Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty Research Articles

Unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

The outcomes of patients with unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to establish the prevalence and infection-free implant survival in UPCs during presumed aseptic single-stage revision THA and TKA at mid-term follow-up. This study included 297 patients undergoing presumed aseptic single-stage revision THA or TKA at a single treatment centre. All patients with at least three UPCs obtained during revision surgery were treated with minimum three months of oral antibiotics following revision surgery. The prevalence of UPCs and causative microorganisms, the recurrence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), and the infection-free implant survival were established at minimum five years' follow-up (5.1 to 12.3). Of the 297 patients undergoing aseptic revisions, 37 (12.5%) had at least three UPCs obtained during surgery. The UPC cohort included 23 males (62.2%) and 14 females (37.8%), with a mean age of 71.2 years (47 to 82). Comorbidities included smoking (56.8%), hypertension (48.6%), diabetes mellitus (27.0%), and chronic renal impairment (13.5%). The causative microorganisms included Staphylococcus epidermidis (49.6%), Bacillus species (18.9%), Micrococcus species (16.2%), and Cutibacterium acnes (16.2%). None of the study patients with UPCs developed further PJIs or required further surgical intervention during follow-up. The prevalence of UPCs during presumed aseptic revision THA and TKA was 12.5%. The most common causative microorganisms were of low virulence, and included S. epidermidis, Bacillus species, Micrococcus species, and C. acnes. Microorganism-specific antibiotic treatment for minimum three months' duration of UPCs in presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty was associated with excellent infection-free implant survival at mid-term follow-up.

Tranexamic Acid as a Preventive Strategy Against Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review

Tranexamic Acid as a Preventive Strategy Against Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review

High Demand for Psychological Support in Patients Who Have Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: An Analysis of 13,976 Patients

BackgroundThere is only sparse knowledge on the psychological burden of patients who have periprosthetic joint infections. The aim of our study was to assess the need for psychological support following total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. A special focus was set on patients who had aseptic and septic complications. MethodsA total of 13,976 patients who underwent total hip (n = 6,926) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 7,050) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated for the postoperative need for a psychological consultation. Data were collected on age, sex, type of surgery, and indications for revision procedures. The need for a psychological consultation was assessed during the daily postoperative visits, which were further coordinated by 2 institutional psychologists. ResultsThe average age was 68 years (range, 12 to 100), and there were 63.5% women. The overall rate of psychological consultations was 1.7%. Patients who had a septic indication for revision surgery had an 18.7-fold higher rate of postoperative psychological consultations compared to patients following primary surgery and a 5.4-fold higher rate compared to patients who had an aseptic indication. In detail, this rate was 1.0% in the primary subgroup, compared to 7.7% following revision arthroplasty (P < .001). In the revision subgroup, the rate was 17.9% for septic and 3.3% for aseptic revision arthroplasty cases (P < .001). Postoperative psychological consultations were twice as frequent in women (2.1%) compared to men (1.0%), P < .001. ConclusionsThe present study raises awareness of the markedly high psychological burden in revision arthroplasty cases, in the view of the high estimated number of unknown cases. There is a significant correlation between periprosthetic joint infectionsand the postoperative need for a psychological consultation, with women being at an even higher risk. Health care providers should aim at offering psychological support for patients who have a septic complication, with affected patients being at risk for psychological stress. Level of EvidenceIV.

Investigation of the pathogen-specific antibody response in periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a very demanding complication of arthroplasty. Diagnosis of PJI and pathogen identification pose considerable challenges in clinical practice. We hypothesized that the pathogen-specific immune response to PJI reflects the infection process, provides clinically relevant information on disease course, and has the potential to further optimize antimicrobial therapy. We conducted a prospective matched cohort pilot study with 13 patients undergoing two-stage septic revision arthroplasty (PJI patients) between 06/2020 and 06/2021, as well as 11 control patients undergoing one-stage aseptic revision arthroplasty (Non-PJI patients). Pre-, intra- and postoperative serum samples were collected at standardized time points. We developed a custom Luminex®-based quantitative bead-based suspension array (Infection Array; IA), and used it for simultaneous measurement of antibody specificities against 32 pathogens commonly associated with PJI in 267 serum samples. The IA was able to trace the dynamics of the pathogen-specific humoral immune response in all patients against PJI-related pathogens, prominently coagulase-negative staphylococci and streptococci. Pathogen-specific serum antibody titers declined in 62% of PJI patients over the course of treatment, while no changes in antibody titers were observed in 82% of Non-PJI patients during this study. Our serological data strongly suggested that antibody signatures reflect an immune response to microbial invasion. Our results provide insights into the pathophysiology of PJI and information on the individual disease courses. The IA is therefore a promising and novel serological tool of high resolution for monitoring the immunoproteomic footprints of infectious pathogens in the course of PJI.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an excellent surgical option for patients who have end-stage knee osteoarthritis. While rates of major postoperative complications have steadily decreased with modern implants and operative techniques, contemporary outcome data for patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) are scarce. The goal of this study was to compare complication rates after primary TKA in patients who have EDS versus matched controls. MethodsA large administrative database was used to identify patients who underwent primary TKA from 2009 to 2020. Patients who had a diagnosis of EDS were identified by International Classification of Diseases Coding. Propensity scores were utilized to match these patients with controls at a 1:4 ratio based on age, sex, and various comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the rates of medical and surgical complications at 90 days and 2 years. A total of 188 patients who had EDS and 752 controls were included in this study. ResultsAfter univariate analysis, Ehlers-Danlos patients exhibited significantly higher rates of wound complications (4.8 versus 0.9%, P = .001) at 90 days. When adjusted for comorbidities, Ehlers-Danlos patients still exhibited significantly increased odds of developing wound complications (odds ratio: 7.06; P < .001). ConclusionsPatients who have EDS undergoing TKA exhibited significantly higher rates of wound complications within 90 days postoperatively compared to matched controls. Rates of instability, manipulation under anesthesia, periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, and aseptic revision arthroplasty did not significantly differ between the cohorts. This study found generally favorable short-term outcomes of TKA in this population; however, the inability to control for implant type and other confounding variables may have influenced the lack of difference in complication rates at 2 years. Surgeons should monitor for the potentially increased risk of wound complications and consider the possible need for increased constraint in this population during preoperative planning.

ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT FOR NON-ONCOLOGICAL CONDITIONS (EPRO) STUDY: A UK MULTICENTRE STUDY INTO CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT

This large UK multicentre study evaluates clinical outcomes and identifies factors associated with local complication following PFR for non-oncological conditions.132 patients across four UK centres underwent PFR from 01/08/2004-28/03/2023 with median follow-up of 1.9 (Q10.5-Q34.2) years. 75 (56.8%) patients were female and the mean age was 74.0 (SD 11.7) years. 103 (78%) patients had Charleston Comorbidity Index ≥3. ASA class was III or IV in 66.6%. Indications were infected revision (39, 29.5%), periprosthetic fracture (36, 27.3%), acute trauma (30, 22.7%), aseptic revision (17, 12.9%), failed trauma (nine, 6.8%) and complex primary arthroplasty (one, 0.8%). The primary outcome was the local complication rate. Secondary outcomes were systemic complications, reoperation and mortality rates. Comparisons were made with t-tests and Chi2 tests to investigate patient and surgical factors associated with local complication. Statistical significance was p&lt;0.05.There were 37(28.0%) local complications. These were 18 (13.6%) dislocations, eight (6.1%) prosthetic joint infections, four (3.0%) haematomas, three (2.3%) superficial infections, one (0.8%) wound dehiscence, one (0.8%) sciatic nerve palsy and one (0.8%) femoral perforation. Dislocation mostly occurred in conventional articulations (12, 9.1%) followed by dual-mobility cups (three, 2.3%), constrained cups (two, 1.5%) and hemiarthroplasty (one, 0.8%). Median time to local complication was 30 (Q14-Q3 133) days. Seven (5.3%) patients developed a systemic complication. Thirty-three (25.0%) patients underwent reoperation. Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates were 3.8% and 12.1%, respectively. Longer surgical waiting times (7.9 \[SD 16.9) versus 2.6 \[SD 4.4\] days, p&lt;0.001) and longer operating times (212.5 \[SD 71.8\] versus 189.4 \[SD 59.3\] mins, p=0.0450) were associated with local complication.Due to its high complication rate, PFR should be a salvage option when performed for non-oncological indications. Conventional articulations should be avoided. PFR should be delivered in a timely manner and ideally as dual-consultant cases to reduce operating time.

A Low Rate of Periprosthetic Infections after Aseptic Knee Prosthesis Revision Using Dual-Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement.

The incidence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) following aseptic knee revision arthroplasty lies between 3% and 7.5%. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the use of dual-antibiotic-impregnated cement in knee revision arthroplasty leads to a lower rate of periprosthetic joint infections. We retrospectively reviewed 403 aseptic revision knee arthroplasties performed between January 2013 and March 2021 (148 revisions of a unicompartmental prosthesis, 188 revisions of a bicondylar total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 41 revisions of an axis-guided prosthesis, and 26 revisions of only one component of a surface replacement prosthesis). The bone cement Copal G+C (Heraeus Medical, Wertheim, Germany) with two antibiotics-gentamycin and clindamycin-was used for the fixation of the new implant. The follow-up period was 53.4 ± 27.9 (4.0-115.0) months. Five patients suffered from PJI within follow-up (1.2%). The revision rate for any reason was 8.7%. Survival for any reason was significantly different between the types of revision (p = 0.026, Log-Rank-test), with lower survival rates after more complex surgical procedures. The 5-year survival rate with regard to revision for any reason was 91.3% [88.2-94.4%] and with regard to revision for PJI 98.2% [98.7-99.9%], respectively. The use of the dual-antibiotic-impregnated bone cement Copal G+C results in a lower rate of periprosthetic infections after aseptic knee prosthesis replacement than that reported in published prosthesis revisions using only one antibiotic in the bone cement.

Анализ биохимических показателей сыворотки крови у больных с ревизионным эндопротезированием тазобедренного сустава и нарушением углеводного обмена

INTRODUCTION: Along with increase in the number of hip arthroplasty surgeries, the number of complications after them also increases. Laboratory diagnostics, being a unified method for determining the risks of complications and relapses, indicates the need for a comparative analysis of standard laboratory parameters in patients with carbohydrate metabolism disorders (CMD) before revision arthroplasty. AIM: To evaluate changes in the biochemical parameters of blood serum of patients with impaired carbohydrate metabolism before revision arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of anamnesis, morphometry and main blood parameters of patients who underwent treatment for osteoarticular pathology and purulent osteology in inpatient facility from 2011 to 2019 were processed and analyzed. The first group included 115 patients (33% of the total amount of examined patients) with revision hip arthroplasty having no disorders in carbohydrate metabolism in history. The second group included 103 patients (30%) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty and had diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, and early forms of carbohydrate metabolism disorders as comorbidities. The third group included 73 patients (21%) with periprosthetic infection of the hip joint without history of carbohydrate metabolism disorders. The fourth group included 56 patients (16%) with periprosthetic infection, with disorders of carbohydrate metabolism. RESULTS: The results obtained in the study groups were intercompared and compared with the reference intervals established by the reagent manufacturers for each study method. In the studies, no statistically significant differences were found in the biochemical parameters of blood of patients with aseptic revision arthroplasty, depending on the existing disorders of carbohydrate metabolism. When comparing biochemical parameters of blood of patients with periprosthetic infection, statistically significant differences depending on the presence of CMD, were found in three parameters. Patients with disorders of carbohydrate metabolism had higher blood levels of glucose, creatinine and urea, which, however, remained within the normal range. Two biochemical parameters of the blood of patients of all four groups were beyond the standard limits — C-reactive protein and albumin-globulin ratio. In patients with endoprosthesis instability, bilirubin, creatinine, and albumin values changed depending on the presence of an infectious process in the joint, and creatinine and urea, depending on carbohydrate metabolism disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the presence of an infectious process or disorders of carbohydrate metabolism, these parameters require closer attention in the preoperative period in patients with endoprosthesis instability. Patients with periprosthetic infection of the hip joint with carbohydrate metabolism disorders require laboratory monitoring of kidney function, protein fractions, and C-reactive protein even with normal results of biochemical blood tests.

Diagnostic value of preoperative blood parameters in periprosthetic joint infections

Aim: Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is not easy and it is made by presenting of combined findings rather than a single finding. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of blood parameters in diagnosing PJI.&#x0D; Material and Method: Revisions of total knee replacement and total hip replacement operated by the same surgeon between 2008 and 2018 were included in this study. Preoperative blood parameters of the patients were recorded. 69 primary arthroplasty patients with similar demographic characteristics to the patients were also included as the control group.&#x0D; Results: 214 arthroplasty patients, 79.0% of whom were female (n=169), were included in this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups; 32.2% were primary arthroplasty, 36.9% were aseptic revision arthroplasty, and 30.8% were septic revision arthroplasty. There was no difference between the three groups in terms of demographic characteristics. In pairwise comparisons, preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte rate (PLR) parameters were found to be significantly different in the septic group when compared to both the aseptic group and the primary arthroplasty group. Further analyzes were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of ESR, CRP, lymphocyte, and PLR in PJI relative to aseptic patients by plotting to receive operating characteristic curves.&#x0D; Conclusion: Lymphocyte, PLR, ESR, and CRP may have diagnostic value in predicting PJI. Therefore, these parameters may be helpful in deciding on revision arthroplasty for PJI.

Economic and educational disparities are associated with an increased risk of revision surgery following shoulder arthroplasty

There is limited literature exploring how nonmedical factors such as social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. A retrospective cohort review of the Pearl Diver Database was used to capture patients undergoing either primary anatomic total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2019 with at least 1 year of active longitudinal follow-up. Patients with proximal humeral fractures, stress fractures, or septic arthritis were excluded. The included patients were then divided into 2 cohorts based on the presence of current SDOHs or a history of SDOHs. The SDOH cohort comprised 4 non-mutually exclusive categories: economic, educational, social, and environmental disparities. Subsequently, a control cohort was matched at a 1:1 ratio to the SDOH cohort. Primary outcome measures were assessed using a logistic regression and consisted of the following 90-day postoperative complications: minor and major medical complications and infection. Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions for any cause were also assessed. Additionally, the following 1-year outcomes were assessed: aseptic loosening, instability, and revision arthroplasty. Surgical costs and 90-day postoperative costs were collected using averaged insurance reimbursements for both the control and SDOH cohorts. There were 5190 patients in each cohort. Economic disparities made up the largest portion of the SDOH cohort (n=4631, 89.2%), followed by social (n=741, 14.3%), environmental (n=417, 8.0%), and educational (n=99, 1.9%) disparities. Compared with the control cohort, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of major complications (2.3% vs. 1.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.87; P<.001), minor complications (5.7% vs. 3.8%; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.21-1.95; P=.001), readmissions (4.3% vs. 2.8%; OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.84; P<.001), and ED visits (15.2% vs. 11.0%; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.63; P<.001) within 90 days following surgery. Additionally, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of aseptic loosening (1.1% vs. 0.6%; OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.65; P=.006), instability (4.0% vs. 2.2%; OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43-2.28; P<.001), and ipsilateral revision (9.2% vs. 7.6%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43; P<.001) at 1 year postoperatively compared with the control cohort. SDOHs are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost compared with matched controls without SDOHs. Specifically, economic and educational disparities are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following surgery including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost.

Assessment of antimicrobial mismatches in empirical treatment in early PJI after aseptic revision arthroplasty.

In early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), 'debridement, antibiotics and implant retention' (DAIR) is a widely accepted form of treatment. Empirical antimicrobial treatment is started while culture results of tissue samples taken during debridement are pending. In this retrospective study we assessed the antimicrobial mismatch rate between empirical treatment and the susceptibility of the causative microorganisms of PJI after aseptic revision arthroplasty. We analysed risk factors for antimicrobial mismatches and the impact of mismatches on the outcome of PJI treatment. A total of 119 patients were included in the analysis. In 72% (86/119) of the cases there was an antimicrobial mismatch in empirical treatment. Most of the antimicrobial mismatches were caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus spp. (77%, 66/86). In multivariable analysis, polymicrobial PJI was significantly associated with antimicrobial mismatch (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 2.38-19.53; P < 0.001), and antimicrobial mismatch was significantly associated with reduced success rate of PJI treatment (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.05 ± 0.82; P = 0.026). There was no difference in successful outcome between PJI caused by Gram-negative bacilli (61%) and Gram-positive bacteria (69%, P = 0.516). Mismatching empirical antimicrobial treatment after DAIR following aseptic revision arthroplasty was significantly associated with failure of PJI treatment. Polymicrobial PJI is a risk factor for antimicrobial mismatch of the empirical treatment of PJI. Antimicrobial mismatch and delay in targeted treatment should be integrated in the approach to optimize antibiotic treatment to improve clinical outcomes, while minimizing unintended side effects of antimicrobial use (antimicrobial stewardship).

Post-operative prophylactic antibiotics in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching analysis

The use of extended antibiotic (EA) prophylaxis (> 24 h) remains controversial in aseptic revision arthroplasty. We sought to determine whether EA prophylaxis reduces the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty. A total of 2800 patients undergoing aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty at five institutional databases from 2008 to 2017 were evaluated. One to two nearest-neighbor propensity score matching analysis was conducted between patients who did and did not receive extended antibiotic prophylaxis. The matching elements included age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, hospital distribution, year of surgery, joint (hip or knee), surgical time, CRP, preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, and length of stay. The primary outcome was the development of PJI, which was assessed at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year following revision and analyzed separately. A total of 2467 (88%) patients received EA prophylaxis, and 333 (12%) patients received standard antibiotic (SA) prophylaxis (≤ 24 h). In the propensity-matched analysis, there was no difference between patients who received EA prophylaxis and those who did not in terms of 30-day PJI (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 1.00), 90-day PJI (1.7% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.62) and 1- year PJI (3.8% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.109). For revision hip, the incidence of PJI was 0.2% vs 0% at 30 days (p = 0.482), 1.6% vs 1.4% at 90 days (p = 0.837), and 3.4% vs 5.1% at 1 year (p = 0.305) in the EA and SA group. For revision knee, the incidence of PJI was 0.4% vs 0.9% at 30 days (p = 0.63), 1.8% vs 3.4% at 90 days (p = 0.331), and 4.4% vs 7.8% at 1 year (p = 0.203) in the EA and SA group. A post hoc power analysis revealed an adequate sample size with a beta value of 83%. In addition, the risks of Clostridium difficile and resistant organism infection were not increased. This multi-institutional study demonstrated no difference in the rate of PJIs between patients who received extended antibiotic prophylaxis and those who did not in aseptic revision arthroplasty. The risk of C. difficile and resistant organism infection was not increased with prolonged antibiotic use.

Is Prior Hip Arthroscopy Associated With Higher Complication Rates or Prolonged Opioid Claims After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Study.

Background:Hip arthroscopy (HA) procedures have increased exponentially in recent years. Their effect on outcomes after subsequent total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear.Purpose:To compare rates of complications and opioid claims after elective THA among patients with prior HA versus controls.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Patients who underwent THA were identified in the PearlDiver database. Arthroplasty performed for hip fractures and hip avascular necrosis were excluded. Within this population, patients with HA before arthroplasty (n = 3156) were propensity score matched 1:1 with controls on age, sex, US region, and several comorbidities. Rates of medical complications within 90 days and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years were queried. The number of patients with an opioid claim within 0 to 30 days and subsequent opioid claim(s) during the 90-day global period were obtained to assess rates of prolonged opioid use after arthroplasty. Rates of postoperative complications and opioid claims were compared using logistic regression.Results:Patients with prior HA exhibited significantly lower rates of readmission (5.6% vs 7.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.72), pulmonary embolism (0.2% vs 0.6%; OR, 0.45), urinary tract infection (3.1% vs 4.0%; OR, 0.75), and blood transfusion (3.6% vs 6.1%; OR, 0.55). The prior HA cohort also exhibited a significantly lower rate of prosthetic joint infection at 1 year postoperatively (0.6% vs 1.3%; OR, 0.50). Rates of dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, mechanical complications, and aseptic revision arthroplasty were statistically comparable between the cohorts within 2 years. The prior HA cohort was significantly less likely to file persistent opioid claims after 30 days postoperatively, including between 31 and 60 days (27.2% vs 33.1%; OR, 0.74) and 61 to 90 days (16.2% vs 20.9%; OR, 0.71).Conclusion:After elective THA, patients with prior HA exhibited significantly lower rates of medical complications and prolonged opioid claims within 90 days and prosthetic joint infection at 1 year. Rates of all other prosthesis-related complications within 2 years were statistically comparable.

Perioperative myocardial injury and mortality after revision surgery for orthopaedic device-related infection.

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and fracture-related infections (FRIs) are associated with a significant risk of adverse events. However, there is a paucity of data on cardiac complications following revision surgery for PJI and FRI and how they impact overall mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk of perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) and mortality in this patient cohort. We prospectively included consecutive patients at high cardiovascular risk (defined as age ≥ 45 years with pre-existing coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular artery disease, or any patient aged ≥ 65 years, plus a postoperative hospital stay of > 24 hours) undergoing septic or aseptic major orthopaedic surgery between July 2014 and October 2016. All patients received a systematic screening to reliably detect PMI, using serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. All-cause mortality was assessed at one year. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied to compare incidence of PMI and mortality between patients undergoing septic revision surgery for PJI or FRI, and patients receiving aseptic major bone and joint surgery. In total, 911 consecutive patients were included. The overall perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) rate was 15.4% (n = 140). Septic revision surgery for PJI was associated with a significantly higher PMI rate (43.8% (14/32) vs 14.5% (57/393); p = 0.001) and one-year mortality rate (18.6% (6/32) vs 7.4% (29/393); p = 0.038) compared to aseptic revision or primary arthroplasty. The association with PMI persisted in multivariable analysis with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 4.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 10.7; p < 0.001), but was not statistically significant for one-year mortality (aOR 1.9 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.4; p = 0.240). PMI rate (15.2% (5/33) vs 14.1% (64/453)) and one-year mortality (15.2% (5/33) vs 9.1% (41/453)) after FRI revision surgery were comparable to aseptic long-bone fracture surgery. Patients undergoing revision surgery for PJI were at a risk of PMI and death compared to those undergoing aseptic arthroplasty surgery. Screening for PMI and treatment in specialized multidisciplinary units should be considered in major bone and joint infections. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(6):696-702.

Wound infection in elbow fractures: Incidence and new management protocol.

Wound infection in elbow fractures: Incidence and new management protocol.

Implementation of astandardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine.

The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing and the proportion of revision arthroplasties is becoming increasingly more important. The need for standardized and guideline-based diagnostics for the safe detection of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming apparent. In the past 10 years various organizations have published definitions and diagnostic guidelines. The implementation of an inhouse standard test kit could help to simplify the process and could improve the diagnostic quality. In 2016 a test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, taking the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria 2014 and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria into account, which also fulfils the definitions of the ICM criteria 2018 and criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021. The test kit was implemented in the clinical setting of a special department for aseptic and septic revision arthroplasty. The usability and accuracy of the test kit were examined. The test kit was implemented using blood samples (leukocyte count; C‑reactive protein, CRP), samples for examining the synovial fluid (white blood cell count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, leukocyte esterase test strips) together with information and request forms. Between April 2016 and February 2020 a total of 405 patients were investigated. Within 3 calendar years, the use of the test kit increased from 59% initially to 86%, and finally to 96% of cases in the third calendar year. The leukocyte esterase test strip was reliable in only 72%, due to undifferentiated readability or blood contamination. The costs increased by the only commercially available alpha-defensin ELISA test by approx. 52€ per puncture. The best individual test showed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8%/95.2% with alpha-defensin. It was calculated which combinations showed a similar test quality and different combinations, such as CRP+ cell count+ microbiology showed a sensitivity/specificity both of around 90%. Metallosis is a challenge for preoperative PJI diagnostics. In a prospective study it was shown, that the implementation of the standardized test kit lead to a guideline based PJI diagnostic in all cases and thus to a significantly increase of the diagnostic quality. There is currently no single test that reliably excludes or proves an infection. The alpha-defensin laboratory ELISA test showed the best test accuracy, whereby the consideration of test combinations is obligatory and at the same time safe.

Implementation of astandardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine. German version

The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing and the proportion of revision arthroplasties is becoming increasingly more important. The need for standardized and guideline-based diagnostics for the safe detection of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming apparent. In the past 10 years various organizations have published definitions and diagnostic guidelines. The implementation of an inhouse standard test kit could help to simplify the process and could improve the diagnostic quality. In 2016 a test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, taking the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria 2014 and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria into account, which also fulfils the definitions of the ICM criteria 2018 and criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021. The test kit was implemented in the clinical setting of a special department for aseptic and septic revision arthroplasty. The usability and accuracy of the test kit were examined. The test kit was implemented using blood samples (leukocyte count; C‑reactive protein, CRP), samples for examining the synovial fluid (white blood cell count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, leukocyte esterase test strips) together with information and request forms. Between April 2016 and February 2020 a total of 405 patients were investigated. Within 3 calendar years, the use of the test kit increased from 59% initially to 86%, and finally to 96% of cases in the third calendar year. The leukocyte esterase test strip was reliable in only 72%, due to undifferentiated readability or blood contamination. The costs increased by the only commercially available alpha-defensin ELISA test by approx. 52€ per puncture. The best individual test showed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8%/95.2% with alpha-defensin. It was calculated which combinations showed a similar test quality and different combinations, such as CRP+ cell count+ microbiology showed a sensitivity/specificity both of around 90%. Metallosis is a challenge for preoperative PJI diagnostics. In a prospective study it was shown, that the implementation of the standardized test kit lead to a guideline based PJI diagnostic in all cases and thus to a significantly increase of the diagnostic quality. There is currently no single test that reliably excludes or proves an infection. The alpha-defensin laboratory ELISA test showed the best test accuracy, whereby the consideration of test combinations is obligatory and at the same time safe.

Short-term mortality after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty: a single-center analysis of 103,560 patients.

The demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is increasing worldwide with excellent long-term results. In general, TJA provides several benefits to the patients but also causes possible complications. The aim of our study was to describe trends in mortality after TJA in a high-volume arthroplasty center, and to examine the potential risk factors. From 1996 to 2018, a total of 103,560 patients (73,130 primary cases, 30,430 revision cases) underwent a TJA procedure in our institution. Anthropometric parameters, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pre- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), blood loss during surgery, postoperative complication (such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, etc.) and cause of death from all patients who deceased during hospitalization were collected. The short-term mortality rate was analyzed between the primary and the revision groups. The short-term mortality rate within our investigated groups was low with 0.041% in primary THA, 0.299% in revision THA, 0.045% in primary TKA, 0.205% in revision TKA, 0.214% in TSA/RSA, 0.15 % in primary TAA and 0% after TEA. Significant differences were found for preoperative Hb-values in patients undergoing septic revision (10.7g/dl) compared to patients undergoing aseptic revision (12.8g/dl) or primary arthroplasty (13.6g/dl) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, we found significant differences regarding CCI between the groups. The comparison between causes of death (COD) showed a significantly higher number for pulmonary embolisms in the aseptic groups, while septic shock was the leading COD in the septic group and myocardial infarction as COD was found significantly more often after primary TJA. This is the largest single-center study presenting the short-term mortality rate following TJA. Consequently, TJA is a safe procedure with a low short-term mortality rate. However, depending on the type of surgery, certain risk factors cannot be eliminated. In order to further reduce the mortality, procedures as such should continue to be performed at specialized centers under standardized conditions.

Tranexamic Acid Reduces the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty.

Revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared with primary TJA, possibly as the result of increased allogeneic blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is gaining popularity in revision TJA to minimize blood loss and the need for transfusion; however, its effect on PJI reduction has yet to be investigated. The hypothesis of this study was that the administration of TXA during revision arthroplasty is protective against subsequent PJI. A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent revision TJA for aseptic failure from 2009 to 2018 and had a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Patients who developed PJI following revision arthroplasty were identified. All patients with PJI met Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables independently associated with PJI after aseptic revision TJA. Overall, 1,731 patients who underwent aseptic revision were identified; of these patients, 83 (4.8%) developed PJI. Patients who received TXA had significantly lower rates (p = 0.029) of PJI postoperatively at 3.30% compared with those who did not receive TXA at 5.73%. After controlling for relevant confounding variables, TXA remained a significant independent factor that protected against PJI (odds ratio [OR], 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23 to 0.90]; p = 0.030). Female sex was also identified as a significant independent factor that protected against PJI (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.88]; p = 0.016). However, preoperative anemia was independently associated with an increased risk of subsequent PJI (OR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.34 to 4.16]; p = 0.003). Based on this study conducted at a single institution, the use of TXA during aseptic revision arthroplasty was independently associated with a reduced risk of subsequent acute PJI after adjusting for multiple patient characteristics and surgical factors. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Positive Microbiological Findings at the Site of Presumed Aseptic Revision Arthroplasty Surgery of the Hip and Knee Joint: Is a Surgical Revision Always Necessary?

Little is known about patients that undergo presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty surgery of the hip and knee joint and having positive microbiological findings of the intraoperatively taken tissue samples. 228 “aseptic” operations were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively collected data with regard to the following parameters: demographic data; reasons for primary and revision surgery, respectively; time between primary and revision surgery; preoperative laboratory findings; microbiological and histopathological findings; type and length of systemic antibiotic therapy; clinical outcome; and follow-up. Identification of microorganisms was present in 8.8% of the cases (9.3% of the hip and 7.8% of the knee cases). Preoperatively, the median CRP value was 8.4 mg/l (normal values 0-5.0 mg/l) and the median WBC count 8,100 × 106/l (normal values 3, 700‐10,100 × 106/l). The most common identified organism was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in 30%, followed by viridans streptococci in 15% of the cases. In 7 cases, the microbiological findings were interpreted as a contamination, and no antibiotic therapy was administered. In the other cases, a systemic antibiotic therapy was applied for a time period between 2 weeks and 3 months. 68.4% of the patients did not have any infectious complications at a median follow-up of 20 (3-42) months. The present study indicates that more than 2/3 of the cases with positive microbiological findings at the site of presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty surgery of the hip and knee joint can be successfully treated conservatively and they do not require any further surgical therapy.