The 1990 U.S. census figures showed the state of Utah to be 93 percent white, 4 percent Hispanic, 2 percent Asian Pacific Islander American, 1 percent Native American, and less than 1 percent African American. These simple numbers are important for understanding the special contribution of Leslie G. Kelen and Eileen Hallet Stone's ambitious oral history book, Missing Stories: An Oral History of Ethnic and Minority Groups in Utah. This book brings together the history, voices, and photographs of the state's eight oldest and largest ethnic minority groups. Research for this project began in 1982 with the relatively modest goal of interviewing 120 individuals representing Salt Lake City's Ute, African-American, Jewish, Chinese, Italian, Japanese, Greek, and Chicano-Hispanic communities. Eight years and 689 interviews later, the project was completed. It took another four years to finish the manuscript. Missing Stories stands out because it highlights non-Mormon social and cultural life in Utah, which has only been glossed over by most Utah historians. The book serves to acknowledge Utah's multiracial and multicultural past and present. Second, the book is intended to be very personal, rather than a general history of diverse groups in Utah. The primary focus throughout the book is on the reflections of how individuals and families migrated to the state, earned a living, and interacted with the dominant society. A preface to each section by historians from each of the different communities does provide a historical context for the reader. Lastly, Missing Stories stands out for its efforts to offer a complex and comparative look at the racial and ethnic experience in Utah. This is consistent with the new trend in ethnic and community studies to recognize the heterogeneity within, and interactions between, minority groups. The last point is both a strength and the book's most glaring weakness. Missing Stories does a good job of showing the role of social class, gender, the perspectives and experiences of different generations, specific historical situations, and other dimensions that enhance our knowledge about each individual group. Equally important is the fact the book does not shy away from highlighting acts of prejudice and discrimination against all minority groups. However, the book's organization and text still treat each group linearly and as a separate entity. There are surprisingly few direct examples of interaction between the groups featured, and
Read full abstract