Artificial Intelligence In Surgery Research Articles

Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series

As opportunities for artificial intelligence to augment surgical care expand, the accompanying surge in published literature has generated both substantial enthusiasm and grave concern regarding the safety and efficacy of artificial intelligence in surgery. For surgeons and surgical data scientists, it is increasingly important to understand the state-of-the-art, recognize knowledge and technology gaps, and critically evaluate the deluge of literature accordingly. This article summarizes the experiences and perspectives of a global, multi-disciplinary group of experts who have faced development and implementation challenges, overcome them, and produced incipient evidence thereof. Collectively, evidence suggests that artificial intelligence has the potential to augment surgeons via decision-support, technical skill assessment, and the semi-autonomous performance of tasks ranging from resource allocation to patching foregut defects. Most applications remain in preclinical phases. As technologies and their implementations improve and positive evidence accumulates, surgeons will face professional imperatives to lead the safe, effective clinical implementation of artificial intelligence in surgery. Substantial challenges remain; recent progress in using artificial intelligence to achieve performance advantages in surgery suggests that remaining challenges can and will be overcome.

The Development of Electronic Health and Artificial Intelligence in Surgery after the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic-A Scoping Review.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 has significantly transformed the healthcare environment, and it has triggered the development of electronic health and artificial intelligence mechanisms, for instance. In this overview, we concentrated on enhancing the two concepts in surgery after the pandemic, and we examined the factors on a global scale. Objective: The primary goal of this scoping review is to elaborate on how surgeons have used eHealth and AI before; during; and after the current global pandemic. More specifically, this review focuses on the empowerment of the concepts of electronic health and artificial intelligence after the pandemic; which mainly depend on the efforts of countries to advance the notions of surgery. Design: The use of an online search engine was the most applied method. The publication years of all the studies included in the study ranged from 2013 to 2021. Out of the reviewed studies; forty-four qualified for inclusion in the review. Discussion: We evaluated the prevalence of the concepts in different continents such as the United States; Europe; Asia; the Middle East; and Africa. Our research reveals that the success of eHealth and artificial intelligence adoption primarily depends on the efforts of countries to advance the notions in surgery. Conclusions: The study’s primary limitation is insufficient information on eHealth and artificial intelligence concepts; particularly in developing nations. Future research should focus on establishing methods of handling eHealth and AI challenges around confidentiality and data security.

Artificial intelligence in surgery

Artificial intelligence in surgery

Application of artificial intelligence in surgery

Machine-learning (ML) is an artificial intelligence (AI) technology that has been adopted in many areas of modern society, including medical science. In ML, computational models composed of multiple processing layers learn various data representations with multiple levels of abstraction. ML is currently being used in not only surgery but also other areas, such as, pharmacogenomics, image classification, and medical decision support systems. Therefore, for this lecture, I aim to summarize various new risk prediction platforms after surgery using ML algorithms. If so, we would expect that a patient's predicted various risk after surgery could direct their clinical management and prevent or mitigate untoward outcomes.

Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in surgery

Surgery is an exceptionally complex domain where multi-dimensional expertise is developed over an extended period of time, and mastery is maintained only through ongoing engagement in surgical contexts. Expert surgeons integrate perceptual information through both conscious and subconscious awareness, and respond to the environment by leveraging their deep understanding of surgical constructs. However, their ability to utilize these deep knowledge structures can be complicated by continuous advances in technology, medical science, pharmacology, technique, materials, operative environments, etc. that must be routinely accommodated in professional practice. The demands on surgeons to perform perfectly in ever-changing contexts increases cognitive load, which could be reduced through judicious use of accurate and reliable artificial intelligence (AI) systems. AI has great potential to support human performance in complex environments such as surgery; however, the foundational requirements for the rules governing algorithmic development of performance requirements necessitate the active involvement of surgeons to precisely model the quantitative measures of performance along the continuum of expertise. Providing the AI development community with these data will help assure that accurate and reliable systems are designed to supplement human performance in applied surgical contexts. The Military Health System’s Clinical Readiness Program is developing these types of metrics to support military medical readiness.

A Review on the Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Operating Room.

Background. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era upcoming in medicine and, more recently, in the operating room (OR). Existing literature elaborates mainly on the future possibilities and expectations for AI in surgery. The aim of this study is to systematically provide an overview of the current actual AI applications used to support processes inside the OR. Methods. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and IEEE Xplore were searched using inclusion criteria for relevant articles up to August 25th, 2020. No study types were excluded beforehand. Articles describing current AI applications for surgical purposes inside the OR were reviewed. Results. Nine studies were included. An overview of the researched and described applications of AI in the OR is provided, including procedure duration prediction, gesture recognition, intraoperative cancer detection, intraoperative video analysis, workflow recognition, an endoscopic guidance system, knot-tying, and automatic registration and tracking of the bone in orthopedic surgery. These technologies are compared to their, often non-AI, baseline alternatives. Conclusions. Currently described applications of AI in the OR are limited to date. They may, however, have a promising future in improving surgical precision, reduce manpower, support intraoperative decision-making, and increase surgical safety. Nonetheless, the application and implementation of AI inside the OR still has several challenges to overcome. Clear regulatory, organizational, and clinical conditions are imperative for AI to redeem its promise. Future research on use of AI in the OR should therefore focus on clinical validation of AI applications, the legal and ethical considerations, and on evaluation of implementation trajectory.

Investigating the Ethical and Data Governance Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Protocol for a Delphi Study.

BackgroundThe rapid uptake of digital technology into the operating room has the potential to improve patient outcomes, increase efficiency of the use of operating rooms, and allow surgeons to progress quickly up learning curves. These technologies are, however, dependent on huge amounts of data, and the consequences of their mismanagement are significant. While the field of artificial intelligence ethics is able to provide a broad framework for those designing and implementing these technologies into the operating room, there is a need to determine and address the ethical and data governance challenges of using digital technology in this unique environment.ObjectiveThe objectives of this study are to define the term digital surgery and gain expert consensus on the key ethical and data governance issues, barriers, and future research goals of the use of artificial intelligence in surgery.MethodsExperts from the fields of surgery, ethics and law, policy, artificial intelligence, and industry will be invited to participate in a 4-round consensus Delphi exercise. In the first round, participants will supply free-text responses across 4 key domains: ethics, data governance, barriers, and future research goals. They will also be asked to provide their understanding of the term digital surgery. In subsequent rounds, statements will be grouped, and participants will be asked to rate the importance of each issue on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all important) to 9 (critically important). Consensus is defined a priori as a score of 7 to 9 by 70% of respondents and 1 to 3 by less than 30% of respondents. A final online meeting round will be held to discuss inclusion of statements and draft a consensus document.ResultsFull ethical approval has been obtained for the study by the local research ethics committee at Imperial College, London (20IC6136). We anticipate round 1 to commence in January 2021.ConclusionsThe results of this study will define the term digital surgery, identify the key issues and barriers, and shape future research in this area.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/26552

Part 1: Artificial intelligence technology in surgery.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the disruptive technologies of the fourth Industrial Revolution that is changing our work practices. This technology is in use in highly diverse industries including health care, defence, insurance and e-commerce. This review focuses on the relevance of AI to surgery. AI will aid surgeons with diagnostic decision-making, patient selection for surgery as well as improve patient pre- and post-operative care and management. Ethical considerations of AI with respect to patient rights and data privacy are highlighted. A further challenge is how best to present to national regulators a pragmatic way to assess AI as 'software as a medical device'. This relates to the ramifications for the adoption of AI technology in clinical practice, and its subsequent public funding support and reimbursement. It is evident that AI technology has important applications in surgery in the 21st century. The establishment of a key work programme in this area will be important if surgeons are to fully utilize AI in surgery.

The automaton as a surgeon: the future of artificial intelligence in emergency and general surgery.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a field involving computational simulation of human intelligence processes; these applications of deep learning could have implications in the specialty of emergency surgery (ES). ES is a rapidly advancing area, and this review will outline the most recent advances. A literature search encompassing the uses of AI in surgery was conducted across large databases (Pubmed, OVID, SCOPUS). Two doctors (LR, CH) both collated relevant papers and appraised them. Papers included were published within the last 5years, and a "snowball effect" used to collate further relevant literature. AI has been shown to provide value in predicting surgical outcomes and giving personalised patient risks based on inputted data. Further to this, image recognition technology within AI has showed success in fracture identification and breast cancer diagnosis. Regarding theatre presence, supervised robots have carried out suturing and anastomosis of bowel in controlled environments to a high standard. AI has potential for integration across surgical services, from diagnosis to treatment, and aiding the surgeon in key decision-making for risks per patient. Fully automated surgery may be the future, but at present, AI needs human supervision.

Application of artificial intelligence in surgery.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually changing the practice of surgery with technological advancements in imaging, navigation, and robotic intervention. In this article, we review the recent successful and influential applications of AI in surgery from preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance to its integration into surgical robots. We conclude this review by summarizing the current state, emerging trends, and major challenges in the future development of AI in surgery.

Situating Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Focus on Disease Severity.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has numerous applications in surgical quality assurance. We assessed AI accuracy in evaluating the critical view of safety (CVS) and intraoperative events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that AI accuracy and intraoperative events are associated with disease severity. One thousand fifty-one laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos were annotated by AI for disease severity (Parkland Scale), CVS achievement (Strasberg Criteria), and intraoperative events. Surgeons performed focused video review on procedures with ≥1 intraoperative events (n = 335). AI versus surgeon annotation of CVS components and intraoperative events were compared. For all cases (n = 1051), intraoperative-event association with CVS achievement and severity was examined using ordinal logistic regression. Using AI annotation, surgeons reviewed 50 videos/hr. CVS was achieved in ≤10% of cases. Hepatocystic triangle and cystic plate visualization was achieved more often in low-severity cases (P < 0.03). AI-surgeon agreement for all CVS components exceeded 75%, with higher agreement in high-severity cases (P < 0.03). Surgeons agreed with 99% of AI-annotated intraoperative events. AI-annotated intraoperative events were associated with both disease severity and number of CVS components not achieved. Intraoperative events occurred more frequently in high-severity versus low-severity cases (0.98 vs 0.40 events/case, P < 0.001). AI annotation allows for efficient video review and is a promising quality assurance tool. Disease severity may limit its use and surgeon oversight is still required, especially in complex cases. Continued refinement may improve AI applicability and allow for automated assessment.

Artificial intelligence in general and visceral surgery

Artificial intelligence procedures will find special fields of application also in general and visceral surgery. These will not only be limited to intraoperative surgical applications but also extend to perioperative processes, education and training as well as to future scientific developments. Major impulses are to be expected in decision support systems, cognitive collaborative interventional environments and in evidence-based knowledge acquisition models; however, the implementation into the daily practice not only requires profound insights into the field of informatics and computer science but also acomprehensive knowledge of the surgical domain. Accordingly, the future implementation of artificial intelligence in surgery requires anew culture of collaboration between surgeons and researchers/computer scientists.

Mysteries, Epistemological Modesty, and Artificial Intelligence in Surgery.

Life is filled with puzzles and mysteries, and we often fail to recognize the difference. As described by Gregory Treverton and Malcolm Gladwell, puzzles are solved by gathering and assimilating all relevant data in a logical, linear fashion, as in deciding which antibiotic to prescribe for an infection. In contrast, mysteries remain unsolved until all relevant data are analyzed and interpreted in a way that appreciates their depth and complexity, as in determining how to best modulate the host immune response to infection. When investigating mysteries, we often fail to appreciate their depth and complexity. Instead, we gather and assimilate more data, treating the mystery like a puzzle. This strategy is often unsuccessful. Traditional approaches to predictive analytics and phenotyping in surgery use this strategy.

Review of “Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Review of “Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Review of “Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Review of “Artificial Intelligence in Surgery

Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils.

The aim of this review was to summarize major topics in artificial intelligence (AI), including their applications and limitations in surgery. This paper reviews the key capabilities of AI to help surgeons understand and critically evaluate new AI applications and to contribute to new developments. AI is composed of various subfields that each provide potential solutions to clinical problems. Each of the core subfields of AI reviewed in this piece has also been used in other industries such as the autonomous car, social networks, and deep learning computers. A review of AI papers across computer science, statistics, and medical sources was conducted to identify key concepts and techniques within AI that are driving innovation across industries, including surgery. Limitations and challenges of working with AI were also reviewed. Four main subfields of AI were defined: (1) machine learning, (2) artificial neural networks, (3) natural language processing, and (4) computer vision. Their current and future applications to surgical practice were introduced, including big data analytics and clinical decision support systems. The implications of AI for surgeons and the role of surgeons in advancing the technology to optimize clinical effectiveness were discussed. Surgeons are well positioned to help integrate AI into modern practice. Surgeons should partner with data scientists to capture data across phases of care and to provide clinical context, for AI has the potential to revolutionize the way surgery is taught and practiced with the promise of a future optimized for the highest quality patient care.