity. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the need for quality improvement interventions targeting patients with two or more moderate-risk factors or the high-risk factor of autoimmune disease.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Unrepaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cardiovascular death, cause substantial morbidity and mortality. This review assessed the incidence rate of MACE and the association with modifiable risk factors (diabetes, hypertension) and medication use (aspirin, statins) in patients with unrepaired abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Electronic databases were searched systematically for observational studies reporting the incidence of MI, stroke or cardiovascular death in patients with unrepaired AAAs. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death reported as an incidence rate (events per 100 person-years (PY)). Fourteen studies, including 69,579 participants with a mean follow-up time of 5.4 years, were included. Meta-analysis revealed the overall incidence of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke of 2.31 per 100 PY (95% CI, 1.63-3.26; I2 = 98%), 1.65 per 100 PY (95% CI, 1.01-2.69, I2 = 88%) and 0.89 per 100 PY (95% CI, 0.53-1.48, I2 = 87.0%), respectively. The mean rates of statin and aspirin prescriptions were 58.1% and 53.5%, respectively. In conclusion, there is a substantial incidence of MACE in patients with unrepaired AAA, but the prescription of preventative medication is suboptimal. Greater emphasis should be placed on secondary prevention in this population.

Association of Clinician Practice Ownership With Ability of Primary Care Practices to Improve Quality Without Increasing Burnout

Work environments and practice structural features are associated with both burnout and the ability of practices to enhance quality of care. To characterize factors associated with primary care practices successfully improving quality scores without increasing clinician and staff burnout. This cross-sectional study assessed small- to medium-sized primary care practices that participated in the EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health initiative using surveys that were administered at baseline (September 2015 to April 2017) and after the intervention (January 2017 to October 2018). Data were analyzed from February 2022 to January 2023. The primary outcome of being a quality and well-being positive deviant practice was defined as a practice with a stable or improved percentage of clinicians and staff reporting burnout over the study period and with practice-level improvement in all 3 cardiovascular quality measures: aspirin prescribing, blood pressure control, and smoking cessation counseling. Of 727 practices with complete burnout and aspirin prescribing, blood pressure control, and smoking cessation counseling data, 18.3% (n = 133) met the criteria to be considered quality and well-being positive deviant practices. In analyses adjusted for practice location, accountable care organization and demonstration project participation, and practice specialty composition, clinician-owned practices had greater odds of being a positive deviant practice (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.16-3.54) than practices owned by a hospital or health system. In this cross-sectional study, clinician-owned practices were more likely to achieve improvements in cardiovascular quality outcomes without increasing staff member burnout than were practices owned by a hospital or health system. Given increasing health care consolidation, our findings suggest the value of studying cultural features of clinician-owned practices that may be associated with positive quality and experience outcomes.

Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A retrospective, propensity score matched study

Background and aimsAlthough the guidelines have been revised recently, the effect of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still controversial. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of aspirin on primary prevention in the real world. MethodsAmong the 4,266,268 participants without a history of CVD or previous prescription of aspirin and other antiplatelet agents who were screened between 2002 and 2008, 268,963 persons who were prescribed low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg/day) over 90 days in 2002–2008 and 1,075,852 persons who did not receive aspirin were selected after propensity score matching. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used to evaluate the effect of low-dose aspirin on the development of CVD and bleeding episodes. ResultsAspirin showed a protective effect on total CVD events (hazard ratio (HR); 0.737, 95% confidence interval; 0.729–0.745). The protective effect of aspirin on total CVD events was significant in men, women and even in young participants (<65 years). Aspirin had a protective effect in participants with diabetes or hypertension against all subcategories of CVD. The HR of bleeding risk was 1.4–1.5 in aspirin group. ConclusionsLow-dose aspirin generally showed a protective effect against CVD regardless of age, sex, and underlying comorbidities in the real world. Though, the effect of aspirin was evident at a young age, the risk of bleeding was also high (1.4–1.5 times), and thus, careful prescription is required.

Abstract P4-03-02: Low-dose aspirin prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide cohort study with up to 23 years of follow-up

Abstract Background Low-dose aspirin irreversibly inhibits the cyclooxygenase enzymes COX-1 and COX-2, which catalyze the formation of prostaglandins and thromboxanes, inhibiting platelet aggregation. Platelets are thought to play a role in tumorigenesis. As such, aspirin may have a beneficial effect on breast cancer prognosis, but results to date are conflicting. Objectives To evaluate the association between aspirin use and breast cancer recurrence up to 23 years after primary diagnosis. Methods We included all women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer during 1996-2004 registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) clinical database. We obtained information on aspirin prescriptions (&amp;gt;= 2 prescriptions filled between cancer diagnosis and the landmark) from the Danish National Prescription Registry. Information on early and late (&amp;gt;10 years after primary diagnosis) recurrence was obtained using the DBCG database (for recurrence within the first 10 years after diagnosis) and for late recurrence via a previously described and validated algorithm, drawing on data from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Pathology Registry, the Danish Cancer Registry and a contralateral breast cancer database. We used Cox regression to compute crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) employing landmark analyses starting follow-up at years 5, 10, 15, and 20 after primary diagnosis. We adjusted for potential confounders including calendar year of diagnosis, menopausal status, comorbidities, estrogen receptor status, clinical stage, grade, surgery type, chemo- and endocrine therapy, diagnostic codes for alcoholism and obesity, as well as co-medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins, bisphosphonates, metformin, digoxin, hormone replacement therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and vitamin K antagonists). We followed patients until recurrence, death, second cancer, loss to follow-up, or 31 December 2018. Results Among 21,684 women with non-metastatic breast cancer, 4,902 experienced recurrence during 242,427 person-years of follow-up. Our landmark analyses showed a reduced hazard of recurrence in the 5-, 10-, and 15-year landmark cohorts (5-year landmark adjusted HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68, 0.94; 10-year landmark adjusted HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.71, 1.00, 15-year landmark adjusted HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.61, 1.14). The 20-year landmark analysis revealed an adjusted HR of 1.09 (95% CI = 0.49, 2.46). Conclusions The potential anti-cancer effect of aspirin appears most pronounced in the first 15 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Funding Elisabeth Solmunde is funded by the Danish Cancer Society (R320-A18464-B5768) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (1149-00013B). This work was supported by grants to Deirdre Cronin-Fenton from the Danish Cancer Society (“Knæk Cancer” R147-A10100). Citation Format: Elisabeth Solmunde, Rikke N Pedersen, Mette Nørgaard, Lene Mellemkjær, Søren Friis, Bent Ejlertsen, Thomas P. Ahern, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton. Low-dose aspirin prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence: a Danish nationwide cohort study with up to 23 years of follow-up [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-03-02.

Bleeding and thrombotic events in bevacizumab-treated patients with colorectal cancer on novel oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications

BackgroundBevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody often given in combination with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The bleeding and thrombotic event rates in the setting of concurrent novel oral anticoagulants with and without aspirin and bevacizumab treatment in patients with mCRC remain unclear. Methods462 patients with mCRC at Barnes-Jewish Hospital were identified between December 1, 2016 and December 1, 2021 and screened for concurrent treatment with bevacizumab and anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. Demographic and clinical information was extracted by electronic chart review. Results21 patients were identified who received bevacizumab and either apixaban or rivaroxaban for mCRC treatment. Aspirin was prescribed in some of these patients within three years of starting apixaban or rivaroxaban. Of the 13 patients without aspirin prescription, nine were given apixaban, and four were given rivaroxaban while on bevacizumab. Four out of nine of the patients who received apixaban had epistaxis, and only one case resulted in any treatment discontinuation. Three out of four of the patients who received rivaroxaban experienced bleeding, and one of these three patients discontinued bevacizumab. We also looked at eight patients who had received aspirin. Two out of seven patients who received apixaban/bevacizumab/aspirin experienced bleeding and discontinued a medication. The patient who received rivaroxaban/bevacizumab/aspirin experienced bleeding and discontinued bevacizumab. No patient experienced adverse thrombotic events. ConclusionsPatients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab and apixaban with no history of aspirin use within three years have a relatively low risk of bleeding that warrants treatment discontinuation.

Bleeding and thrombotic events in patients with colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab and receiving novel oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications.

104 Background: Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal VEGF antibody given in combination with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Many patients with mCRC also have cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. The bleeding and thrombotic event rates in the setting of concurrent novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and bevacizumab treatment in patients with mCRC remain unclear. Methods: 462 patients with mCRC at Barnes-Jewish Hospital were identified between December 1, 2016 and December 1, 2021 and screened for concurrent treatment with bevacizumab and anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. Demographic and clinical information was extracted by electronic chart review. Results: 21 patients were identified who received bevacizumab and either apixaban or rivaroxaban for mCRC treatment. Aspirin was prescribed in some of these patients within 3 years of starting apixaban or rivaroxaban. Of the 13 patients who had no history of aspirin prescription, 9 were given apixaban, and 4 were given rivaroxaban while on bevacizumab. 44.4% of the patients who received apixaban experienced bleeding. All these events were epistaxis, and only 25% of the cases resulted in any treatment discontinuation. 75% of the patients who received rivaroxaban experienced bleeding events, which 33.3% of the time resulted in discontinuation of either rivaroxaban or bevacizumab. We also looked at 8 patients who had received aspirin in the last three years: 7 patients were on apixaban, and one was on rivaroxaban while on concomitant aspirin and bevacizumab. 28.6% of the patients who received apixaban with bevacizumab and aspirin experienced an adverse bleeding event that resulted in some form of treatment discontinuation. Meanwhile, the patient who received rivaroxaban with bevacizumab and aspirin experienced a bleeding event that resulted in discontinuation of a medication. No patient experienced any adverse thrombotic events. Conclusions: Patients with mCRC treated with bevacizumab and apixaban with no history of prior aspirin use within three years have a relatively low risk of developing bleeding events that warrant treatment discontinuation. The addition of NOAC to bevacizumab therapy does not appear to increase the risk of adverse thrombotic events.

Structured discharge documentation reduces sex-based disparities in statin prescription in vascular surgery patients

ObjectivePerioperative statin use has been shown to improve survival in vascular surgery patients. In 2018, the Northern California Vascular Study Group implemented a quality initiative focused on the use of a SmartText in the discharge summary. We hypothesized that structured discharge documentation would decrease sex-based disparities in evidence-based medical therapy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using Vascular Quality Initiative eligible cases at a single institution. Open or endovascular procedures in the abdominal aorta or lower extremity arteries from 2016 to 2021 were included. Bivariate analysis identified factors associated with statin use and sex. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the end point of statin prescription at discharge and aspirin prescription at discharge. An interaction term assessed the differential impact of the initiative on both sexes. Analysis was then stratified by prior aspirin or statin prescription. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the trend in statin prescription over time. ResultsOverall, 866 patients were included, including 292 (34%) female and 574 (66%) male patients. Before implementation, statins were prescribed in 77% of male and 62% of female patients (P < .01). After implementation, there was no statistically significant difference in statin prescription (91% in male vs 92% in female patients, P = .68). Female patients saw a larger improvement in the adjusted odds of statin prescription compared with male patients (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.6, P = .04). For patients not prescribed a statin preoperatively, female patients again saw an even larger improvement in the odds of being prescribed a statin at discharge (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-22.7, P < .01). Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated a sustained improvement in the frequency of prescription for both sexes over time. The unadjusted frequency of aspirin prescription also improved by 3.5% in male patients vs 5.5% in female patients. For patients not prescribed an aspirin preoperatively, we found that the frequency of aspirin prescription significantly improved for both male (19% increase, P = .006) and female (31% increase, P = .001) patients. There was no significant difference in the perioperative outcomes between male and female patients before and after standardized discharge documentation. ConclusionsA simple, low-cost regional quality improvement initiative eliminated sex-based disparities in statin prescription at a single institution. These findings highlight the meaningful impact of regional quality improvement projects. Future studies should examine the potential for structured discharge documentation to improve patient outcomes and reduce disparities.

Trends in Provision of Medications and Lifestyle Counseling in Ambulatory Settings by Gender and Race for Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, 2006-2016

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) continues to be highly prevalent in the US. The 2013 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) treatment guidelines reevaluated evidence-based practices for reduction of ASCVD in men and women from high-quality randomized trials and meta-analyses recommending the use of statin therapy, aspirin prescription, and lifestyle counseling for adults with ASCVD. Population trends in secondary prevention strategies for patients with ASCVD among primary care settings is currently lacking, limiting ability to evaluate impact of guideline implementation. To examine temporal and sociodemographic trends in secondary prevention strategies in patients with ASCVD between 2006 and 2016 in a nationally representative, ambulatory care database. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), which is an annual survey conducted to represent the national US population and contains information on ambulatory office-based patient visits, including medical conditions, services provided, and demographic characteristics. Participants were adults aged 21 years and older with prevalent ASCVD identified via International Classification of Disease codes between 2006 and 2016. Data were extracted and analyzed in March 2021. Data were separated by calendar year pre-2013 (2006 to 2013) and post-2013 (2014 to 2016). Outcomes included statin therapy, aspirin prescription, and lifestyle counseling (eg, nutrition, exercise, weight reduction) service provided at clinic visits. There were 11 033 visits for adults with ASCVD, representing a weighted total of 275.3 million visits nationwide; 40.7% (112.1 million [weighted]) were women, 9.2% (25.4 million [weighted]) were Hispanic, 9.9% (19.0 million [weighted]) were non-Hispanic Black, 90.1% (172.7 million [weighted]) were non-Hispanic White, and 40.6% (112.1 million [weighted]) were from cardiology clinics. Of 11 033 patient visits, 5507 patients (49.9%) were prescribed statin therapy, 5165 patients (46.8%) were using aspirin, 2233 patients (20.2%) received lifestyle counseling. Statin therapy increased from 9.3 million individuals (45.3%) in 2006 to 14.9 million individuals (46.5%) in 2016, and aspirin prescriptions increased from 8.5 million individuals (41.3%) in 2006 to 15.2 individuals (47.5%) in 2016. Women were less likely than men to receive medications for secondary prevention: among women, 48.8 million (43.3%) received statins (vs 85.9 million men [52.7%]), 44.7 million (39.8%) received aspirin (vs 79.1 million men [48.5%]), and 25.7 million (22.9%) received lifestyle counseling services (vs 37.5 million men [23.0%]). These findings suggest only modest increases in statin and aspirin prescription since 2006; however, lifestyle counseling use decreased in recent years. Women and Black patients continued to be less likely to receive secondary prevention ASCVD treatment. Adherence to guideline-directed secondary prevention recommendations remained low (less than 50%) in patients with ASCVD, especially with regards to lifestyle counseling, suggesting the need for more implementation research.

Quality Improvement Initiative for Aspirin Screening and Prescription Rates for Preeclampsia Prevention in an Outpatient Obstetric Clinic.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) impact 10% of pregnancies in the United States and cause adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes such as prematurity and low birth weight. Aspirin administration to at-risk individuals during pregnancy can reduce risk of HDP. Define-Measure-Assess-Improve-Control methodology was utilized to improve aspirin screening in an outpatient obstetric clinic. Retrospective cohort analysis compared outcome metrics pre- and postimplementation by using logistic regression models, adjusting for race and insurance. Key informant interviews and process mapping identified barriers to aspirin screening. A multidisciplinary team implemented low-cost strategies such as provider education, additional screening by ancillary staff, automated electronic reminders, and standardized patient counseling. Over 6 months, the screening rate improved from 62.5 to 92.0% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.30-14.43). The prescription rate for patients correctly identified to be eligible for aspirin improved from 66.7 to 82.4% (aOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 0.88-4.35). Comprehensive, tailored quality improvement efforts can significantly increase aspirin screening and prescription, which may decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity due to HDP. · Initiative improved overall and correct screening rates.. · Initiative increased provider knowledge of eligibility.. · Low-cost interventions can have high impact over short time interval..

Long-Term Adherence and Persistence to Low-Dose Aspirin for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Using information from electronic health records in Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) in a common data model, we followed adults with ≥2 low-dose aspirin prescriptions (75-100 mg) during 2007-2018 for up to 10 years. Included individuals had no low-dose aspirin prescriptions in the year before the follow-up started (date of first low-dose aspirin prescription) and ≥12 months' observation. Adherence was determined using the medication possession ratio (MPR), and persistence was defined as continuous treatment disregarding gaps between prescriptions of <60 days; analyses were undertaken according to indication (primary/secondary CVD prevention). We identified 144,717 low-dose aspirin users from Germany and 190,907 from the UK. Among patients with 5-10 years' follow-up, median adherence among secondary CVD prevention users was 60% in Germany and 75% in the UK. Among primary prevention users, median adherence was 50% for both countries. Persistence among secondary CVD prevention users was 58.3% at 2 years, 47.0% at 5 years, 35.2% at 10 years (Germany), and 67.5% at 2 years, 58.0% at 5 years, and 46.8% at 10 years (UK). Among primary CVD prevention users, persistence was 52.8% at 2 years, 41.6% at 5 years, 32.1% at 10 years (Germany), 56.3% at 2 years, 45.4% at 5 years, and 33.8% at 10 years (UK). Long-term adherence and persistence to low-dose aspirin are suboptimal; efforts for improvement could translate into a lower CVD burden in the general population.

The Association Between Aspirin and Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical and Financial Analysis.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) comprises about 80% of all NMSCs and its incidence continues to rise. Although BCC rarely leads to metastases or increased mortality, its effects on healthcare costs and quality of life are substantial. Aspirin may prevent the development of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) by the inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, which are associated with carcinogenesis and inflammation. This study therefore examined the effect of aspirin on the risk of BCC, its clinical outcomes, and its treatment costs. A retrospective study (2010 - 2018) was conducted using the Humana Health Insurance Database. International Classification of Disease ninth and 10th codes and National Drug Codes were used to identify BCC diagnoses and aspirin prescriptions. Patients were matched for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Score (CCI), and region of residence. Chi-squared, logistic regression, and odds ratio (OR) analyses were utilized to test for significance and to estimate relative risk. Aspirin use was associated with a decreased incidence of BCC in unmatched (OR = 0.658, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.526 - 0.820) and matched (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.47 - 0.61) analyses. Aspirin was also associated with a decreased BCC risk when stratified by hypertension (P = 3.888 × 10-5), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P = 0.014), diabetes (P = 0.049) and tobacco use (P = 0.017). Aspirin use was not associated with risk of BCC when stratified by obesity (P = 0.408). The average paid per patient for BCC treatment was significantly higher for patients in the aspirin use group than in the aspirin nonuse group (P = 0.0087). While the high incidence and cost of treatment of BCC are demanding both clinically and financially, the low cost of aspirin and its widespread use may have vital implications for its preventative role in this disease. This study concluded that aspirin use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of BCC.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Ambulatory Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol.

Recent guidelines indicate that aspirin affords less cardiovascular protection and greater bleeding risks in adults aged > 70 years. Deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications is particularly important in older adults, as this population experiences a high risk of adverse effects and polypharmacy. Limited data are available regarding targeted aspirin deprescribing approaches by pharmacists. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate the success and feasibility of a pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol for older adults in a primary care setting. This prospective feasibility study in a US Department of Veterans Affairs ambulatory care pharmacy setting included patients aged ≥ 70 years with documented aspirin use. We reviewed 459 patient records and determined that 110 were eligible for deprescribing. A pharmacistinitiated telephone call was attempted for each eligible patient to discuss the risks and benefits of deprescribing aspirin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reached for whom aspirin was discontinued. Secondary outcomes included patient rationale for declining deprescribing and the time to complete the intervention. Of 94 patients reached, 45 (48%) agreed to aspirin deprescribing, 3 (3%) agreed to dose reduction, and 29 (31%) declined the intervention. An additional 17 (18%) had previously stopped aspirin, which led to a medication reconciliation intervention. Pharmacists spent about 2 minutes per record review and 12 minutes on each encounter, including documentation. Implementing a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol in a primary care setting led to the discontinuation of inappropriate aspirin prescribing in nearly half of older adults contacted. The protocol was well accepted by collaborating physicians and feasible for pharmacists to implement, with potential for further dissemination across primary care settings.