Economic drivers, changing material streams, environmental regulations, and formulation changes driven by the climate-based PG grading system itself have led to substantial changes in the production and modification of paving grade asphalt since the development of Superpave Performance-Graded (PG) binder specifications during the 1990s. Superpave specifications and mechanistic-empirical pavement design criteria attempt to address pavement distresses such as rutting, transverse cracking, and fatigue damage with varying degrees of success. Unexpectedly though, aged-induced surface distresses have worsened to become the primary cause of pavement damage for many highway agencies. Thermally-induced surface deterioration, which may not be directly linked to traffic loading, appears in the form of traditional evenly spaced transverse thermal cracking, block cracking, raveling, or accelerating damage at joints or other areas where density is insufficient to prevent moisture and oxygen from permeating into the asphalt surface layer. The source of damaging stresses leading to such failures are not well-understood, nor have binder properties contributing to early pavement surface damage been completely and effectively controlled by PG specifications.Transverse cracking damage is known to require external restraint in one-dimension to impose tensile stresses on the asphalt concrete mixture as it cools and contracts. Recent experimental results from mixture bending beam testing (BBR Sliver), acoustic emissions, and finite element analysis (FEA) provide evidence that asphalt concrete can be damaged on cooling even when no external restraint is imposed. A second “Internal Restraint” damage mechanism has been theorized to create localized tensile stresses due to differential contraction between mastics and the surrounding aggregate skeleton as a pavement surface cools. This recently proposed concept is now thought to be one of the primary causes for surface block cracking and raveling. Moreover, damage accumulating via the internal restraint mechanism acts cumulatively with other sources of stress on the mixture, such as the top-down fatigue cracking that initiates near the tires edge, transverse cracking due to externally restrained cooling, thermal fatigue cycling without sufficient healing, longitudinal cracking at the construction joints or reflective cracking from cracks in the underlying layer that propagate through the overlays at the surface.Other researchers have proposed various rheological parameters measured in the linear-viscoelastic region (LVE) to be indicators of problematic binders that are prone to age-induced surface damage. Most of these parameters can be fundamentally or empirically related to binder stress relaxation properties at low temperatures. Although these LVE rheological surrogates can be used to rank binder performance for straight-run asphalts produced by conventional vacuum distillation, these materials typically have a narrow strain tolerance and strength range. Limitations of LVE parameters, such as ΔTc, R-value, or G-R parameter, are more noticeable when used to characterize the performance of complex binders. This study indicates that rheological surrogates in the LVE region are not a direct measure of binder failure properties such as strength, ductility, strain tolerance, fracture toughness, or fatigue resistance, particular after a bitumen has been modified with polymers (PMA). Hence, rheological surrogates within the LVE domain are important, but not sufficient for a universal and blind approach to evaluate binders without knowing their composition or production process. LVE surrogates alone cannot rank performance for a wide range of complex systems such as incompatible blends, recycled materials (crumb rubber, shingles, plastics, biomaterials) or PMA’s using the same thresholds for pass/fail specifications. This paper proposes a practical approach to rank a binder’s resistance to low-temperature age-induced surface damage by combining LVE rheological measurements with failure parameters using the Asphalt Binder Cracking Device. ABCD is particularly appropriate to ranking surface damage via the internal restraint cooling model because the binder cracking temperature measured in this test depends upon both failure strength, cooling rate, and the binder’s coefficient of thermal contraction (CTC).