REVIEWS 765 in the aviation sector, but here the damage was probably done by the Purges rather than premature development: modern fightersand bombers replaced obsolete ones on the production lines in I940-4I ratherthan in I937-38. In any event constructingtanks, aircraft,and guns taught Soviet industryabout mass production. The availability of these weapons gave the Red Army the possibilityto trainlarge numbersof personnel and to develop operationaland tacticaldoctrine.All these were factorsin Soviet survivalinI94I-42. This book makesa valuable contributionto the expanding literatureon the Soviet armed forces and war industry in the I920S and 1930S produced by Bob Davies, Mark Von Hagen, Roger Reese, Sally Stoecker, Lennart Samuelson, and others.It also providesvaluable insightsinto Soviet decisionmaking more generally at a criticaljuncture. The subjectis a most important one, and thisbook is certainlynotjust for studentsof militaryhistory. Department ofHistory EVAN MAWDSLEY University ofGlasgow Ivanova, Galina Mikhailovna. LaborCampSocialism.7The Gulagin theSoviet Totalitarian System.Edited by Donald J. Raleigh. Translated by Carol Flath. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, and London, 2000. XXiV+ 209 pp. Photographs.Notes. Index. $24.95. THIsbook is a translationof the author'sGUL4AG vsisteme totalitarnogogosudarstva (MOSCOw, I997), and ispart of Sharpe's'The New Russian History Series'.Its appearance is certainly welcome, for it is probably the first archive-based study which attempts to cover the entire history of the camp system from Tsarist times to the GULAG's effective dismantling in 1956. It is by no means a definitive study. It provides few data on the size of the camp system, offers no systematic analysis of the latter's structure and operation, and makes not even the slightest pretence at discussing existing historiography on the topic, of which, in fact, the author seems to have only a rudimentary knowledge. Fortunately the book is weakest precisely on those periods on which we already have access to other studies, namely the I930S and World War Two, and strongest on the post-war period, about which we know relatively little, save for the revelations of various memoirs. The book's broad scope, its lively mode of argumentation, and rich but never over-specialized use of illustrative examples make it an ideal text for students, subject to a few cautions which I note at the end of this review. The book consists in effect of three extended essays: the evolution of the GULAG as a system of punishment and repression; the economic role of the GULAG; and an analysis of the people who staffed the GULAG administration and the camps themselves. These are bracketed by a brief introduction, which surveys the Tsarist system of penal colonies, and an even briefer conclusion. The first essay on the evolution of the camp system is the least original, not because it is not based on solid research, but because much of what it says we already know from memoirs and Western studies. It is, however, central to Ivanova's larger thesis, namely that there was a linear evolution from the use 766 SEER, 79, 4, 2001 of prison camps to isolate and punish opponents during the early years of Bolshevikrule to the application of mass terrorand slavelabour under Stalin. I shallreturnto thispoint at the end. The second essay on the economy reallydoes breaknew ground, especially in its coverage of the postwar years. Nearly forty years ago S. Swianiewicz (Forced Labour andEconomic Development, Oxford, I 965) gave us a fascinating,but largely theoretical analysisof the role which camp labour played in relieving the bottlenecksand strainsin the freelabour marketcreatedby Stalin'spolicy of hypertrophic development of heavy industry during industrialization. Ivanova's account is almost the polar opposite of this approach. She provides a meticulous analysisof the sheerwastefulnessand inefficiencyof the GULAG economy, even when taken on its own terms. Although labour power was virtuallyfree, the camps produced goods at vastlyhigher costs than even local artisan industries could turn them out. For all its strategic importance, especially after World War Two, the GULAG was a huge drain on the economy. The third essay is the most original of all, and gives us fascinatinginsights into the web of toadyism and corruption which allowed figures of demonstrablemediocrityand criminalpredilectionsto riseto leadingpositionswithin theMVD and GULAG, oftenin defianceofobjectionsby Partyand Procuracy bodies. It was frequently the case that...
Read full abstract